推荐微信扫码登录以获得更好的体验!另:🎉建议更新到最新版,以体验新功能!🎉 版本更新记录→

【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价

12

剧集目录

标题时长
P1【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:56
P3【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价20:50
P4【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:08
P5【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:59
P6【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:07
P7【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:01
P8【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:10
P9【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:04
P10【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:14
P11【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:46
P12【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:52
P13【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:49

P1 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p01 1. 1.谋杀的道德侧面 (P1)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:06Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:31This is a course about justice and we begin with a story.这是一个关于正义的课程 我们从一个故事开始。
0:37Suppose you're the driver of a trolley car and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour.假设你是一辆推车的司机 你的推车以每小时60英里的速度在轨迹下行驶
0:44And at the end of the track you notice five workers working on the track.在赛道尽头,你注意到有五个工人在赛道上工作。
0:49You try to stop but you can't. Your brakes don't work.你试图停止,但你不能。 你的刹车不起作用。
0:53You feel desperate because you know that if you crash into these five workers你感到绝望 因为你知道 如果你撞上这五个工人
0:59they will all die. Let's assume you know that for sure.他们都会死 让我们假设你肯定知道这一点。
1:05And so you feel helpless until you notice that there is, off to the right, a side track.因此,你感到无助 直到你注意到, 有一个右侧的轨道。
1:13And at the end of that track there's one worker working on the track.在赛道的尽头 有一个工人在赛道上工作
展开字幕全文(714 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3This is a course about justice and we begin with a story.这是一个关于正义的课程 我们从一个故事开始。
4Suppose you're the driver of a trolley car and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour.假设你是一辆推车的司机 你的推车以每小时60英里的速度在轨迹下行驶
5And at the end of the track you notice five workers working on the track.在赛道尽头,你注意到有五个工人在赛道上工作。
6You try to stop but you can't. Your brakes don't work.你试图停止,但你不能。 你的刹车不起作用。
7You feel desperate because you know that if you crash into these five workers你感到绝望 因为你知道 如果你撞上这五个工人
8they will all die. Let's assume you know that for sure.他们都会死 让我们假设你肯定知道这一点。
9And so you feel helpless until you notice that there is, off to the right, a side track.因此,你感到无助 直到你注意到, 有一个右侧的轨道。
10And at the end of that track there's one worker working on the track.在赛道的尽头 有一个工人在赛道上工作
11Your steering wheel works. So you can turn the trolley car, if you want to, onto the side track你的方向盘工作。 这样你就可以把推车开到侧道上
12killing the one but sparing the five.杀死一个,但留下五个。
13Here's our first question. What's the right thing to do?这是第一个问题。 何等为善.
14What would you do? Let's take a poll.你会怎么做? 我们来投票吧
15How many would turn the trolley car onto the side track? Raise your hands.有多少人会把推车开到侧轨? 举手曰.
16How many wouldn't? How many would go straight ahead?有多少不会? 有多少人会直接前进?
17Keep your hands up, those of you who would go straight ahead.举起手来 你们中那些会直走的人
18A handful of people would. The vast majority would turn.少数人会的 绝大多数人会变成这样。
19Let's hear first. Now we need to begin to investigate the reasons why you think it's the right thing to do.先说. 现在我们需要开始调查你认为这样做是正确的原因。
20Let's begin with those in the majority who would turn to go onto the side track.让我们从多数人开始, 他们将转向到边上。
21Why would you do it? What would be your reason?你为什么要这么做? 你有什么理由吗?
22Who's willing to volunteer a reason? Go ahead, stand up.谁愿意自愿一个理由? 来吧,站起来。
23Because it can't be right to kill five people when you can only kill one person instead.因为杀五个人是不对的 当你只能杀一个人的时候
24It wouldn't be right to kill five if you could kill one person instead.如果你能杀了一个人 杀了五个人是不对的
25That's a good reason. That's a good reason.这是很好的理由。 这是很好的理由。
26Who else? Does everybody agree with that reason? Go ahead.还有谁? 大家都同意这个理由吗? 来吧。
27Well, I think it's the same reason on 9-11.我想9 -11也是这个原因
28We regard the people who flew the plane into the Pennsylvania field as heroes我们把飞机飞到宾夕法尼亚战场的人视为英雄
29because they chose to kill the people in the plane and not kill more people in big buildings.因为他们选择了杀死飞机上的人,而不是在大建筑物中杀死更多的人.
30So the principle there was the same on 9-11. It's a tragic circumstance.所以9 -11的原理是一样的 这是一个悲惨的情况。
31But better to kill one so that five can live.但宜杀一人,以养五人.
32Is that the reason most of you had those of you who would turn? Yes.这就是你们中多数人 愿意转身的原因吗? 对
33Let's hear now from those in the minority, those who wouldn't turn. Yes.现在让我们听听少数派的人, 那些不肯转身的人。 对
34Well, I think that's the same type of mentality that justifies genocide and totalitarianism.我想那也是种族屠杀和极权主义的理由
35In order to save one type of race, you wipe out the other.为了拯救一种种族,你消灭另一种种族.
36So what would you do in this case? You would, to avoid the horrors of genocide,这件案子你会怎么做? 为了避免种族灭绝的恐怖
37you would crash into the five and kill them? Presumably, yes. Yeah.你会撞到五个人并杀死他们? 估计是的 对
38Okay, who else? That's a brave answer. Thank you.好吧,还有谁? 这是一个勇敢的答案。 谢谢
39Let's consider another trolley car case我们再考虑另一件赛车案
40and see whether those of you in the majority want to adhere to the principle看看你们大多数人是否愿意遵守原则
41better that one should die so that five should live.最好让一个人死 好让五个人活着
42This time you're not the driver of the trolley car, you're an onlooker.这次你不是特快车的司机 你是旁观者
43You're standing on a bridge overlooking a trolley car track.你站在一座桥上 俯瞰着一辆拖车
44And down the track comes a trolley car. At the end of the track are five workers.跑道下面有辆推车 赛道尽头有5名工人.
45The brakes don't work. The trolley car is about to careen into the five and kill them.刹那无功用. 推车即将关照到五人之中并杀死他们.
46And now you're not the driver. You really feel helpless.现在你不是司机了 你真的觉得无助。
47Until you notice, standing next to you, leaning over the bridge is a very fat man.在你注意到之前,站在你旁边,靠在桥上是一个非常胖的人.
48And you could give him a shove. He would fall over the bridge,你可以给他一个推力。 他会倒在桥上,
49onto the track, right in the way of the trolley car.在赛道上,在车道上
50He would die, but he would spare the five.他会死,但他会饶了五人
51Now, how many would push the fat man over the bridge? Raise your hand.有多少人会把胖子推到桥上? 举手曰.
52How many wouldn't? Most people wouldn't.有多少不会? 大多数人不会。
53Here's the obvious question. What became of the principle?这里有一个明显的问题。 原则是什么?
54Better to save five lives even if it means sacrificing one.最好救五条命 就算是牺牲一条命
55What became of the principle that almost everyone endorsed in the first case?在第一个案例中,几乎所有人都赞同的原则是什么?
56I need to hear from someone who was in the majority in both cases.我需要听到一个人 谁在多数 在这两种情况。
57How do you explain the difference between the two? Yes.如何解释二者之别. 对
58The second one, I guess, involves an active choice of pushing the person down,第二种,我想, 涉及积极的选择 推一个人下来,
59which I guess that person himself would otherwise not have been involved in the situation at all.我猜他本人本来根本不会参与这件事
60And so to choose on his behalf, I guess, to involve him in something that he otherwise would have escaped所以我想代表他选择 让他参与到他本来会逃脱的事情中
61is, I guess, more than what you have in the first case,我想,比你第一件案子的要多
62where the three parties, the driver and the two sets of workers, are already, I guess, in the situation.在那里,三党, 驾驶员和两组工人, 我想, 已经处于这种情况。
63But the guy working, the one on the track, off to the side,但是那个在跑道上工作的人 直接走到一边
64he didn't choose to sacrifice his life any more than the fat man did, did he?他没有比胖子更选择牺牲自己的生命 是吗?
65That's true, but he was on the tracks.没错 但他在铁轨上
66This guy was on the bridge.这家伙在桥上
67Go ahead. You can come back if you want.来吧。 你可以回来,如果你想要的。
68All right. It's a hard question. You did well. You did very well. It's a hard question.好吧,我们走。 难问. 你表现得很好 你表现得很好 难问.
69Who else can find a way of reconciling the reaction of the majority in these two cases? Yes.还有谁能够找到一种方法来调和多数人在这两种情况下的反应? 对
70Well, I guess in the first case, where you have the one worker and the five,好吧,我想在第一种情况下, 你有一个工人和五个,
71it's choice between those two, and you have to make a certain choice,是这两个人之间的选择, 你必须做出一定的选择,
72and people are going to die because of the trolley car, not necessarily because of your direct actions.人们会因为那辆推车而死 不一定是因为你的直接行动
73The trolley car is a runway thing, and you're making it a split-second choice.推车是跑道的事,你把它做成分两秒的选择.
74Whereas pushing the fat man over is an actual act of murder on your part.把胖子推过来 才是真正的谋杀行为
75You have control over that, whereas you may not have control over the trolley car.你可以控制它,而你可能无法控制 推车。
76So I think it's a slightly different situation.所以我觉得情况有点不同
77All right. Who has a reply? That's good. Who has a way, who wants to reply?好吧,我们走。 谁有答复? 这是很好的。 谁有办法,谁想回答?
78Is that a way out of this?这是一条出路吗?
79I don't think that's a very good reason because you choose to,我不认为这是一个很好的理由 因为你选择,
80it's either way you have to choose who dies because you either choose to turn and kill the person,无论是哪种方式,你必须选择谁死 因为你要么选择转身和杀死这个人,
81which is an act of conscious thought to turn,这是一种自觉的行为,
82or you choose to push the fat man over, which is also an act of conscious action.或者你选择把胖子推过来 这也是一种自觉的行为
83So either way, you're making a choice.所以不管怎么样,你都在做一个选择。
84Do you want to reply?你想回答吗?
85Well, I'm not really sure that that's the case.我不太确定情况是这样的
86It just still seems kind of different, the act of actually pushing someone over onto the tracks and killing him.这似乎还是有点不同, 实际上把某人推到铁轨上并杀死他。
87You are actually killing him yourself.你实际上是杀了他自己。
88You're pushing him with your own hands.你在亲手推他
89你在推他,他不会有事的 You're pushing him.
90It's not different than steering something that is going to cause death into another,这和把会导致死亡的东西 引向另一个没有区别
91you know, it doesn't really sound right saying it now, but I'm up here.你知道,这听起来不太对 现在,但我在这里。
92It's good. What's your name?不错 你叫什么来着?
93Andrew.安德鲁
94Andrew. Let me ask you this question, Andrew.安德鲁 让我问你这个问题,安德鲁。
95Yes.
96Suppose standing on the bridge next to the fat man, I didn't have to push him.假如站在那个胖子旁边的桥上 我不必推他
97Suppose he were standing over a trap door that I could open by turning a steering wheel like that.假设他站在一个陷阱的门上 我可以打开 通过转动方向盘 这样。
98Would you turn?你会转身吗?
99For some reason, that still just seems more wrong.出于某种原因,这似乎更错了。
100Right?对吧?
101I mean, maybe if you accidentally like leaned into the steering wheel or something like that,我的意思是,也许如果你不小心喜欢 倾斜到方向盘或类似的东西,
102or say that the car is hurtling towards a switch that will drop the trap, then I could agree with that.或者说这辆车正在向一个开关开动 开关会掉下陷阱 我同意
103Fair enough.不错
104It still seems wrong in a way that it doesn't seem wrong in the first case to turn, you say.你说,在第一个案子里 似乎还是不对的
105And in another way, I mean, in the first situation, you're involved directly with the situation.还有一种方式,我是说,在第一种情况下,你直接卷入了这种情况.
106In the second one, you're an onlooker as well.在第二个,你也是一个旁观者。
107All right.好吧,我们走。
108So you have the choice of becoming involved or not by pushing the fat man.所以你有选择参与与否 通过推胖子。
109Let's forget for the moment about this case.暂时忘记这个案子吧
110That's good.这是很好的。
111Let's imagine a different case.让我们设想一个不同的情况。
112This time you're a doctor in an emergency room and six patients come to you.这次你是急诊室的医生 六位病人来找你
113They've been in a terrible trolley car wreck.他们遭遇了可怕的车祸
114Five of them sustained moderate injuries.其中5人受轻伤。
115One is severely injured.其中一人受重伤。
116You could spend all day caring for the one severely injured victim.你可以花一整天时间 照顾一个严重受伤的受害者。
117But in that time, the five would die.但在那段时间,五人会死。
118Or you could look after the five, restore them to health.或者你可以照顾五个人,恢复他们的健康。
119But during that time, the one severely injured person would die.但在这期间,一名重伤者将死亡。
120How many would save the five?多少人能救五个人?
121Now is the doctor.现在的医生。
122How many would save the one?有多少人能救那个?
123Very few people.甚少众生.
124Just a handful of people.只是几个人
125Same reason, I assume.我想也是一样的原因
126One life versus five.一命对五.
127Now consider another doctor case.现在考虑另一个医生病例。
128This time you're a transplant surgeon.这次你是移植外科医生
129And you have five patients each in desperate need of an organ transplant in order to survive.为了生存,你们有五个病人 迫切需要器官移植
130One needs a heart, one a lung, one a kidney, one a liver, and the fifth a pancreas.一者须心,一者肺,一者肾,一者肝,五者胰.
131And you have no organ donors.而你没有器官捐献者。
132You are about to see them die.你即将看到他们死去。
133And then it occurs to you that in the next room there's a healthy guy who came in for a checkup.然后你想到,在隔壁的房间里 有一个健康的家伙 谁进来检查。
134And he's...他现在...
135You like that?你喜欢吗?
136And he's taking a nap.他正在睡觉
137You could go in very quietly, yank out the five organs, that person would die.你可以悄悄地进去 挖出五个器官 那个人会死的
138But you could save the five.但你可以救五个人
139How many would do it?有多少人会这么做?
140Anyone?有人吗?
141How many? Put your hands up if you would do it.多少个? 如果你愿意的话,举起手来
142Anyone in the balcony?有人在阳台吗?
143You would?你会吗?
144Be careful, don't lean over too much.小心点,别靠得太紧
145How many wouldn't?有多少不会?
146Alright, what do you say?好吧,怎么样?
147Speak up in the balcony, you who would yank out the organs.在阳台上说话,谁会挖出器官。
148Why?为什么?
149I'd actually like to explore a slightly alternate possibility of just taking the one of the five who needs an organ, who dies first,实际上,我想探索一种 稍有替代的可能性 只是取其中之一 谁需要器官,谁先死,
150and using their four healthy organs to save the other four.并用他们四个健康的器官来拯救另外四个。
151That's a pretty good idea.这主意不错
152That's a great idea.这主意不错
153Except for the fact that you just wrecked the philosophical point.除了你破坏了哲学观点
154Now let's step back from these stories and these arguments to notice a couple of things about the way the arguments have begun to unfold.现在,让我们从这些故事和这些争论中退一步, 注意一些关于这些争论开始展开的方式。
155Certain moral principles have already begun to emerge from the discussions we've had.我们的讨论已经开始产生一些道德原则。
156And let's consider what those moral principles look like.让我们来看看这些道德原则是什么样子。
157The moral principle that emerged in the discussion said the right thing to do, the moral thing to do,讨论中出现的道德原则 说正确的事情,道德的事情,
158depends on the consequences that will result from your action.取决于你的行为的后果
159At the end of the day, better that five should live even if one must die.最后,最好让五个人活着 即使一个人必须死。
160That's an example of consequentialist moral reasoning.这是间接道德推理的例子.
161Consequentialist moral reasoning locates morality in the consequences of an act,随之而来的道德推理将道德定位于行为的后果中,
162in the state of the world that will result from the thing you do.发生在世界的状态, 将因你的行为。
163But then we went a little further, we considered those other cases,但后来我们更进一步, 我们考虑了那些其他案例,
164and people weren't so sure about consequentialist moral reasoning when people hesitated to push the fat man over the bridge当人们犹豫不决地把胖子推到桥上
165or to yank out the organs of the innocent patient,或拔出无辜病人的器官,
166people gestured toward reasons having to do with the intrinsic quality of the act itself.人们对与行为本身的内在质量有关的原因表态。
167Consequences be what they may.后果是可能发生的。
168People were reluctant, people thought it was just wrong, categorically wrong,人们很不情愿 人们觉得这是错误的 绝对是错误的
169to kill a person, an innocent person, even for the sake of saving five lives.杀死一个人,一个无辜的人, 即使为了挽救五个生命。
170At least people thought that in the second version of each story we considered.至少在我们考虑的每个故事的第二个版本中,人们都这样认为.
171So this points to a second categorical way of thinking about moral reasoning.因此,这指出了第二个对道德推理的断然思考方式.
172Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain absolute moral requirements,分类道德推理 定位道德在某些绝对道德要求,
173certain categorical duties and rights, regardless of the consequences.某些明确的义务和权利,不论后果如何。
174We're going to explore in the days and weeks to come the contrast between consequentialist and categorical moral principles.我们将在几天和几周内探索 必然的道德原则与绝对的道德原则之间的对比。
175The most influential example of consequential moral reasoning is utilitarianism,影响最大的道德推理例子是功利主义,
176a doctrine invented by Jeremy Bentham, the 18th century English political philosopher.一种由18世纪英国政治哲学家杰里米·本特姆发明的学说.
177The most important philosopher of categorical moral reasoning is the 18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant.绝对道德推理最重要的哲学家是18世纪德国哲学家伊曼纽尔·康德.
178So we will look at those two different modes of moral reasoning, assess them, and also consider others.因此,我们将研究这两种不同的道德推理模式,评估它们,并审议其他模式。
179If you look at the syllabus you'll notice that we read a number of great and famous books.如果你看看教学大纲,你会注意到 我们读了很多伟大和著名的书籍。
180Books by Aristotle, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and others.著有亚里士多德,约翰·洛克,伊曼纽尔·坎特,约翰·斯图尔特·米尔等人的书.
181You'll notice too from the syllabus that we don't only read these books.你也会从教学大纲中注意到 我们不只是看这些书
182We also take up contemporary political and legal controversies that raise philosophical questions.我们还处理引起哲学问题的当代政治和法律争议。
183We will debate equality and inequality, affirmative action, free speech versus hate speech,我们将讨论平等和不平等、平权行动、言论自由与仇恨言论,
184same-sex marriage, military conscription, a range of practical questions.同性婚姻 征兵 一系列实际问题
185Why? Not just to enliven these abstract and distant books,为什么? 不只是为这些抽象和遥远的书注入活力,
186but to make clear to bring out what's at stake in our everyday lives, including our political lives, for philosophy.但是要清楚说明我们日常生活的利害关系 包括我们的政治生活 为了哲学
187And so we will read these books, and we will debate these issues,所以,我们将阅读这些书, 我们将辩论这些问题,
188and we'll see how each informs and illuminates the other.我们看看每个人如何向对方提供信息和照明
189This may sound appealing enough, but here I have to issue a warning.也许这听起来很吸引人 但我得发出警告
190And the warning is this, to read these books in this way, as an exercise in self-knowledge,警告是,用这种方式阅读这些书,作为自我认知的练习,
191to read them in this way carries certain risks.以这种方式阅读它们会带来某些风险。
192Risks that are both personal and political.风险既涉及个人,也涉及政治。
193Risks that every student of political philosophy has known.每个政治哲学学生都知道的风险。
194These risks spring from the fact that philosophy teaches us and unsettles us这些风险源于哲学教导我们,使我们不安
195by confronting us with what we already know.通过面对我们 已经知道的东西。
196There's an irony.有讽刺意味。
197The difficulty of this course consists in the fact that it teaches what you already know.这个课程的难度在于它教授你已经知道的东西。
198It works by taking what we know from familiar unquestioned settings and making it strange.它的工作原理是,从熟悉的无疑问的场合中吸取我们的知识,使它变得奇怪。
199That's how those examples worked, the hypotheticals with which we began,这些例子就是这样运作的, 我们开始的假设,
200with their mix of playfulness and sobriety.和他们玩耍和清醒的混合
201It's also how these philosophical books work.这也是这些哲学著作是如何运作的.
202Philosophy estranges us from the familiar, not by supplying new information,哲学让我们远离熟悉的人 而不是提供新的信息
203but by inviting and provoking a new way of seeing.但通过邀请和激起新的观察方式。
204But, and here's the risk, once the familiar turns strange, it's never quite the same again.但是,这里的风险是, 一旦熟悉的人变得奇怪, 它不再完全一样了。
205Self-knowledge is like lost innocence.自知如是失净.
206However unsettling you find it, it can never be unthought or unknown.无论你多么不安地找到了它,它永远不可能是无意识的或未知的。
207What makes this enterprise difficult, but also riveting,是什么使这个企业困难, 但也令人兴奋,
208is that moral and political philosophy is a story,道德和政治哲学是一个故事,
209and you don't know where the story will lead, but what you do know is that the story is about you.你不知道故事会走向何处 但你知道的是故事是关于你的
210Those are the personal risks.这些是个人风险。
211Now what of the political risks?现在的政治风险呢?
212One way of introducing a course like this would be to promise you介绍这样的课程的方法之一是答应你
213that by reading these books and debating these issues, you will become a better, more responsible citizen.你读这些书,辩论这些问题,就会成为一个更好,更负责任的公民。
214You will examine the presuppositions of public policy.你们将审查公共政策的预设。
215You will hone your political judgment.你会用你的政治判断
216You will become a more effective participant in public affairs.你将更有效地参与公共事务。
217But this would be a partial and misleading promise.但这将是一个部分和误导性的承诺。
218Political philosophy, for the most part, hasn't worked that way.政治哲学,在多数情况下,还没有这样发挥作用.
219You have to allow for the possibility that political philosophy may make you a worse citizen,你必须允许政治哲学 让你成为更糟糕的公民
220rather than a better one, or at least a worse citizen, before it makes you a better one.而不是一个更好的人, 或者至少一个更糟糕的公民, 在它让你成为一个更好的人。
221And that's because philosophy is a distancing, even debilitating activity.这是因为哲学是一种疏远甚至削弱的活动.
222And you see this going back to Socrates.你会看到这个回到苏格拉底。
223There's a dialogue, the Gorgias, in which one of Socrates' friends,有一个对话,Gorgias, 其中苏格拉底的朋友之一,
224Calicles, tries to talk him out of philosophizing.Calicles,试图说服他 脱离哲学。
225Calicles tells Socrates, philosophy is a pretty toy if one indulges in it with moderation at the right time of life.Calicles告诉Socrates 哲学是一个相当的玩具 如果在生命的正确时刻温和地沉浸其中的话
226But if one pursues it further than one should, it is absolute ruin.但是,如果一个人进一步追求它,它就绝对是毁灭。
227Take my advice, Calicles says.接受我的建议吧 考利克斯说
228Abandon argument.弃辩.
229Learn the accomplishments of active life.学习积极生活的成绩.
230Remember your models, not those people who spend their time on these petty quibbles,记住你的模特 而不是那些花时间 玩这些小花样的人
231but those who have a good livelihood and reputation and many other blessings.他们有良好的生计和声望,并享受许多福利。
232So Calicles is really saying to Socrates, quit philosophizing.Calicles真的在对苏格拉底说, 放弃哲学。
233Get real.变得真实。
234Go to business school.去商学院吧
235Calcles确实有道理
236He had a point because philosophy distances us from conventions, from established assumptions, and from settled beliefs.他之所以有道理,是因为哲学使我们远离公约、既定的假设和既定的信仰。
237Those are the risks, personal and political.这些是个人和政治风险。
238And in the face of these risks, there is a characteristic evasion.面对这些风险,存在着典型的逃避现象。
239The name of the evasion is skepticism.逃者名曰疑论.
240It's the idea, let's go something like this, we didn't resolve, once and for all,这是想法,让我们去 这样的东西,我们没有解决, 一劳永逸,
241either the cases or the principles we were arguing when we began.要么是案件 要么是我们开始时争论的原则
242And if Aristotle and Locke and Kant and Mill haven't solved these questions after all of these years,如果亚里士多德、洛克、康特和米尔 这么多年没解决这些问题
243who are we to think that we, here in Sanders Theater over the course of a semester, can resolve them?谁会认为我们在桑德斯剧院 度过一个学期就能解决他们?
244And so maybe it's just a matter of each person having his or her own principles and there's nothing more to be said about it.所以也许这仅仅是每个人有自己的原则的问题,对此没有什么可说的了.
245No way of reasoning.无法推理.
246That's the evasion, the evasion of skepticism, to which I would offer the following reply.这就是逃避,逃避怀疑,对此我提出以下答复.
247It's true, these questions have been debated for a very long time.确实,这些问题已经辩论了很长时间.
248But the very fact that they have recurred and persisted但事实上,他们不断重演
249may suggest that though they're impossible in one sense, they're unavoidable in another.可能暗示,虽然从某种意义上说,它们是不可能的,但从另一种意义上说,它们是不可避免的。
250And the reason they're unavoidable, the reason they're inescapable, is that we live some answer to these questions every day.而它们不可避免的原因, 不可避免的原因, 就是我们每天都有回答这些问题。
251So skepticism, just throwing up your hands and giving up on moral reflection, is no solution.所以怀疑主义,只是举起手来,放弃道德反思,不是办法.
252Immanuel Kant described very well the problem with skepticism when he wrote,伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)在写到怀疑主义时非常清楚地描述了这个问题,
253skepticism is a resting place for human reason, where it can reflect upon its dogmatic wanderings,怀疑主义是人类的安息之所, 它可以反思它的教条游荡,
254but it is no dwelling place for permanent settlement.但这里不是永久居民点。
255Simply to acquiesce, in skepticism, Kant wrote, can never suffice to overcome the restlessness of reason.康德写道,只要默许,在怀疑论中,永远不足以克服理性的不安.
256I've tried to suggest, through these stories and these arguments,我试图建议 通过这些故事和争论
257some sense of the risks and temptations of the perils and the possibilities.某些风险和诱惑感 风险和可能性。
258I would simply conclude by saying that the aim of this course is to awaken the restlessness of reason and to see where it might lead.最后,我只想说,这一方针的目的是唤醒理智的不安,看看它可能带来什么结果。
259Thank you very much.谢谢
260Like, in a situation that desperate, you have to do what you have to do to survive.就像,在那种绝望的情况下,你必须做你必须做的事才能生存.
261You have to do what you have to do.须作如是事.
262You gotta do what you gotta do, pretty much.你得做你该做的, 相当多。
263If you've been going 19 days without any food, someone just has to take the sacrifice, someone has to make the sacrifice, and people can survive.如果你已经走了19天 没有任何食物, 有人只需要承担牺牲, 有人做牺牲, 人们可以生存。
264Alright, that's good. What's your name?好吧,这是很好的。 你叫什么来着?
265Marcus.马库斯
266Marcus. What do you say to Marcus?马库斯 你对马库斯怎么说?
267Last time, we started out last time with some stories, with some moral dilemmas about trolley cars and about doctors and healthy patients vulnerable to being victims of organ transplantation.上回,我们以一些故事开始, 有一些道德困境 关于推车, 关于医生和健康的病人 很容易成为器官移植的受害者。
268We noticed two things about the arguments we had.我们注意到两件事 关于我们的争论。
269One had to do with the way we were arguing.一个和我们争论的方式有关
270We began with our judgments in particular cases.我们首先对特定案件作出判决。
271We tried to articulate the reasons or the principles lying behind our judgments.我们试图阐明我们判决背后的原因或原则。
272And then, confronted with a new case, we found ourselves re-examining those principles, revising each in the light of the other.然后,面对一个新案件,我们发现自己重新审视了这些原则,根据另一个原则修改了每个原则。
273And we noticed the built-in pressure to try to bring into alignment our judgments about particular cases and the principles we would endorse on reflection.我们注意到,我们受到内在压力,要求我们努力调整对具体案件的判决,以及我们赞同的反思原则。
274We also noticed something about the substance of the arguments that emerged from the discussion.我们也注意到讨论中提出的论点的实质内容。
275We noticed that sometimes we were tempted to locate the morality of an act and the consequences in the results, in the state of the world that it brought about.我们注意到,有时,我们想将某一行为的道德和后果放在其结果中,放在它所造成的世界状况中。
276And we called this consequentialist moral reasoning.我们称之为必然的道德推理。
277But we also noticed that in some cases, we weren't swayed only by the result.但我们也注意到,在某些情况下,我们不仅仅因为结果而摇摆不定。
278Sometimes, many of us felt, that not just consequences but also the intrinsic quality or character of the act matters morally.我们许多人有时感到,不仅后果,而且行为的内在质量或性质在道义上都很重要。
279Some people argued that there are certain things that are just categorically wrong, even if they bring about a good result.有些人认为,有些事情是完全错误的,即使它们带来了好的结果。
280Even if they save five people at the cost of one life.纵以一命救五人.
281So we contrasted consequentialist moral principles with categorical ones.因此,我们把必然的道德原则与绝对的道德原则作了对比。
282Today, and in the next few days, we will begin to examine one of the most influential versions of consequentialist moral theory.今天,在接下来的几天里,我们将开始研究一个最有影响力的必然主义道德理论版本.
283And that's the philosophy of utilitarianism.这就是功利主义的哲学.
284Jeremy Bentham, the 18th century English political philosopher, gave the first clear systematic expression to the utilitarian moral theory.杰里米·本特姆(英語:Jeremy Bentham),18世纪英国政治哲学家,为功利主义的道德理论提供了第一个清晰的系统化表达.
285And Bentham's idea, his essential idea, is a very simple one.而本塔姆的想法,他的基本想法,是一个非常简单的想法.
286With a lot of morally intuitive appeal.与许多道德直观的吸引力.
287Bentham's idea is the following.本特姆的想法如下.
288The right thing to do, the just thing to do, is to maximize utility.正确之事,公正之事,是最大限度地发挥效用.
289What did he mean by utility?他是什么意思的效用吗?
290He meant by utility the balance of pleasure over pain, happiness over suffering.他的意思是利用快乐与痛苦的平衡 幸福与痛苦的平衡
291Here's how he arrived at the principle of maximizing utility.这就是他如何达到最大效用的原则.
292He started out by observing that all of us, all human beings, are governed by two sovereign masters.他首先观察,我们所有人,所有的人,都受两个主权主人的统治.
293Pain and pleasure.痛苦与快乐.
294We human beings like pleasure and dislike pain.我们人类喜欢快乐 不喜欢痛苦
295And so we should base morality, whether we're thinking about what to do in our own lives,所以,我们应该以道德为基础, 无论我们在思考 做什么在我们自己的生活,
296or whether, as legislators or citizens, we're thinking about what the laws should be.或者,作为立法者或公民,我们正在思考法律应该是什么。
297The right thing to do, individually or collectively, is to maximize, act in a way that maximizes the overall level of happiness.正确的做法是,单独或集体地最大限度地,以最大限度的幸福整体水平行事.
298Bentham's utilitarianism is sometimes summed up with the slogan, the greatest good for the greatest number.本塔姆的功利主义有时会用口号来概括,对人数最多的最有利.
299With this basic principle of utility on hand, let's begin to test it and to examine it by turning to another case.有了这一基本实用原则,我们开始试一试,转而研究另一案.
300Another story, but this time not a hypothetical story, a real life story.另一个故事,但这次不是假设的故事,是真实生活的故事.
301The case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stephens.女王诉杜德利和斯蒂芬斯案.
302This was a 19th century British law case that's famous and much debated in law schools.这是一个19世纪的英国法律案例,在法学院中很有名,也有很多争论.
303Here's what happened in the case.案件是这样的
304I'll summarize the story, then I want to hear how you would rule, imagining that you're the jury.我会总结这个故事,然后我想听听你如何裁决, 想象你是陪审团。
305A newspaper account of the time described the background.一份当时的报纸报道描述了背景.
306A sadder story of disaster at sea was never told than that of the survivors of the yacht Minunet.海上灾难的悲惨故事从未像游艇Minunet的幸存者那样被讲述.
307The ship foundered in the South Atlantic, 1300 miles from the Cape.该舰在南大西洋解体,距开普1300英里.
308There were four in the crew, Dudley was the captain, Stephens was the first mate, Brooks was a sailor.船员中有4人,杜德利为船长,斯蒂芬斯为大副,布鲁克斯为水手.
309All men of excellent character, or so the newspaper account tells us.所有品行优秀的人 报纸帐号都告诉我们
310The fourth crew member was the cabin boy, Richard Parker, 17 years old.第四名机组成员是17岁的机舱男孩理查德·帕克.
311He was an orphan, he had no family, and he was on his first long voyage at sea.他是一个孤儿,没有家人,他在海上第一次长途航行.
312He went, the news account tells us, rather against the advice of his friends.他去了,新闻帐户告诉我们, 而不是他朋友的建议。
313He went in the hopefulness of youthful ambition, thinking the journey would make a man of him.他投身于年轻野心的希望中,认为旅程会让他成为男人.
314Sadly, it was not to be.可悲的是,它不是那样的。
315The facts of the case were not in dispute.该案的事实没有争议。
316The wave hit the ship and the Minunet went down.海浪击中舰只,米努内特号下沉.
317The four crew members escaped to a lifeboat.四名船员逃到救生艇.
318The only food they had were two cans of preserved turnips, no fresh water.他们仅有的食物是两罐保存好的萝卜,没有淡水。
319For the first three days they ate nothing.头三天他们什么都没吃
320On the fourth day they opened one of the cans of turnips and ate it.在第四天,他们打开了一个罐子 萝卜,吃了它。
321The next day they caught a turtle.第二天他们抓到一只乌龟
322Together with the other can of turnips, the turtle enabled them to subsist for the next few days.和另一罐萝卜一起,海龟使它们得以在接下来的几天里生存。
323And then for eight days they had nothing.然后八天他们什么都没有。
324No food, no water.无食无水.
325Imagine yourself in a situation like that.想象自己在这样的情况下。
326What would you do?你会怎么做?
327Here's what they did.这就是他们所做的。
328By now the cabin boy, Parker, is lying at the bottom of the lifeboat in the corner现在船舱男孩Parker 躺在船尾的角落
329because he had drunk seawater against the advice of the others因为他喝过海水 违背别人的建议
330and he had become ill and he appeared to be dying.他病了,他看起来快死了。
331So on the 19th day Dudley, the captain, suggested that they should all have a lottery,所以在19日 Dudley,船长,建议 他们都应该有一个彩票,
332that they should draw lots to see who would die to save the rest.他们应该抽签,看看谁会为了拯救其他人而死。
333Brooks refused.布鲁克斯拒绝了
334He didn't like the lottery idea.他不喜欢彩票的想法。
335We don't know whether this was because he didn't want to take the chance我们不知道是不是因为他不想冒险
336or because he believed in categorical moral principles.或者因为他相信绝对的道德原则
337But in any case, no lots were drawn.但无论如何,没有抽签。
338The next day there was still no ship in sight,第二天仍然没有船在望
339Dudley告诉Brooks别盯着他 他向Stevens移动了
340that the boy Parker had better be killed.帕克的男孩最好被杀了
341Dudley offered a prayer.达德利提出祈祷.
342He told the boy his time had come and he killed him with a penknife,他告诉那个男孩 他的时间已经到来 他用小刀杀了他
343stabbing him in the jugular vein.刺其颈脉.
344Brooks emerged from his conscientious objection to share in the gruesome bounty.布鲁克斯从出于良心拒绝分享令人发指的赏金中脱颖而出.
345For four days, the three of them fed on the body and blood of the cabin boy.在4天的时间里,他们三人以小屋男孩的身体和血液为食.
346True story.真实的故事。
347And then they were rescued.后被救出.
348Dudley describes their rescue in his diary with staggering euphemism,达德利在日记中以惊人的委婉语描述他们的营救,
349quote, on the 24th day as we were having our breakfast,引用一下,第24天 我们吃早餐的时候,
350a ship appeared at last.船终于出现了
351The three survivors were picked up by a German ship.三名幸存者被一艘德国船只接走.
352They were taken back to Falmouth in England where they were arrested and tried.他们被带回英国的法尔茅斯,在那里被逮捕和审判.
353Brooks turned states witness.布鲁克斯成为州证人。
354Dudley and Stevens went to trial.达德利和史蒂文斯受审.
355They didn't dispute the facts.他们并没有质疑事实。
356They claimed they had acted out of necessity.他们声称他们出于必要采取行动。
357That was their defense.那是他们的辩护
358They argued, in effect, better that one should die so that three could survive.他们实际上认为,最好让一个人死,这样三人才能生存。
359The prosecutor wasn't swayed by that argument.公诉人没有被这个论点动摇.
360He said murder is murder and so the case went to trial.他说谋杀是谋杀 所以案件被审判了
361Now imagine you are the jury.现在想象一下你是陪审团
362And just to simplify the discussion, put aside the question of law.为了简化讨论 把法律问题放在一边
363Let's assume that you as the jury are charged with deciding假设你作为陪审团 负责决定
364whether what they did was morally permissible or not.他们的所作所为在道德上是否允许。
365How many would vote not guilty that what they did was morally permissible?有多少人不会认为他们的所作所为在道德上是允许的?
366And how many would vote guilty that what they did was morally wrong?有多少人会认为他们的所作所为在道德上是错误的?
367A pretty sizable majority.相当的多数
368Now let's see what people's reasons are.现在来看看人们的理由是什么.
369And let me begin with those who are in the minority.首先让我谈谈那些属于少数的人。
370Let's hear first from the defense of Dudley and Stevens.让我们先从杜德利和史蒂文斯的辩护中听到.
371Why would you morally exonerate them?你为什么在道义上免除他们的罪责?
372What are your reasons?你的理由为何?
373Yes.
374I think it is morally reprehensible,我认为这是道德上应受谴责的,
375but I think that there is a distinction between what's morally reprehensible但我认为在道德上应受谴责的东西是有区别的
376and what makes someone legally accountable.是什么使一个人 法律责任。
377In other words, as the judge said, what's always moral isn't necessarily against the law.换句话说,正如法官所说,总是道德的东西不一定违法.
378And while I don't think that necessity justifies theft or murder or any illegal act,虽然我不认为必要性可以证明偷窃、谋杀或任何非法行为是正当的,
379at some point your degree of necessity does in fact exonerate you from any guilt.在某些时候,你的必然性 实际上是免除你的任何罪责。
380Okay, good.好吧,不错。
381Other defenders, other voices for the defense.其他维权者 其他维权者的声音
382Moral justifications for what they did.道德解释 他们做了什么。
383All right, thank you.好吧,谢谢你。
384I just feel like in a situation that desperate, you have to do what you have to do to survive.我只是觉得在那种绝望的情况下 你必须做你该做的才能生存
385You have to do what you have to do.须作如是事.
386You got to do what you got to do, pretty much.你得做你该做的, 相当多。
387If you've been going 19 days without any food, you know, someone just has to take the sacrifice,如果你已经走了19天 没有任何食物, 你知道,有人 只需要承担牺牲,
388someone has to make the sacrifice and people can survive.得有人去牺牲 人民才能生存
389And furthermore, from that, let's say they survive and then they become productive members of society并且,从这个开始,让我们假设他们生存下来,然后他们成为社会的生产成员。
390who go home and start like a million charity organizations and this and that and this and that.回到家 像一百万个慈善组织 以及这个和那个
391I mean, they benefit everybody in the end.我是说,他们最终对每个人都有好处。
392I mean, I don't know what they did afterwards.我不知道他们后来做了什么
393They might have gone and like, I don't know, killed more people.他们可能走了 我不知道 杀了更多人
394Whatever.随便吧
395What?你说什么?
396What if they went home and they turned out to be assassins?要是他们回家 成了刺客怎么办?
397What if they went home and turned out to be assassins?如果他们回家 变成刺客怎么办?
398You'd want to know who they assassinated.你会想知道他们暗杀了谁
399That's true, too.亦如是说.
400That's fair.这很公平。
401Okay.摆
402I want to know who they assassinated.我想知道他们暗杀了谁
403All right, that's good.好吧,这是很好的。
404What's your name?你叫什么来着?
405Marcus.马库斯
406All right.好吧,我们走。
407A couple of voices for the defense.几声为辩.
408Now we need to hear from the prosecution.现在我们需要检方的消息
409Most people think what they did was wrong.大多数人认为他们的所作所为是错误的.
410Why?为什么?
411Yes.
412One of the first things that I was thinking was, oh, if they haven't been eating for a really long time,我首先想到的一件事是,哦, 如果他们已经吃了很多年,
413maybe they're mentally, like, affected.也许他们是精神上,喜欢,受到影响。
414And so then that could be used as a defense, a possible argument that, oh,因此,这可以用作辩护, 一个可能的论点,哦,
415they weren't in the proper state of mind, they weren't making decisions they might otherwise be making.他们没有在正确的状态, 他们没有做决定 他们可能正在做。
416And if that's an appealing argument, that you have to be in an altered mindset to do something like that,如果这是个有吸引力的争论, 你必须在改变的心态 做类似的事情,
417it suggests that people who find that argument convincing do think that they were acting immorally.它表明,那些认为这一论点令人信服的人确实认为他们的行为不道德。
418But I want to know what you think.但我想知道你的看法。
419You defend them.你为他们辩护。
420Yeah.
421I'm sorry.对不起
422You vote to convict, right?你投给罪犯,对吧?
423Yeah.
424I don't think that they acted in a morally appropriate way.我认为他们的行为在道德上是不恰当的.
425And why not?为什么不呢?
426What do you say?你说什么?
427Here's Marcus.这是马库斯。
428He just defended them.他只是替他们辩护
429He said, you heard what he said.他说,你听到他说的。
430Yes.
431That you've got to do what you've got to do in a case like that.你必须做你必须做的 在类似的情况。
432Yeah.
433What do you say to Marcus?你对马库斯怎么说?
434That there's no situation that would allow human beings to take the idea of fate没有任何情况可以让人类接受命运
435or that the other people's lives in their own hands, that we don't have that kind of power.或者其他人的性命掌握在他们手中 我们没有这种权力
436Good.不错
437Okay.摆
438Thank you.谢谢
439And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
440Britt.布莱特
441Britt?布丽特?
442Yes.
443Okay.摆
444Who else?还有谁?
445What do you say?你说什么?
446Stand up.站起来
447I'm wondering if Dudley and Stephen had asked for Richard Parker's consent in, you know,我想知道杜德利和史蒂芬是否 要求理查德・帕克的同意
448dying.临终.
449Would that exonerate them from an act of murder?这能让他们免于谋杀吗?
450And if so, is that still morally justifiable?如果是这样,这在道义上还是有道理的?
451That's interesting.这很有趣。
452All right.好吧,我们走。
453Consent.同意 同意吗
454Let's wait.让我们等待。
455Wait.单单
456Hang on.坚持住。
457What's your name?你叫什么来着?
458Kathleen.凯瑟琳
459Kathleen says, suppose they had asked.凯瑟琳说,假设他们问。
460What would that scenario look like?那会是什么情况?
461So in the story, Dudley is there, penknife in hand.所以在故事里,杜德利就在那里,手持笔刀.
462But instead of the prayer or before the prayer, he says, Parker, would you mind?但他说,帕克,你介意吗?
463We're desperately hungry, as Marcus empathizes with.马库斯很同情我们
464We're desperately hungry.我们快饿死了
465You're not going to last long anyhow.反正你撑不了多久的
466Yeah.
467You can be a martyr.你可以当烈士
468Would you be a martyr?你会成为烈士吗?
469How about it, Parker?怎么样,帕克?
470Then, what do you think?那你觉得呢?
471Would it be morally justified then?那么这在道义上是否合理?
472Suppose Parker, in his semi stupor, says, OK.假设Parker在半脑筋里说
473I don't think it would be morally justifiable.我不认为这在道德上是正当的。
474But I'm wondering.但是,我在想,为什么?
475Even then.即便当时.
476Even then it wouldn't be.即使那样也不可能
477No.没有
478You don't think that even with consent, it would be morally justified.你不认为,即使得到同意,这在道德上也是合理的。
479Are there people who think, who want to take up Kathleen's consent idea and who think that是否有人想,谁想接受 凯瑟琳的同意想法
480that would make it morally justified?这会使它在道德上合理吗?
481Raise your hand if it would.举手吧
482If you think it would.如果你认为会
483That's very interesting.这很有趣。
484Why would consent make a moral difference?为什么同意会改变道德?
485Why would it?为什么?
486Yes.
487Well, I just think that if he was making his own original idea and it was his idea to start好吧,我只是认为 如果他是 自己的想法 这是他的主意开始
488with, then that would be the only situation in which I would see it being appropriate那么那是我唯一认为合适的情况
489in any way.无论如何。
490Because that way you couldn't make the argument that he was pressured.因为那样你就不能说他受到压力了
491You know, it's three to one or whatever the ratio was.你知道,这是三对一 或者无论比例是什么。
492Right.
493And I think that if he was making a decision to give his life, then he took on the agency我想如果他决定献出自己的生命 然后他接了这个机构
494to sacrifice himself, which some people might see as admirable.牺牲自己, 一些人可能认为这是令人钦佩的。
495And other people might disagree with that decision.其他人可能不同意这一决定。
496So if he came up with the idea that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence所以,如果他想出的想法 这是唯一的一种同意 我们可以有信心
497in morally, then it would be OK.在道德上,那就没事了
498Otherwise, it would be kind of coerced consent under the circumstances.否则,在这种情况下将是一种强迫同意。
499You think.你觉得呢?
500Is there anyone who thinks that even the consent of Parker would not justify their killing有没有人认为即使得到帕克的同意 也没有理由杀死他们
501him?他吗?
502Who thinks that?谁这么认为?
503Yes.
504Tell us why.告诉我为什么。
505Stand up.站起来
506I think that Parker would be killed with the hope that the other crew members would be我认为帕克会被杀 希望其他船员会是
507rescued.获救。
508There's no definite reason that he should be killed, because you don't know when they're他不应该被杀 因为你不知道什么时候
509going to get rescued.会被救出来
510So if you kill him, it's killing him in vain.故若杀之,乃枉杀之.
511Do you keep killing the crew member until you're rescued and then you're left with no你是否一直杀死船员 直到你被救出来 之后你就会离开
512one?一个?
513Because someone's going to die eventually.因为总有一天有人会死的
514Well, the moral logic of the situation seems to be that, that they would keep on picking嗯,这个状况的道德逻辑似乎是, 他们会继续选择
515off the weakest, maybe, one by one, until they were rescued.离开最弱者,也许,一个接一个,直到他们获救。
516And in this case, luckily, they were rescued when three, at least, were still alive.在此情况下,幸运的是,他们被救出,至少三个人还活着。
517Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think, or not?现在,如果Parker真的同意了, 会不会没事, 你觉得呢?
518No.没有
519It still wouldn't be right.这还是不对的
520And tell us why it wouldn't be all right.告诉我们为什么不好。
521First of all, cannibalism, I believe, is morally incorrect.首先,我认为食人主义在道德上是不正确的。
522So you shouldn't be eating a human anyway.所以,你不应该吃一个人类反正。
523So cannibalism is morally objectionable.所以食人主义在道德上是令人厌恶的.
524So then, even on the scenario of waiting until someone died, still it would be objectionable.因此,即便在等待某人死亡的情况下,它仍然会引起反对。
525Yes.
526To me, personally.对我个人来说
527I feel like it all depends on one's personal morals.我觉得一切取决于个人道德
528And, like, we can't sit here and just, like, this is just my opinion.我们不能坐在这里,而这只是我的看法
529Of course, other people are going to disagree.当然,其他人会不同意。
530Well, we'll see.好吧,我们会看到。
531Let's see what their disagreements are, and then we'll see if they have reasons that can看看他们的分歧是什么 然后我们看看他们是否有理由
532persuade you or not.说服你与否。
533Let's try that.让我们试试。
534All right.好吧,我们走。
535Let's, now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent, can让我们,现在,有人 谁可以解释, 你们中谁 诱惑同意,可以
536you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?你解释为什么同意会改变道德吗?
537What about the lottery idea?那彩票的点子呢?
538Does that count as consent?这算不算同意?
539Remember, at the beginning, Dudley proposed a lottery.记住,一开始,杜德利提出彩票.
540Suppose that they had agreed to a lottery.假设他们同意了彩票
541Then, how many would then say it was all right?那么,有多少人会说它没事?
542Suppose there were a lottery, cabin boy lost, and the rest of the story unfolded.假设有一个彩票,小屋男孩输了, 其他的故事展开。
543Then how many people would say it was morally permissible?那么有多少人会说这在道德上是允许的?
544So the numbers are rising if we had a lottery.如果我们有彩票,数字就会上升。
545Let's hear from one of you, for whom the lottery would make a moral difference.让我们听听你们中的一个, 彩票会给谁带来道德上的改变。
546Why would it?为什么?
547I think the essential element, in my mind, that makes it a crime is the idea that they我认为,在我脑海里, 使它成为犯罪的基本元素 是他们的想法
548decided at some point that their lives were more important than his, and that, I mean,在某个时候决定 他们的生命比他更重要 我是说
549that's kind of the basis for really any crime, right?这是真正犯罪的基础,对不对?
550It's like, my needs, my desires are more important than yours, and mine take precedent.就像,我的需要,我的欲望 比你更重要, 我的先例。
551And if they had done a lottery where everyone consented that someone should die, and it's如果他们投了彩票 大家都同意有人会死
552sort of like they're all sacrificing themselves to save the rest.好像他们都在牺牲自己来拯救其他人
553Then it would be all right.那就没事了
554A little grotesque, but...有点奇怪,但是...
555But morally permissible?但道德上允许?
556Yes.
557And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
558Matt.马特。
559So, Matt, for you, what bothers you is not the cannibalism, but the lack of due process.所以,马特,对你来说,你烦恼的不是食人,而是缺乏正当程序。
560I guess you could say that, right?我想你可以说,对不对?
561And can someone who agrees with Matt say a little bit more about why a lottery would有人同意马特的话 可以多说一点为什么彩票会
562make it, in your view, morally permissible?让你觉得道德上允许吗?
563Go ahead.来吧。
564The way I understood it originally was that that was the whole issue, is that the cabin我最初的理解是,这是整个问题,是小屋
565boy was never consulted about whether or not something was going to happen to him, even男孩从来没有被咨询 他会不会出事,甚至
566with the original lottery, whether or not he would be a part of that.和原彩票, 是否他将成为其中的一部分。
567It was just decided that he was the one that was going to die.刚决定他就是那个要死的人
568Right.
569That's what happened in the actual case.实案亦如此.
570Right.
571But if there were a lottery, and they had all agreed to the procedure, you think that但如果有彩票 他们都同意这个程序 你就会认为
572would be okay?不会有事吧?
573Right.
574Because then everyone knows that there's going to be a death.因为那样大家就会知道 会有死亡
575Whereas, you know, the cabin boy didn't know that this discussion was even happening.但是,你知道,小木屋男孩不知道 这个讨论甚至正在发生。
576There was no, you know, forewarning for him to know that, hey, I may be the one that's没有,你知道,前警告 他知道,嘿,也许我是一个
577dying.临终.
578All right.好吧,我们走。
579So he, everyone agrees to the lottery, they have the lottery, the cabin boy loses, and所以,他,每个人都同意彩票, 他们有彩票,小屋男孩输了,
580he changes his mind.他改变主意了
581You've already decided.你已经决定了
582It's like a verbal contract.如是语约.
583You can't go back on that.你不能再这样了
584You've decided the decision was made.你已经决定了
585You know, if you know that you're dying for the, you know, the reason for others to live,你知道,如果你知道 你正在死 为,你知道,
586you would, if someone else had died, you know that you would consume them.你会的,如果有人死了, 你知道你会消耗他们。
587So that's right.故对曰.
588But then he could say, I know, but I lost.但他可以说,我知道,但我输了。
589I just think that that's the whole moral issue, is that there was no consulting of the cabin我只是觉得这是整个道德问题, 因为没有咨询小屋
590boy, and that that's what makes it the most horrible, is that he had no idea what was这才是最恐怖的 他根本不知道是什么
591even going on.甚至继续
592That had he known what was going on, it would be a bit more understandable.如果他知道发生了什么事情,那会比较容易理解。
593All right.好吧,我们走。
594Good.不错
595Now I want to hear, so there are some who think it's morally permissible, but only about现在我想听听,所以有些人认为这在道德上是允许的,但只谈
59620%, led by Marcus.20%,由马库斯领导.
597Then there are some who say, the real problem here is the lack of consent, whether the lack还有一些人说,真正的问题是缺乏同意,是否缺乏同意。
598of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure, or, Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the同意彩票 公平程序 或凯瑟琳的想法
599moment of death.死亡的时刻。
600And if we add consent, then more people are willing to consider the sacrifice morally如果我们同意, 那么更多的人愿意考虑 在道德上牺牲
601justified.正当的。
602I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think, even with consent, even with现在,我终于想听听 你们中那些认为,即使同意,甚至同意
603a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker, at the very last moment, it would彩票,即使得到帕克最后的认可 在最后一刻,它会
604still be wrong.还是错了
605And why would it be wrong?为什么会这样?
606That's what I want to hear.这就是我想听到的。
607Yes.
608Well, the whole time I've been leaning all towards the categorical moral reasoning, and嗯,一直以来,我一直 倾斜所有的道德推理,
609I think that there's a possibility I'd be okay with the idea of a lottery, and then我觉得我可能会接受彩票的想法 然后
610the loser taking into their own hands to kill themselves, so that there wouldn't be an输家自己动手自杀 这样就不会有
611act of murder.谋杀行为。
612But I still think that even that way, it's coerced.但我仍然认为,即使这样,它也是被胁迫的。
613And also, I don't think that there is any remorse.还有,我不认为有任何悔恨。
614Like in Dudley's diary, we were eating our breakfast.就像Dudley的日记里一样 我们在吃早餐
615It seems as though he's just sort of like, oh, the whole idea of not valuing someone似乎他只是有点, 哦,整个想法 不重视某人
616else's life.别人的生活。
617So that makes me feel like I have to take the categorical...这让我感觉我必须接受...
618You want to throw the book at him?你想把书扔给他吗?
619When he lacks remorse or a sense of having done anything wrong.当他缺乏悔恨感或者没有做错任何事的感觉时.
620Right.
621So, all right, good.所以,没事,很好。
622Other, any other defenders of, who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without其他,任何其他维护者, 谁说这是完全错误的, 有或不
623consent?同意吗?
624Yes.
625Stand up.站起来
626Why?为什么?
627I think undoubtedly the way our society is shaped, murder is murder.我认为,毫无疑问,我们社会的形式,谋杀就是谋杀。
628Murder is murder in every way.谋杀就是谋杀
629The way our society looks at murder down in the same light, and I don't think it's any我们社会在同一个光线下看待谋杀的方式 我觉得这根本不是
630different in any case.在任何情况下都不一样。
631Good.不错
632Let me ask you a question.让我问你一个问题。
633There were three lives at stake versus one.有三条生命处于危险之中,对一。
634Okay.摆
635The one, the cabin boy, he had no family.那个小木屋男孩 他没有家人
636He had no dependents.他没有家属
637These other three had families back home in England.这三人在英国有家人
638They had dependents.他们有家属。
639They had wives and children.他们有妻子和孩子。
640Think back to Bentham.回想本达姆.
641Bentham says we have to consider the welfare, the utility, the happiness of everybody.本特姆说我们必须考虑每个人的福利,效用,幸福.
642We have to add it all up.我们必须加起来。
643So, it's not just numbers three against one.所以,它不仅仅是数字三对一。
644It's also all of those people at home.在家的那些人也是这样
645In fact, the London newspaper at the time and Popular Opinion sympathized with them,事实上,当时的伦敦报纸和大众舆论都同情他们,
646Dudley and Stevens.达德利和史蒂文斯。
647And the paper said if they weren't motivated by affection and concern for their loved ones报纸上说,如果他们不是出于对亲人的爱和关心
648at home and their dependents, surely they wouldn't have done this.在家里和他们的家属, 他们肯定不会这样做。
649Yeah.
650And how is that any different from people on the corner trying to have the same desire和街角上的人有什么不同吗?
651to feed their family?养家糊口?
652I don't think it's any different.亦无分别.
653I think in any case, if I'm murdering you to advance my status, that's murder.我认为无论如何,如果我谋杀你 提升我的地位,这就是谋杀。
654And I think that we should look at that all in the same light.我认为我们应该从同一个角度来看待这些。
655Instead of criminalizing certain activities and making certain things seem more violent而不是将某些活动定为犯罪,使某些东西看起来更加暴力
656and savage, when in the same case, it's all the same.和野蛮人, 当在同一个情况, 它都是一样的。
657It's all the same act and mentality that goes into murder, the necessity to feed your family.这都是同样的行为和心态 进入谋杀, 需要养活你的家人。
658Suppose it weren't three.假设不是三个
659Suppose it were 30.假设是30岁
660Three hundred.三百块
661One life to save three hundred.一命救三百众.
662We're in wartime.我们在战时
663Three thousand.三千户.
664Suppose the stakes are even bigger.如果赌注更大的话
665I think it's still the same deal.我觉得还是一样
666Do you think Bentham is wrong to say the right thing to do is to add up the collective happiness?你认为本塔姆说正确的话是不是错的,就是把集体的幸福加起来?
667Do you think he's wrong about that?你觉得他错了吗?
668I don't think he's wrong, but I think murder is murder in any case.我不认为他错了 但我认为谋杀是谋杀
669Well, then Bentham has to be wrong.那么本塔姆一定错了
670If you're right, he's wrong.如果你是对的 他就错了
671Okay, he's wrong.好吧,他错了。
672All right.好吧,我们走。
673Thank you.谢谢
674Well done.干得不错
675All right.好吧,我们走。
676Let's step back from this discussion and notice how many objections have we heard to what they did.让我们从这次讨论后退一步,注意到我们听到多少反对他们做了什么.
677We heard some defenses of what they did.我们听到一些辩护 他们做了什么。
678The defenses had to do with necessity, their dire circumstance, and implicitly at least, the idea that numbers matter.辩护与必要性、危急情况以及至少暗含的数字重要的概念有关。
679And not only numbers matter, but the wider effects matter.不仅数字重要,而且更广泛的影响也重要。
680Their families back home, their dependents.其家人归家,其眷属也.
681Parker was an orphan.帕克是一个孤儿。
682No one would miss him.没有人会想念他。
683So if you add up, if you tried to calculate the balance of happiness and suffering, you might have a case for saying what they did was the right thing.因此,如果你加起来,如果你试图计算幸福和痛苦的平衡, 你可能有一个理由说,他们做了什么是正确的事情。
684Then we heard at least three different types of objections.然后我们至少听到三种不同的反对。
685We heard an objection that said what they did was categorically wrong, Mike here at the end, categorically wrong.我们听到一个反对 说他们的所作所为是绝对错误的, 迈克在这里最后,绝对错误。
686Murder is murder, it's always wrong, even if it increases the overall happiness of society.谋杀就是谋杀,它总是错误的,即使它能增加社会的整体幸福.
687A categorical objection.绝对反对。
688But we still need to investigate why murder is categorically wrong.但我们仍然需要调查为什么谋杀绝对是错误的。
689Is it because even cabin boys have certain fundamental rights?是因为连小屋男孩都有某些基本权利吗?
690And if that's the reason, where do those rights come from, if not from some idea of the larger welfare or utility or happiness?如果这就是原因, 这些权利来自哪里, 如果不是从某种 更大的福利或效用或幸福的想法?
691Question number one.问曰.
692Others said a lottery would make a difference, a fair procedure, Matt said.马特说,其他人说彩票会有所作为,是一种公平的程序。
693But, and some people were swayed by that.但是,有些人为此摇摆不定。
694That's not a categorical objection exactly.这不是绝对的反对
695It's saying everybody has to be counted as an equal, even though at the end of the day one can be sacrificed for the general welfare.意思是每个人都得被算作一个平等的,尽管在最后的一天,人们可以为了一般的福利而牺牲.
696That leaves us with another question to investigate.这就让我们有另一个问题要调查。
697Why does agreement to a certain procedure, even a fair procedure, justify whatever result flows from the operation of that procedure?为什么同意某种程序,甚至公平程序,就证明该程序的运作产生的任何结果是合理的?
698Question number two.第二问.
699And question number three, the basic idea of consent.第三问题,同意的基本思想。
700Kathleen got us onto this.凯瑟琳让我们知道这件事
701If the cabin boy had agreed himself and not under duress, as was added, then it would be alright to take his life to save the rest.如果小木屋男孩同意了 而不是在胁迫下 加上,那么就应该抢他的命来拯救剩下的人
702And even more people signed on to that idea.更多的人同意这个想法。
703But that raises a third philosophical question.但这提出了第三个哲学问题。
704What is the moral work that consent does?同意的道德工作是什么?
705Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference that an act that would be wrong, taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?为什么同意行为会给道德带来如此不同的影响,以致于未经同意而夺取生命的错误行为在道德上是经同意允许的?
706To investigate those three questions, we're going to have to read some philosophers.为了调查这三个问题,我们要读一些哲学家.
707And starting next time, we're going to read Bentham and John Stuart Mill, utilitarian philosophers.从下次开始,我们要读本特姆和约翰·斯图尔特·米尔,功利主义哲学家.
708Don't miss the chance to interact online with other viewers of Justice.不要错过与司法界其他观众在线互动的机会.
709Join the conversation. Take a pop quiz.加入对话。 做个流行测验
710Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
711请访问justiceharvard.org. 谓之正法.
712Thank you.谢谢
713Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
714additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 719 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P3 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p03 2. 2.为生命标价 (P3)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:06Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:10Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:15Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:30Last time, we argued about the case of the Queen vs. Dudley and Stevens.上次我们争论了皇后诉杜德利和史蒂文斯的案子
0:39The lifeboat case, the case of cannibalism at sea.救生艇案,海上食人案.
0:44And with the arguments about the lifeboat in mind,考虑到救生艇的争论
0:50the arguments for and against what Dudley and Stevens did in mind,和反对杜德利和史蒂文斯所想的
0:54let's turn back to the philosophy,让我们回到哲学,
0:58the utilitarian philosophy of Jeremy Bentham.杰里米·本塔姆的功利主义哲学.
展开字幕全文(233 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
4Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
5Last time, we argued about the case of the Queen vs. Dudley and Stevens.上次我们争论了皇后诉杜德利和史蒂文斯的案子
6The lifeboat case, the case of cannibalism at sea.救生艇案,海上食人案.
7And with the arguments about the lifeboat in mind,考虑到救生艇的争论
8the arguments for and against what Dudley and Stevens did in mind,和反对杜德利和史蒂文斯所想的
9let's turn back to the philosophy,让我们回到哲学,
10the utilitarian philosophy of Jeremy Bentham.杰里米·本塔姆的功利主义哲学.
11Bentham was born in England in 1748.本特姆1748年出生于英国.
12At the age of 12, he went to Oxford.12岁时就读于牛津大学.
13At 15, he went to law school.15岁就读于法学院.
14He was admitted to the bar at age 19, but he never practiced law.他19岁时进入酒吧,但从未执业.
15Instead, he devoted his life to jurisprudence and moral philosophy.相反,他毕生致力于法学和道德哲学.
16Last time, we began to consider Bentham's version of utilitarianism.上次,我们开始考虑本塔姆的功利主义版本.
17The main idea is simply stated, and it's this.其主要思想是简单阐述的,就是这个.
18The highest principle of morality,道德的最高原则,
19whether personal or political morality,无论是个人道德还是政治道德,
20is to maximize the general welfare,最大限度地提高一般福利,
21or the collective happiness,或集体的幸福,
22or the overall balance of pleasure over pain,或快乐与痛苦的总体平衡,
23in a phrase, maximize utility.在一个短语中,最大限度地发挥效用。
24Bentham arrives at this principle by the following line of reasoning.本特姆通过以下推理得出了这一原则.
25We're all governed by pain and pleasure.皆受苦乐所化.
26They are our sovereign masters.他们是我们的主权主人。
27And so any moral system has to take account of them.因此,任何道德制度都必须考虑到他们。
28How best to take account? By maximizing.如何最好地考虑? 通过最大化。
29And this leads to the principle of the greatest good for the greatest number.这导致了最大利益对最大数量的原则.
30What exactly should we maximize?我们究竟应该最大限度地做些什么?
31Bentham tells us, happiness, or more precisely, utility.本特姆告诉我们,幸福,或者更确切地说,实用。
32Maximizing utility is a principle not only for individuals,最大限度地发挥效用不仅是个人的一项原则,
33but also for communities and for legislators.但也是为了社区和立法者。
34What, after all, is a community? Bentham asks.毕竟社区是什么? 本答问.
35It's the sum of the individuals who comprise it.是组成它的个体的总和.
36And that's why, in deciding the best policy,这就是为什么在决定最佳政策时
37in deciding what the law should be,决定什么是法律,
38in deciding what's just,在决定什么是正义,
39citizens and legislators should ask themselves the question,公民和立法者应该问自己这个问题,
40if we add up all of the benefits of this policy如果我们把这项政策的所有好处加起来
41and subtract all of the costs,并减去一切费用,
42the right thing to do is the one that maximizes the balance of happiness over suffering.做正确的事情是 尽量平衡幸福和痛苦
43That's what it means to maximize utility.这就是最大化效用的意义.
44Now, today, I want to see whether you agree or disagree with it.今天,我想看看你是否同意还是不同意。
45And it often goes, this utilitarian logic, under the name of cost-benefit analysis,这种实用主义的逻辑 往往以成本效益分析为名
46which is used by companies and by governments all the time.公司和政府经常使用
47And what it involves is placing a value, usually a dollar value,它涉及的是一个价值, 通常是美元价值,
48to stand for utility on the costs and the benefits of various proposals.(c) 主张对各种提案的成本和效益有用。
49Recently, in the Czech Republic, there was a proposal to increase the excise tax on smoking.最近,在捷克共和国,有人建议增加对吸烟的消费税。
50Philip Morris, the tobacco company, does huge business in the Czech Republic.菲利普·莫里斯(Philip Morris),烟草公司,在捷克从事巨大的业务.
51They commissioned a study of cost-benefit analysis of smoking in the Czech Republic.他们委托对捷克共和国吸烟的成本效益分析进行研究。
52And what their cost-benefit analysis found was the government gains by having Czech citizens smoke.他们的成本效益分析发现,政府通过让捷克公民吸烟而获得了收益。
53Now, how do they gain?现在,他们有什么好处?
54It's true that there are negative effects to the public finance of the Czech government捷克政府的公共财政确实受到不利影响
55because there are increased health care costs for people who develop smoking-related diseases.因为对于患与吸烟有关的疾病的人来说,保健费用有所增加。
56On the other hand, there were positive effects, and those were added up on the other side of the ledger.另一方面,也产生了积极的效果,这些结果被加到分类账的另一边。
57The positive effects included, for the most part, various tax revenues that the government derives其积极影响主要包括政府获得的各种税收收入。
58from the sale of cigarette products, but it also included health care savings to the government包括政府的医疗储蓄。
59when people die early, pension savings, you don't have to pay pensions for as long,当人们早死, 养老金储蓄, 你不必支付养老金 这么久,
60and also savings in housing costs for the elderly.并节省老年人的住房费用。
61And when all of the costs and benefits were added up, the Philip Morris study found当所有成本和利益都加在一起后 菲利普·莫里斯的研究发现
62that there is a net public finance gain in the Czech Republic of $147 million.捷克共和国的公共财政净收益为1.47亿美元。
63And given the savings in housing and health care and pension costs,并且考虑到在住房和医疗保健以及养老金费用方面的节省,
64the government enjoys a savings of over $1200 for each person who dies prematurely due to smoking.政府为每个因吸烟而过早死亡的人节省了1 200多美元。
65Cost-benefit analysis.成本效益分析。
66Now, those among you who are defenders of utilitarianism may think that this is an unfair test.现在,你们中那些维护功利主义的人可能认为这是不公平的考验。
67Philip Morris was pilloried in the press, and they issued an apology for this heartless calculation.Philip Morris在报纸上被打得一团糟 他们为这个无情的计算结果道歉
68You may say that what's missing here is something that the utilitarian can easily incorporate, namely,你可以说这里所缺少的 是功利主义者可以轻易纳入的东西,即,
69the value to the person and to the families of those who die from lung cancer.对肺癌患者的个人和家庭的价值。
70What about the value of life?那生命的价值呢?
71Some cost-benefit analyses incorporate a measure for the value of life.一些成本效益分析包括生命价值计量。
72One of the most famous of these involved the Ford Pinto case.其中最著名的一件涉及福特平托案.
73Did any of you read about that? This was back in the 1970s.你们有看过吗? 这回到了1970年代.
74Do you remember what the Ford Pinto was, that kind of car? Anybody?你还记得福特平托是什么吗? 有人吗?
75It was a small car, a subcompact car, very popular.这是一辆小车,一个子协议车,非常受欢迎.
76But it had one problem, which is the fuel tank was at the back of the car,但有一个问题 燃料箱在车尾
77and in rear collisions the fuel tank exploded.燃料箱在后方碰撞中爆炸
78And some people were killed and some severely injured.一些人被杀,一些人受重伤。
79Victims of these injuries took Ford to court to sue.这些伤害的受害者将福特告上法庭起诉.
80And in the court case it turned out that Ford had long since known about the vulnerable fuel tank在法庭案件中 福特早就知道 易碎燃料箱
81and had done a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it would be worth it并进行了成本效益分析,以确定是否值得
82to put in a special shield that would protect the fuel tank and prevent it from exploding.安装一个特殊的防护罩,保护燃料箱,防止燃料箱爆炸。
83They did a cost-benefit analysis.他们进行了成本效益分析。
84The cost per part to increase the safety of the Pinto, they calculated at $11 per part.提高平托号安全性的费用按每部分11美元计算.
85And this was the cost-benefit analysis that emerged in the trial.这是试验中出现的成本效益分析。
86$11 per part at 12.5 million cars and trucks came to a total cost of $137 million to improve the safety.每部分11美元,1 250万美元汽车和卡车,总费用1.37亿美元,用于改善安全。
87But then they calculated the benefits of spending all this money on a safer car但后来他们计算了把这些钱 花在一辆更安全的汽车上的好处
88and they counted 180 deaths and they assigned a dollar value, $200,000 per death.他们统计了180人死亡 并分配了一个美元值,每人死亡20万美元。
89180 injuries, $67,000.180人受伤,6.7万元.
90And then the cost to repair, the replacement cost for 2,000 vehicles that would be destroyed without the safety device, $700 per vehicle.然后是修理费用,2000辆没有安全装置就销毁的车辆的更换费用,每辆700美元。
91So the benefits turned out to be only $49.5 million and so they didn't install the device.结果收益只有4,950万美元,所以他们没有安装设备.
92Needless to say, when this memo of the Ford Motor Company's cost-benefit analysis came out in the trial,不用说 当福特汽车公司的成本效益分析备忘录在审判中出来时
93it appalled the jurors who awarded a huge settlement.它震惊了陪审员 谁授予一个巨大的和解。
94Is this a counterexample to the utilitarian idea of calculating?这是对计算功利主义思想的反比吗?
95Because Ford included a measure of the value of life.因为福特包含了生命价值的度量.
96Now, who here wants to defend cost-benefit analysis from this apparent counterexample?现在,谁想从这个明显的反例中为成本效益分析辩护?
97Who has a defense?谁有辩护权?
98Or do you think this completely destroys the whole utilitarian calculus?或者你认为这完全摧毁了整个功利微积分?
99Yes.
100Well, I think that once again they've made the same mistake the previous case did that they assigned a dollar value to human life我认为他们再次犯了同样的错误 之前的案子 他们给人的生命分配了一个美元价值
101and once again they failed to take account things like suffering and emotional losses by the families.并且他们又一次没有考虑到诸如家人的痛苦和情感损失之类的事情。
102I mean, families lost earnings but they also lost a loved one and that is more valued than $200,000.我的意思是,家庭失去了收入,但他们也失去了一个爱人,价值超过20万美元。
103Right. And wait, wait, wait. That's good. What's your name?对 且道个甚么. 这是很好的。 你叫什么来着?
104Julia Roto.朱莉娅·罗托.
105So if $200,000, Julie, is too low a figure because it doesn't include the loss of a loved one and the loss of those years of life,因此如果20万,朱莉, 是一个太低的数字,因为它不包括 失去一个亲人 和那些年的生命损失,
106what would be, what do you think would be a more accurate number?你觉得更准确的数字是什么?
107I don't believe I could give a number. I think that this sort of analysis shouldn't be applied to issues of human life.我不相信我能给出一个数字。 我认为这种分析不应该应用于人类生活的问题.
108I think it can't be used monetarily.我认为它不能被金钱使用。
109So they didn't just put too low a number, Julie says.Julie说 他们不只是把数字放太低了
110They were wrong to try to put any number at all.他们想把任何号码都放错
111All right, let's hear someone who...好吧,让我们听到有人谁...
112You have to adjust for inflation.你要适应通货膨胀
113All right. Fair enough. So what would the number be now?好吧,我们走。 不错 号码是多少?
114This was 35 years ago.这是35年前。
115$2 million. You would put $2 million. And what's your name?两百万 你会投入200万美元。 你叫什么来着?
116Wojtek says we have to allow for inflation. We should be more generous.Wojtek说,我们必须允许通货膨胀。 我们应该更加慷慨
117Then would you be satisfied that this is the right way of thinking about the question?那你会满意吗? 这是思考这个问题的正确方式?
118I guess, unfortunately, there needs to be a number put somewhere.我想,不幸的是, 需要有一个数字的地方。
119I'm not sure what that number would be, but I do agree that there could possibly be a number put on human life.我不知道那号码会是多少 但我也同意 可能会有数字用于人的生命
120All right. So Wojtek says, and here he disagrees with Julie,好吧,我们走。 所以Wojtek说, 在这里他不同意朱莉,
121Julie says we can't put a number on human life for the purpose of a cost benefit analysis.朱莉说,我们不能为了成本效益分析的目的,把数字放在人的生命上.
122Wojtek says we have to because we have to make decisions somehow.Wojtek说我们必须这么做,因为我们必须做决定。
123What do other people think about this? Is there anyone prepared to defend cost benefit analysis here?别人怎么看? 这里有没有人愿意为成本效益分析辩护?
124As accurate, as desirable? Yes? Go ahead.准确的,像理想的吗? 是吗? 来吧。
125I think that if Ford and other car companies didn't use cost benefit analysis,我认为如果福特和其他汽车公司 不使用成本效益分析,
126they'd eventually go out of business because they wouldn't be able to be profitable他们终究会退出生意 因为他们无法赚钱
127and millions of people wouldn't be able to use their cars to get the jobs, to put food on the table, to feed their children.数百万人无法使用他们的汽车 获得工作, 将食物放在桌子上, 养活他们的孩子。
128So I think that if cost benefit analysis isn't employed, the greater good is sacrificed in this case.所以,我认为如果不进行成本效益分析, 更大的好处就牺牲了。
129All right. What's your name? Raoul.好吧,我们走。 你叫什么来着? 拉乌尔
130Raoul. There was recently a study done about cell phone use by drivers when people are driving a car.拉乌尔 最近对司机在开车时使用手机的情况进行了研究。
131And there's a debate whether that should be banned.是否应该禁止也存在争论.
132And the figure was that some 2,000 people die as a result of accidents each year using cell phones.这个数字是,每年约有2,000人死于使用手机的事故。
133And yet the cost benefit analysis, which was done by the Center for Risk Analysis at Harvard,但哈佛风险分析中心所做的成本效益分析
134found that if you look at the benefits of the cell phone use and you put some value on the life,发现如果你看看手机的优点 并给生命带来一些价值
135it comes out about the same because of the enormous economic benefit of enabling people to take advantage of their time,因为它带来了巨大的经济利益 让人们能够利用自己的时间,
136not waste time, be able to make deals and talk to friends and so on while they're driving.不要浪费时间, 能够做交易 和朋友谈话等等 当他们开车。
137Doesn't that suggest that it's a mistake to try to put monetary figures on questions of human life?这难道不表明试图把金钱数字放在人的生命问题上是错误的吗?
138Well, I think that if the great majority of people try to derive maximum utility out of the service,我想如果绝大多数人想从服务中获得最大效用
139like using cell phones and the convenience that cell phones provide, that sacrifice is necessary for satisfaction to occur.就像使用手机和手机提供的方便, 牺牲是满足的必要条件。
140You're an outright utilitarian.你是个纯粹的功利主义者
141Yes. Okay.对 摆
142All right. Then one last question, Raoul.好吧,我们走。 还有最后一个问题 拉乌尔
143Okay.摆
144我把这个给Wojtek。
145What dollar figure should be put on human life to decide whether to ban the use of cell phones?人类生活中应该用多少美元来决定是否禁止使用手机?
146Well, I don't want to arbitrarily calculate a figure.我不想任意计算一个数字
147I mean, right now, I think that...我的意思是,现在,我认为...
148You want to take it under advisement?你想接受建议吗?
149Yeah, I'll take it under advisement.是的,我会接受它的建议。
150But what, roughly speaking, would it be?但是,大致来说,会是什么?
151You've got 2,300 deaths.你死了2300个
152You've got to assign a dollar value to know whether you want to prevent those deaths by banning the use of cell phones in cars.你得花一美元才能知道是否要禁止汽车使用手机来防止这些死亡。
153Okay.摆
154So what would your hunch be?那你的直觉是什么?
155How much?多少钱?
156A million? Two million?一百万吗? 两百万?
157Two million was Wojtek's figure.两百万是沃伊泰克的数字
158Yeah.
159Is that about right?是吗?
160Maybe a million.也许一百万。
161A million?一百万吗?
162Yeah.
163You know, that's good. Thank you.你知道,这是很好的。 谢谢
164Okay.摆
165So these are some of the controversies that arise these days from cost-benefit analysis,因此,这些是最近从成本效益分析中产生的一些争议,
166especially those that involve placing a dollar value on everything to be added up.特别是那些涉及给每件要加起来的东西加一美元价值。
167Well, now I want to turn to your objections.现在我想谈谈你的反对意见
168To your objections, not necessarily to cost-benefit analysis specifically,对你的反对意见, 不一定是成本效益分析,
169because that's just one version of the utilitarian logic in practice today,因为这只是今天实践中实用主义逻辑的一个版本,
170but to the theory as a whole, to the idea that the right thing to do,但对于整个理论, 对于一个想法, 正确的事情做,
171the just basis for policy and law,政策和法律的公正基础,
172is to maximize utility.目的是最大限度地发挥效用。
173How many disagree with the utilitarian approach to law and to the common good?有多少人不同意实用主义对法律和共同利益的态度?
174How many agree with it?有多少人同意这个说法?
175So more agree than disagree.所以,更多的同意 而不是异议。
176So let's hear from the critics.因此,让我们听听批评者。
177Yes?是吗?
178My main issue with it is that I feel like you can't say that just because someone's in the minority,我的主要问题是,我觉得你不能这么说 只是因为某人在少数,
179what they want and need is less valuable than someone who's in the majority.他们想要和需要的东西比多数人要少
180So I guess I have an issue with the idea that the greatest good for the greatest number is okay所以我想我有一个问题 关于一个想法, 最大的好处是最多是好
181because there's still, what about people who are in the lesser number?因为还有 人数较少的人呢?
182Like, it's not fair to them. They didn't have any say in where they wanted to be.这对他们不公平 他们没有发言权 他们想去哪儿。
183All right. That's an interesting objection.好吧,我们走。 这是一个有趣的反对。
184Who is worried about the effect on the minority?谁担心对少数民族的影响?
185Yes.
186What's your name, by the way?对了,你叫什么名字?
187Anna.安娜,请问安娜
188Who has an answer to Anna's worry about the effect on the minority?安娜担心对少数民族的影响 谁有答案?
189What do you say to Anna?你怎么跟安娜说?
190She said that the minorities value less.她说,少数群体的价值较低。
191I don't think that's the case because individually the minority's value is just the same as the individual of the majority.我认为情况并非如此,因为个人的少数派价值与多数派的个人价值一样.
192It's just that the numbers outweigh the minority.只是人数超过了少数
193I mean, at a certain point you have to make a decision, and I'm sorry for the minority,我的意思是,在某一时刻 你必须做一个决定, 我很抱歉少数,
194but sometimes it's for the general, for the greater good.但有时是为了将军,为了大局
195For the greater good. Anna, what's your name?为大利益. 安娜,你叫什么来着?
196Youngda.杨达.
197What do you say to Youngda?你对英达怎么说?
198Youngda says you just have to add up people's preferences,英达说,你只需要 增加人们的喜好,
199and those in the minority do have their preferences weighed.少数群体的偏好确实得到了考虑。
200Can you give an example of the kind of thing you're worried about你能举个例子吗? 你担心什么?
201when you say you're worried about utilitarianism violating the concern or respect due to the minority?你说你担心功利主义 违反少数人的顾虑或尊重?
202Can you give an example?你能举个例子吗?
203Well, with any of the cases that we've talked about, like for the Shipwreck one,好吧,任何我们讨论过的案件, 就像沉船案一样,
204I think the boy who was eaten still had as much of a right to live as the other people,我觉得被吃掉的男孩 仍然有权像其他人一样活着
205just because he was the minority in that case, the one who maybe had less of a chance to keep living.就因为他是那个案子的少数 可能没有机会活下去的人
206That doesn't mean that the others automatically have a right to eat him这并不意味着其他人自动有吃他的权利
207just because it would give a greater amount of people a chance to live.因为它会给更多的人 生存的机会。
208So there may be certain rights that the minority members have, that the individual has,因此,少数群体成员可能享有某些权利,个人可能拥有,
209that shouldn't be traded off for the sake of utility.不应该为了实用而交换
210Yes, Anna? Youngda, this would be a test for you.什么事,安娜吗? 杨达,这对你来说是个考验
211Back in ancient Rome, they threw Christians to the lions in the Colosseum for sport.早在古罗马时期,他们就把基督徒扔到Colosseum的狮子那里去参加运动.
212If you think how the utilitarian calculus would go,如果你觉得功利微积分会怎样
213yes, the Christian thrown to the lion suffers enormous excruciating pain.是的 被扔到狮子身上的基督徒 承受着巨大的痛苦
214But look at the collective ecstasy of the Romans.但看看罗马人的集体狂喜.
215Youngda?杨达?
216Well, in that time, I don't – in modern day of time,在那个时候,我不... 在现代的日子,
217to value the – to give a number to the happiness given to the people watching,珍惜给观众的幸福,
218I don't think any policymaker would say the pain of one person –我不认为任何决策者 会说一个人的痛苦 -
219the suffering of one person is much, much – in comparison to the happiness gained.一个人的痛苦与获得的幸福相比是很多很多很多。
220No, but you have to admit that if there were enough Romans delirious enough with happiness,不,但你必须承认 如果有足够的罗马人 精神错乱和幸福,
221it would outweigh even the most excruciating pain of a handful of Christians thrown to the lion.这甚至会超过少数基督徒 扔到狮子身上最痛苦的痛苦
222And we really have here two different objections to utilitarianism.我们在这里对功利主义有两种不同的反对。
223One has to do with whether utilitarianism adequately respects individual rights or minority rights.问题在于功利主义是否充分尊重个人权利或少数人权利。
224And the other has to do with the whole idea of aggregating utility or preferences or values.而另一个则与集合效用或偏好或价值的整个想法有关.
225Is it possible to aggregate all values to translate them into dollar terms?能否将所有数值汇总起来,将其转化为美元值?
226There was, in the 1930s, a psychologist who tried to address this second question.在20世纪30年代,有一个心理学家试图解决第二个问题。
227He tried to prove what utilitarianism assumes that it is possible to translate all goods,他试图证明什么功利主义 假设它是可能的 翻译所有商品,
228all values, all human concerns into a single uniform measure.所有价值观,所有人类关心的问题,都纳入一个统一的尺度。
229And he did this by conducting a survey of young recipients of relief.他通过对接受救济的年轻人进行调查来做到这一点。
230This was in the 1930s.这是在1930年代。
231And he asked them – he gave them a list of unpleasant experiences.他问他们,他给他们一份不愉快的经历的清单。
232And he asked them, how much would you have to be paid to undergo the following experiences?他问他们,你要付多少钱才能接受以下经历?
233And he kept track.他一直追踪着
该视频共有字幕 235 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P4 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p04 3. 3.选择的自由 (P4)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:06Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:10Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:15Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:30When we finished last time,我们上次做完之后
0:35We were looking at John Stuart Mill's attempt to reply我们正看着约翰·斯图尔特·米尔试图回答
0:42To the critics of Bentham's utilitarianism.对本塔姆功利主义的批评者.
0:48In his book, Utilitarianism,在他的书,乌蒂利亚主义,
0:51Mill tries to show that critics to the contrary,米尔试图表明 批评者 相反,
0:55It is possible within the utilitarian framework在功利主义框架内是可能的
展开字幕全文(1220 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
4Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
5When we finished last time,我们上次做完之后
6We were looking at John Stuart Mill's attempt to reply我们正看着约翰·斯图尔特·米尔试图回答
7To the critics of Bentham's utilitarianism.对本塔姆功利主义的批评者.
8In his book, Utilitarianism,在他的书,乌蒂利亚主义,
9Mill tries to show that critics to the contrary,米尔试图表明 批评者 相反,
10It is possible within the utilitarian framework在功利主义框架内是可能的
11To distinguish between higher and lower pleasures.以分上下乐.
12It is possible to make qualitative distinctions of worth.可以作出价值的定性区分。
13And we tested that idea我们测试了这个想法
14With the Simpsons and the Shakespeare excerpts.与辛普森夫妇和莎士比亚节选.
15And the results of our experiment我们实验的结果
16Seem to call into question似乎有疑问
17Mill's distinction.米尔的区别。
18Because a great many of you因为你们很多人
19Reported that you prefer the Simpsons,报告你喜欢辛普森一家
20But that you still consider Shakespeare但你仍然认为莎士比亚
21To be the higher or the worthier.成为更高的或更有价值的。
22Pleasure. That's the dilemma幸会 这就是难题所在
23With which our experiment confronts Mill.我们的实验面对米尔。
24What about Mill's attempt to account那米尔的企图呢?
25For the specially weighty character对于特别重的字符
26Of individual rights and justice个人权利和正义
27In Chapter 5 of Utilitarianism?在尤利塔主义的第五章?
28He wants to say that individual rights他想说个人权利
29Are worthy of special respect.值得特别的尊敬
30In fact, he goes so far as to say that事实上,他甚至说
31Justice is the most sacred part正义是最神圣的部分
32And the most incomparably binding part of morality.而道德中最无比的束缚部分.
33But the same challenge could be put但同样的挑战可以提出
34To this part of Mill's defense.为米勒的这个辩护部分.
35Why is justice the chief part为什么正义是最重要的
36In the most binding part of all morality?在所有道德中最有约束力的部分?
37Well, he says because in the long run他说因为从长远来看
38If we do justice and if we respect rights,如果我们伸张正义,如果我们尊重权利,
39Society as a whole will be better off整个社会都会好起来的
40In the long run.于长行中.
41Well, what about that?那怎么样?
42What if we have a case where making an exception要是我们有个破例呢?
43And violating individual rights侵犯个人权利
44Will make people better off in the long run?从长远来看 会让人好过点吗?
45Is it all right then to use people?那用人可以吗?
46And there's a further objection还有人反对
47That could be raised against这可以针对
48Mill's case for justice and rights.米尔关于正义和权利的案子。
49Suppose the utilitarian calculus in the long run如果从长远来看是功利微积分
50Works out as he says it will.按他说的做
51Such that respecting people's rights尊重人民权利
52Is a way of making everybody better off是让大家都好起来的一种方式
53In the long run.于长行中.
54Is that the right reason?这是正确的理由吗?
55Is that the only reason to respect people?这是尊重人的唯一理由吗?
56If the doctor goes in and yanks the organs如果医生进去 挖出器官
57{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}从那个来检查的病人那里
58To save five lives,为了拯救五条生命
59There would be adverse effects in the long run.从长远来看,会产生不利影响。
60Eventually people would learn about this最终人们会知道这一点
61And would stop going in for checkups.并且会停止去检查。
62Is it the right reason?这是正确的理由吗?
63Is the only reason that you as the doctor是你做医生的唯一原因
64Won't yank the organs out of the healthy patient?不把器官从健康病人身上拔出来吗?
65That you think, well if I use him in this way,你觉得,如果我用他的方式,
66In the long run more lives will be lost?从长远来看,会有更多的人丧生?
67Or is there another reason?还是还有别的理由?
68Having to do with intrinsic respect与内在尊重有关
69For the person as an individual.为个人.
70And if that reason matters,如果这个原因很重要的话
71Then it's not so clear那就没那么清楚了
72That even Mill's utilitarianism甚至米尔的功利主义
73Can take account of it.悉能顾及.
74Fully to examine these two完全检查这两个
75Worries or objections担忧或反对
76To Mill's defense,为了Mill的辩护
77We need to push further.我们需要进一步推进。
78And we need to ask,我们需要问,
79In the case of higher or worthier pleasures,在更高或更值得享受的情况下
80Are there theories of the good life有美好生活的理论吗?
81That can provide independent moral standards这可以提供独立的道德标准
82For the worth of pleasures?为了享受?
83If so, what do they look like?如果是的话,它们长什么样?
84That's one question.这是一个问题。
85In the case of justice and rights,在司法和权利方面,
86If we suspect that Mill is implicitly leaning如果我们怀疑米尔隐含着倾斜
87On notions of human dignity关于人的尊严概念
88Or respect for a person that are not或尊重一个不是
89Strictly speaking utilitarian,严格地说,功利主义者,
90We need to look to see whether there are我们需要看看是否有
91Some stronger theories of rights一些更强大的权利理论
92That can explain the intuition这能解释直觉
93Which even Mill shares,即使米尔也分享
94The intuition that the reason原因的直觉
95For respecting individuals and not using them为了尊重个人而不利用他们
96Goes beyond even utility in the long run.从长远来看,甚至超过效用。
97Today we turn to one of those今天,我们转向其中之一
98Strong theories of rights.强权论.
99Strong theories of rights say强烈的权利理论说
100Individuals matter not just as instruments个人不仅仅是工具
101To be used for a larger social purpose用于更大的社会目的
102Or for the sake of maximizing utility.或为尽功德故.
103Individuals are separate beings个人是分开的
104With separate lives worthy of respect.与诸众生分别受尊重.
105And so it's a mistake,所以这是个错误
106According to strong theories of rights,根据强烈的权利理论,
107It's a mistake to think about justice or law考虑正义或法律是错误的
108By just adding up preferences and values.只要把偏好和价值加起来
109The strong rights theory we turn to today今天我们讨论的强权理论
110Is libertarianism.是自由主义。
111Libertarianism takes individual rights seriously.自由主义严肃对待个人权利.
112It's called libertarianism because it says这叫做自由主义 因为它说
113The fundamental individual right个人基本权利
114Is the right to liberty.这是自由的权利。
115Precisely because we are separate individual beings正是因为我们是单独的个体
116We're not available to any use我们没有任何用处
117That the society might desire or devise.社会可能渴望或设计。
118Precisely because we are individual正是因为我们是个人
119Separate human beings分开的人
120We have a fundamental right to liberty.我们有自由的基本权利。
121And that means这意味着
122A right to choose freely自由选择的权利
123To live our lives as we please过我们所愿的生活
124Provided we respect other people's rights只要我们尊重别人的权利
125To do the same.为作如是事.
126That's the fundamental idea.这就是基本的想法。
127Robert Nozick, one of the libertarian philosophers罗伯特·诺兹克,自由哲学家之一
128We read for this course puts it this way我们读这门课时就这么说了
129Individuals have rights.个人享有权利。
130So strong and far-reaching are these rights这些权利如此有力和深远
131That they raise the question of what if anything他们问,如果有什么
132The state may do.州可能办.
133So what does libertarianism say自由主义怎么说?
134About the role of government关于政府的作用
135Or of the state?还是州里?
136Well there are three things that most modern states do现代国家有三件事要做
137That on the libertarian theory of rights关于自由主义的权利理论
138Are illegitimate, are unjust.非法的,不公正的
139One of them is paternalist legislation.其中之一是家长立法。
140That's passing laws that protect people from themselves.也就是通过法律来保护人们不受伤害.
141Seat belt laws for example.例如,安全带法。
142Or motorcycle helmet laws.或者摩托车头盔法
143The libertarian says自由主义者说
144It may be a good thing if people wear seat belts如果有人戴安全带,那或许是好事
145But that should be up to them.但这应该取决于他们。
146And the state, the government国家,政府
147Has no business coercing them, us没有生意强迫他们,我们
148To wear seat belts by law.依法系安全带.
149It's coercion.这是强迫。
150So no paternalist legislation, number one.所以没有家长立法,第一。
151Number two, no morals legislation.第二,没有道德立法。
152Many laws try to promote the virtue of citizens.许多法律试图促进公民的美德。
153Or try to give expression to the moral values或尝试表达道德价值
154Of the society as a whole.整个社会
155Libertarians say that's also a violation自由主义者说这也是违法的
156Of the right to liberty.自由权。
157Take the example of, well a classic example举个例子,好的典型的例子
158Of legislation offered in the name of promoting morality以提倡道德的名义提供的立法
159Traditionally have been laws that prevent传统上,法律是防止
160Sexual intimacy between gays and lesbians.男同性恋和女同性恋之间的性亲密关系.
161The libertarian says自由主义者说
162Nobody else is harmed.没有人受到伤害。
163Nobody else's rights are violated.其他人的权利受到侵犯。
164So the state should get out of the business entirely所以国家应该完全退出
165Of trying to promote virtue or to enact morals legislation.试图促进美德或制定道德立法。
166And the third kind of law还有第三种法律
167Or policy that is ruled out或者政策被排除
168On the libertarian philosophy关于自由主义哲学
169Is any taxation or other policy任何税收或其他政策
170That serves the purpose of redistributing income or wealth这符合重新分配收入或财富的目的
171From the rich to the poor.从富至贫.
172Redistribution, if you think about it重新分配,如果你考虑它
173Says the libertarian is a kind of coercion.说自由主义者是一种强迫.
174What it amounts to is theft相当于偷窃
175By the state or by the majority国家或多数
176If we're talking about a democracy如果我们说的是民主
177From people who happen to do very well and earn a lot of money.从人,偶然作得很好,赚了很多钱。
178Now Nozick and other libertarians allow现在诺兹克和其他自由主义者允许
179That there can be a minimal state可能有一个最低状态
180That taxes people for the sake of what everybody needs为了大家需要的东西 给人课税
181The national defense, police force, judicial system国防、警察部队、司法系统
182To enforce contracts and property rights执行合同和财产权
183But that's it.但就是这样。
184Now I want to get your reactions现在我想得到你的反应
185To this third feature第三个特点
186Of the libertarian view.在自由主义的视野。
187I want to see who among you我想看看你们中间是谁
188Agree with that idea and who disagree and why.同意这个想法,同意谁不同意和为什么。
189But just to make it concrete and to see what's at stake但为了让事情变得具体 并且看看有什么关系
190Consider the distribution of wealth考虑财富的分配
191In the United States.在美国
192The United States is among the most inegalitarian societies美国是最无产阶级社会之一
193As far as the distribution of wealth至于财富的分配
194Of all the advanced democracies.所有先进民主国家中.
195Now is this just or unjust?这是正义还是不公正?
196Well what does the libertarian say?自由主义者怎么说?
197The libertarian says自由主义者说
198You can't know just from the facts I've just given you.你不可能从我刚刚告诉你的事实中知道
199You can't know whether that distribution is just or unjust.你不可能知道分配是公正还是不公正的。
200You can't know just by looking at a pattern or a distribution or a result你不可能只看图案 分布或结果
201Whether it's just or unjust.无论是公正还是不公正。
202You have to know how it came to be.你必须知道它是如何来的。
203You can't just look at the end state or the result.不能只看结局状态或结果.
204You have to look at two principles.得观二法.
205The first he calls justice in acquisition第一个他称正义在获取
206Or in initial holdings.或在初始持有.
207And what that means simply is也就是说
208Did people get the things they used to make their money?人们得到他们用来赚钱的东西了吗?
209Fairly.不错
210So we need to know was there justice in the initial holdings?所以我们需要知道 在最初的控股中有正义吗?
211Did they steal the land or the factory or the goods他们偷了土地、工厂或货物
212That enabled them to make all that money?让他们赚这么多钱?
213If not, if they were entitled to whatever it was that enabled them to如果不是,如果他们有权获得任何能够使他们
214Gather the wealth聚积财产,
215The first principle is met.第一原则得到满足。
216The second principle is第二项原则是:
217Did the distribution arise from the operation of free consent?分发是否源于自由同意?
218People buying and trading on the market.人民群众在市场上购买和交易.
219As you can see the libertarian idea of justice你可以看到自由主义的正义思想
220Corresponds to a free market相当于自由市场
221Conception of justice.司法概念.
222Provided people got what they used只要人们得到他们使用的东西
223Fairly. Didn't steal it.不错 不是偷来的
224And provided提供
225The distribution results from the free choice of individuals分配是个人自由选择的结果
226Buying and selling things买卖物品
227The distribution is just.分布是公正的.
228And if not, it's unjust.然若无,则不公也.
229So let's in order to fix ideas for this discussion因此,让我们来为这次讨论确定想法
230Take拿着
231An actual example.一个实际的例子。
232Who's the wealthiest person in the United States?美国最富有的人是谁?
233Wealthiest person in the world.世界上最富有的人。
234Bill Gates. It is. That's right.比尔盖茨。 没错 没错
235Here he is.他来了
236You'd be happy too.你也会高兴的
237Now, what's his net worth?现在,他的净值多少?
238Anybody have any idea?有人知道吗?
239That's a big number.这是一个很大的数字。
240During the Clinton years, remember there was a controversy在克林顿的岁月里,记得有争论
241Donors, big campaign contributors捐助者、大型运动捐助者
242Were invited to stay overnight in the Lincoln bedroom at the White House.被邀请在白宫林肯卧室过夜.
243I think if you contributed $25,000 or above我想如果你捐了两万五千元或以上
244Someone figured out有人发现
245That the median contribution中位数贡献
246That got you invited to stay a night in the Lincoln bedroom让你在林肯卧室呆一晚
247Bill Gates could afford to stay in the Lincoln bedroom every night比尔·盖茨每晚都能住在林肯卧室
248For the next 66,000 years.后六万六千岁.
249Somebody else figured out别人知道
250How much does he get paid on an hourly basis?他每小时得到多少钱?
251And so they figured out since he began Microsoft所以他们想通了自从他开始微软
252Suppose he worked, what, 14 hours per day.假设他每天工作14小时
253Reasonable guess.合理猜测.
254And you calculate this net wealth.你计算这种净财富。
255It turns out that his rate of pay原来他的薪水
256Is over $150, not per hour.超过150美元,不是每小时。
257Not per minute.不是一分钟。
258$150, more than $150 per second.150元,每秒超过150元.
259Which means也就是说
260That if on his way to the office如果在去办公室的路上
261Gates noticed a $100 bill on the street盖茨注意到街上有一百块钞票
262It wouldn't be worth his time to stop and pick it up.不值得他停下来捡起来
263Now, most of you will say现在,你们大多数人会说
264Someone that wealthy一个有钱的人
265Surely we can tax them to meet我们当然可以交税让他们见面
266The pressing needs迫切需要
267Of people who lack an education缺乏教育的人
268Or lack enough to eat或者吃不饱
269Or lack decent housing.或缺乏体面的住房。
270They need it more than he does.他们比他更需要这个
271And if you were a utilitarian如果你是个功利主义者
272What would you do?你会怎么做?
273What tax policy would you have?你会有什么税收政策?
274You'd redistribute in a flash, wouldn't you?你会一瞬间重新分配,不是吗?
275Because you would know因为你会知道
276Being a good utilitarian做一个好功利主义者
277That taking some, a small amount这需要一些,一小笔钱
278He's scarcely going to notice it他不会注意到的
279But it will make a huge improvement in the lives但它会大大改善生活
280And in the welfare of those at the bottom.和在福利 在底层的人。
281But remember但记住
282The libertarian theory says自由主义理论说
283We can't just add up and aggregate我们不能只加总和
284Preferences and satisfactions.优待与满足.
285That way we have to respect persons这样我们才能尊重人
286And if he earned that money fairly如果他能公平赚到钱
287Without violating anybody else's rights不侵犯别人的权利
288In accordance with the two principles根据这两项原则
289Of justice in acquisition and justice in transfer获得正义和移交正义
290Then it would be wrong那就不对了
291It would be a form of coercion to take it away.把它带走是一种胁迫。
292Michael Jordan is not as wealthy as Bill Gates迈克尔·乔丹没有比尔·盖茨那么富有
293But he did pretty well for himself.但是他表现得很好
294You want to see Michael Jordan?你想见迈克尔・乔丹吗?
295There he is.他来了
296His income alone光靠他的收入
297In one year was 31 million dollars一年是3100万美元
298And then he made another 47 million dollars然后他又赚了四千七百万
299In endorsements for Nike and other companies.支持耐克和其他公司
300So his income was in one year 78 million.所以他的收入在1年7800万.
301To require him to pay要求他付钱
302Let's say a third of his earnings算他三分之一的收入吧
303To the government对政府
304To support good causes支持好事业
305Like food and health care and housing食品、保健和住房等
306And education for the poor和穷人的教育
307That's coercion. That's unjust.这是强迫。 这是不公正的。
308That violates his rights.这侵犯了他的权利。
309And that's why redistribution is wrong.这就是为什么再分配是错误的。
310Now, how many agree with that argument?现在,有多少人同意这个论点?
311Agree with the libertarian argument同意自由主义的论点
312That redistribution for the sake of这种重新分配是为了
313Trying to help the poor is wrong.试图帮助穷人是错误的。
314And how many disagree with that argument?有多少人不同意这一论点?
315Alright, let's begin with those who disagree.好吧,让我们从不同意的人开始。
316What's wrong with the libertarian case against自由主义案有什么不对?
317Redistribution?重新分配?
318Yes?是吗?
319I think these people like Michael Jordan have received我想这些人像迈克尔・乔丹已经得到了
320We're talking about working within a society我们说的是在社会中工作
321And they received a larger gift from the society他们收到社会上更大的礼物
322And they have a larger obligation in return他们有更大的义务回报
323To give that through redistribution.以再分配的方式给予它。
324You can say that Michael Jordan may work just as hard你可以说迈克尔·乔丹也一样努力
325As someone who works doing laundry作为洗衣服的人
32612 hours, 14 hours a day每天12小时14小时
327But he's receiving more但他收到更多的东西
328I don't think it's fair to say that我觉得这样说不公平
329It's all on his inherent hard work.这一切都在他的固有的艰苦工作。
330Alright, let's hear from defenders of libertarianism.好吧,让我们听听 自由主义的捍卫者。
331Why would it be wrong in principle为什么这原则上是错误的
332To tax the rich to help the poor?向富人征税以帮助穷人?
333Go ahead.来吧。
334My name's Joe and I collect skateboards.我叫乔,我收集滑板
335I've since bought 100 skateboards.之后我买了100块滑板
336I live in a society of 100 people.我生活在一个有100人的社会。
337I'm the only one with skateboards.我是唯一一个有滑板的人。
338Suddenly everyone decides they want a skateboard.突然大家都决定要滑板
339They come into my house, they take 99 of my skateboards.他们进入我家,拿走了我的99块滑板
340I think that is unjust.我认为这不公平。
341Now, I think in certain circumstances现在,我想在某些情况下
342It becomes necessary to overlook that injustice有必要忽视这种不公正
343Perhaps condone that injustice也许可以宽恕不公正
344As in the case of the cowboy being killed for food.就像牛仔为了食物被杀一样
345If people are on the verge of dying如果人们濒临死亡
346Perhaps it is necessary to overlook that injustice也许有必要忽略这种不公正
347But I think it's important to keep in mind但我认为必须记住
348That we're still committing injustice说我们还有冤枉
349By taking people's belongings or assets.通过拿走人们的财物或资产。
350Are you saying that taxing Michael Jordan你是说对迈克尔·乔丹征税吗
351Say at a 33% tax rate税率为33%
352For good causes to feed the hungry为了养活饥饿的人
353Is theft?是偷窃吗?
354I think it's unjust. Yes, I do believe it's theft.我觉得这不公平 是的,我相信这是偷窃。
355But perhaps it is necessary但也许有必要
356To condone that theft.为了宽恕那起盗窃案
357But it's theft.却作是盗.
358Yes.
359Why is it theft?为什么是偷窃?
360Joe.
361Because...因为...
362Why is it like your collection of skateboards?为什么就像你收集的滑板?
363It's theft because这是盗窃,因为
364At least in my opinion至少我认为
365And by the libertarian opinion和自由主义者的意见
366He earned that money fairly他赚的钱是公平的
367And it belongs to him.它属于他
368So to take it from him is by definition theft.所以,从他那里夺走它 顾名思义,是盗窃。
369Alright, let's see if there's...好吧,让我们看看是否有...
370Who wants to reply to Joe?谁想回复乔?
371Yes, go ahead.说吧
372I don't think this is necessarily a case我觉得这不一定是案子
373In which you have 99 skateboards里面有99块滑板
374And the government...还有政府...
375Or you have 100 skateboards或者你有100块滑板
376And the government is taking 99 of them.并且政府要带走其中的99个.
377It's like you have more skateboards就像你有更多的滑板一样
378Than there are days in a year比一年有几天的时间
379You have more skateboards你还有更多的滑板
380Than you're going to be able to use比你能够使用
381In your entire lifetime在你整个一生中
382And the government is taking part of those.政府也参与其中
383And I think that if you're operating in a society我认为如果你在社会中运作
384In which the government doesn't redistribute wealth政府不重新分配财富
385That that allows for people to amass so much wealth让人民聚集这么多财富
386That people who haven't started from this very...那些还没开始的人...
387The equal footing in our hypothetical situation我们假设中的平等地位
388That doesn't exist in our real society这在我们真正的社会中并不存在
389Get undercut for the rest of their lives.一辈子都被割伤
390So you're worried that if there isn't some degree of redistribution所以你担心如果没有某种程度的再分配
391If some are left at the bottom如果有些留在底部的话
392There will be no genuine equality of opportunity.不存在真正的机会平等。
393Alright?好吗?
394The idea that taxation is theft税收是偷窃的想法
395Nozick takes that point one step further诺兹克更进一步
396He agrees that it's theft他同意这是偷窃
397He's more demanding than Joe.比乔更苛求.
398Joe says it is theft祖说是偷窃
399Maybe in an extreme case it's justified也许在极端情况下是有理由的
400Maybe a parent is justified in stealing a loaf of bread也许父母偷面包有道理
401To feed his or her hungry family养活饥饿的家庭
402So Joe is a...乔是...
403What would you call yourself?你会怎么称呼自己?
404A compassionate quasi-libertarian?一个富有同情心的准文学家?
405Nozick says, if you think about itNozick说,如果你考虑一下
406Taxation amounts to the taking of earnings税收等于收入
407In other words, it means taking the fruits of my labor换句话说,它意味着夺走我劳动的成果
408But if the state has the right to take my earnings但是如果国家有权拿走我的收入
409Or the fruits of my labor或是我劳动的成果
410Isn't that morally the same道德上不是一样吗?
411As according to the state照州话
412The right to claim a portion of my labor?有权要求我的一部分劳动?
413So, taxation actually所以,税收实际上
414Is morally equivalent在道德上是相当的
415To forced labor强迫劳动
416Because forced labor因为强迫劳动
417Involves the taking of my leisure, my time, my efforts包括我的闲暇,我的时间,我的努力
418Just as taxation takes the earnings就像税收占用了收入一样
419That I makeи暗
420With my labor用我的劳动
421And so, for Nozick所以,诺兹克
422And for the libertarians对自由主义者来说
423Taxation for redistribution is theft, as Joe says重新分配税就是偷窃,就像乔说的
424But not only theft不只是偷窃
425Theft is morally equivalent偷窃在道德上是相当的
426To laying claim to certain hours要求某些时间
427Of a person's life一个人的生活
428And labor劳动
429So it's morally equivalent to forced labor所以在道德上相当于强迫劳动
430If the state has a right to claim the fruits of my labor如果国家有权要求我的工作成果
431That implies that it really has an entitlement这意味着它真的有权利
432To my labor itself为了我的劳动
433And what is forced labor?什么是强制劳动?
434Forced labor, Nozick points out强迫劳动,诺兹克指出
435Is what? Is slavery是吗? 是奴隶制
436Because if I don't have the right, the sole right因为如果我没有权利,唯一的权利
437To my own labor为了自己的劳动
438Then礛
439That's really to say that the government or the political community也就是说政府或政治界
440Is a part owner in me我是一个主人
441And what does it mean for the state to be a part owner in me?州里成为我的主人是什么意思?
442If you think about it, it means如果你考虑一下,这意味着
443That I'm a slave我是一个奴隶
444That I don't own myself说我并不拥有自己
445So what this line of reasoning brings us to所以,这条推理线 带给我们
446Is the fundamental principle根本原则
447That underlies the libertarian case for rights这是自由主义权利的理由
448What is that principle?这一原则是什么?
449It's the idea that I own myself这是我自己的想法
450It's the idea of self-possession这是自负的想法
451If you want to take rights seriously如果你想认真对待权利
452If you don't want to just regard people as collections of preferences如果你不想把人们当作喜好的收藏
453The fundamental moral idea基本道德观念
454To which you will be led你将被引导到那里
455Is the idea that we are the owners or the proprietors of our own person是认为我们是自己的主人还是主人
456And that's why utilitarianism goes wrong所以功利主义就错了
457And that's why it's wrong to yank the organs from that healthy patient所以把病人的器官挖出来是错误的
458You're acting as if that patient belongs to you or to the community你表现得好像那个病人属于你或社区
459But we belong to ourselves但我们属于自己
460And that's the same reason这也是同样的原因
461That it's wrong to make laws to protect us from ourselves制定法律来保护我们自己是错误的
462Or to tell us how to live或者告诉我们如何生活
463To tell us what virtues we should be governed by告诉我们我们应该遵循什么美德
464And that's also why it's wrong这也是为什么它是错误的
465To tax the rich, to help the poor向富人征税,帮助穷人
466Even for good causes, even to help those who are displaced by the Hurricane Katrina即使有好的理由,甚至帮助那些因卡特里娜飓风而流离失所的人
467Ask them to give charity叫他们施舍
468But if you tax them, it's like forcing them to labor但是,如果你向他们征税, 这就像强迫他们劳动
469Could you tell Michael Jordan he has to skip the next week's games你能告诉迈克尔乔丹 他必须跳过下周的比赛吗?
470And go down to help the people displaced by Hurricane Katrina?去帮助因卡特里娜飓风而流离失所的人?
471More or less the same差不多一样
472So the stakes are very high所以赌注很高
473So far we've heard some objections to the libertarian argument到目前为止,我们听到一些反对 自由主义的论点
474But if you want to reject it但如果你想拒绝
475You have to break into this chain of reasoning, which goes你必须突破这个推理链,它去
476Taking my earnings is like taking my labor收我的钱就像收我的钱
477But taking my labor is making me a slave但是,拿我的劳动 使我成为奴隶
478And if you disagree with that如果你不同意的话
479You must believe in the principle of self-possession你必须相信自负原则
480Those who disagree, gather your objections不同意的人,请收集你的反对意见
481And we'll begin with them next time我们下次从他们开始
482Anyone like to take up that point? Yes?有人愿意接受吗? 是吗?
483I feel like when you live in a society, you give up that right我觉得当你生活在一个社会, 你放弃的权利
484I mean, technically, if I want to personally go out and kill someone我的意思是,从技术上讲,如果我想亲自出去杀人的话
485Because they offend me, that is self-possession因为他们冒犯我,那是自负
486Because I live in a society, I cannot do that因为我生活在一个社会,我不能这样做
487Victoria, are you questioning the fundamental premise of self-possession?Victoria 你在质疑自我占有的基本前提吗?
488Yes
489I think that you don't really have self-possession我觉得你没有真正的自负
490If you choose to live in a society如果你选择生活在一个社会
491Because you cannot just discount the people around you因为你不能轻视身边的人
492We were talking last time about libertarianism我们上次谈的是自由主义
493I want to go back to the arguments for and against the redistribution of income我想回到支持和反对收入再分配的论点
494But before we do that但是在我们这样做之前
495Just one word about the minimal state只说一个字 关于最低状态
496Milton Friedman, a libertarian economist米尔顿·弗里德曼,自由主义经济学家
497He points out that many of the functions that we take for granted他指出,我们认为许多职能是理所当然的。
498As properly belonging to government, don't属于政府,不要
499They are paternalist他们是家长
500One example he gives is social security他举的一个例子是社会保障
501He says it's a good idea他说这是个好主意
502For people to save for their retirement为了人们的退休储蓄
503During their earning years收入年限
504But it's wrong但这是不对的
505It's a violation of people's liberty这是对人民自由的侵犯
506For the government to force everyone政府强迫所有人
507Whether they want to or not无论他们是否愿意
508To put aside some earnings today今天把一些收入放在一边
509For the sake of their retirement为了他们的退休
510If people want to take the chance如果人们想冒险
511Or if people want to live big today如果人们想活在今天
512And live a poor retirement过着贫穷的退休生活
513That should be their choice这应该是他们的选择
514They should be free to make those judgements他们应该可以自由作出这些判决
515And take those risks冒这些险
516So even social security所以连社会保障
517Would still be at odds with the minimal state仍然与最低状态不符
518That Milton Friedman argued for米尔顿·弗里德曼为
519It's sometimes thought that有时会想到
520Collective goods like police protection and fire protection警察保护和消防等集体物品
521Will inevitably create the problem of free riders将不可避免地造成自由骑手的问题
522Unless they're publicly provided除非是公开提供的
523But there are ways但有办法
524To prevent free riders防止自由骑手
525There are ways to restrict有办法限制
526Even seemingly collective goods like fire protection即使是像消防这样的集体商品
527I read an article a while back我之前读过一篇文章
528About a private fire company关于一家私人消防公司
529The Salem Fire Corporation in Arkansas阿肯色州的Salem消防公司
530You can sign up with the Salem Fire Corporation你可以和萨利姆消防公司签约
531Pay a yearly subscription fee缴纳年度订阅费
532And if your house catches on fire如果你的房子着火了
533They will come and put out the fire他们会来灭火
534But they won't put out但他们不会扑灭的
535Everybody's fire每个人都有火
536They will only put it out他们只会熄灭
537If it's a fire如果有火的话
538In the home of a subscriber在订户家里
539Or if it starts to spread如果它开始扩散
540And to threaten并威胁
541The home of a subscriber订户的家
542The newspaper article报纸文章
543Told the story of a homeowner讲了房主的故事
544Who had subscribed谁签了
545To this company in the past过去对这家公司
546But failed to renew his subscription但是没有续约
547His house caught on fire他的房子着火了
548The Salem Fire Corporation showed up with its trucks萨利姆消防队的卡车来了
549And watched the house burn看着房子被烧毁
550Just making sure that it didn't spread只是确保它不会扩散
551The fire chief was asked有人问消防队长
552Well, he wasn't exactly the fire chief他又不是消防队长
553I guess he was the CEO我想他就是CEO了,我猜他是CEO
554He was asked有人问他
555How can you stand by with fire equipment你怎能用消防器材
556And allow a person's home to burn?并允许一个人的家燃烧?
557He replied他回答说
558Once we verified there was no danger一旦我们核实 就没有危险
559To a member's property成员的财产
560We had no choice我们别无选择
561But to back off according to our rules但是要按照我们的规矩退缩
562If we responded to all fires如果我们对所有的火灾作出反应
563He said there would be no incentive他说没有奖励
564To subscribe订阅
565The homeowner in this case这案子的房主
566Tried to renew his subscription想续约
567At the scene of the fire在火灾现场
568But the head of the company refused但公司负责人拒绝了
569You can't wreck your car你不能毁了你的车
570He said and then buy insurance他说,然后买保险
571For it later晚点再说吧
572So even public goods因此,即使是公益物
573That we take for granted as being我们视为理所当然
574Within the proper province of government在适当的政府省内
575Can many of them in principle原则上,他们中有许多可以
576Be isolated被隔离
577Made exclusive to those who pay专给那些付钱的人
578That's all to do with这都与
579The question of collective goods集体货物问题
580And the libertarian's自由主义者的
581Injunction against paternalism禁止家长制
582But let's go back now现在回去吧
583To the arguments about关于
584Redistribution重新分配
585Now underlying现在隐藏
586The libertarian's case自由主义者的案子
587For the minimal state起码的状态
588Is a worry about coercion是担心强迫
589But what's wrong with coercion?但强迫有什么问题?
590The libertarian offers自由主义者的提议
591This answer这个答案
592To coerce someone强迫别人
593To use some person利用别人
594For the sake of the general welfare为了一般的福利
595Is wrong because错了,因为
596It calls into question它引起了质疑
597The fundamental fact根本事实
598That we own ourselves我们拥有自己
599The fundamental moral fact基本道德事实
600Of self-possession自有财产
601Or self-ownership或自我拥有
602The libertarian's自由主义者的
603Argument against redistribution反对再分配的论点
604Begins with this fundamental idea从这个基本想法开始
605That we own ourselves我们拥有自己
606Nozick says诺兹克说
607That if狦
608The society as a whole整个社会
609Can go to Bill Gates可以去比尔盖茨
610Or go to Michael Jordan或者去迈克尔乔丹
611And tax away a portion并征收一部分税款
612Of their wealth他们的财富
613What the society is really真正的社会是什么
614Asserting煽动
615Is a collective property是集体财产
616Right in右进
617Bill Gates比尔·盖茨
618Or in Michael Jordan或者在迈克尔・乔丹
619But that violates但是,这违反了
620The fundamental principle基本原则
621That we belong to ourselves我们属于自己
622Now we've already现在,我们已经
623Heard a number of objections听到一些反对意见
624To the libertarian argument到自由主义的论据
625What I would like to do today今天我想做什么就做什么吗?
626Is to give是给
627The libertarians among us我们中间的自由主义者
628A chance to answer the objections有机会回答反对
629That have been raised已经提起了
630And some have been有些已经
631Some have already有些已经
632Identified themselves认得自己
633And have agreed to并已经同意
634Come and make the case来说明一下
635For libertarianism to reply自由主义的回答
636To the objections that have been raised对提出的反对
637So raise your hand举起手来
638If you are among the libertarians如果你们是自由主义者,
639Who's prepared to stand up谁准备站起来
640For the theory对于理论
641And respond to the objections对反对作出回应
642You are琌
643Alex Harris亚历克斯·哈里斯
644Who's been a star谁是明星
645On the web blog在网络博客上
646Alex come here亚历克斯过来
647Stand up站起来
648We'll create a libertarian corner我们会创造一个自由的角落
649Here
650And who else还有谁
651Other libertarians其他自由主义者
652Who will join谁会加入
653What's your name你叫什么来着?
654John约翰
655John Sheffield约翰·谢菲尔德
656Who else wants to join还有谁想加入
657Other brave libertarians其他勇敢的自由主义者
658Who are prepared谁准备好了
659To take on开始吧
660What's your name你叫什么来着?
661Julia Roto朱莉娅·罗托
662Come join us over there到那边来
663Now while the现在,当
664While Team Libertarian自由队
665Julia, John, Alex茱莉亚,约翰,亚历克斯
666While Team Libertarian自由队
667Is gathering over there在那边集合
668Let me just summarize让我总结一下
669The main objections that I've heard我听到的主要反对意见
670In class and on the web site课堂和网站
671Objection number one反对第一
672And here I'll come down to在这里,我会下来
673I want to talk to Team Libertarian over here我想跟自由队谈谈
674So objection number one所以反对第一
675Is that这是
676The poor need the money more穷人更需要钱
677That's an obvious objection这是明显的反对
678A lot more than远不止
679Than do没有
680Bill Gates and Michael Jordan比尔·盖茨和迈克尔·乔丹
681Objection number two二号异议
682It's not really slavery to tax这不是真正的奴隶税
683Because因为
684At least in a democratic society至少在一个民主社会
685It's not a slave holder不是奴隶持有者
686It's Congress是国会
687It's a democratic这是一个民主的
688You're smiling Alex already你已经在笑亚历克斯了
689You're confident you can reply to all of these你确信你可以回答所有这些
690So, taxation by consent of the governed因此,经被管辖人同意征税
691Is not coerced不是强迫的
692Third第三届
693Some people have said有人说
694Don't the successful别成功
695Like Gates像盖茨一样
696Success that they repay by paying taxes他们靠交税偿还的成功
697Who wants to respond to the first one谁想回应第一个
698The poor need the money穷人需要钱
699More更多
700John约翰
701The poor need the money more穷人更需要钱
702That's quite obvious很明显
703I could use the money我可以用钱
704I certainly wouldn't mind if Bill Gates gave me a million dollars如果比尔·盖茨给我一百万 我当然不介意
705I'd take a thousand我要一千块
706But at some point但有时
707You have to understand that the benefits你必须明白,好处
708Of redistribution of wealth财富再分配
709Don't justify the initial violation of the property不要为最初的侵犯财产辩解
710Right
711If you look at the argument the poor need the money more如果你看这个争论 穷人更需要钱
712At no point in that argument do you contradict你从不反驳
713The fact that we've extrapolated from我们推断出的事实
714Agreed upon principles商定原则
715That people own themselves人拥有自己
716We've extrapolated that people have property rights我们推断出,人们有财产权
717And so whether or not it would be a good不管这是否是件好事
718Thing or a nice thing东西还是好东西
719Or even a necessary thing for the survival甚至是生存所必需的东西
720Of some people有些人
721We don't see that that justifies the violation of the right我们不认为这能证明 违反权利
722To be logically extrapolated要逻辑推断
723And so that also因此,同样
724There still exists this institution of目前还存在这样一个体制:
725Like individual philanthropy就像个人慈善事业
726Milton Friedman提出这个论点
727Bill Gates can give to charity比尔·盖茨可以给慈善事业
728If he wants to如果他想的话
729But it would still be wrong但还是不对劲
730To coerce him强迫他
731To meet the needs of the poor满足穷人的需要
732Exactly没错
733Are the two of you happy你们俩开心吗?
734With that reply有了这个答复
735Go ahead说吧
736Julie朱丽
737I think I could also add我想我还可以补充
738I guess I could whole add that我想我可以补充一点
739There's a difference between needing something需要的东西是有区别的
740And deserving something值得为我做点什么
741I mean in an ideal society everyone's needs be met我是说在理想的社会中 每个人都需要满足
742But here we're arguing what do we deserve as a society但是我们在这里争论 我们作为一个社会应该得到什么
743And the poor还有穷人
744Don't deserve不值得这样
745Don't deserve the benefits不值得得到好处
746That would flow from taxing Michael这会从对迈克尔的征税中产生
747Jordan to help them约旦帮他们
748Based on what we've come up with here根据我们想出来的
749I don't think you deserve我不认为你值得
750Something like that差不多是这样
751Let me push you a little bit on that让我推你一点
752The victims of Hurricane Katrina卡特里娜飓风的受害者
753Are in进入
754Desperate need of help急需帮助
755Would you say that你会说
756They don't deserve他们不值得
757Help帮助
758That would come from那会来自
759The federal government through taxation联邦政府通过征税
760Okay还好
761That's a difficult question这个问题很难解决
762I think this is a case where they need help我觉得这是他们需要帮助的案子
763Not deserve it不值得这样
764I think again if you hit a certain level of我又想如果你打到某个程度
765Requirements to reach sustenance达到供养的要求
766You're going to need help你需要帮助
767Like if you don't have food or a place to live就像你没有食物或住的地方
768That's a case of need这是需要的
769So need is one thing and desert is another所以需求是一回事 沙漠是另一回事
770Exactly没错
771Alright罢
772Who would like to reply谁想回答
773Yes
774Going back to the first point回到第一点
775That he made about the property rights他做的关于财产权
776Of the individual个人
777The property rights are established and enforced by the财产权由法院确定并强制执行。
778Government which is现任政府
779A democratic government民主政府
780And we have representatives我们有代表
781When first those rights当这些权利开始
782If you live in a society that operates under those如果你生活在一个社会 运作在这些,
783Rules then it should be规则应该是这样
784Up to the government升为政府
785To decide决定
786How怎么样
787Those resources that come out through这些资源通过
788Taxation are distributed because税收分配的原因是:
789It is through the consent of the government这是通过政府的同意
790So you don't have to live in that society where这么说你不必住在那个社会
791That operates这样就可以了
792Alright good and tell me your name好吧,好,告诉我你的名字
793Raul劳尔
794Actually Raul is invoking其实劳尔正在援引
795Point number two第二点
796If the taxation is by the consent如果税务是经同意的
797Of the governed被管理者中
798It's not coerced不是强迫的
799It's legitimate这是正当的
800Bill Gates and Michael Jordan比尔·盖茨和迈克尔·乔丹
801Are citizens of the United States美国公民
802They get to vote for congress他们可以投票给国会
803They get to vote他们可以投票
804Alright罢
805Who would like to take that one on谁愿意接受这个
806John约翰
807Basically what the libertarians基本上什么是自由主义者
808Are objecting to反对
809In this case is the middle 80 percent在这种情况下,中间80%
810Deciding what the top 10 percent are doing for the bottom决定前10%为底部做什么
81110%
812Wait John等等,约翰
813Majority, don't you believe in democracy多数,你不相信民主
814Well right but at some point不错,但有时
815I mean you say 80 percent, 10 percent我的意思是你说80%,10%
816Majority, majority rule is what多数,多数规则是什么
817Majority多数
818Democracy, aren't you for democracy民主,你不赞成民主吗?
819Yes I'm for democracy but是的,我赞成民主,但是
820Hang on, hang on, hang on坚持住,坚持住,坚持住
821Democracy and mob rule aren't the same thing民主和暴徒统治不一样
822Mob rule移动规则
823Exactly没错
824In an open society you have a recourse to address that在一个开放的社会中,你有一个解决
825Through your representatives通过你们的代表
826And if the majority of the consent如果大多数同意
827Of those who are governed doesn't agree with you那些被统治的人不认同你
828Then you know那你们知道
829You're choosing to live in a society你选择生活在一个社会中
830And you have to operate under what你必须在什么下操作
831The majority of society concludes社会大多数人认为:
832Alright Alex on democracy好吧,亚历克斯关于民主
833Democracy, what about that民主,那怎么办?
834The fact that I have我拥有的事实
835Won you know 500,000th of a vote元,你知道50万票
836For one representative in congress代表大会一名代表
837Is not the same thing as my跟我不一样
838Having the ability to decide for myself拥有自己决定的能力
839How to use my property如何利用我的财产
840Rights, I'm a drop对,我是滴水
841In the bucket在水桶内
842And you know well笵
843You might lose the vote你可能会失去选票
844Exactly and I will, I mean I don't have是的,我会的,我的意思是,我没有
845The decision right now whether or not to pay taxes现在决定是否交税
846If I don't I get locked in jail如果我不这样做,我会被关进监狱
847Or they tell me to get out of the country或者他们叫我离开这个国家
848But Alex, Alex但亚历克斯,亚历克斯
849Let me make让我来
850A small case for democracy一个小小的民主案例
851See what you would say看你会说什么
852Why can't you为什么你不能
853We live in a democratic society我们生活在民主社会中
854With freedom of speech有言论自由
855Why can't you take to the hustings你为什么不可以去胡思乱想
856Persuade your让你的
857Fellow citizens that taxation征税的公民
858Is unjust and try to get是不公正的,试图得到
859A majority多数
860I don't think that people should be我不认为人们应该
861Should have to convince 280 million others应该说服其他2.8亿
862Simply in order to exercise只是为了锻炼
863Their own rights in order to not have their他们自己的权利不享有
864Self ownership violated侵犯自我所有权
865I think people should be able to do that without having to convince我认为人们应该能够做到这一点 而无需说服
866280 million people2.8亿人口
867Does that mean you're against democracy as a whole这是否意味着你反对整个民主
868No, I just believe in a very不,我只是相信一个非常
869Limited form of democracy whereby we have我们拥有的有限形式的民主
870A constitution that severely limits严重限制宪法
871The scope of what decisions何种决定的范围
872Can be made democratically可以民主地实现
873Alright so you're saying that democracy is好吧,所以你说民主是
874A fine except where fundamental罚款,但基本罚款除外
875Rights are involved涉及权利
876And还有
877I think you could win if you're going on the我想你可以赢 如果你要去
878Hustings 让我再加一个元素
879To the argument you might make为了你可能提出的论点
880Maybe you could say也许你可以说
881Put aside the economic debates把经济辩论放在一边
882Taxation税务
883Suppose the individual right to religious假设个人对宗教的权利
884Liberty were at stake自由受到威胁
885Then Alex you could say然后亚历克斯你可以说
886On the hustings在胡思乱想
887Surely you would all agree你们一定会同意的
888That we shouldn't put the right to individual我们不应该把 个人的权利
889Liberty up to a vote直至表决的自由
890Yeah that's exactly right没错
891And that's why这就是为什么
892We have constitutional amendments我们有宪法修正案
893讽и琵и constitution跑硂或螟
894So you would say that the所以你会说
895Right to private property私人财产权
896The right of Michael Jordan迈克尔·约旦的权利
897To keep all the money he makes为了保住他赚的钱
898At least to protect it from至少是为了保护它
899Redistribution is the重新分配是
900Same kind of right with同样的正确
901The same kind of weight同样的重量
902As the right to freedom of speech作为言论自由的权利
903The right to religious liberty宗教自由权
904Rights that should trumpB. 应超越的权利
905What the majority wants多数人想要的
906Absolutely the reason why we have a right绝对是我们有权的理由
907To free speech is because we have a right言论自由是因为我们有权利
908To own ourselves to exercise自我锻炼
909Our voice in any way无论如何,我们的声音
910That we choose我们选择
911Alright so there we好吧,这样吧
912Who would like to respond to that argument谁愿意回答这个论点?
913About关于
914Democracy being民主的实现
915Okay up there stand up好,站起来
916I think comparing religion我认为比较宗教
917Economics it's not the same thing经济是不一样的
918The reason why Bill Gates was able to make比尔·盖茨之所以能够
919So much money is because we live in an economically这么多钱是因为我们生活在经济上
920And socially stable社会稳定
921Society and if the government社会,如果政府
922Didn't provide for the poorest 10%不给最穷的人10%
923As you say through就像你说的
924Taxation then we would need more税收,那么我们需要更多
925Money for police to prevent crime警察预防犯罪的钱
926And so either way like所以不管怎么样
927There would be more taxes taken away to provide将会有更多的税收被拿走提供
928What you guys call like the你们怎么称呼的?
929Necessary things that the需要的东西
930Government provides what's your name政府提供你的名字
931Anna甊
932Anna let me ask you this安娜让我问你
933Why is the fundamental为什么根本的
934Right to religious liberty宗教自由权
935Different不同
936From
937The right Alex asserts亚历克斯声称的权利
938As a fundamental right作为一项基本权利
939To private property私人财产
940And to keep what I earn为了保持我挣的钱
941What's the difference between the two两者有什么区别
942Because you wouldn't have因为你不会
943You wouldn't be able to你不会
944Make money you wouldn't be able to own赚钱是不能拥有的
945Property if there wasn't a socially没有社会化的地产
946Like if society wasn't stable就像社会不稳定一样
947And that's completely different from这完全不同于
948Religion that's like something personal宗教就像个人的东西
949Something that you can practice on your own in your own你可以自己练习的东西
950Home where at like me像我一样的家
951Practicing my religion is not going to affect练习我的宗教不会影响
952The next person but if I'm poor下一个人,但如果我贫穷
953And I'm desperate我绝望
954Like I might commit a crime to feed my就像我犯罪是为了养活我
955Family and that can affect others家庭以及可能影响他人的家庭
956Okay good thank you好的,谢谢
957Would it be wrong会不对吗?
958For someone to steal为了有人偷东西
959A loaf of bread一块面包
960To feed要喂养
961His starving family is that wrong他家饿得不行
962I believe that it is我相信这是
963Let's take a quick poll of the我们来快速调查一下
964Three of you it is you say yes你们三个是说好
965It is wrong it violates property这是错的,它侵犯财产
966Rights it's wrong even to权利是错的,甚至
967Save a starving family I mean拯救一个饥饿的家庭
968There are definitely other ways肯定还有别的办法
969Around that and by justifying绕着那条路 说出理由
970No hang on hang on before之前不许挂断
971You laugh at me你笑话我
972That didn't work没用的
973Before在此之前
974Justifying the说明
975Act of stealing偷窃行为
976You have to look at你一定要看一看,看一看
977Violating the right that we've already agreed侵犯我们已经同意的权利
978Exists the right of self possession拥有拥有权
979And the possession of I mean我的意思是拥有
980Your own things we agree on property你的东西,我们同意的财产
981Right we agree it's stealing so property对,我们同意它偷东西
982Right is not the issue all right but问题不在于权利
983So why is it wrong to steal even那为什么偷东西是错的
984To feed your starving family sort of为了养活你饿死的家人
985The original argument that I made in the very我最初提出的论点
986In the very first question you asked the在你问的第一个问题
987Benefits of an action don't行动的好处不是
988Justify don't make说明不做
989The action just do you want行动只是你想要的
990What would you say Julia is it all right朱莉娅会怎么说?
991To steal a loaf of bread to偷面包给
992Feed a starving family or to steal a养家糊口 还是偷东西
993Drug that your your child你的孩子用药
994Needs to to survive生存需要
995I think I'm okay with that我觉得我不介意
996Honestly even from a libertarian老实说,即使是从自由主义者那里
997Standpoint I think that okay站点,我想可以
998Saying that you can just take money arbitrarily说你可以随便收钱
999From people who have a lot to to go to从有很多事情要处理的人那里
1000This pool of people who need it but you这群人需要它,但你
1001Have an individual who's acting on their own有个人在独立行动
1002Behalf to kind of say说到一半
1003Themselves I mean I think you said they我意思是你说过
1004From the idea like self possession从想法 像自我占有
1005They're also in charge of protecting themselves他们也负责保护自己
1006And keeping themselves alive so让自己活下来
1007Therefore even from a libertarian standpoint that因此,即使从自由主义的观点来看
1008Might be okay all right that's good可能没事,很好
1009That's good all right what about what about很好,好吧,怎么样?
1010Number three up here isn't it三号在上面不是么?
1011The case that the案件涉及:
1012Successful the wealthy有钱人成功
1013Oh a debt they didn't do that all哦,欠他们的人情,他们没做这些
1014By themselves they had to cooperate with他们自己必须和
1015Other people that they其他人,他们
1016They owe a debt to他们欠我一笔债
1017Society and that that's expressed in社会,这表现在
1018Taxation you want to take that on税收,你想承担
1019Okay this one I believe好吧,这个我相信
1020That there is not a debt to society社会没有债务
1021In the sense that how did these people become wealthy也就是说,这些人是如何变得富有的
1022They did something that society valued他们做了社会珍视的事
1023Highly think that society has already强烈地认为社会已经
1024Been giving been providing一直在提供
1025For them if anything给他们,如果有什么
1026I think it's everything's canceled out我觉得一切都取消了
1027They provided a service to society他们为社会提供服务
1028And society responded by社会的反应是
1029Somehow they got their wealth不知何故他们得到了他们的财富
1030So be concrete in the case of Michael迈克尔的事要具体点
1031Jordan some约旦一些
1032I mean to illustrate your我的意思是要说明你
1033Point there were people who helped指有人帮忙
1034You make the money the teammates你赚了队友的钱
1035The coach people教练们
1036Who taught him how to play谁教他打球的
1037But they you're saying but they've all been但是,他们说,但是他们一直
1038Paid for their services支付服务费
1039Exactly and society derived完全正确,社会产生
1040A lot of benefit and pleasure from watching Michael看着迈克尔有很多好处和乐趣
1041Jordan play I think that乔丹弹,我想
1042That's how he paid his debt to society他就是这样还债的
1043All right good who would好吧,谁愿意
1044Anyone like to take up that point谁都喜欢这样
1045Yes
1046I think that there's a problem我觉得有问题
1047Here with that we're assuming在这里,我们假设
1048That a person has self possession when一个人拥有自己的财产
1049They live in a society I feel他们生活在一个我感受到的社会里
1050Like when you live in a society you give up就像你生活在一个社会,你放弃了
1051That right I mean technically if I没错,我的意思是技术上,如果我
1052Want to personally go out and kill someone想亲自出去杀人
1053Because they offend me that is self possession因为他们冒犯我,这是自我占有
1054Because I live in a society I cannot因为我生活在一个社会 我不能
1055Do that I think it's kind of做,我认为这是一种
1056Equivalent to say because I have more可以说,因为我有更多的
1057Money I have resources that can save people's钱我有钱救人
1058Lives is it not okay活着是不好的
1059For the government to take that from me政府要从我这里夺走
1060Self possession only to a certain extent because仅在某种程度上,由于
1061I'm living in a society where I have to take我生活在一个我必须接受的社会
1062Account of the people around me so are you我身边的人,你也是
1063Questioned what's your name Victoria问起你叫维多利亚
1064Victoria are you questioning维多莉亚在审问你
1065The fundamental基本内容
1066Premise of self possession yes自我拥有的前提 是
1067I think that you don't我想你不会
1068Really have self possession if you choose to如果你愿意的话,真的有自己的财产
1069Live in a society because you cannot just生活在一个社会 因为你不能只是
1070Discount the people around you给周围的人打折
1071Alright I want to quickly get the response好,我要尽快得到答复
1072Of员额
1073The libertarian team自由队
1074To the last point到最后一点
1075The last point最后一点
1076Builds on
1077Well maybe it builds on Victoria's suggestion也许它基于维多利亚的建议
1078That we don't own ourselves我们不拥有自己
1079Because it says因为它说
1080That Bill Gates is wealthy比尔·盖茨很有钱
1081That Michael Jordan迈克尔・乔丹
1082Makes a huge income赚大钱
1083Isn't holy岂不是神圣
1084Their own doing他们自己做的
1085It's the product of a lot of luck这是运气的产物
1086And so we can't claim that they所以我们不能声称他们
1087Morally deserve道德应得
1088All the money they make who wants to reply他们赚的钱谁都想回答
1089To that Alex敬亚历克斯
1090You certainly couldn't make the case that你当然不能这样
1091It is not their wealth不是他们的财富
1092Is not appropriate to the goodness in their hearts不适合他们心中的善良
1093But that's not really the但这不是真正的
1094Morally relevant issue the point is that与道德相关的问题是:
1095They have received what they have他们得到了他们所拥有的
1096Through the free exchange of people who have通过自由交流拥有
1097Given them their holdings有了他们的财产
1098Usually in exchange for providing通常作为提供交换
1099Some other service其他服务
1100I want to try to sum up what we've我想总结一下我们的情况
1101Learned from this discussion but first从这次讨论中吸取了教训,但首先
1102Let's thank John, Alex, and让我们感谢约翰,亚历克斯,和
1103Julia for a really wonderful job朱莉娅的工作很出色
1104Toward the end of the即将结束
1105Discussion just now刚才的讨论
1106Victoria challenged维多利亚受到挑战
1107The premise of this line of这条线的前提
1108Reasoning this libertarian logic解释这种自由主义逻辑
1109Maybe she suggested也许她建议
1110We don't own ourselves我们不是自己人
1111After all毕竟
1112If you reject如果你拒绝
1113The libertarian自由主义者
1114Case against redistribution反对重新分配的理由
1115There would seem to be似乎还有
1116An incentive奖励
1117To break into闯入
1118The libertarian line of reasoning自由主义推理线
1119At the earliest最早
1120At the most modest最谦虚的时候
1121Level职等
1122Which is why a lot of people这就是为什么很多人
1123Disputed that taxation对征税提出异议
1124Is morally equivalent to forced道德上相当于强迫
1125Labor劳工
1126But what about但是,怎么样
1127The big claim大索赔
1128The premise, the big idea前提,大点子
1129Underlying the libertarian argument自由主义论点的基础
1130Is it true that we own是真的吗?
1131Ourselves我们自己
1132Or can we do或者我们可以做
1133Without that idea没有这个想法
1134And still avoid还是要避开
1135What libertarians want自由主义者想要什么
1136To avoid为了避免
1137Creating a society建立一个社会
1138And an account of justice和正义的叙述
1139Where some people在那里有些人
1140Can be可能会
1141Just used刚刚用过
1142For the sake为了这个
1143Of other people's welfare其他人的福利
1144Or even for the sake甚至为了这个
1145Of the general good总的好
1146Libertarians combat自由主义者战斗
1147The utilitarian idea功利主义思想
1148Of using people利用别人
1149As means作为手段
1150For the collective happiness为了集体幸福
1151By saying the way to put说出办法
1152A stop to that utilitarian logic停止那个实用主义逻辑
1153Of using persons使用人员
1154Is to resort是要诉诸
1155To the intuitively powerful idea直觉强大的想法
1156That we are我们是
1157The proprietors of our own我们的主人
1158Person个人
1159That's Alex这是亚历克斯
1160And Julia and John还有茱莉亚和约翰
1161And Robert Nozick还有罗伯特·诺兹克
1162What are the consequences后果如何?
1163For a theory of justice为了正义的理论
1164And an account of rights和权利说明
1165Of calling into question质疑
1166The idea of self possession自我占有的概念
1167Does it mean that we're back这是否意味着我们回来了
1168To utilitarianism敬功利主义
1169And using people利用别人
1170And aggregating preferences合并喜好
1171And pushing the fat man off the bridge把胖子推下桥
1172Nozick doesn't诺兹克不会的
1173Himself他本人
1174Fully develop the idea of self possession充分发展自我占有的思想
1175He borrows it from an earlier他以前借来的
1176Philosopher John Locke哲学家约翰·洛克
1177John Locke约翰·洛克
1178Accounted已入账
1179For the rise为了崛起
1180Of private property私人财产
1181From the state of nature从自然状态
1182By a chain of reasoning由一连串的推理
1183Very similar to the one that Nozick和诺兹克的很相似
1184And the libertarians use自由主义者使用
1185John Locke said约翰·洛克说
1186Private property私有财产
1187Private property arises私人财产产生
1188Because因为
1189When we mix our labor当我们混合劳动时
1190With things东西
1191Unowned things无主的东西
1192We come to acquire a property我们是来买地的
1193Right in those things就是这样
1194And the reason还有原因
1195The reason is that we own原因是我们拥有
1196Our own labor我们的劳动
1197And the reason for that还有原因
1198We are the proprietors我们是业主
1199The owners of our own person我们自己的主人
1200And so in order to examine所以,为了检查
1201The moral force道德力量
1202Of the libertarian claim自由主义主张
1203That we own ourselves我们拥有自己
1204We need to turn我们要转身
1205To the English political对英国政治
1206Philosopher John Locke哲学家约翰·洛克
1207And examine his account检查他的账户
1208Of private property私人财产
1209And self ownership自我拥有
1210And that's what we'll do next time我们下次就这么做
1211Don't miss the chance to interact online不要错过网上交流的机会
1212With other viewers of Justice与正义的其他观众
1213Join the conversation加入对话
1214Take a pop quiz来个流行测验
1215Watch lectures you've missed看你错过的课
1216And learn a lot more学更多
1217访问justiceharvard.org
1218It's the right thing to do这是正确的事情
1219Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
1220Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1222 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P5 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p05 4. 4.这是我的土地 (P5)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:06Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:31Today we turn to John Locke.今天我们找约翰洛克
0:39On the face of it, Locke is a powerful ally of the libertarian.表面上看,洛克是自由主义者的强大盟友.
0:47First, he believes, as libertarians today maintain,首先,他相信, 今天自由主义者认为,
0:54that there are certain fundamental individual rights某些基本的个人权利
0:59that are so important that no government,如此重要,以至于没有政府,
1:03even a representative government, even a democratically elected government,甚至一个有代表性的政府, 甚至一个民主选举的政府,
1:08can override them.能够覆盖它们。
1:12Not only that, he believes that those fundamental rights include不仅如此,他认为这些基本权利包括:
展开字幕全文(645 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3Today we turn to John Locke.今天我们找约翰洛克
4On the face of it, Locke is a powerful ally of the libertarian.表面上看,洛克是自由主义者的强大盟友.
5First, he believes, as libertarians today maintain,首先,他相信, 今天自由主义者认为,
6that there are certain fundamental individual rights某些基本的个人权利
7that are so important that no government,如此重要,以至于没有政府,
8even a representative government, even a democratically elected government,甚至一个有代表性的政府, 甚至一个民主选举的政府,
9can override them.能够覆盖它们。
10Not only that, he believes that those fundamental rights include不仅如此,他认为这些基本权利包括:
11a natural right to life, liberty and property.生命、自由和财产的自然权利。
12And, furthermore, he argues that the right to property此外,他主张财产权
13is not just the creation of government or of law.不仅仅是建立政府或法律。
14The right to property is a natural right财产权是一项自然权利
15in the sense that it is pre-political.也就是说,这是政治性的。
16It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings,这是个人作为人的权利,
17even before government comes on the scene,甚至在政府出现之前
18even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws甚至在议会和立法机构颁布法律之前
19to define rights and to enforce them.界定权利并执行这些权利。
20Locke says in order to think about what it means to have a natural right,洛克说为了思考拥有自然权利的意义
21we have to imagine the way things are before government, before law.我们必须想象政府面前,法律面前的状态。
22And that's what Locke means by the state of nature.而这就是洛克根据自然状态的含义.
23He says the state of nature is a state of liberty.他说自然状态是自由状态.
24Human beings are free and equal beings.人类是自由平等的。
25There is no natural hierarchy.没有自然的等级。
26It's not the case that some people are born to be kings有些人生来就是为了当国王
27and others are born to be serfs.其他人生来就是农奴
28We are free and equal in the state of nature.我们在自然状态下是自由和平等的。
29And yet, he makes the point that there's a difference然而,他却说,有区别
30between a state of liberty and a state of license.自由状态和许可证状态之间。
31And the reason is that even in the state of nature,原因是即使在自然状态下
32there is a kind of law.有一种法律。
33It's not the kind of law that legislatures enact.这不是立法机关颁布的法律.
34It's a law of nature.谓自然之法.
35And this law of nature constrains what we can do,而这种自然法则制约了我们所能做的事情,
36even though we're free, even though we're in the state of nature.尽管我们自由了 尽管我们处于自然状态
37Well, what are the constraints?那么,是什么限制?
38The only constraint given by the law of nature is that the rights we have,自然法则给予的唯一限制是,我们拥有的权利,
39the natural rights we have, we can't give up,我们拥有的自然权利 我们不能放弃
40nor can we take them from somebody else.我们也不能把他们从别人那里带走。
41Under the law of nature, I'm not free to take somebody else's life根据自然法则,我不能随意夺走别人的生命
42or liberty or property,或自由或财产,
43nor am I free to take my own life or liberty or property.我也不能自由地夺走自己的生命或自由或财产。
44Even though I'm free, I'm not free to violate the law of nature.虽自在无量无边无量无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边
45I'm not free to take my own life or to sell myself into slavery我无法自由夺去自己的生命 也无法出卖自己成为奴隶
46or to give to somebody else arbitrary absolute power over me.或者把绝对的权力交给别人
47So where does this constraint,那么,这种限制在哪里,
48you may think it's a fairly minimal constraint,你可能认为这是一个很小的制约,
49but where does it come from?但从哪里来的?
50Well, Locke tells us where it comes from.洛克告诉我们它从哪里来的
51And he gives two answers.他给出了两个答案。
52Here's the first answer.这是第一个答案。
53For men, being all the workmanship对男人来说,做所有的工作
54of one omnipotent and infinitely wise maker, namely God,他是全能的、至睿的创造者,
55they are his property,他们是他的财产,
56whose workmanship they are made to last during his,他们的劳动是在他的期间完成的,
57not one another's, pleasure.不是彼此的,快乐。
58So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights所以问题的一个答案是 为什么我不能放弃我的自然权利
59to life, liberty and property is,生命、自由和财产,
60well, they're not strictly speaking yours.严格说来,它们不是你的
61After all, you are the creature of God.毕竟你是上帝的创造者
62God has a bigger property right in us, a prior property right.上帝对我们有更大的财产权利, 一种先前的财产权。
63Now you might say that's an unsatisfying, unconvincing answer,现在你可能说 这是一个不满意, 令人信服的答案,
64at least for those who don't believe in God.至少对不相信上帝的人来说
65What did Locke have to say to them?洛克对他们说了什么?
66Well, here's where Locke appeals to the idea of reason.好吧,这是洛克呼吁理性的想法。
67And this is the idea that if we properly reflect这就是这个想法 如果我们正确反映
68on what it means to be free,自由意味着什么,
69we will be led to the conclusion that freedom我们将得出自由
70can't just be a matter of doing whatever we want.不能只是做我们想做的事
71I think this is what Locke means when he says,我想这是洛克的意思 当他说,
72the state of nature has a law of nature to govern it自然状态有自然法则来支配它
73which obliges everyone, and reason, which is that law,要求每个人 和理性,这是法律,
74teaches mankind who will but consult it教人只以物配主,
75that all being equal and independent,人人平等独立,
76no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.任何人都不应伤害他人的生命、健康、自由或财产。
77This leads to a puzzling paradoxical feature这导致一个令人费解的矛盾特征
78of Locke's account of rights,洛克的权利,
79familiar in one sense but strange in another.一种意义上很熟悉 但另一种意义上很陌生
80It's the idea that our natural rights are unalienable.我们的自然权利不可剥夺
81What does unalienable mean?不可剥夺是什么意思?
82It's not for us to alienate them or to give them up,我们不应该疏远他们或者放弃他们
83to give them away, to trade them away, to sell them.把他们送走 把他们卖掉
84Consider an airline ticket.考虑一张机票。
85Airline tickets are non-transferable,飞机票不可转让,
86or tickets to the Patriots or to the Red Sox.或者去爱国者队或者红袜队
87Non-transferable tickets are unalienable.不可转让车票不可转让.
88I own them in the limited sense that I can use them for myself,我拥有它们 有限意义上,我可以使用它们自己,
89but I can't trade them away.但我不能把它们换掉
90So in one sense, an unalienable right, a non-transferable right,所以从某种意义上说,不可剥夺的权利,不可转让的权利,
91makes something I own less fully mine.使我拥有的东西不那么完全。
92But in another sense of unalienable rights,但在另一个不可剥夺的权利意义上,
93especially where we're thinking about life, liberty and property,尤其是我们想着生活 自由和财产的地方
94for a right to be unalienable makes it more deeply, more profoundly mine.一项不可剥夺的权利使它更深刻、更深刻地属于我。
95And that's Locke's sense of unalienable.这也是洛克不可剥夺的感觉.
96We see it in the American Declaration of Independence.我们在《美国独立宣言》中看到了这一点。
97Thomas Jefferson drew on this idea of Locke.托马斯·杰斐逊借鉴了洛克的这个想法.
98Unalienable rights to life, liberty, and as Jefferson amended Locke,生命、自由的不可剥夺的权利 和杰斐逊修正的洛克,
99to the pursuit of happiness.为了追求幸福
100Unalienable rights.不可剥夺的权利。
101Rights that are so essentially mine基本上属于我的权利
102that even I can't trade them away or give them up.连我也不能交换他们 也不能放弃他们
103So these are the rights we have in the state of nature这就是我们自然状态下的权利
104before there is any government.在政府成立之前
105In the case of life and liberty, I can't take my own life,就生命和自由而言 我无法夺走自己的生命
106I can't sell myself into slavery any more than I can take somebody else's life我不能再把自己出卖为奴隶了 我只能夺走别人的生命
107or take someone else's slave by force.或者用武力夺取别人的奴隶
108But how does that work in the case of property?但是,在财产方面,这有什么作用呢?
109Because it's essential to Locke's case因为这对洛克的案子很重要
110that private property can arise私人财产可能发生
111even before there is any government.甚至在政府成立之前
112How can there be a right to private property怎么会有私有财产权
113even before there is any government?甚至在没有政府之前
114Locke's famous answer comes in Section 27.洛克的著名答案出现在第27节.
115Every man has a property in his own person.每个人都有自己的财产
116This nobody has any right to but himself.只有他自己才有这个权利
117The labor of his body and the work of his hands,他的身体和手的功劳,
118we may say, are properly his.我们可以说,是他的正确。
119So he moves, as the libertarians later would move,所以他动了 自由主义者后来会动
120from the idea that we own ourselves,从我们自己的想法,
121that we have property in our persons,我们拥有我们的财产,
122to the closely connected idea that we own our own labor.与我们拥有自己的劳动力这个密切相关的想法。
123And from that to the further claim从这到进一步的索赔
124that whatever we mix our labor with that is unowned不管我们把工作和工作混在一起
125becomes our property.成为我们的财产。
126Whatever he removes out of the state that nature has provided and left it in,不管他把大自然提供的东西 都从状态中清除出来
127he has mixed his labor with and joined it to something that is his own他把工作和工作混为一谈
128and thereby makes it his property.从而成为他的财产。
129Why?为什么?
130Because the labor is the unquestionable property of the laborer,因为劳工是劳工无可置疑的财产,
131and therefore no one but the laborer can have a right因此,只有劳动者才有权利,
132to what is joined to or mixed with his labor.与他的劳动结合或混合。
133And then he adds this important provision,然后他又增加了这个重要条款,
134at least where there is enough and is good left in common for others.至少在足够和对他人有好处的地方。
135But we not only acquire a property in the fruits of the earth,我们不仅以大地的果实获得财产,
136in the deer that we hunt, in the fish that we catch,我们猎杀的鹿,我们捕捉的鱼,
137but also if we till and plow and enclose the land and grow potatoes,如果我们能耕田 种土豆
138we own not only the potatoes but the land, the earth.我们不仅拥有马铃薯 而且拥有土地 土地
139As much land as a man tills, plants, improves, cultivates,和男人一样多的土地 耕种 改良 耕种
140and can use, the product of so much is his property.并且可以使用, 这么多的产物是他的财产。
141He, by his labor, encloses it from the commons.他以他的劳绩,把它从公道中夺取。
142So the idea that rights are unalienable seems to distance Locke from the libertarian.所以权利不可剥夺的观点似乎让洛克与自由主义者保持距离.
143The libertarian wants to say we have an absolute property right in ourselves自由主义者想说我们自己有绝对的财产权
144and therefore we can do with ourselves whatever we want.因此,我们可以做我们自己想要的。
145Locke is not a sturdy ally for that view.洛克不是那种观点的坚定盟友
146In fact, he says if you take natural rights seriously,事实上,他说如果你认真对待自然权利
147you'll be led to the idea that there are certain constraints你会得到一个想法 有一些限制
148on what we can do with our natural rights,关于我们能做什么 我们的自然权利,
149constraints given either by God or by reason,或因真主或缘故而加以限制,
150reflecting on what it means really to be free思考自由的真正意义
151and really to be free means recognizing that our rights are unalienable.真正自由意味着承认我们的权利不可剥夺。
152So here's the difference between Locke and the libertarians,洛克和自由主义者的区别如下
153but when it comes to Locke's account of private property,但是关于洛克的私人财产
154he begins to look again like a pretty good ally他开始看起来像一个很好的盟友
155because his argument for private property begins with the idea因为他关于私有财产的争论 始于这个想法
156that we are the proprietors of our own person and therefore of our labor我们是我们个人的主人 也因此是我们劳动的主人
157and therefore of the fruits of our labor,和我们劳动的果实,
158including not only the things we gather and hunt in the state of nature,不仅包括我们在自然状态下采集和猎杀的东西,
159but also we acquire property right in the land that we enclose and cultivate and improve.也获得我们土地的产权 土地的封存、耕种和改善
160There are some examples that can bring out the moral intuition有些例子可以说明道德的直觉
161that our labor can take something that is unowned and make it ours,我们的劳动可以拿走一些没有所有权的东西 使之成为我们的
162though sometimes there are disputes about this.虽然有时有争议
163There's a debate among rich countries and developing countries富国和发展中国家之间有争论
164about trade-related intellectual property rights.关于与贸易有关的知识产权。
165It came to a head recently over drug patent laws.药用专利法最近引起了人们的注意
166Western countries, and especially the United States,西方国家,特别是美国,
167say we have a big pharmaceutical industry that develops new drugs.说我们有一个大型制药业 开发新的药物。
168We want all countries in the world to agree to respect the patents.我们希望世界各国同意尊重专利。
169Then there came along the AIDS crisis in South Africa.然后南非的艾滋病危机也随之而来。
170The American AIDS drugs were hugely expensive,美国艾滋病药物非常昂贵,
171far more than could be afforded by most Africans.远远超出了大多数非洲人所能提供的范围。
172The South African government said,南非政府说,
173we are going to begin to buy a generic version of the AIDS antiretroviral drug我们将要开始购买艾滋病抗逆转录病毒药物的通用版本
174at a tiny fraction of the cost because we can find an Indian manufacturing company成本的一小部分 因为我们能找到一家印度制造公司
175that figures out how the thing is made and produces it,找出东西是如何制造和产生的,
176and for a tiny fraction of the cost we can save lives if we don't respect that patent.如果我们不尊重专利 我们就能挽救生命
177Then the American government said,美国政府说,
178no, here's a company that invested research and created this drug.不,这里的一家公司 投资研究并创造了这种药物。
179You can't just start mass producing these drugs without paying a licensing fee.你不能不付许可证费就开始大规模生产这些药物。
180So there was a dispute.所以发生了争执
181The pharmaceutical companies sued the South African government制药公司起诉南非政府
182to try to prevent their buying the cheap, generic, as they saw it,试图阻止他们购买廉价的,通用的, 他们看到了它,
183pirated version of an AIDS drug.盗版的艾滋病药物。
184Eventually the pharmaceutical industry gave in and said, all right, you can do that.最终制药业让步,说,好吧,你可以做到这一点。
185But this dispute about what the rules of property should be,但关于财产规则应该是什么的争议,
186of intellectual property, of drug patenting,知识产权,药物专利,
187in a way is the last frontier of the state of nature because among nations在某种程度上,这是自然状态的最后一线 因为各国之间
188where there is no uniform law of patent rights and property rights,在没有关于专利权和财产权的统一法律的情况下,
189it's up for grabs until by some act of consent, some international agreement,直到某种同意行为 一些国际协议
190people enter into some settled rules.人们会遵守一些既定的规则。
191What about Locke's account of private property那洛克的私人财产账户呢?
192and how it can arise before government and before law comes on the scene?如何在政府和法律出现之前出现?
193Is it successful?成功了吗?
194How many think it's pretty persuasive?有多少人认为这很有说服力?
195Raise your hand.举手曰.
196How many don't find it persuasive?有多少人觉得没有说服力?
197All right, let's hear from some critics.好吧,让我们听听一些批评者。
198What is wrong with Locke's account of how private property can arise without consent?洛克关于私人财产如何不经同意而产生的说法有什么问题?
199Yes.
200Yeah, I think it justifies European cultural norms as far as,是的,我认为它证明 欧洲文化规范,因为,
201when you look at how Native Americans may not have cultivated American land,当你看着美国原住民 如何没有种植美国土地,
202but by their arrival in the Americas,但随着他们来到美洲
203that contributed to the development of America,有助于美国的发展,
204which wouldn't have otherwise necessarily happened then or by that specific group.如果不是那样的话,那就不一定发生 或者是那个特定群体干的
205So you think that this is a defense, this defense of private property in land.所以你认为这是对土地私有财产的辩护
206Yes, because it complicates original acquisition是的,因为它使原始购置变得复杂
207if you only cite the arrival of foreigners that cultivated the land.如果你只引用 外国人的到来 耕种土地。
208I see. And what's your name?原来如此 你叫什么来着?
209Rochelle.罗谢尔
210Rochelle?罗谢尔?
211Yeah.
212Rochelle says this account of how property arisesRochelle说这是财产的产生方式
213would fit what was going on in North America和北美发生的事情相符
214during the time of the European settlement.在欧洲定居期间。
215Do you think, Rochelle, that it's a way of defending the appropriation of the land?罗谢尔,你觉得这是为土地的占有辩护吗?
216Indeed.没错
217Because, I mean, he's also justifying the Glorious Revolution,因为他也为光荣革命辩护
218so I don't think it's inconceivable that he's also justifying colonization as well.所以我不认为他也为殖民辩护是不可思议的。
219Well, it's an interesting historical suggestion,这是一个有趣的历史建议,
220and I think there's a lot to be said for it.我觉得有很多话要说
221What do you think of the validity of his argument, though?你觉得他的论点有效吗?
222Because if you're right that this would justify the taking of land in North America因为如果你是对的,这样就可以在北美夺取土地
223from Native Americans who didn't enclose it,从美洲原住民那里拿来的,他们没有带
224if it's a good argument, then Locke's given us a justification for that.如果这是个好理由 那洛克给我们一个理由
225If it's a bad argument, then Locke's given us a mere rationalization如果这是个糟糕的争论,那么洛克给了我们一个简单的合理化
226that isn't morally defensible.这在道德上是不合理的。
227I'm leaning to the second one.倚于二门.
228You're leaning to the second.汝向二处倾斜.
229But that's my opinion as well.但这也是我的看法。
230All right.好吧,我们走。
231Well, then let's hear if there's a defender of Locke's account of private property,那让我们听听洛克的私人财产账户是否有维护者
232and it would be interesting if they could address Rochelle's worry如果他们能解决罗谢尔的忧虑 那会很有趣
233that this is just a way of defending the appropriation of land这只是一种捍卫土地占有的方法
234by the American colonists from the Native Americans who didn't enclose it.由来自美洲原住民的 殖民者,他们没有把它。
235Is there someone who will defend Locke on that point?有没有人会为此为洛克辩护?
236Are you going to defend Locke?你要为洛克辩护吗?
237You're accusing him of justifying the European basically massacre of the Native Americans,你指控他为欧洲屠杀美洲原住民 辩护
238but who says he's defending it?但谁说他在捍卫它?
239Maybe the European colonization isn't right.也许欧洲殖民是不对的
240Maybe it's the state of war that he talked about in his second treatise.也许是他在第二部论文中谈到的战争状态.
241So the wars between the Native Americans and the colonists, the settlers,美洲原住民和殖民者 定居者之间的战争
242that might have been a state of war that we can only emerge from by an agreement or an act of consent,我们只能通过协议或同意行为才能摆脱战争状态,
243and that's what would have been required.而这正是需要的。
244Yeah, and both sides would have had to agree to it and carry it out and everything.是啊,双方都必须同意 并执行它和一切。
245But what about when, what's your name?但何时,你叫什么名字?
246Dan.丹语.
247But Dan, what about Rochelle says this argument in Section 27 and then in 32 about appropriating land,但Dan Rochelle在27节和32节里 说到占有土地
248that argument, if it's valid, would justify the settlers appropriating that land and excluding others from it.如果这一论点是有效的,那么定居者就有理由侵占这块土地,将其他人排除在外。
249Do you think that argument's a good argument?你觉得这种争论很好吗?
250Well, doesn't it kind of imply that the Native Americans hadn't already done that?难道这不意味着 美洲原住民还没有这样做吗?
251Well, the Native Americans as hunter-gatherers didn't actually enclose land,美洲原住民作为猎人采集者 并没有真正封存土地
252so I think Rochelle is onto something there.所以,我认为罗谢尔 发现的东西在那里。
253But I want to, I'd like to, go ahead, Dan.但我想,我想,继续,丹。
254At the same time, he's saying that just by picking an acorn or taking an apple or maybe killing a buffalo on a certain amount of land,他同时说,只要挑个橡子 或者拿个苹果 或者在一定的土地上杀死一只水牛
255that makes it yours because it's your labor and that's, you know, your labor would enclose that land.因为它是你的劳动,你知道, 你的劳动会吞噬那块土地。
256So by that definition, maybe they didn't have fences around little plots of land but didn't...因此,根据这个定义,也许他们没有围在小块土地周围的栅栏,但是没有...
257They were using it.他们用它。
258Yeah, by Locke's definition.是的,根据洛克的定义。
259So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed the property right in the land itself.所以也许根据洛克的定义,美洲原住民可以要求土地本身的财产权.
260But they just didn't have Locke on their side, as she points out.但他们只是没有洛克站在他们一边,正如她所指出的.
261Okay, that's good.好吧,这是很好的。
262One more defender of Locke.洛克的一位卫士
263Go ahead.来吧。
264Well, I mean, just defend Locke.嗯,我的意思是,只是为洛克辩护。
265He does say that there are some times in which you can't take another person's land.他确实说过,有时你不能夺走别人的土地。
266For example, you can't acquire land that is common property.例如,你不能获取作为共同财产的土地.
267See, people in terms of American Indians, I feel like they already had civilizations themselves and they were using land in common.你看,从美国印第安人的角度来说, 我觉得他们已经有自己的文明, 他们正在使用共同的土地。
268So it's kind of like an analogy to what he was talking about with like the common English property.因此,这有点像一个类比 他正在谈论什么 像共同的英国财产。
269You can't take land that everybody's sharing in common.你不能拿走大家共享的土地
270Oh, that's interesting.哦,这很有趣。
271And also you can't take land unless you make sure that there's as much land as possible left for other people to take as well.另外,除非确保尽可能多的土地留给其他人也占用,否则你不能夺取土地.
272So you have to make sure that whenever you take land or that there's enough left for other people to use.所以,你必须保证,每当你夺取土地或有足够的剩余时间让其他人使用。
273That's just as good as the land that you took.这和你夺走的土地一样好
274That's true.没错
275Locke says there has to be this right to private property in the earth is subject to the provision that there be as much and as good left for others.洛克说,地球上必须有这种对私有财产的权利,但必须遵守为他人留下同样多和同样好的遗产的规定.
276What's your name?你叫什么来着?
277I'm Feng.我叫冯
278So Feng in a way agrees with Dan that maybe there is a claim within Locke's framework that could be developed on behalf of the Native Americans.所以冯在某种程度上同意丹的观点,或许洛克框架内有可以代表美洲原住民开发的主张.
279Here's the further question.更问曰.
280If the right to private property is natural, not conventional,如果私有财产权是自然的,而不是常规的,
281if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government,如果这是我们在同意政府之前 获得的东西
282how does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?这个权利如何限制一个合法政府能做什么?
283In order finally to see whether Locke is an ally or potentially a critic of the libertarian idea,为了最终了解洛克是盟友还是潜在的自由主义思想的批评者,
284of the state, we have to ask what becomes of our natural rights once we enter into society.国家,我们必须问,一旦我们进入社会,我们的自然权利会变成什么。
285We know that the way we enter into society is by consent, by agreement.我们知道,我们进入社会的方式是通过同意和协议。
286To leave the state of nature and to be governed by the majority and by a system of laws, human laws.离开自然状态,受多数人和一套法律,人文法律的支配.
287But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights,但是,这些人权法律只有尊重我们的自然权利才是合法的,
288if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty and property.如果他们尊重我们不可剥夺的生命、自由和财产权利。
289No parliament, no legislature, however democratic its credentials,没有议会,没有立法机构,无论多么民主
290can legitimately violate our natural rights.可以合法地侵犯我们的自然权利。
291This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty and property认为任何法律都不能侵犯我们的生命权、自由和财产权的想法
292would seem to support the idea of a government so limited似乎支持这样一个政府的想法:
293that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.它会高兴的 自由主义者的心脏毕竟。
294But those hearts should not be so quickly gladdened但那些心不应该这么快高兴
295because even though for Locke the law of nature persists once government arrives,因为即使对洛克来说,一旦政府到来,自然法则就一直存在,
296even though Locke insists on limited government,尽管洛克坚持有限政府,
297government limited by the end for which it was created, namely the preservation of property,保护财产,
298even so there's an important sense in which what counts as my property,即便如此 也有一种重要的意义 即什么才是我的财产
299what counts as respecting my life and liberty are for the government to define.重要的是尊重我的生命和自由 由政府来定义
300That there be property, that there be respect for life and liberty,有财产,有尊重生命和自由,
301is what limits government.是政府的限制
302But what counts as respecting my life and respecting my property,但重要的是尊重我的生命 尊重我的财产
303that is for governments to decide and to define.由各国政府决定和界定。
304How can that be?怎么会这样?
305Is Locke contradicting himself or is there an important distinction here?洛克是自相矛盾,还是在这里有重要的区别?
306In order to answer that question which will decide Locke's fit with the libertarian view,为了回答那个决定洛克 与自由主义观点相符的问题
307we need to look closely at what legitimate government looks like for Locke我们需要仔细观察洛克的合法政府是什么样子
308and we turn to that next time.下次再谈这个
309Nikolai, if you didn't think you'd get caught, would you pay your taxes?尼古拉,如果你不认为你会被抓到 你会交税吗?
310I don't think so.亦不见.
311I would rather have a system personally that I could give money to exactly those sections of the government我个人更希望有一个系统 能给政府那些部门钱
312that I support and not just blanket support everything.我不仅支持一切,而且支持一切。
313You'd rather be in the state of nature at least on April 15th.你宁愿在4月15日进入自然状态.
314Last time we began to discuss Locke's state of nature, his account of private property,上次我们讨论洛克的自然状况 他的私人财产
315his theory of legitimate government which is government based on consent and also limited government.他的合法政府理论 也就是基于同意的政府 以及有限的政府
316Locke believes in certain fundamental rights that constrain what government can do洛克相信某些基本权利 限制政府能做什么
317and he believes that those rights are natural rights, not rights that flow from law or from government.他认为,这些权利是自然权利,而不是来自法律或政府的权利。
318And so Locke's great philosophical experiment is to see if he can give an account所以洛克的伟大的哲学实验 就是看看他能不能说出
319of how there could be a right to private property without consent如何不经同意而享有私有财产权
320before government and legislators arrive on the scene to define property.在政府和立法者到达现场界定财产之前。
321That's his question, that's his claim.这是他的问题,这是他的主张。
322There is a way, Locke argues, to create property not just in the things we gather and hunt,洛克认为,有办法创造财产 不仅仅是我们收集的猎物
323but in the land itself, provided there is enough and is good luck for others但是,在土地本身,只要有 足够的,为他人带来好运
324Today I want to turn to the question of consent, which is Locke's second big idea.今天我想谈谈同意问题,这是洛克的第二个大主意。
325Private property is one, consent is the other.私有财产为一,同意为二.
326What is the work of consent?同意有什么作用?
327People here have been invoking the idea of consent since we began, since the first week.自从我们开始,从第一个星期开始,这里的人们就一直在援引同意的想法。
328You remember when we were talking about pushing the fat man off the bridge, someone said,你还记得当时我们谈论 把胖子推下桥, 有人说,
329but he didn't agree to sacrifice himself.但他不同意牺牲自己
330It would be different if he consented.如果他同意,那会不同。
331Or when we were talking about the cabin boy, killing and eating the cabin boy.或者当我们谈论小屋男孩, 杀死和吃小屋男孩。
332Some people said, well, if they had consented to a lottery, it would be different, then it would be alright.有些人说,如果同意彩票,就不一样了,那就没事了。
333So consent has come up a lot, and here in John Locke, we have one of the great philosophers of consent.所以同意已经产生了很多, 在约翰洛克,我们有一个伟大的哲学家同意。
334Consent is an obvious, familiar idea in moral and political philosophy.同意是道德和政治哲学中一个明显和熟悉的想法。
335Locke says that legitimate government is government founded on consent,洛克说合法政府是建立在同意基础上的政府,
336and who nowadays would disagree with him?现在谁会不同意他的意见?
337Sometimes when the ideas of political philosophers are as familiar as Locke's ideas about consent,有时当政治哲学家的想法和洛克关于同意的想法一样熟悉时,
338it's hard to make sense of them, or at least to find them very interesting.很难理解他们, 或者至少找到他们非常有趣。
339But there are some puzzles, some strange features,但有些谜题,有些怪异的特征
340of Locke's account of consent as the basis of legitimate government.洛克同意是合法政府的基础
341And that's what I'd like to take up today.而今欲举此.
342One way of testing the plausibility of Locke's idea of consent,检验洛克同意的想法是否可信的方法之一
343and also probing some of its perplexities,并检讨其中的一部分迷惑;
344is to ask just what a legitimate government founded on consent can do,问一个建立在同意基础上的合法政府能做什么,
345what are its powers according to Locke?洛克认为它有什么能力?
346Well, in order to answer that question, it helps to remember what the state of nature is like.为了回答这个问题,它有助于记住自然状态是什么样子。
347Remember, the state of nature is the condition that we decide to leave,记住 自然状态是我们决定离开的条件
348and that's what gives rise to consent.而这就是引起同意的原因。
349Why not stay there? Why bother with government at all?为什么不呆在那里? 为什么要烦政府?
350Well, what's Locke's answer to that question?那么,洛克的答案是什么?
351He says there are some inconveniences in the state of nature, but what are those inconveniences?他说自然界有些不便,但有什么不便?
352The main inconvenience is that everyone can enforce the law of nature.主要的不便在于每个人都可以执行自然法则.
353Everyone is an enforcer, or what Locke calls the executor, of the state of nature.每个人都是一个执行者, 或洛克所说的执行者, 自然状态。
354And he means executor literally.他的意思是执行者
355If someone violates the law of nature, he's an aggressor, he's beyond reason, and you can punish him.如果有人违反自然法则,他是一个侵略者,他是没有理智的,你可以惩罚他.
356And you don't have to be too careful or fine about gradations of punishment in the state of nature.而自然状态下的处罚等级,也不必过于谨慎或罚款.
357You can kill him. You can certainly kill someone who comes after you, tries to murder you.你可以杀了他。 你当然可以杀死一个追杀你的人 试图谋杀你
358That's self-defense.这是自卫
359But the enforcement power, the right to punish, everyone can do the punishing in the state of nature.但执法权,惩罚权,每个人都可以在自然状态下进行惩罚.
360And not only can you punish with death people who come after you, seeking to take your life,你不仅能惩罚那些追杀你 想要夺走你生命的人
361you can also punish a thief who tries to steal your goods,你也可以惩罚一个偷东西的小偷,
362because that also counts as aggression against the law of nature.因为这也构成对自然法则的侵犯。
363If someone has stolen from a third party, you can go after him.如果有人偷了第三方的东西 你可以去追他
364Why is this? Well, violations of the law of nature are an act of aggression.为什么? 违反自然法则是侵略行为
365There is no police force, there are no judges, no juries.没有警察部队,没有法官,没有陪审团。
366So everyone is the judge in his or her own case.所以每个人都是自己案件的法官。
367And Locke observes that when people are the judges of their own cases, they tend to get carried away.而洛克观察到,当人们成为自己案件的裁判时,他们往往会变得心烦意乱.
368And this gives rise to the inconvenience in the state of nature.这引起了自然状态的不便.
369People overshoot the mark, there's aggression, there's punishment,人们过度射击标记, 有侵略,有惩罚,
370and before you know it, everybody is insecure in the enjoyment在你们知道之前,每个人都是不享受的,
371of his or her unalienable rights to life, liberty and property.享有生命、自由和财产的不可剥夺的权利。
372Now he describes in pretty harsh and even grim terms what you can do to people who violate the law of nature.现在他用非常严酷,甚至严酷的语气,描述你能对违反自然法则的人做些什么.
373One may destroy a man who makes war upon him for the same reason that he may kill a wolf or a lion.人们可以摧毁一个为杀死狼或狮子而对他开战的人.
374Such men have no other rule but that of force and violence.这些人除了武力和暴力之外没有其他规则。
375Listen to this, and so may be treated as beasts of prey,听这个,所以可能会被当成猎物的野兽
376those dangerous and noxious creatures that will be sure to destroy you if you fall into their power.那些危险和有毒的生物 如果你落入他们的魔掌 一定会毁灭你
377So kill them first.先杀了他们
378So what starts out as a seemingly benign state of nature所以,什么是开始 一个看起来良好 自然状态
379where everyone's free and yet where there is a law and the law respects people's rights人人自由,但有法律和法律尊重人民的权利
380and those rights are so powerful that they're unalienable, what starts out looking very benign这些权利是如此强大,以至于不可剥夺 一开始看起来非常善良
381once you look closer is pretty fierce and filled with violence and that's why people want to leave.一旦你近距离看 就会很凶猛 充满暴力 这就是为什么人们想离开
382How do they leave?他们怎么走?
383Well, here's where consent comes in.同意书在这里
384The only way to escape from the state of nature is to undertake an act of consent摆脱自然状态的唯一途径是采取同意行动
385where you agree to give up the enforcement power and to create a government or a community在你同意放弃执行权并建立一个政府或社区的情况下
386where there will be a legislature to make law and where everyone agrees in advance,将有一个立法机构来制定法律,而且每个人都事先同意,
387everyone who enters agrees in advance to abide by whatever the majority decides.无论多数人决定什么,所有进入者都同意遵守。
388But then the question, and this is our question and here's where I want to get your views,但问题是,这是我们的问题 我想在这里得到你的看法,
389then the question is what powers, what can the majority decide?那么问题是,什么是权力,什么是多数能决定?
390Now here it gets tricky for Locke because you remember alongside the whole story about consent现在对洛克来说很棘手 因为你记得关于同意的整个故事
391and majority rule there are these natural rights, the law of nature, these unalienable rights这些自然权利、自然法则、不可剥夺的权利
392and you remember they don't disappear when people join together to create a civil society.你还记得当人们联手创建公民社会时 他们不会消失
393So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your unalienable rights,因此,即使多数人当权,多数人也不能侵犯你的不可剥夺的权利,
394can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty and property.不能侵犯你的基本生命、自由和财产权利。
395So here's the puzzle.这就是谜题。
396How much power does the majority have?多数人有多少权力?
397How limited is the government created by consent?经同意成立的政府有多么有限?
398It's limited by the obligation on the part of the majority to respect and to enforce它受到多数人尊重和强制执行的义务的限制
399the fundamental natural rights of the citizens.公民的基本自然权利。
400They don't give those up, we don't give those up when we enter government.他们不放弃这些,我们进入政府时不放弃这些.
401That's this powerful idea taken over from Locke by Jefferson in the declaration.这就是Jefferson在宣言中从洛克手中接管的强大想法.
402Unalienable rights.不可剥夺的权利。
403So let's go to our two cases.因此,让我们去我们的两个案件。
404Remember Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the libertarian objection to taxation for redistribution.记得迈克尔·乔丹,比尔·盖茨,自由主义者反对为再分配征税.
405Well what about Locke's limited government?那洛克的有限政府怎么办?
406Is there anyone who thinks that Locke does give grounds for opposing taxation for redistribution?是否有人认为洛克确实为反对再分配征税提供了理由?
407Anybody? Go ahead.有人吗? 来吧。
408If the majority rules that there should be taxation, even if the minority should still not have to be taxed如果多数人规定应征税,即使少数群体仍不必征税
409because that's taking away property, which is one of the rights of nature.因为这是夺去财产 这是自然的权利之一
410Alright, so, and what's your name? Ben.好吧,那么,你叫什么来着? 宾.
411So if the majority taxes the minority without the consent of the minority to that particular tax law,因此,如果多数人未经少数人同意而向该少数人征税,那么,
412it does amount to a taking of their property without their consent这确实等于未经他们同意而夺走他们的财产。
413and it would seem that Locke should object to that.洛克似乎应该反对
414Do you want some textual support for your view, for your reading of Locke, Ben?你想从文字上支持你的观点吗?
415Alright. I brought some along just in case you raised it.还好 我带来了一些 以防你提起来
416If you have your texts, look at passage 138.如果你有短信,请看138段。
417The supreme power, by which Locke means the legislature,最高权力 洛克就是立法机构
418cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent未经本人同意,不得从任何人手中夺走其财产的任何部分。
419for the preservation of property being the end of government保护财产是政府的终结
420and that for which men enter into society it necessarily supposes and requires that people should have property.男人进入社会时,它必然要假设和要求人们拥有财产。
421That was the whole reason for entering society in the first place.这就是进入社会的原因。
422To protect the right to property and when Locke speaks about the right to property,为了保护财产权 当洛克谈到财产权时
423he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category,他经常用这个术语来形容整个类别
424the right to life, liberty and property.生命权、自由和财产权。
425So that part of Locke, at the beginning of 138, seems to support Ben's reading.因此,138年初洛克的部分似乎支持本的阅读.
426But what about the part of 138, if you keep reading?如果你继续读的话,那138的那部分呢?
427Men therefore in society having property, they have such a right to the goods因此,在社会中,男人有财产,他们有这种对商品的权利
428which by the law of the community are theirs.以社区的法律,是他们的。
429Look at this. And that no one can take from them without their consent.看看这个。 未经他们同意,任何人不得夺走他们的财产。
430And then at the end of this passage he says,然后,在这个段落的结尾,他说,
431so it's a mistake to think that the legislative power can do what it will因此,认为立法权可以做它会做的是一个错误
432and dispose of the estates of the subject arbitrarily or take any part of them at pleasure.任意处置主体的遗产或随意占有其中任何一部分。
433Here's what's elusive.这是难以捉摸的
434On the one hand he says the government can't take your property without your consent.一方面,他说政府不能抢走你的财产 没有你的同意。
435He's clear about that.他很清楚这一点。
436But then he goes on to say, and that's the natural right to property,但是他接着说 这就是财产权
437but then it seems that property, what counts as property,但似乎财产,什么是财产,
438property is not natural but conventional, defined by the government.财产不是自然的,而是传统的,由政府界定。
439The goods which by the law of the community are theirs.根据社区法律属于他们的商品。
440And the plot thickens if you look ahead to section 140.如果你往前看140节 情节就会变厚
441In 140 he says governments can't be supported without great charge.在140年,他说政府不能在没有重大指控的情况下得到支持.
442Government is expensive.政府费用昂贵。
443Isn't it fit that everyone who enjoys his share of the protection should pay out of his estate?享受他那份保护的每个人都从他的庄园里付钱,这不合适吗?
444And then here's the crucial line.接下来是关键线。
445But still it must be with his own consent, i.e. the consent of the majority,但必须征得他本人的同意,即多数同意,
446giving it either by themselves or through their representatives.由自己或通过其代表给予。
447So what is Locke actually saying?洛克到底在说什么?
448Property is natural in one sense but conventional in another.财产在某种意义上是自然的,但在另一种意义上是传统的。
449It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right自然而然,我们有不可剥夺的基本权利
450that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.财产的存在和政府的尊重。
451So an arbitrary taking of property would be a violation of the law of nature所以任意抢夺财产就是违反自然法则
452and would be illegitimate.也是非法的
453But it's a further question, here's the conventional aspect of property,但还有一个问题 财产的传统方面
454and it's a further question what counts as property, how it's defined,还有一个问题,什么是财产, 如何定义它,
455and what counts as taking property, and that's up to the government.以及什么是抢夺财产, 这取决于政府。
456So the consent, here we're coming back to our question, what is the work of consent?所以,同意,这里我们回到我们的问题, 什么是同意的工作?
457What it takes for taxation to be legitimate is that it be by consent,税收必须经同意才能合法,
458not the consent of Bill Gates himself if he's the one who has to pay the tax,不是比尔·盖茨本人同意的 如果他是必须交税的人
459but by the consent that he and we, all of us within the society, gave但经他和我们社会所有人同意
460when we emerged from the state of nature and created the government in the first place.当我们从自然状态中崛起 并创建了政府
461It's the collective consent.这是集体同意。
462And by that reading, it looks like consent is doing a whole lot读起来 似乎同意是大功告成了
463and the limited government consent creates isn't all that limited.而有限的政府同意 并不是所有的有限。
464Does anyone want to respond to that or have a question about that?是否有人对此做出回应或提出疑问?
465Go ahead, stand up.来吧,站起来。
466Well, I'm just wondering what Locke's view is on,我只是想知道洛克的观点是什么
467once you have a government that's already in place,一旦政府已经成立
468whether it is possible for people who are born into that government出生于该政府的人是否可以
469to then leave and return to the state of nature.然后离开,回到自然状态
470I don't think that Locke mentioned that at all.我觉得洛克根本没提过
471What do you think?你觉得呢?
472Well, I think as the Convention,我认为,作为公约,
473it would be very difficult to leave the government离开政府很难
474because nobody else is just living in the state of nature.因为没有人只是生活在自然状态。
475Everybody else is now governed by this legislature.其他人现在都由这个立法机构管理。
476What would it mean today, you're asking, and what's your name?今何谓,汝问之,何谓?
477Nicola.尼可拉 尼可拉 尼可拉
478Suppose you wanted to leave civil society today,如果你今天想离开公民社会
479you want to withdraw your consent and return to the state of nature.你想撤回你的同意 回到自然状态
480Well, because you didn't actually consent to it, you were just born into it.嗯,因为你实际上没有同意它, 你只是出生在它。
481It was your ancestors who joined.是你祖先加入我们的
482Right.
483You didn't sign the social contract, I didn't sign it.你没有签署社会契约 我没有签署
484Exactly.没错
485All right, so what does Locke say there?好吧,洛克怎么说?
486Yeah.
487I don't think Locke says that you have to sign anything.我不认为洛克说 你必须签署任何事情。
488I think that he says that it's kind of implied consent.我认为他说这是暗示同意
489By leaving and taking government services,通过离开和接受政府服务,
490you are implying that you are consenting to the government taking things from you.你是在暗示你同意 政府拿走你的东西
491All right, so implied consent, that's a partial answer to this challenge.好吧,所以暗示同意, 这是这个挑战的部分答案。
492Now, you may not think that implied consent is as good as the real thing.现在,你可能不认为 暗示同意是 与真实的一样好。
493Is that what you're shaking your head about, Nicola?这就是你摇头的原因吗,尼古拉?
494Speak up.说吧
495Stand up and speak up.起身说话.
496I don't think that necessarily just by utilizing the government's我认为这不一定只是 利用政府的
497you know, various resources that we are necessarily implying你知道,各种资源 我们必然意味着
498that we agree with the way that this government was formed我们同意政府的组成方式
499or that we have consented to actually join into the social contract.或者我们同意加入社会契约
500So you don't think the idea of implied consent is strong enough所以你认为暗示同意的想法还不够强
501to generate any obligation at all to obey the government?产生任何服从政府的义务?
502Not necessarily, no.不一定,没有。
503Nicola, if you didn't think you'd get caught, would you pay your taxes?尼可拉,如果你没想到你会被抓 你会交税吗?
504I don't think so.亦不见.
505I would rather have a system, personally,我宁愿有一个系统,个人,
506that I could give money to exactly those sections of the government that I support我可以把钱给那些我支持的政府部门
507and not just blanket support.不只是一揽子支持。
508You'd rather be in the state of nature, at least on April 15th.你宁愿进入自然状态 至少是在4月15日
509But what I'm trying to get at is但我想说的是
510do you consider that you're under no obligation你认为你没有义务
511since you haven't actually entered into any act of consent?既然你还没有达成任何同意?
512But for prudential reasons, you do what you're supposed to do according to the law.但出于谨慎之故,依律行其应.
513Exactly.没错
514If you look at it that way, then you're violating another one of Locke's Treatises,如果你这样看待它, 那么你违反了另一个洛克的 治疗,
515which is that you can't take anything from anyone else.那就是你不能从别人那里夺走任何东西
516Like, you can't take the government's services你不能接受政府的服务
517and then not give them anything in return.而不给他们任何报酬。
518If you want to go live in the state of nature, that's fine,如果你想在自然状态下生活 那没关系
519but you can't take anything from the government because by the government's terms,但你不能从政府那里夺走任何东西 因为根据政府的规定
520which are the only terms under which you can enter the agreement,这是你唯一可以达成协议的条件,
521say that you have to pay taxes to take those things.说你要交税才能拿这些东西
522So you're saying that Nicola can go back into the state of nature if she wants to,所以,你是说,尼古拉可以 回到自然状态 如果她想,
523but she can't drive on Mass Ave.但她不能驾车去弥撒大道
524Exactly.没错
525I want to raise the stakes beyond using Mass Ave and even beyond taxation.我想提高赌注 超越使用大众Ave 甚至超越税收。
526What about life?生活怎么办?
527What about military conscription?征兵怎么样?
528Yes, what do you say? Stand up.是的,你怎么说? 站起来
529First of all, we have to remember that sending people to war首先,我们必须记住,送人去打仗
530is not necessarily implying that they'll die.不一定意味着他们会死
531I mean, obviously, you're not raising their chances here,我的意思是,很明显, 你没有增加他们的机会在这里,
532but it's not a death penalty.但这不是死刑
533So if you're going to discuss whether or not military conscription is equivalent所以,如果你要讨论 军队征兵是否相等
534to, you know, suppressing people right to life,压制人们的生命权
535you shouldn't approach it that way.你不应该这样对待它。
536Secondly, the real problem here is Locke has this view about consent第二,真正的问题是洛克对同意的看法
537and natural rights, but you're not allowed to give up your natural rights either.和自然权利, 但你也不能放弃你的自然权利。
538So the real question is, you know, how does he himself figure it out所以,真正的问题是,你知道, 他是如何自己想出来的
539between I agree to give up my life, give up my property我同意放弃我的生命 放弃我的财产
540when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact,当他谈到税收或征兵时,
541but I guess Locke would be against suicide.但我猜洛克会反对自杀
542And that's still, you know, my own consent.这也是我本人同意的
543I agree.и種
544Good. All right. What's your name?不错 好吧,我们走。 你叫什么来着?
545Eric.爱瑞克
546So Eric brings us back to the puzzle we've been wrestling withEric让我们回到了 我们一直和他摔跤的谜题
547since we started reading Locke.自从我们开始读洛克。
548On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property,一方面,我们拥有这些不可剥夺的生命、自由和财产权利,
549which means that even we don't have the power to give them up.这意味着即使我们没有权力放弃他们。
550And that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.这也是对合法政府的限制。
551It's not what we consent to that limits government.这不是我们同意的 限制政府。
552It's what we lack the power to give away when we consent that limits government.这就是我们缺乏权力 放弃当我们同意 限制政府。
553That's the point at the heart of Locke's whole account of legitimate government.这就是洛克关于合法政府的全部说法的核心.
554But now you say, well, if we can't give up our own life, if we can't commit suicide,但现在你说,如果我们不能放弃自己的生命, 如果我们不能自杀,
555if we can't give up our right to property,如果我们不能放弃财产权
556how can we then agree to be bound by a majority that will force us我们怎能同意受多数人的约束,从而迫使我们
557to sacrifice our lives or give up our property?牺牲我们的生命或放弃我们的财产?
558Does Locke have a way out of this?洛克有办法吗?
559Or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government,或者他基本上是在制裁一个全能的政府
560despite everything he says about unalienable rights?尽管他说什么 不可剥夺的权利?
561Does he have a way out of it?他有出路吗?
562Who would speak here in defense of Locke or make sense,谁会在这里为洛克辩护 或者说有道理
563find a way out of this predicament?找到办法摆脱困境吗?
564All right, go ahead.好吧,继续。
565I feel like there's a general distinction we've made between the right to life我觉得我们一般都区分了 生命权
566that individuals possess and the fact that a government cannot take away个人拥有和政府不能剥夺的事实
567a single individual's right to life.一个人的生命权。
568I think if you look at conscription as the government picking out我认为如果你把征兵看作是政府挑出来的
569certain individuals to go fight in war,一些个人去打仗,
570then that would be a violation of their natural right to life.这会侵犯他们的自然生命权
571On the other hand, if you have conscription, let's say a lottery, for example,另一方面,如果你有征兵, 让我们说一个彩票,例如,
572then in that case I would view that as the population picking their representatives这样的话,我就会认为,当人们挑选他们的代表时,
573to defend them in the case of war.在战争中保护他们
574The idea being that since the whole population cannot go out there这个想法是,由于 整个人口不能去那里
575to defend its own right to property,维护自己的财产权,
576it picks its own representatives through a process that's essentially random,它选择自己的代表 通过一个基本上是随机的过程,
577and then these sort of elected representatives go out and fight然后这些当选代表 出去战斗
578for the rights of the people.为人民的权利。
579It works just like an elected government, in my opinion.我认为,这就像民选政府一样。
580All right, so an elected government can conscript citizens to go out好吧,这样民选政府 可以征召公民出去
581and defend the way of life, the community that makes the enjoyment of rights possible?并捍卫生活方式,使享有权利成为可能的社区?
582I think it can, because to me it seems that it's very similar我想可以,因为对我来说,它似乎非常相似
583to the process of electing representatives through legislature.通过立法选举代表的过程。
584Although here, it's as if the government is electing by conscription虽然这里,但好像政府通过征兵选举
585certain citizens to go die for the sake of the whole.某些公民为了整个人而死
586Is that consistent with respect for a natural right to liberty?这是否与尊重自由的自然权利相一致?
587Well, what I would say there is there's a distinction between picking out individuals我想说的是 挑个人是有区别的
588and having a random choice of individuals.和随机选择个人。
589Between picking out, let me make sure, between picking out individuals.在挑人之间,让我确定, 在挑人之间。
590What's your name?你叫什么来着?
591Gopal.戈帕尔。
592Gopal says there's a difference between picking out individuals to lay down their livesGopal说 挑个人来放下生命是有区别的
593and having a general law.并拥有一般法律。
594I think this is the answer Locke would give, actually, Gopal.我认为这是洛克会给出的答案,其实,戈帕尔。
595Locke is against arbitrary government.洛克反对专制政府
596He's against the arbitrary taking, the singling out of Bill Gates to finance the war in Iraq.他反对任意夺取,独唱比尔·盖茨资助伊拉克战争.
597He's against singling out a particular citizen or group of people to go off and fight.他反对单独挑一个特定的公民或一群人去战斗.
598But if there's a general law such that the government's choice,但是,如果有这样的一般法律 政府的选择,
599the majority's action, is non-arbitrary,多数人的行为是非任意的,
600it doesn't really amount to a violation of people's basic rights.这实际上并不等于侵犯人们的基本权利。
601What does count as a violation is an arbitrary taking何谓是任意夺权
602because that would essentially say, not only to Bill Gates, but to everyone,因为这基本上意味着, 不仅比尔盖茨, 并且每个人,
603there is no rule of law, there is no institution of property,没有法治 没有财产制度
604because at the whim of the king, or for that matter of the parliament,因为国王或议会的意念
605we can name you or you to give up your property or to give up your life.我们可以给你起名 让你放弃你的财产 或者放弃你的生命
606But so long as there is a non-arbitrary rule of law, then it's permissible.但是只要有非任意的法治,那么是允许的.
607Now you may say this doesn't amount to a very limited government,现在你可以说这不等于 一个非常有限的政府,
608and the libertarian may complain that Locke is not such a terrific ally after all.自由主义者可能会抱怨洛克 毕竟不是一个伟大的盟友
609The libertarian has two grounds for disappointment in Locke.自由主义者在洛克有两个失望的理由.
610First, that the rights are unalienable and therefore I don't really own myself after all.第一,权利不可剥夺,因此我毕竟并不真正拥有自己。
611I can't dispose of my life or my liberty or my property in a way that violates my rights.我不能以侵犯我权利的方式 处置我的生命 自由和财产
612That's disappointment number one.这是失望的第一。
613Disappointment number two, once there is a legitimate government based on consent,失望的第二, 一旦有一个合法政府 基于同意,
614the only limits for Locke are limits on arbitrary takings of life or of liberty or of property.对洛克的唯一限制是对任意夺取生命、自由或财产的限制。
615But if the majority decides, if the majority promulgates a generally applicable law,但如果多数人决定,如果多数人颁布普遍适用的法律,
616and if it votes duly according to fair procedures, then there is no violation,如果它按照公正程序进行投票,那么不存在违反规定的情况,
617whether it's a system of taxation or a system of conscription.无论是税收制度还是征兵制度。
618So it's clear that Locke is worried about the absolute arbitrary power of kings.因此很明显,洛克担心的是国王的绝对专断权力.
619But it's also true, and here's the darker side of Locke,但这也是事实 洛克的黑暗面
620that this great theorist of consent came up with a theory of private property that didn't require consent.这个伟大的同意论者 提出了私人财产的理论 不需要同意
621That may, and this goes back to the point Rochelle made last time,也许,这可以追溯到 罗谢尔上次说的
622may have had something to do with Locke's second concern, which was America.可能和洛克的第二个关切有关 也就是美国
623You remember when he talks about the state of nature, he's not talking about an imaginary place.你还记得当他谈到自然状态时 他不是在说一个想象中的地方
624In the beginning he says all the world was America.一开始他说全世界都是美国
625And what was going on in America?美国发生了什么?
626The settlers were enclosing land and engaged in wars with the Native Americans.定居者包围土地,与美洲原住民开战。
627Locke, who was an administrator of one of the colonies,洛克曾是其中一个殖民地的管理者
628may have been as interested in providing a justification for private property可能同样有兴趣为私人财产提供理由
629through enclosure without consent, through enclosure and cultivation,未经同意,通过封锁和种植,
630as he was with developing a theory of government based on consent因为当时他正在发展一种基于同意的政府理论
631that would rein in kings and arbitrary rulers.统治着国王和统治者
632The question we're left with, the fundamental question we still haven't answered is,我们剩下的问题 根本的问题我们还没有回答
633what then becomes of consent?同意会怎样?
634What work can it do?还能做什么?
635What is its moral force?它的道德力量是什么?
636What are the limits of consent?同意的限制是什么?
637Consent matters not only for governments but also for markets.同意不仅对政府而且对市场都很重要。
638And beginning next time we're going to take up questions of the limits of consent从下次开始,我们讨论同意的限度问题
639in the buying and selling of goods.在买卖商品。
640Don't miss the chance to interact online with other viewers of Justice.不要错过与司法界其他观众在线互动的机会.
641Join the conversation. Take up hot quiz.加入对话。 参加热门测验
642Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
643请访问justiceharvard.org. 谓之正法.
644Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
645Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 647 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P6 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p06 5. 5.公平的起点是什么 (P6)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by, additional funding provided by...本方案的资金由.提供,额外资金由.
0:29Today, we turn to the question of distributive justice.今天,我们谈谈分配司法问题。
0:36How should income and wealth and power and opportunities be distributed according to what principles?收入、财富、权力和机会如何按照什么原则分配?
0:44John Rawls offers a detailed answer to that question.约翰·罗尔斯详细回答了这个问题。
0:48And we're going to examine and assess his answer to that question today.我们今天将审查并评估他对该问题的回答。
0:53We put ourselves in a position to do so last time by trying to make sense of why he thinks我们让自己能够这样做 上次,通过试图 理解为什么他认为
1:06that principles of justice are best derived from a hypothetical contract.司法原则最好来自假设的合同。
1:16And what matters is that the hypothetical contract be carried out in an original position of equality重要的是假想的合同 要以平等的地位执行
1:24behind what Rawls calls the veil of ignorance.罗尔斯所说的无知面纱背后
1:29So that much is clear.因此,这一点是明确的。
展开字幕全文(832 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by, additional funding provided by...本方案的资金由.提供,额外资金由.
2Today, we turn to the question of distributive justice.今天,我们谈谈分配司法问题。
3How should income and wealth and power and opportunities be distributed according to what principles?收入、财富、权力和机会如何按照什么原则分配?
4John Rawls offers a detailed answer to that question.约翰·罗尔斯详细回答了这个问题。
5And we're going to examine and assess his answer to that question today.我们今天将审查并评估他对该问题的回答。
6We put ourselves in a position to do so last time by trying to make sense of why he thinks我们让自己能够这样做 上次,通过试图 理解为什么他认为
7that principles of justice are best derived from a hypothetical contract.司法原则最好来自假设的合同。
8And what matters is that the hypothetical contract be carried out in an original position of equality重要的是假想的合同 要以平等的地位执行
9behind what Rawls calls the veil of ignorance.罗尔斯所说的无知面纱背后
10So that much is clear.因此,这一点是明确的。
11Alright, then let's turn to the principles that Rawls says would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.好吧,那我们来谈谈 Rawls说 会被选在无知的面纱后面的原则
12First, he considers some of the major alternatives.首先,他考虑了一些主要的替代办法。
13What about utilitarianism?功利主义呢?
14Would the people in the original position choose to govern their collective lives?处于原位的人民会选择管理他们的集体生活吗?
15Utilitarian principles, the greatest code for the greatest number.尤利塔利主义原则, 最大的代码为最多。
16No, they wouldn't, Rawls says.不,他们不会,罗尔斯说。
17And the reason is that behind the veil of ignorance, everyone knows that once the veil goes up原因是在愚昧的面纱背后 每个人都知道一旦面纱升起
18and real life begins, we will each want to be respected with dignity.我们每个人都希望有尊严地得到尊重。
19Even if we turn out to be a member of a minority, we don't want to be oppressed.即使我们变成少数派的一员,我们也不想被压迫.
20And so we would agree to reject utilitarianism and instead to adopt as our first principle所以我们同意拒绝功利主义 代之以第一原则
21equal basic liberties, fundamental rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly,平等的基本自由、言论自由的基本权利、集会自由、
22religious liberty, freedom of conscience and the like.宗教自由、良心自由等等。
23We wouldn't want to take the chance that we would wind up as members of an oppressed or despised minority我们不想冒这个险 冒着被压迫或被鄙视的少数的下场
24with the majority tyrannizing over us.多数人强暴我们
25And so Rawls says utilitarianism would be rejected.所以罗尔斯说功利主义会被拒绝.
26Utilitarianism makes the mistake, Rawls writes, of forgetting or at least not taking seriously罗尔斯写道,乌蒂利亚主义犯了一个错误,那就是忘记或至少不认真对待
27the distinction between persons.人与人之间的区别。
28And in the original position behind the veil of ignorance, we would recognize that在无知的面纱背后的最初位置,我们会认识到
29and reject utilitarianism.并拒绝功利主义。
30We wouldn't trade off our fundamental rights and liberties for any economic advantages.我们不会为了任何经济利益而牺牲我们的基本权利和自由。
31That's the first principle.这是第一个原则。
32Second principle has to do with social and economic inequalities.第二项原则涉及社会和经济不平等。
33What would we agree to?我们同意什么?
34Remember, we don't know whether we're going to wind up being rich or poor, healthy or unhealthy.记住,我们不知道我们到底要成为富人还是穷人,健康还是不健康.
35We don't know what kind of family we're going to come from,我们不知道我们来自什么样的家庭
36whether we're going to inherit millions or whether we will come from an impoverished family.我们是否要继承成百上千万 或者我们将来自一个贫穷的家庭。
37So we might at first thought say, well, let's require an equal distribution of income and wealth因此,我们一开始可能想说, 好了,让我们要求 收入和财富的平等分配
38just to be on the safe side.就是为了安全
39Then we would realize that we could do better than that, even if we're unlucky and wind up at the bottom.然后我们会意识到,我们可以做得更好, 即使我们运气不好, 并最终在底部。
40We could do better if we agree to a qualified principle of equality.如果我们同意一项合格的平等原则,我们可以做得更好。
41Rawls calls it the difference principle.罗尔斯称之为区别原则.
42It's a principle that says only those social and economic inequalities will be permitted这是一条原则,规定只有这些社会和经济不平等才会被允许
43that work to the benefit of the least well-off.给最不富裕的人带来好处
44So we wouldn't reject all inequality of income and wealth.所以我们不会拒绝收入和财富的所有不平等。
45We would allow some, but the test would be, do they work to the benefit of everyone, including those,我们将允许一些,但考验是,它们是否有利于所有人,包括那些,
46or as he specifies the principle, especially those at the bottom.或如他规定的原则, 特别是那些在底部。
47Only those inequalities would be accepted behind the veil of ignorance.只有这些不平等才能被接受在无知的面纱背后。
48And so Rawls argues, only those inequalities that work to the benefit of the least well-off are just.所以Rawls认为,只有那些有利于最不富裕的人的不平等才是公正的。
49We talked about the examples of Michael Jordan making $31 million a year,我们谈到了迈克尔・乔丹每年赚3100万美元的例子
50of Bill Gates having a fortune in the tens of billions.比尔·盖茨拥有数百亿的财富
51Would those inequalities be permitted under the difference principle?差别原则是否允许这些不平等?
52Only if they were part of a system, those wage differentials,除非他们属于一个制度,这些工资差别,
53that actually work to the advantage of the least well-off.这实际上有利于最不富裕的人。
54Well, what would that system be?那这个系统会是什么?
55Maybe it turns out that as a practical matter, you have to provide incentives也许事实证明,作为一个实际问题, 你必须提供激励
56to attract the right people to certain jobs.吸引合适的人去工作
57And when you do, having those people in those jobs will actually help those at the bottom.当你这样做的时候, 那些人在那些工作 将会帮助那些在底层的人。
58Strictly speaking, Rawls' argument for the difference principle严格地说,Rawls主张区别原则
59is that it would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.这是在无知的面纱后面选择的。
60Let me hear what you think about Rawls' claim that these two principles would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.让我听听你对Rawls的说法的看法,即这两项原则会被选择在无知的面纱后面.
61Is there anyone who disagrees that they would be chosen?有谁不同意选他们吗?
62All right, let's start up in the balcony, if that's all right. Go ahead.好吧,让我们开始 在阳台上,如果可以。 来吧。
63Okay, your argument depends upon us believing that we would argue and set policy or justice from a bottom,好吧,你的论点取决于我们相信 我们会争论和制定政策或正义 从底部,
64for the disadvantaged, and I just don't see from a proof standpoint where we've proven that. Why not the top?我无法从证据的角度 看出我们已经证明了这一点 为什么不是顶部?
65Right, and what's your name?对,你叫什么名字?
66Mike.迈克
67Mike, all right, good question.迈克,好的,问得好
68Put yourself behind the veil of ignorance, enter into the thought experiment.把自己放在无知的面纱后面,进入思想实验.
69What principles would you choose?你会选择什么原则?
70How would you think it through?你怎么想出来的?
71Well, I would say things like even Harvard's existence is an example of preaching toward the top,我想说,即使是哈佛大学的存在 也是向上传教的例子
72because Harvard takes the top academics, and I didn't know when I was born how smart I would be,因为哈佛学得最好的学者, 我不知道当我出生时,我会有多聪明,
73but I worked my life to get to a place of this caliber.但我毕生都是为了找到这个口径的地方
74Now, if you'd said Harvard's going to randomly take 1,600 people of absolutely no qualification,如果你说哈佛会随机抽取 1600个人 绝对没有资格
75we'd all be saying, well, there's not much to work for.我们都会说,嗯,没有什么可以工作的。
76And so what principle would you choose?那你选择什么原则?
77In that situation, I would say a merit-based one,在这种情况下,我要说,一个择优录取的人,
78one where I don't necessarily know what I have, but I'd rather have a system that rewards me based on my efforts.一种我不一定知道我有什么 但我宁愿有一个系统 奖励我 根据我的努力。
79So you, Mike, behind the veil of ignorance, would choose a merit-based system所以你,迈克,在无知的面纱背后, 会选择一个择优制度
80where people are rewarded according to their efforts.在那里,人们将因自己的努力而获得报酬。
81All right, fair enough. What would you say? Go ahead.好吧,公平点 你会说什么? 来吧。
82My question is if the merit-based argument is based on when everyone is at a level of equality,我的问题是,当每个人都处于平等水平时,是否基于择优辩论,
83where from that position you're rewarded to where you get,从那个位置你得到的回报,
84or is it regardless of what advantages you may have when you began your education to get where you are here?还是不管你开始接受教育后 会有什么好处?
85I think the question you're asking is saying, you know,我想你问的问题是,你知道,
86if you want to look at whatever utilitarianism policy it is, do we want to maximize world wealth?如果你想看看它是什么功利主义政策,我们是否想要最大限度地增加世界财富?
87And I think a system that rewards merit is the one that we've pretty much all established is what is best for all of us,我认为奖励功绩的制度 是我们大家共同建立的制度
88despite the fact that some of us may be in the second percentile and some may be in the 98th percentile.尽管事实上我们有些人可能处于第二百分位,有些人可能处于第九百分位。
89And at the end of the day, it lifts that lowest base level, a community that rewards effort as opposed to innate differences.而在最后,它提升了最低的基数水平,一个奖励努力而不是内在差异的社区.
90I don't understand how you're rewarding someone's efforts who clearly has had,我不明白你是如何奖励 某人的努力 谁显然已经,
91not you, but maybe myself, advantages throughout to get where I am here.而不是你,但也许我自己, 优势贯穿于我在这里。
92I mean, I can't say that somebody else who maybe worked as hard as I did我的意思是,我不能说别人 谁也许工作像我一样辛苦
93would have had the same opportunity to come to a school like this.也会有同样的机会 来这样的学校。
94All right, let's look at that point. What's your name?好吧,让我们来看看这一点。 你叫什么来着?
95Kate.凯特
96Kate, you suspect that the ability to get into top schools凯特,你怀疑进入顶尖学校的能力
97may largely depend on coming from an affluent family,可能很大程度上取决于来自富裕的家庭,
98having a favorable family background, social, cultural, economic advantages and so on?拥有有利的家庭背景、社会、文化、经济优势等等?
99I mean, economic, but yes, social, cultural, all of those advantages for sure.我的意思是,经济,但是是的, 社会,文化,所有这些优势是肯定的。
100Someone did a study of the 146 selective colleges and universities in the United States.有人对美国146所选择性的学院和大学进行了研究.
101And they looked at the students in those colleges and universities他们看着那些大专院校的学生
102to try to find out what their economic background was.试图找出他们的经济背景。
103What percentage do you think come from the bottom quarter of the income scale?你认为收入表的下季度会占多少百分比?
104You know what the figure is?你知道是什么吗?
105Only 3% of students at the most selective colleges and universities come from poor backgrounds.在最有选择的学院和大学中,只有3%的学生来自贫困背景。
106Over 70% come from affluent families.70%以上来自富裕家庭。
107Let's go one step further then and try to address Mike's challenge.我们再走一步 试着解决迈克的挑战
108Rawls actually has two arguments, not one, in favor of his principles of justice罗尔斯实际上有两个论点 而不是一个 支持他的正义原则
109and in particular of the difference principle.特别是区别原则。
110One argument is the official argument, what would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.一个论点是官方的论点,即无知面纱背后会选择什么。
111Some people challenge that argument saying maybe people would want to take their chances.有些人质疑这个论点,说也许人们会想冒这个险。
112Maybe people would be gamblers behind the veil of ignorance hoping that they would wind up on top.也许人们会赌博 背后的无知面纱 希望他们 最终到顶端。
113That's one challenge that has been put to Rawls.这是对罗尔斯的挑战
114But backing up the argument from the original position is a second argument.但支持原立场的论点是第二个论点。
115And that is a straightforwardly moral argument.这是一个直接的道德论点。
116And it goes like this.它是这样的。
117It says the distribution of income and wealth and opportunities上面说收入、财富和机会的分配
118should not be based on factors for which people can claim no credit.不应基于人们不能要求信贷的因素。
119It shouldn't be based on factors that are arbitrary from a moral point of view.它不应该基于从道德角度来说武断的因素.
120Rawls illustrates this by considering several rival theories of justice.Rawls通过考虑几个相互竞争的司法理论来说明这一点。
121He begins with the theory of justice that most everyone these days would reject.他从大多数这些天来都会拒绝的正义理论开始.
122A feudal aristocracy.一个封建贵族
123What's wrong with the allocation of life prospects in a feudal aristocracy?在封建贵族统治下分配生活前景有什么问题?.
124Rawls says, well, the thing that's obviously wrong about it罗尔斯说,嗯,那显然是错误的
125is that people's life prospects are determined by the accident of birth.人的生活前景是由出生事故决定的。
126Are you born to a noble family or to the family of peasants and serfs?你是出身于贵族家庭还是农民和农奴家庭?
127And that's it. You can't rise.且道. 你不能站起来。
128It's not your doing where you wind up or what opportunities you have.这不是你做什么 在那里你结束了 或者你有什么机会。
129But that's arbitrary from a moral point of view.但从道德角度来看,这是武断的.
130And so that objection to a feudal aristocracy leads,因此,反对封建贵族统治,
131and historically has led people to say, careers should be open to talents.并且从历史上看,人们会说,事业应该向人才开放。
132There should be formal equality of opportunity.应有形式上的机会平等。
133Regardless of the accident of birth, every person should be free to strive,无论发生什么意外,每个人都应自由地努力,
134to work, to apply for any job in the society.工作,申请任何社会工作。
135And then if you open up jobs and you allow people to apply如果你打开工作 允许人们申请
136and to work as hard as they can, then the results are just.并尽可能努力工作,那么结果就是公正。
137So it's more or less the libertarian system that we've discussed in earlier weeks.因此,这或多或少是我们前几周讨论过的百合制度.
138What does Rawls think about this? He says it's an improvement.罗尔斯对此有什么看法? 他说这是一个进步。
139It's an improvement because it doesn't take as fixed the accident of birth.这是一种改进,因为它并不认为是固定了出生的意外.
140But even with formal equality of opportunity,但即使形式上的机会平等,
141the libertarian conception doesn't extend its insight far enough.自由主义的观念 不够深入
142Because if you let everybody run the race, everybody can enter the race,因为如果你让每个人跑 比赛,每个人都可以进入比赛,
143but some people start at different starting points.但有些人从不同的起点开始
144That race isn't going to be fair.那场比赛不公平
145Intuitively, he says, the most obvious injustice of this system他直觉地说,这个制度最明显的不公正
146is that it permits distributive shares to be improperly influenced它允许分配股票受到不当的影响
147by factors arbitrary from a moral point of view,从道德观点来看,
148such as whether you've got a good education or not,比如你是否受过良好教育
149whether you grew up in a family that supported you and developed in you你是否成长在一个支持你 并在你成长的家庭
150a work ethic and gave you the opportunities.工作道德,给你机会。
151So that suggests moving to a system of fair equality of opportunity.因此,这意味着向公平平等机会制度迈进。
152And that's really the system that Mike was advocating earlier on,而这正是迈克之前倡导的系统,
153what we might call a merit-based system, a meritocratic system.我们可能称之为择优制,择优制。
154In a fair meritocracy, the society sets up institutions在一个公平的精英管理中,社会建立了机构
155to bring everyone to the same starting point before the race begins.在比赛开始前把大家带到同一个起点
156Equal educational opportunities.平等教育机会。
157Head start programs, for example.例如头部启动程序.
158Support for schools in impoverished neighborhoods.支持贫困街区办学.
159So that everyone, regardless of their family background,所以,每个人,不管他们的家庭背景,
160has a genuinely fair opportunity.拥有真正公平的机会。
161Everyone starts from the same starting line.每个人都从同一个起点开始。
162Well, what does Rawls think about the meritocratic system?Rawls对功勋系统有什么看法?
163Even that, he says, doesn't go far enough in remedying or addressing即便如此,他说,在补救或解决上 还不够远
164the moral arbitrariness of the natural lottery.自然彩票的道德专断
165Because if you bring everyone to the same starting point因为如果你把每个人都带到同一个起点
166and begin the race, who's going to win the race?开始比赛,谁能赢得比赛?
167Who would win, to use the runners example?谁会赢,用跑者的例子?
168The fastest runners would win.最快的跑者会赢
169But is it their doing that they happen to be blessed但他们的作为 恰好使他们得到祝福
170with the athletic prowess to run fast?跑得快吗?
171So Rawls says, even the principle of meritocracy,所以罗尔斯说,即使是功勋原则,
172where you bring everyone to the same starting point,在那里,你带大家 在同一起点,
173may eliminate the influence of social contingencies and upbringing,消除社会突发事件和教养的影响,
174but it still permits the distribution of wealth and income但是它仍然允许财富和收入的分配
175to be determined by the natural distribution of abilities and talents.由能力和才能的自然分布决定。
176And so he thinks that the principle of eliminating morally arbitrary influences所以他认为消除道德武断影响的原则
177and the distribution of income and wealth requires going beyond收入和财富的分配需要超越
178what Mike favors, the meritocratic system.迈克喜欢什么,优异的系统。
179Now, how do you go beyond?现在,你如何超越?
180If you bring everyone to the same starting point如果你把大家带到同一个起点
181and you're still bothered by the fact that some are fast runners你仍然对有些人跑得很快
182and some are not fast runners, what can you do?有些不是跑得快的 你能怎么办?
183Well, some critics of a more egalitarian conception嗯,一些批评 更平等的概念
184say the only thing you can do is handicap the fast runners,说你唯一能做的就是 阻碍快速跑者
185make them wear lead shoes, but who wants to do that?让他们穿铅鞋 但谁想这么做?
186That would defeat the whole point of running the race.这会击败比赛的全局
187But Rawls says you don't have to have a kind of leveling equality但罗尔斯说,你不必 有一种平平平等
188if you want to go beyond a meritocratic conception.如果你想超越一个优异的概念。
189You permit, you even encourage those who may be gifted你允许,你甚至鼓励那些有天赋的人
190to exercise their talents, but what you do is you change the terms来锻炼他们的才华 但你所做的就是改变条件
191on which people are entitled to the fruits of the exercise of those talents.人们在其中有权享有这些才华的成果。
192And that really is what the difference principle is.这才是区别原则所在。
193You establish a principle that says people may benefit from their good fortune,你确立了一条原则 说人们可以从他们的好运气中获益,
194from their luck in the genetic lottery,因为他们在遗传性彩票上的运气
195but only on terms that work to the advantage of the least well-off.但只能从有利于最不富裕的人的角度出发
196And so, for example, Michael Jordan can make $31 million,例如迈克尔·乔丹能赚到3100万美元
197but only under a system that taxes away a chunk of that但只有在一个制度下, 税收去掉其中的一小部分
198to help those who lack the basketball skills that he's blessed with.帮助那些缺乏篮球技巧的人 他的祝福。
199Likewise, Bill Gates, he can make his billions,同样,比尔·盖茨, 他可以赚他的亿万,
200but he can't think that he somehow morally deserves those billions.但他不能认为 他在某种程度上在道德上应该得到那些亿万。
201Those who have been favored by nature may gain from their good fortune,被自然所宠爱者,得享其福;
202but only on terms that improve the situation of those who have lost out.但只能改善那些输家的处境
203That's the difference principle.这就是区别原则。
204And it's an argument from moral arbitrariness.而从道德专断论辩.
205Rawls claims that if you're bothered by basing distributive sharesRawls声称,如果你被基于分配股份的困扰
206on factors arbitrary from a moral point of view,从道德观点来看,
207you don't just reject a feudal aristocracy for a free market.你不只是拒绝一个封建贵族 自由市场。
208You don't even rest content with a meritocratic system你甚至不满足于功勋制度
209that brings everyone to the same starting point.这让每个人都来到同一个起点。
210You set up a system where everyone, including those at the bottom,你建立了一个系统 每个人,包括那些在底层,
211benefit from the exercise of the talents held by those who happen to be lucky.受益于那些碰巧幸运的人发挥的才能。
212What do you think? Is that persuasive?你觉得呢? 有说服力吗?
213Who finds that argument unpersuasive, the argument from moral arbitrariness?谁认为这一论点没有说服力,就是道德武断的论点?
214Yes?是吗?
215I think that in the egalitarian proposition, the more talented people,我认为,在平等的命题, 更有才华的人,
216I think it's very optimistic to think that they would still work really hard我觉得他们还是很努力的很乐观
217even if they knew that part of what they made would be given away.即使他们知道自己所造物的一部分,必定要被分舍。
218So I think that the only way for the more talented people to exercise their talents所以我觉得只有这样才有才华的人才能发挥才华
219to the best of their ability is in the meritocracy.尽他们的最大能力 是在功绩管理。
220And in a meritocracy, what's your name?在精英统治中 你叫什么名字?
221Kate.凯特
222Kate, does it bother you, and Mike, does it bother you,凯特,你烦不烦,麦克,你烦不烦?
223that in a meritocratic system, even with fair equality of opportunity,在一个优异的制度中,即使有公平的机会平等,
224people get ahead, people get rewards that they don't deserve人们先行一步,得到他们不配得到的奖励
225simply because they happen to be naturally gifted?就因为他们天生有天赋?
226What about that?怎么样?
227I think that it is arbitrary, and obviously it's arbitrary,我认为这是武断的 很明显是武断的
228but I think that correcting for it would be detrimental.但我认为纠正会有害的
229Because it would reduce incentives, is that why?因为这样会减少激励,这就是为什么?
230It would reduce incentives, yeah.这会减少激励,是的。
231Mike, what do you say?迈克,怎么样?
232We're all sitting in this room, and we have undeserved glory of some sorts,我们都坐在这间屋子里 我们拥有一些不应有的荣耀
233that you should not be satisfied with the process of your life你不应该满足 你的生活过程
234because you have not created any of this.因为你没有创造任何这些。
235And I think from a standpoint of not just this room, us being upset,我从不光是这间屋子的角度来看 我们很不高兴
236but from a societal standpoint, we should have some kind of a gut reaction但从社会角度看,我们应该有某种直觉的反应
237to that feeling that the guy who runs the race, he actually harms us as opposed to那种感觉 跑车的人, 他实际上伤害我们 而不是
238maybe makes me run that last 10 yards faster,可能让我跑得更快
239and that makes the guy behind me run 10 yards faster,这让我后面的人跑得更快十码
240and the guy behind him 10 yards faster.和他后面的人更快10码。
241All right, so Mike, let me ask you, you talked about effort before, effort.好吧,所以迈克,让我问你, 你谈到过努力,努力。
242Do you think when people work hard to get ahead and succeed,你认为当人们努力工作 取得领先和成功,
243that they deserve the rewards that go with effort?难道他们要受报应吗?
244Isn't that the idea behind your defense?这不是你辩护背后的想法吗?
245I mean, of course, bring Michael Jordan here, I'm sure you can get him,我的意思是,当然,带迈克尔 乔丹在这里, 我相信你可以得到他,
246and have him come and defend himself about why he makes $31 million.让他来为自己辩护 为什么他赚了3100万美元
247And I think what you're going to realize is his life was a very, very tough one我想你会意识到 他的生活非常非常艰难
248to get to the top and that we are basically being the majority oppressing the minority我们基本上都是压迫少数的多数人
249in a different light.以不同的光线。
250It's very easy to pick on him, very easy.这很容易挑他,非常容易。
251All right, effort.好吧 努力点
252You know what?你知道吗?
253You've persuaded a lot of people.你说服了很多人
254Effort.奋发精进.
255You know what Raul's answer to that is?你知道劳尔的答案是什么吗?
256Even the effort that some people expend, conscientious striving, the work ethic,甚至有些人付出的努力, 认真努力,工作道德,
257even effort, depends a lot on fortunate family circumstances哪怕是努力 也取决于幸运的家庭环境
258for which you, we, can claim no credit.你,我们,不能要求任何信用。
259Now, let's do the test.现在,让我们做测试。
260Let's do a test here.我们来测试一下
261Never mind economic class, those differences are very significant.不论经济等级,这些差异都非常重要。
262Put those aside.把这些放在一边。
263Psychologists say that birth order makes a lot of difference心理学家说,出生顺序 有很多不同
264in work ethic striving effort.在职业道德努力。
265How many here?这里有多少人?
266Raise your hand, those of you here who are first in birth order.举起你的手,你们这些先出生的人
267I am too, by the way.顺便说一句,我也是
268Mike, I noticed you raised your hand.迈克,我注意到你举起手来了
269If the case for the meritocratic conception is that effort should be rewarded,如果功绩主义的概念是,应该奖励这种努力,
270doesn't Raul's have a point that even effort striving work ethic is largely shaped,劳尔没有一点意义,即使努力工作道德 在很大程度上是成形的,
271even by birth order?即使是根据出生令?
272Is it your doing, Mike, is it your doing that you were first in birth order?是你做的,迈克, 是你做的, 你是第一个出生顺序?
273Then why, Raul says, of course not.那为什么,劳尔说,当然不是。
274So why should income and wealth and opportunities in life因此,为什么收入和财富以及生活中的机会
275be based on factors arbitrary from a moral point of view?从道德角度来看,是否基于任意因素?
276That's a challenge that he puts to market societies,这是他对市场社会的挑战,
277but also to those of us at places like this.也是为了我们这些人
278A question to think about for next time.下次想个问题
279A justice of the United States Supreme Court.美国最高法院法官.
280What do they make?他们做的是什么?
281It's just under $200,000.刚刚不到二十万
282But there's another judge who makes a lot more than Sandra Day O'Connor.但有另一位法官比桑德拉·戴·奥康纳赚得更多.
283You know who it is?你知道是谁吗?
284Judge Judy, how did you know that?朱迪法官 你怎么知道这个的?
285Judge Judy, you know how much she makes?Judy法官 你知道她赚了多少钱吗?
286$25 million.2500万美元。
287Now, is that just?是这样吗?
288Is it fair?公平吗?
289We ended last time with that remarkable poll.上次的民意调查结束了
290Do you remember the poll about birth order?你还记得关于出生令的民意调查吗?
291What percentage of people in this room raised their hands?这个房间里有多少人举起手来?
292Was it to say that they were the first born?是说他们是第一个出生的吗?
29375, 80 percent?75,80%吗?
294And what was the significance of that这有什么意义?
295if you're thinking about these theories of distributive justice?如果你在考虑这些分配正义的理论?
296Remember, we were discussing记住,我们在讨论
297three different theories of distributive justice.分配正义的三种不同理论.
298Three different ways of answering the question,有三种不同的回答方式,
299how should income and wealth and opportunities收入、财富和机会如何
300and the good things in life be distributed?生活中的佳物,是分配的。
301And so far we've looked at the libertarian answer目前为止,我们已经看 自由主义的答案
302that says the just system of distribution这说明 公正的分配系统
303is a system of free exchange, of free market economy,自由交换制度,自由市场经济,
304against a background of formal equality,在形式上平等的背景下,
305which simply means that jobs and careers are open to anyone.也就是说,工作和事业是向任何人开放的。
306Rawls says this represents an improvement罗尔斯说这是个进步
307over aristocratic and caste systems超越贵族和种姓制度
308because everyone can compete for every job,因为每个人都可以竞争每份工作,
309careers open to talents.职业向人才开放。
310And beyond that, the just distribution除此之外,公正的分配
311is the one that results from free exchange,是自由交换的结果,
312voluntary transactions, no more, no less.自愿交易,不再,也不再减少。
313Then Rawls argues, if all you have is formal equality,那么罗尔斯说,如果你只有形式上的平等,
314jobs open to everyone,向所有人开放的工作,
315the result is not going to be fair.结果是不公平的。
316It will be biased in favor of those将偏向于那些
317who happen to be born to affluent families,他们是富裕家庭的后裔,
318who happen to have the benefit of good educational opportunities.享受良好教育机会。
319And that accident of birth is not a just basis和这个意外的出生 不只是根据
320for distributing life chances.分配生命的机会。
321And so many people who notice this unfairness,这么多人谁注意到这种不公平,
322Rawls argues, are led to embraceRawls争吵,被引向拥抱
323a system of fair equality of opportunity.机会平等制度。
324That leads to the meritocratic system,这导致了功勋制度,
325fair equality of opportunity.机会平等。
326But Rawls says, even if you bring everyone但罗尔斯说,即使你带大家来
327to the same starting point in the race,在比赛的同一个起点,
328what's going to happen?会发生什么事?
329Who's going to win?谁会赢?
330The fastest runners.跑得最快的选手
331So once you're troubled by basing distributive shares所以一旦你被分配股困扰
332on morally arbitrary contingencies,道德上任意的意外事件,
333you should, if you reason it through,你应该,如果你解释它通过,
334be carried all the way to what Rawls calls被一路带到罗尔斯所说的
335the democratic conception,民主概念,
336a more egalitarian conception of distributive justice更平等的分配公正概念
337that he defines by the difference principle.他用不同的原则来定义
338Now he doesn't say that the only way to remedy现在他没有说 唯一的补救方法
339or to compensate for differences in natural talents and abilities或补偿天赋和能力的差异;
340is to have a kind of leveling equality,这是一种平等,
341a guaranteed equality of outcome.保证结果平等。
342But he does say,但他确实说,
343there's another way to deal with these contingencies.还有另一种方法可以应付这些意外情况
344People may gain, may benefit from their good fortune,人或许得益,或许得福。
345but only on terms that work to the advantage但只能从有利条件出发
346of the least well off.最不富裕的人
347And so we can test how this theory actually works所以我们可以测试这个理论是如何实际运作的
348by thinking about some pay differentials考虑一些工资差异
349that arise in our society.我们社会上出现的一切
350What does the average school teacher make普通的老师能做什么?
351in the United States, do you suppose?在美国 你觉得呢?
352Roughly.大约吧
353It's a little more, forty, forty-two thousand.稍加,,四万四千两.
354What about David Letterman?大卫·莱特曼呢?
355How much do you think David Letterman makes?你觉得大卫·莱特曼能赚多少钱?
356More than a school teacher?不只是老师?
357Thirty-one million dollars3100万美元
358David Letterman. Is that fair?大卫·莱特曼 公平吗?
359That David Letterman makes that much more than a school teacher.大卫·莱特曼做的不仅仅是一个老师
360Well, Rawls's answer would be,罗尔斯的答案是
361it depends whether the basic structure of society取决于社会的基本结构
362is designed in such a way以这种方式设计
363that Letterman's thirty-one million dollars is subject to taxation莱特曼的三千一百万要缴税
364so that some of those earnings以便部分收入
365are taken to work for the advantage被带去工作为优势
366of the least well off.最不富裕的人
367One other example of a pay differential.另一个工资差别的例子。
368A Justice of the United States Supreme Court.美国最高法院法官。
369What do they make?他们做的是什么?
370It's just under two hundred thousand dollars.刚不到二十万美金
371Here's Sandra Day O'Connor for example.例如桑德拉·戴·奥康纳
372There she is.她来了
373But there's another judge who makes a lot more但还有一位法官 赚得更多
374than Sandra Day O'Connor.比桑德拉・戴・奥康纳。
375You know who it is?你知道是谁吗?
376Judge Judy. How did you know that?法官朱迪。 你怎么知道这个的?
377You watch?你看吗?
378No, but you're right.不,但你说得对。
379Judge Judy. You know how much she makes?法官朱迪。 你知道她赚了多少钱吗?
380There she is.她来了
381Twenty-five million dollars.两千五百万
382Now, is that just?是这样吗?
383Is it fair?公平吗?
384Well, the answer is,嗯,答案是,我们...
385it depends whether这取决于是否
386this is against a background system这是一个背景系统
387in line with the difference principle根据差别原则
388where those who come out on top in terms of在那里,那些从上面出来的人,
389income and wealth are taxed收入和财富被征税
390in a way that benefits the least well off以对最不富裕的人有利的方式
391members of society.社会成员。
392Now, we're going to come back现在,我们要回来
393to these wage differentials,这些工资差别,
394pay differentials,工资差异,
395between a real judge and a TV judge.真正的法官与电视法官之间
396The one Marcus watches all the time.马库斯经常看的那个
397What I want to do now我现在想做的事
398is return to these theories返回这些理论
399and to examine并审查
400the objections反对
401to Rawls's到罗尔斯家
402more egalitarian theory,更平等的理论,
403the difference principle.区别原则。
404There are at least three objections至少有三个反对
405to Rawls's difference principle.到罗尔斯的区别原则。
406One of them came up其中一个来了
407last time in the discussion,上次在讨论中
408and a number of you raised this worry.你们中的一些人提出了这种忧虑。
409What about incentives?那奖励呢?
410What about the risk if taxes reach税额达到的风险如何?
41170, 80, 90 percent marginal rate70、80、90%的边际比率
412that Michael Jordan won't play迈克尔·乔丹不会演奏
413basketball,篮球
414that David Letterman那个大卫·莱特曼
415won't do late night comedy,不做深夜喜剧,
416or that CEOs或首席执行官
417{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}会进入其他的
418line of work?工作线?
419Who among those who are defenders谁是捍卫者?
420of Rawls?罗尔斯?
421Who has an answer to this objection谁有这个反对的答案
422about the need for incentives?需要鼓励吗?
423Yes, go ahead.说吧
424Stand up.站起来
425Rawls's idea is that罗尔斯的想法是
426there should only be so much difference只有这么多的区别
427that it helps the least well off the most.帮助最不富裕的人
428If you're a CEO, then the least well off如果你是CEO,那就最没有好处了
429might not be able to watch late night TV可能不能看深夜电视
430or might not have a job because their CEO或者可能没有工作 因为他们的首席执行官
431doesn't want to work.不想工作。 不想工作吗?
432So you need to find the correct balance所以你需要找到正确的平衡
433where taxation still leaves enough incentive税收仍然有足够的激励
434for the least well off to benefit from the talents.才能从中得益
435Good, and what's your name? Tim.好,你叫什么名字来着? 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆
436Tim. All right, so Tim is saying in effect蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 好吧,蒂姆说实际上
437that there is a need for incentives需要鼓励措施
438and for some adjustment in the tax rate税率调整
439to take account of incentives,考虑到激励措施,
440but Tim points out但蒂姆指出
441the standpoint from which观点
442the question of incentives needs to be considered需要考虑的鼓励措施问题
443is not the effect on the total size不是对总大小的影响
444of the economic pie,经济馅饼,
445but instead from the standpoint of the effect但从效果的角度来看
446on the well being of those at the bottom.那是在下方的人的幸福。
447Right? Good, thank you.对吧? 很好 谢谢
448I think that is what Rawls would say.我想罗尔斯会这么说
449In fact, if you look in section 17事实上,如果你看17节
450where he describes在他描述的地方
451the difference principle,区别原则,
452he allows for incentives他允许奖励
453the naturally advantaged自然优势
454are not to gain是不会得到的
455merely because they are more gifted,只是因为他们更有天赋,
456but only to cover the cost of training and education但只能支付培训和教育费用
457and for using their endowments in ways that help和利用其捐赠的方式
458the less fortunate as well. So you can have incentives.更幸运的 所以,你可以有奖励。
459You can adjust the tax rate您可以调整税率
460if taking too much from David Letterman如果从大卫·莱特曼那里拿走太多钱
461or from Michael Jordan or from Bill Gates迈克尔・乔丹或比尔・盖茨
462winds up actually hurting最终会很痛
463those at the bottom. That's the test.这些在底部。 这就是测试。
464So incentives,所以,激励,
465that's not a decisive objection against Rawls'那不是对罗尔斯的决定性反对
466difference principle,差别原则,
467but there are two weightier, more difficult但有两个更重,更难
468objections.反对。
469One of them其中一个
470comes来了
471from defenders of人权维护者送交的函件
472a meritocratic conception.一个优异的概念。
473The argument that says, what about effort?所谓努力的争论呢?
474What about people working hard那么,人们努力工作
475having a right to what they earn他们有权挣钱
476because they deserved it? They've worked hard for it.因为他们罪有应得? 他们为此付出了很大努力.
477That's the objection这就是反对
478from effort and moral desert.从努力和道德的沙漠。
479Then there's another objection还有另一个反对
480that comes from这是来自
481libertarians自由主义者
482and this objection和本反对
483has to do with reasserting the idea和重新提出这个想法有关
484of self-ownership.自我拥有。
485Doesn't the difference没有区别
486principle, by treating原则,通过处理
487our natural talents and endowments as common assets,我们的天赋和天赋作为共同资产,
488doesn't that violate这不违反
489the idea that we own我们的想法
490ourselves? Now, let me我们自己? 让我来
491deal first先处理
492with the objection that comes from与来自
493the libertarian direction.自由主义的方向。
494Milton Friedman writes in his book米尔顿·弗里德曼在他的书中写道:
495Free to Choose, life is not fair.自由选择,生活是不公平的。
496And it's tempting to believe并且它诱人相信
497that government can rectify what nature政府可以纠正什么性质
498has spawned.已经产卵。
499But his answer is,但他的答案是, ,
500the only way to try to rectify that唯一能纠正这种情况的方法
501is to have a leveling equality of outcome.实现结果的平等
502Everyone finishing the race at the same point大家都在同一个时间完成比赛
503and that would be a disaster.这将是一场灾难。
504This is an easy这很简单
505argument to answer要回答的参数
506and Rawls addresses it和罗尔斯处理它
507in one of the most在一个最
508powerful passages, I think,强大的通道,我认为,
509of a theory of justice. It's in一个正义的理论。 进去了
510section 17.页:1
511The natural distribution, and here he's talking about自然分布,他在这里谈论
512the natural distribution of talents and endowments,天赋和天赋的自然分布,
513is neither just nor unjust.既不公正也不不公正。
514Nor is it unjust that persons are born into society人出生于社会也不是不公正的
515at some particular position. These are simply natural facts.在一个特殊的位置。 这些只是自然的事实。
516What is just and unjust is the way that institutions正义和不公正的是机构的方式
517deal with these facts.处理这些事实。
518That's his answer这就是他的答案
519to libertarian laissez-faire economists自由放任经济学家
520就像Milton Friedman说生活不公平
521but get over it. Get over it但要克服它。 忘记它
522and let's see if we can at least maximize让我们看看我们能不能尽量
523the benefits that flow from it.从它得到的利益。
524But the more powerful libertarian objection但更强大的自由主义反对
525to Rawls is not libertarian from the libertarian到罗尔斯不是自由主义者 从自由主义者
526economists like Milton Friedman.像米尔顿·弗里德曼这样的经济学家.
527It's from the argument about self-ownership这是关于自有的争论
528developed as we saw正如我们所看到的
529in Nozick.在诺兹克
530And from that point of view从这个角度看
531yes, it might be a good thing是的,这可能是一件好事
532to create Head Start programs and public schools创建 " 首创方案 " 和公立学校
533so that everyone can go to a decent school让每个人都能去一个体面的学校
534and start the race at the same starting line.并在同一条起点线开始比赛。
535That might be good.这可能是很好的。
536If you tax people to create public schools如果你向人们征税 创建公立学校
537if you tax people against their will如果你违背人们的意愿而向他们征税
538you coerce them.你强迫他们。
539It's a form of theft.是一种盗窃形式.
540If you take some of Letterman's 31 million如果你拿一些莱特曼的3100万
541tax it away to support public schools向公立学校征税
542against his will违背他的意志
543the state is really doing国家真的在做
544no better than stealing from him.没有比偷他的东西更好的了。
545It's coercion.这是强迫。
546And the reason is原因是
547we have to think of ourselves as owning我们必须自以为是
548our talents and endowments.我们的才能和天赋
549Because otherwise we're back to just using people因为否则我们就会重新利用别人
550and coercing people.和强迫人们。
551That's the libertarian reply.这是自由主义者的回答。
552What's Rawls' answer to that objection?罗尔斯的答案是什么?
553He doesn't address他没有地址
554the idea of self-ownership directly.直接拥有的观念。
555But the effect, the moral weight但效果,道德的分量
556of his argument for the difference principle is他关于区别原则的论点是:
557maybe we don't own ourselves也许我们没有自我
558in that thorough going sense after all.毕竟是彻底的
559Now, he says this doesn't mean他说这并不意味着
560that the state国家
561is an owner in me in the sense从意义上说,我是一个主人
562that it can simply commandeer my life.它可以简单地支配我的生活。
563Because remember the first principle因为记住第一条原则
564we would agree to behind the veil of ignorance我们同意在无知的面纱后面
565is the principle of equal basic liberties.平等基本自由的原则。
566Freedom of speech, religious liberty,言论自由、宗教自由、
567freedom of conscience and the like.良心自由之类的
568So the only respect因此,唯一的尊重
569in which the idea其中的想法
570of self-ownership must give way必须让位给自己
571comes when we're thinking about当我们想到
572whether I own myself无论我自己
573in the sense that从这个意义上说,
574I have a privileged claim我有一个特权要求
575on the benefits that come带来的惠益
576from the exercise of my talents从发挥我的才能
577in a market economy.在市场经济中。
578And Rawls says on reflection we don't.罗尔斯在反射时说我们没有
579We can defend rights.我们可以捍卫权利。
580We can respect the individual.我们可以尊重个人
581We can uphold human dignity我们可以维护人的尊严
582without embracing不拥抱
583the idea of self-possession.自我占有的想法。
584That in effect这实际上
585is his reply这是他的答复
586to the libertarian.对自由主义者。
587I want to turn now to his reply我现在想谈谈他的答复
588to the defender of a meritocratic conception向德才主义概念的捍卫者
589who invokes effort他们是勤劳的,
590as the basis of moral desert.作为道德沙漠的基础
591People who work hard to develop their talents努力培养才能的人
592deserve the benefits应得利益
593that come from the exercise of their talents.这来自于他们的才能的锻炼。
594Well we've already seen我们已经看到了
595the beginning of Rawls' answer to that question.罗尔斯回答这个问题的开始
596And it goes back to that poll回到民意调查
597we took about birth order.我们拿了出生令。
598His first answer is他的第一个答案是
599even the work ethic,甚至职业道德,
600even the willingness to strive conscientiously甚至愿意认真努力
601depends on all sorts of family circumstances取决于各种家庭环境
602and social and cultural contingencies社会和文化紧急情况
603for which we can claim no credit.我们对此不主张任何信用。
604You can't claim credit for the fact that你不能因为
605you, most of us, happen to be first in birth order你,我们大多数人, 恰好是出生顺序第一
606and that for some complex而对于一些复杂
607psychological and social reasons心理和社会原因
608that seems to be associated with striving,这似乎与努力,
609with achieving, with effort.并努力地取得成就。
610That's one answer.这是一个答案。
611There's a second answer.答有二义.
612Those of you who invoke effort,你们这些人是努力的,
613you don't really believe你不会真的相信
614that moral desert attaches to effort.道德的沙漠 与努力。
615Take two construction workers.带两个建筑工人
616One is strong and can raise four walls in an hour一个很强壮,一个小时就能升起四面墙
617without even breaking a sweat.连汗都弄不出来
618And another construction worker is另一个建筑工人是
619small and scrawny.小而细.
620And has to spend three days还要花三天时间
621to do the same amount of work.做同样多的工作。
622No defender of meritocracy没有德才主义的捍卫者
623is going to look at the effort of that将看一看...
624weak and scrawny construction worker and say体弱又瘦的建筑工人说
625therefore he deserves to make more.因此,他应该做更多。
626So it isn't really effort.所以这不是真正的努力。
627This is the second reply to the meritocratic claim.这是对权宜之计的第二次答复。
628It isn't really effort这不是真正的努力
629that the defender of meritocracy是功绩的捍卫者,
630believes is the moral basis相信道德基础
631of distributive shares.分配份额。
632How much do you contribute?你贡献多少?
633But contribution takes us straight back但贡献让我们直接回来
634to our natural talents and abilities.我们的天赋和能力
635Not just effort.不仅仅是努力
636And it's not our doing how we came into the possession这不是我们做什么 我们是如何进入拥有
637of those talents in the first place.这些才华,首先。
638All right, suppose you accepted these arguments.好吧,假设你接受了这些论点。
639That effort isn't everything.并不是所有的努力
640That contribution matters贡献很重要
641to the point of the meritocratic conception.至功德观.
642That effort even isn't那个努力甚至不是
643our own doing.我们自己做的。
644Does that mean这是否意味着
645the objection continues?继续反对?
646Does that mean that according to Rawls这是否意味着,根据罗尔斯
647moral desert has nothing to do道德沙漠没什么可做的
648with distributive justice?与分配正义?
649Well, yes.
650Distributive justice is not about moral desert.分配正义与道德沙漠无关.
651Now here现在
652Rawls introduces an importantRawls引入了一个重要的
653and a tricky distinction.和微妙的区别。
654It's between moral desert on the one hand这是在道德的沙漠之间
655and entitlements to legitimate expectations享受正当期望的权利
656on the other.在另一个。
657What is the difference between moral deserts道德的沙漠有什么区别
658and entitlements?权利?
659Take a game of games.玩游戏吧
660A game of chance and a game of skill.机会游戏和技能游戏.
661Take a game of pure chance.玩个纯粹的机会游戏
662Say I play the Massachusetts State lottery.说我玩马萨诸塞州彩票。
663And my number comes up.我的号码出来了
664I'm entitled to my winnings.我有权赢
665But even though I'm entitled to my winnings但即使我有权赢
666there's no sense in which没有什么意义
667because it's just a game of luck因为它只是一个运气游戏
668no sense in which I morally deserve我道德上不该有这种感觉
669to win in the first place.以赢得第一。
670That's an entitlement.这是权利。
671Now contrast the lottery with a different kind of game.现在把彩票和另一种游戏做对比
672A game of skill.技能游戏.
673Now现在
674imagine the Boston Red Sox想象一下波士顿红袜
675winning the World Series.赢得世界大赛。
676When they win当他们赢了
677they're entitled to the trophy.他们有权获得奖杯。
678But it can be always asked但总是可以问
679of a game of skill技能游戏
680did they deserve to win?他们应该赢吗?
681It's always possible in principle to distinguish原则上总是可以区分的
682what someone's entitled to一个人的权利
683under the rules根据议事规则
684and whether they deserve to win in the first place.以及他们是否应该先赢
685That's an antecedent standard这是以前的标准
686moral desert.道德的沙漠。
687Now Rawls says现在罗尔斯说
688distributive justice is not a matter of moral desert分配正义不是道德荒漠的问题
689though it is a matter of entitlements虽然这是一个权利问题
690to legitimate expectations.与正当的期望。
691Here's where he explains it.他在这里解释
692A just scheme一个公正的计划
693answers to what men are entitled to.回答男人的权利。
694It satisfies their legitimate expectations它满足了他们的合法期望
695as founded upon social institutions.以社会机构为基础。
696But what they are entitled to但是他们应该得到什么
697is not proportional to
698nor dependent on their intrinsic worth.也不取决于它们的内在价值。
699The principles of justice司法原则
700that regulate the basic structure规范基本结构
701do not mention moral desert别提道德的沙漠
702and there is no tendency for distributive shares没有分配股的倾向
703to correspond to it.来对应它。
704Why does Rawls make this distinction?为什么罗尔斯会做出这种区分?
705What morally is at stake?道德上有什么利害关系?
706One thing morally at stake道德上有一点关系
707is the whole question of effort that we've already discussed.是我们讨论过的整个努力问题
708But there's a second contingency但还有第二个意外
709a second source of moral arbitrariness道德专断的第二个根源
710that goes beyond the question这超出了问题的范围
711of whether it's to my credit that I have the talents我是否有才华,这是否是我的功劳
712that enable me to get ahead.那样我才能领先
713And that has to do with the contingency这和意外有关
714that I live in a society我生活在一个社会
715that happens to prize my talents.这恰好是奖励我的才能。
716The fact其实
717that David Letterman那个大卫·莱特曼
718lives in a society that puts a great premium生活在一个充满爱心的社会
719puts a great value很有价值
720on a certain type of smirky joke某类滑稽笑话
721that's not his doing这不是他做的
722that happens to live in such a society.它恰好生活在这样一个社会。
723But this is a second contingency.但这是第二个意外
724This isn't something that we can claim credit for.这不是我们可以要求的功劳。
725Even if I had sole unproblematic claim即使我只有一件没有问题的事
726to my talents and to my effort为了我的才能和努力
727it would still be the case现在还是这样
728that the benefits I get from exercising those talents我从锻炼这些才华得到的好处
729depend on factors取决于因素
730that vary from a moral point of view.从道德角度来说,这是不同的。
731What my talents will reap in a market economy我的才能会在市场经济中收获
732what does that depend on?这取决于什么?
733What other people happen to want or like in this society?社会上还有其他人想要什么?
734It depends on the law of supply and demand.这取决于供求法则.
735That's not my doing.这不是我做的。
736Certainly not the basis for moral desert.当然不是道德荒漠的基础。
737What counts as contributing贡献
738depends on the qualities取决于品质
739that this or that society happens to prize.这个社会或那个社会碰巧是奖品。
740Most of us are fortunate to possess我们大部分人很幸运能拥有
741in large measure, for whatever reason在很大程度上,无论出于何种原因
742the qualities that our society我们社会的品质
743happens to prize.刚好是奖品
744The qualities that enable us使我们具备的品质
745to provide what society wants.提供社会想要的东西。
746In a capitalist society在资本主义社会
747it helps to have entrepreneurial drive.它帮助有 创业驱动力。
748It helps to get on easily and smoothly with superiors.帮助上司轻松顺利相处.
749In a mass democratic society在大众民主社会中
750it helps to look good on television在电视上看起来不错
751and to speak in short superficial sound bites.并用浅浅的音效说话。
752In a litigious society在一个诉讼社会
753it helps to go to law school上法学院有帮助
754and to have the talents to do well on LSATs.并且有才能在LSAT上做得很好。
755But none of this is our doing.但这一切都不是我们做的。
756But we with our talents inhabited not our society但是,我们有我们的才能 居住不我们的社会
757technologically advanced, highly litigious技术先进,诉讼激烈
758but a hunting society or a warrior society.但狩猎社会或战士社会。
759What would become of our talents then?我们的才能会怎样呢?
760They wouldn't get us very far.他们不会让我们走远的
761No doubt some of us would develop others.毫无疑问,我们有些人会发展其他人。
762But would we be less worthy?但是,我们是否更不值得呢?
763Would we be less virtuous?我们会不会不那么善良?
764Would we be less meritorious难道我们不值得
765if we lived in that kind of society rather than in ours?如果我们生活在那种社会 而不是我们的生活?
766Rawls's answer is no.罗尔斯的回答是否定的.
767We might make less money我们可能赚得更少
768and properly so.和正确的是这样。
769But while we would be entitled to less但是,虽然我们有权减少
770we would be no less worthy.我们同样值得
771No less deserving than we are now.与现在一样值得。
772And here's the point, the same could be said问题就在这里,可以说
773of those in our society who happen to hold我们社会中那些碰巧
774less prestigious positions不太有声望的职位
775who happen to have fewer of the talents才华较少
776that our society happens to reward.我们的社会碰巧得到回报。
777So here's the moral import这就是道德的意义
778of the distinction between moral desert道德沙漠的区别
779and entitlements to legitimate expectations.以及享有合法期望的权利。
780We are entitled to the benefits我们有权享受福利
781that the rules of the game promise游戏规则承诺
782for the exercise of our talents.为了发挥我们的才能
783And to concede, to suppose that we deserve承认,假设我们值得
784in the first place a society that values首先,一个重视
785the qualities we happen to have in abundance.我们的品质恰好丰富。
786Now we've been talking here现在我们一直在谈这个
787about income and wealth.关于收入和财富。
788What about opportunities and honors?机会和荣誉呢?
789What about the distribution那分配呢?
790of access, of seats席位的获得情况
791in elite colleges and universities?在精英学院和大学?
792It's true.这是真的。
793All of you你们所有人
794most of you first born你们大多数是刚出生的
795worked hard, strived努力奋斗,努力奋斗
796developed your talents培养你的才华
797to get here.到这里。
798But Rawls asks, in effect但罗尔斯问,实际上
799what is the moral status of your claim你们的道德地位是什么?
800to the benefits that attach附加福利
801to the opportunities you have?你的机会?
802Are seats in colleges大学的座位
803and universities和大学
804a matter, a kind of reward, an honor一个问题,一种奖励,一种荣誉
805for those who deserve them对那些应得的人,
806because they've worked so hard?因为他们工作这么辛苦?
807Or are those seats还是那些座位
808those opportunities and honors这些机会和荣誉
809entitlements to legitimate expectations享受合法期望的权利
810that depend for their justification取决于理由的
811on those of us who enjoy them我们中有享受他们的,
812doing so in a way在某种程度上
813that works to the benefit受益的
814of those at the bottom of society?社会底层的人?
815That's the question that Rawls'这就是罗尔斯的问题
816difference principle poses.差异原则构成。
817It's a question of the这是一个问题
818earnings of Michael Jordan and David Letterman迈克尔·乔丹和戴维·莱特曼的收入
819and Judge Judy.还有朱迪法官
820But it's also a question that can be asked但这也是一个可以问的问题
821of opportunities机会的利用
822to go to前往
823the top colleges and universities.最顶尖的学院和大学。
824And that's the debate that comes out这就是辩论的结果
825when we turn to the question of affirmative action当我们谈到扶持行动问题时
826next time.下次再说吧
827Don't miss the chance to interact online不要错过网上交流的机会
828with other viewers of Justice.与正义的其他观众。
829Join the conversation. Take a pop quiz.加入对话。 做个流行测验
830Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
831请访问justiceharvard.org. 谓之正法.
832. . ....
该视频共有字幕 848 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P7 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p07 6. 6.平权行动的争论 (P7)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by, additional funding provided by.该方案的资金由额外资金提供。
0:29Last time, we were discussing the distinction that Walls draws between two different types of claims.上次,我们讨论了Walls对两种不同类型的索赔所作的区分。
0:40Claims of moral desert on the one hand, and of entitlements to legitimate expectations on the other.一方面声称道德荒漠,另一方面声称有权享有正当的期望。
0:52Walls argued that it's a mistake to think that distributive justice is a matter of moral desert.沃尔斯认为,认为分配正义是道德荒漠问题是错误的.
1:07A matter of rewarding people according to their virtue.以功德报恩.
1:12Today we're going to explore that question of moral desert and its relation to distributive justice.今天我们要探讨道德沙漠问题 及其与分配正义的关系
1:19Not in connection with income and wealth, but in its connection with opportunities.不是与收入和财富有关,而是与机会有关。
1:25With hiring decisions and admission standards.包括雇用决定和录取标准。
1:30And so we turn to the case of affirmative action.因此,我们谈谈平权行动的情况。
1:36你读过Cheryl Hopwood的案子
展开字幕全文(708 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by, additional funding provided by.该方案的资金由额外资金提供。
2Last time, we were discussing the distinction that Walls draws between two different types of claims.上次,我们讨论了Walls对两种不同类型的索赔所作的区分。
3Claims of moral desert on the one hand, and of entitlements to legitimate expectations on the other.一方面声称道德荒漠,另一方面声称有权享有正当的期望。
4Walls argued that it's a mistake to think that distributive justice is a matter of moral desert.沃尔斯认为,认为分配正义是道德荒漠问题是错误的.
5A matter of rewarding people according to their virtue.以功德报恩.
6Today we're going to explore that question of moral desert and its relation to distributive justice.今天我们要探讨道德沙漠问题 及其与分配正义的关系
7Not in connection with income and wealth, but in its connection with opportunities.不是与收入和财富有关,而是与机会有关。
8With hiring decisions and admission standards.包括雇用决定和录取标准。
9And so we turn to the case of affirmative action.因此,我们谈谈平权行动的情况。
10你读过Cheryl Hopwood的案子
11She applied for admission to the University of Texas Law School.她申请进入德克萨斯大学法学院.
12Cheryl Hopwood had worked her way through high school.谢丽尔·霍普伍德在高中时很努力
13She didn't come from an affluent family.她不是出身富裕的家庭
14She put herself through community college and California State University at Sacramento.她把自己通过社区学院和加州州立大学在萨克拉门托.
15She achieved a 3.8 grade point average there.她在那里的平均成绩是3.8分。
16Later moved to Texas, became a resident.后来移居德州,成为居民.
17Took the law school admissions test, did pretty well on that.考了法学院的入学考试 成绩不错
18And she applied to the University of Texas Law School.她申请了德克萨斯大学法学院
19She was turned down.她被拒绝了。
20She was turned down at a time when the University of Texas was using an affirmative action admissions policy.在德克萨斯大学采用平权行动招生政策时,她遭到拒绝.
21A policy that took into account race and ethnic background.一项考虑到种族和族裔背景的政策。
22The University of Texas said 40% of the population of Texas is made up of African Americans and Mexican Americans.德克萨斯大学说,德克萨斯州40%的人口由非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人组成.
23It's important that we, as a law school, have a diverse student body.重要的是,我们作为一个法学院,拥有一个多样化的学生身体.
24And so we are going to take into account not only grades and test scores,所以我们要考虑的不仅是成绩和考试成绩
25but also the demographic makeup of our class, including its race and ethnic profile.还有我们阶级的人口组成 包括其种族和民族特征
26The result, and this is what Hopwood complained about,结果,这就是霍普伍德抱怨的
27the result of that policy is that some applicants to the University of Texas Law School德克萨斯大学法学院的一些申请人
28with the lower academic index, which includes grades and test scores,学术指数较低,包括成绩和考试分数,
29than hers were admitted and she was turned down.比她的被接纳, 她被拒绝。
30She said, she argued, I'm just being turned down because I'm white.她说,她争辩,我只是被拒绝 因为我是白人。
31If I weren't, if I were a member of a minority group with my grades and test scores, I would have been admitted.如果我不是,如果我是少数团体的成员 成绩和考试分数,我会被录取。
32And the statistics, the admissions statistics that came out in the trial和统计, 录取统计 出来在试验
33confirmed that African American and Mexican American applicants that year证实该年的非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人申请人
34who had her grades and test scores were admitted.她的成绩和考试成绩都被录取了
35It went to federal court.它去了联邦法院。
36Now, put aside the law, let's consider it from the standpoint of justice and morality.现在,撇开法律,让我们从正义和道德的角度来考虑.
37Is it fair or is it unfair?公平还是不公平?
38Does Cheryl Hopwood have a case, a legitimate complaint?谢丽尔·霍普伍德有案子 合法投诉吗
39Were her rights violated by the admissions policy of the law school?她的权利受到侵犯了吗?
40How many say, how many would rule for the law school有多少人说,有多少人会统治法学院
41and say that it was just to consider race and ethnicity as a factor in admissions?并说这只是把种族和族裔视为录取的因素?
42How many would rule for Cheryl Hopwood and say her rights were violated?有多少人会统治Cheryl Hopwood 说她的权利受到了侵犯?
43So here we have a pretty even split.因此,我们有一个相当平分。
44All right, now I want to hear from a defender of Cheryl Hopwood.好吧,现在我想听谢丽尔・霍普伍德的辩护人。
45Yes.
46You're basing something on that's an arbitrary factor.你根据的是这个因素
47Cheryl couldn't control the fact that she was white or not in a minority.谢丽尔无法控制自己是白人还是非少数民族的事实.
48And therefore, it's not as if it was like a test score that she worked hard to try因此,这不是像一个测试分数 她努力尝试
49and show that she could put that out there, that she had no control over her race.并显示她可以把 在那里, 她没有控制她的种族。
50Good.不错
51And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
52Brie.布丽
53Okay, Brie, stay right there.好吧,布丽,呆在那里。
54Now, let's find someone who has an answer for Brie.现在,我们去找一个有答案的人
55Yes.
56There are discrepancies in the educational system.教育系统存在差异。
57A majority of the time, I know this in New York City,大部分时间,我知道这一点 在纽约市,
58the schools that minorities go to are not as well-funded,少数群体就读的学校经费不足,
59are not as well-supplied as white schools.供应不如白人学校。
60And so there is going to be a discrepancy naturally between minorities and between whites所以少数民族和白人之间自然会出现差异
61if they go to better schools.如果他们去更好的学校。
62And they will not do as well on exams because they haven't had as much help考试时他们不会做得那么好 因为他们没有那么多帮助
63because of the worse school system.因为学校制度更糟
64All right, let me just interrupt you. Tell me your name.好吧,让我打断你。 告诉我你的名字。
65Anisha.阿尼沙(原变种).
66Anisha, you're pointing out that minority kids may have gone, in some cases,Anisha,你指出少数族群的孩子可能已经走了, 在某些情况下,
67to schools that didn't give them the same educational opportunity学校没有给他们同样的教育机会
68as kids from affluent families.作为富裕家庭的孩子
69Yes.
70And so the test scores they got may actually not represent their true potential.因此,他们得到的测试分数 可能并不代表他们的真正潜力。
71Because they didn't receive the same kind of help that they might have received因为他们没有得到同样的帮助 他们可能已经得到了
72had they gone to a school with better funding.他们去的学校 有更好的资金。
73Good. All right.不错 好吧,我们走。
74Anisha has raised the point that colleges still should chooseAnisha提出 学院应该选择
75for the greatest academic scholarly promise,为最大的学术承诺,
76but in reading the test scores and grades,但是在阅读考试成绩和成绩时
77they should take into account the different meaning those tests and grades have它们应考虑到这些考试和成绩的不同含义。
78in the light of educational disadvantage in the background.考虑到教育背景的不利地位。
79So that's one argument in defense of affirmative action,所以,这是捍卫平权行动的一个论点,
80Anisha's argument, correcting for the effects of unequal preparation,Anisha的论点,纠正 不平等准备的效果,
81educational disadvantage.教育劣势。
82Now, there are other arguments.现在,还有其他的论点。
83Suppose, just to identify whether there is a competing principle here,假设,仅仅为了确定这里是否有相互竞争的原则,
84suppose there are two candidates who did equally well on the tests and grades,假设有两位候选人在考试和成绩上表现同样出色,
85both of whom went to first-rate schools.两人都上过一流的学校。
86Two candidates.两个候选人。
87Among those candidates, would it be unfair for the college or university,在这些候选人中,如果对学院或大学不公平,
88for Harvard to say, we still want diversity along racial and ethnic dimensions,哈佛大学说,我们仍希望种族和族裔的多样性,
89even where we are not correcting for the effects on test scores即使我们没有纠正 对测试分数的影响
90of educational disadvantage?教育劣势?
91What about in that case, Bree?那样怎么样 Bree?
92If it's that one thing that puts someone over the edge,如果有一件事让某人陷入困境
93then I guess that would be justifiable.那么我猜这是有道理的。
94If everything else about the individual first, though,如果其他一切关于个人,虽然,
95everything they consider about that person's talents and where they come from他们所考虑的一切 关于他的才能和他们来自哪里
96and who they are without these arbitrary factors is the same.没有这些武断因素,他们是谁也是一样。
97Without these arbitrary factors, you call it.没有这些任意因素,你叫它。
98But before, you were suggesting, Bree, that race and ethnicity但之前,你是在暗示,布瑞,种族和民族
99are arbitrary factors outside the control of the applicants.是申请人无法控制的任意因素。
100Sure, I would agree with that.当然,我会同意这一点。
101And your general principle is that admissions shouldn't reward arbitrary factors你的一般原则是 录取不应该奖励任意因素
102over which people have no control.他们不能控制一切。
103Right.
104All right.好吧,我们走。
105Who else would like to thank you both?还有谁想感谢你们俩?
106Who else would like to get into this?还有谁想参与进来?
107What do you say?你说什么?
108Well, first of all, I'm for affirmative action temporarily,首先 我暂时支持平权行动
109but for two reasons.但有两个原因
110First of all, you have to look at the university's purpose.首先,你必须看看大学的目的。
111It is to educate their students.教育他们的学生。
112And I feel that different races, people coming from different races,我觉得不同的种族, 不同种族的人,
113have different backgrounds and they contribute differently to the education.他们有不同的背景,对教育的贡献不同。
114And second of all, when you say they have equal backgrounds,第二,当你说他们有同样的背景,
115that's not true when you look at the broader picture and you look at slavery.这不是真的,当你看 更广的画面,你看着 奴隶制。
116And this is kind of a reparation.这是种补偿。
117I think affirmative action is a temporary solution to alleviate history我认为平权行动是缓解历史的暂时解决办法
118and the wrongs done to African Americans in particular.特别是对非裔美国人犯下的错误。
119And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
120David.大卫
121You say that affirmative action is justified, at least for now,你说平权行动是正当的 至少现在
122as a way of compensating for past injustice, the legacy of slavery and segregation.以补偿过去的不公正、奴隶制和种族隔离的遗留问题。
123Right.
124Who wants to take on that argument?谁想接受这个论点?
125We need now a critic of affirmative action.我们现在需要一位肯定行动的批评者。
126Yes, go ahead.说吧
127I think that what happened in the past has no bearing on what happens today,我认为过去发生的事 与今天发生的事无关
128and I think that discriminating based on race should always be wrong,我认为基于种族的歧视应该永远是错误的,
129whether you're discriminating against one group or another.无论你歧视的是哪个群体
130Just because our ancestors did something doesn't mean that只是因为我们的祖先做了什么 并不意味着
131that should have any effect on what happens with us today.这应该对我们今天发生的事情有任何影响。
132All right, good.好吧,不错。
133I'm sorry, your name is?对不起,你的名字是?
134Kate.凯特
135All right, who has an answer for Kate?好吧,谁有凯特的答案?
136Yes.
137I just wanted to comment and say that...我只是想说...
138Tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字。
139My name is Mansoor.我叫曼苏尔
140Because of slavery, because of past injustices,因为奴隶制,因为过去的不公正,
141today we have a higher proportion of African Americans who are in poverty,今天,贫困的非裔美国人比例较高,
142who face less opportunities than white people.他们面对的机会比白人少
143And so because of slavery 200 years ago,因为二百年前的奴隶制
144and because of Jim Crow, and because of segregation,还有因为吉姆·克劳 和因为隔离
145today we have injustice based on race.今天,我们有基于种族的不公正待遇。
146Kate?凯特?
147I think that there are differences, obviously,我认为有分歧,很明显,
148but the way to fix those differences is not by some artificial fixing of the result.但消除这些差异的方法并不是人为地确定结果。
149You need to fix the problem.你需要解决这个问题。
150So we need to address differences in education所以我们需要解决教育方面的分歧
151and differences in upbringing with programs like Head Start和与 " 开始 " 等程序在培养方面的差异
152and giving more funding to lower-income schools向低收入学校提供更多资金;
153rather than trying to just fix the result而不是试图只是 修复结果
154so it makes it look like it's equal when really it isn't.所以它让它看起来像是平等的 当它真的不是。
155Yes.
156Well, with regard to affirmative action based on race,关于基于种族的平权行动,
157I just want to say that white people have had their own affirmative action in this country我只想说 白人在这个国家有自己的平权行动
158for more than 400 years.超过400年。
159It's called nepotism and quid pro quo.所谓任人唯命与报.
160So there's nothing wrong with correcting the injustice and discrimination所以纠正不公正和歧视是没有问题的
161that's been done to black people for 400 years.这已经对黑人做了400年。
162Good.不错
163Tell us...告诉我们...
164Great, tell us your name.太好了,告诉我们你的名字。
165Hannah.汉娜
166All right, who has an answer for Hannah?好吧,谁有汉娜的答案?
167And just to add to Hannah's point,而且为了补充汉娜的观点
168because we need now someone to respond,因为我们现在需要有人回应,
169Hannah, you could have also mentioned legacy admissions.汉娜,你也可以提到 遗产录取。
170Exactly.没错
171I was going to say, if you disagree with affirmative action,我想说 如果你不同意平权行动
172you should disagree with legacy admission,你应该不同意 传统承认,
173because it's obvious from looking around here因为从这里看很明显
174that there are more white legacies than black legacies白人遗产比黑人遗产还多
175in the history of Harvard University.在哈佛大学的历史。
176And explain what legacy admissions are.并解释什么是遗产承认.
177Well, legacy admissions is giving an advantage to someone传统招生给别人带来好处
178who has an arbitrary privilege of their parent拥有父母专有特权的人
179for having attended the university to which they're applying.因为他们上过他们申请的大学
180All right, so a reply for Hannah.好吧,给汉娜一个答复
181Yes, in the balcony.是的,在阳台上。
182Go ahead.来吧。
183First of all, if affirmative action is making up for past injustice,首先,如果平权行动能弥补过去的不公正,
184how do you explain minorities that were not historically discriminated against如何解释历史上没有受到歧视的少数群体
185in the United States who get these advantages?在美国谁得到这些优势?
186In addition, you could argue that affirmative action perpetuates divisions between the races此外,你可以认为,平权行动延续了种族之间的分歧。
187rather than achieve the ultimate goal of race being an irrelevant factor in our society.而不是实现种族成为我们社会无关因素的最终目标。
188And what? Tell us your name.还有呢? 告诉我们你的名字。
189Danielle.丹妮尔
190Hannah.汉娜
191I disagree with that because I think that by promoting diversity in an institution like this,我不同意这一点,因为我认为,通过促进这种机构的多样性,
192you further educate all of the students,你进一步教育所有的学生,
193especially the white students who grew up in predominantly white areas.特别是白人学生 他们主要在白人地区长大
194It's certainly a form of education to be exposed to people from different backgrounds,这肯定是一种教育形式 接触来自不同背景的人,
195and you put white students at an inherent disadvantage你将白人学生置于固有的不利地位
196when you surround them only with their own kind.当时,你们只用他们的同类包围他们。
197Why should race necessarily be equated with diversity?为什么种族必须等同于多样性?
198There are so many other forms.有很多其他形式。
199Why should we assume that race makes people different?我们为什么要假设种族让人们不同?
200Again, that's perpetuating the idea of racial division within our universities and our society.这也是我们大学和社会中种族分裂思想的延续.
201Hannah.汉娜
202With regard to African-American people being given a special advantage,关于非裔美国人获得特殊优势的问题,
203it's obvious that they bring something special to the table很明显他们带了些特别的东西来
204because they have a unique perspective just as someone from a different religion因为他们有独特的视角 就像来自不同宗教的人
205or socioeconomic background would as well.或社会经济背景也会。
206As you say, there are many different types of diversity.如你所说,多样性有很多种。
207There's no reason that racial diversity should be eliminated from that criteria.种族多样性没有理由从这个标准中去除.
208Yes, go ahead.说吧
209Racial discrimination is illegal in this country,种族歧视在这个国家是非法的,
210and I believe that it was African-American leaders themselves我相信是非裔美国领导人自己
211when Martin Luther King said he wanted to be judged not on the color of his skin当马丁・路德・金说,他不想 被评判他的肤色
212but by the content of his character, his merit, his achievements.他的性格、功绩、成就
213And I just think that to decide solely based on someone's race我只是认为 仅仅根据某人的种族来决定
214is just inherently unfair.本来就是不公平的
215I mean, if you want to correct based on disadvantaged backgrounds,我的意思是,如果你想纠正 基于不利背景,
216that's fine, but there are also disadvantaged white people as well.也有一些白人处于劣势
217It shouldn't matter if you're white.白衣应否.
218Tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字。
219{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}Ted {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}泰德 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}你觉得呢
220Ted?特德吗?
221Yes.
222Think of Hopwood.想着霍普伍德
223It's unfair to count race or I assume you would also say ethnicity or religion.数种族是不公平的 或者我想你也会说民族或宗教
224Yes.
225Do you think she has a right to be considered according to her grades and test scores alone?你觉得她有权利被考虑 根据她的成绩 和测试分数?
226No, there is more to it than that.不,还有更多的。
227Universities need to promote diversity.大学需要促进多样性。
228So you agree with the goal of promoting diversity?你同意促进多样性的目标吗?
229There's ways to promote diversity besides discriminating against people除了对人的歧视,还有促进多样性的方法
230solely based on a factor that they cannot control.完全基于他们无法控制的因素。
231All right, so what makes it wrong is that she can't control her race.好吧,所以是什么 使它错了是 她不能控制她的种族。
232She can't control the fact that she's white.她不能控制自己是白人的事实.
233That's the heart of the unfairness to her.这是对她不公平的核心
234Brie made a similar point.布里也提出了类似的观点.
235That basing admissions on factors that people can't control is fundamentally unfair.基于人们无法控制的因素的承认是根本的不公平的。
236What do you say?你说什么?
237There's a lot of things you can't control.诸法无量无边.
238And if you're going to go through it based on merit, like just based on your test scores,如果你要通过它 根据功绩, 就像仅仅根据你的测试分数,
239a lot of what you can achieve has to do with the family background that you raised.你能够实现的许多目标 都与你提起的家庭背景有关
240And if both your parents were scholarly,如果你父母都是学者
241then you have more of a chance of actually being more scholarly yourself and getting those grades.然后你有更多的机会 成为更多的学者 自己并获得这些成绩。
242And you can't control what kind of family you were born into.你无法控制你所生的家庭
243All right, good. That's a great rejoinder.好吧,不错。 这是伟大的复辩。
244What's your name?你叫什么来着?
245Da.达曰.
246Ted, are you against advantages that come from the family you were born into?Ted 你反对你生下来的家庭的好处吗?
247What about legacy admissions?遗产的录取呢?
248I mean, I do believe that in terms of a legacy admission, you shouldn't have a special preference.我的意思是,我确实相信,在遗产 承认,你不应该有一个特别的偏好。
249I mean, there is a legacy admission you could argue is another part of diversity.我的意思是,有一个遗产的承认 你可以认为是多样性的另一部分。
250You could say it's important to have a small percentage of people that have several generation family attendance at a place like Harvard.你可以说,在像哈佛这样的地方, 有几代人的家庭参与很重要。
251However, that should not be an advantage factor like race.然而,这不应像种族那样是一个有利因素。
252That should just be another part of promoting diversity.这应该只是促进多样性的另一个部分。
253Should it count at all?这算不算?
254Alumni status, should it count at all, Ted?校友身份,这算不算,泰德?
255Yes, it should count.是的,应该算数
256All right, I want to step back for a moment from these arguments.好吧,我想退一步 从这些论点。
257Thank you all for these contributions.感谢大家的贡献。
258We're going to come back to you.我们会回来找你的
259If you've listened carefully, I think you will have noticed three different arguments emerged from this discussion如果你仔细听了,我想你会注意到 从讨论中出现了三个不同的论点
260in defense of considering race and ethnicity as a factor in admissions.为将种族和族裔视为录取因素辩护。
261One argument has to do with correcting for the effects, for the effects of educational disadvantage.一种论点涉及纠正教育劣势的影响。
262这是Anisha的论点。
263This is what we might call the corrective argument.这就是我们所谓的纠正论点。
264Correcting for differences in educational background, the kind of school people went to, the opportunities they had and so on.纠正教育背景的差别、学生的种类、机会等等。
265That's one argument.这是一个争论。
266What's worth noticing, though, is that that argument is consistent in principle with the idea但值得注意的是,这个论点在原则上符合
267that only academic promise and scholarly potential should count in admissions.在录取中,只考虑学术承诺和学术潜力。
268We just need to go beyond test scores and grades alone to get a true estimate of academic promise and scholarly ability.我们只需要超越测试分数和分数 才能真正估计学术前景和学术能力
269That's the first argument.此是初辩.
270Then we heard a second argument that said affirmative action is justified even where there may not be the need to correct for educational disadvantage然后,我们听到第二个论点,说平权行动是正当的,即使没有必要纠正教育方面的不利因素。
271in a particular applicant's case.在某一申请人的案件中。
272It's justified as a way of compensating for past wrongs, for historic injustices.这是对过去的错误,对历史的不公正进行补偿的一种合理方法.
273So that's a compensatory argument.所以,这是一个补偿性的论点。
274Compensating for past wrongs.弥补过去的错误。
275Then we heard a third, a different argument for affirmative action from Hannah and others.然后我们听到了第三个, 不同的论点 平权行动与汉娜和其他人。
276That argued in the name of diversity.这是以多样性的名义提出的。
277Now the diversity argument is different from the compensatory argument现在多样性的论点不同于补偿性的论点
278because it makes a certain appeal to the social purpose or the social mission of the college or university.因为它对学院或大学的社会目的或社会使命有一定的吸引力。
279There are really two aspects to the diversity argument.多样性的论点实际上有两个方面。
280One says it's important to have a diverse student body for the sake of the educational experience for everyone.一个说,为了每个人的教育经历,拥有多样化的学生身体是很重要的.
281Hannah made that point.汉娜说到这一点。
282And the other talks about the wider society.而彼则谈广大社会.
283This was the argument made by the University of Texas in the Hoplid case.这是德克萨斯大学在Hoplid案中提出的论点。
284We need to train lawyers and judges and leaders, public officials,我们需要培训律师、法官和领导人、政府官员,
285who will contribute to the strength, the civic strength of the state of Texas and the country as a whole.他们将为德克萨斯州和整个国家的力量、公民力量作出贡献。
286So there are two different aspects to the diversity argument.因此多样性的论点有两个不同的方面。
287But both are arguments in the name of the social purpose or the social mission or the common good served by the institution.但两者都是以社会目的或社会使命或机构服务的共同利益的名义提出的论点.
288Well, what about the force of these arguments?那么,这些争论的力量呢?
289We've also heard objections to these arguments.我们也听到有人反对这些论点.
290The most powerful objection to the compensatory argument is,对补偿性论点的最强烈反对意见是,
291今天让Cheryl Hopwood 做出牺牲是公平的
292to pay the compensation for an injustice that was admittedly committed and was egregious in the past,赔偿过去所犯下的、令人发指的不公正行为,
293but in which she was not implicated.但是她并没有卷入其中。
294Is that fair?公平吗?
295So that's an important objection to the compensatory argument.所以这是对补偿论的重要反对.
296And in order to meet that objection,为了应付这个反对
297we would have to investigate whether there is such a thing as group rights or collective responsibility that reaches over time.我们不得不调查是否有 诸如群体权利或集体责任之类的东西 随着时间的推移。
298So having identified that issue, let's set it aside to turn to the diversity argument.因此,在找出了这个问题之后,让我们把它放在一边,来谈谈多样性的论点。
299The diversity argument doesn't have to worry about that question,多样性的争论 不必担心这个问题,
300about collective responsibility for past wrongs.关于对过去错误的集体责任。
301Because it says, for reasons Hannah and others pointed out,因为它说, 出于汉娜和其他人指出的原因,
302that the common good is served, is advanced,以便众生得享福,
303if there is a racially and ethnically diverse student body.如果有种族和种族多样性的学生团体。
304Everyone benefits.每个人都有益处。
305And this indeed was the argument that Harvard made这确实是哈佛大学提出的论点
306when it filed a Friend of the Court brief to the Supreme Court当法院之友向最高法院提交案情摘要时
307in the 1978 case, affirmative action case, the Bakke case.在1978年案件中,平权行动案,Bakke案。
308And the Harvard brief, the Harvard rationale,哈佛简介 哈佛理论
309was cited by Justice Powell, who was the swing vote in the case, upholding affirmative action.鲍威尔法官引用了这一点,鲍威尔法官是本案的摇摆投票人,坚持平权行动。
310He cited that as providing the rationale that he thought was constitutionally acceptable.他提到,这提供了他认为在宪法上可以接受的理由。
311Harvard's argument in its brief was this.哈佛在简介中的论点就是这个.
312We care about diversity.我们关心多样性。
313Scholarly excellence alone has never been the criterion of admission,单凭学者的才能 从来不是录取的标准
314the sole criterion of admission to Harvard College.进入哈佛大学的唯一标准
315Fifteen years ago, diversity meant students from California and New York and Massachusetts,十五年前 多样性意味着来自加州 纽约和马萨诸塞州的学生
316city dwellers and farm boys, violinists, painters and football players,城市居民和农场男孩、小提琴手、画家和足球运动员,
317biologists, historians and classicists.生物学家,历史学家和经典学家.
318The only difference now, Harvard argued,现在唯一的区别,哈佛大学认为,
319is that we're adding racial and ethnic status to this long list of diversity considerations.也就是我们把种族和民族地位 列入这长长的多样化考虑清单。
320When reviewing the large number of candidates able to do well in our classes,在回顾我们班上能做得很好的大批候选人时,
321Harvard wrote, race may count as a plus just as coming from Iowa may count哈佛写道,种族可能算一个加数 就像来自爱荷华州的种族可能算一个加数
322or being a good middle linebacker or pianist.或当好中后卫或钢琴家
323A farm boy from Idaho can bring something to Harvard College that a Bostonian cannot offer.爱达荷州的农场男孩可以带一些波士顿人无法提供的东西到哈佛大学.
324Similarly, a black student can usually bring something a white student cannot offer.同样,黑人学生通常可以带来白人学生不能提供的东西.
325The quality of the educational experience of all students depends in part on these differences.所有学生的教育经验的质量部分取决于这些差异。
326In the background and outlook that students bring with them.在学生带给他们的背景和前景中.
327That was Harvard's argument.这是哈佛大学的论点。
328Now what about the diversity argument?那么多样性的争论呢?
329Is it persuasive?有说服力吗?
330If it's to be persuasive, it has to meet one very powerful objection要有说服力,必须面对一个非常强大的反对
331that we've heard voiced here by Ted, by Bree.我们听到泰德和布瑞在这里说话
332Unless you're a utilitarian, you believe that individual rights can't be violated.除非你是功利主义者,你相信个人权利是不能被侵犯的.
333And so the question is, is there an individual right that is violated?因此,问题是,是否存在侵犯个人权利的问题?
334Is Cheryl Hopwood's right violated if she is used, so to speak, denied admission如果Cheryl Hopwood被利用的话 她的权利就受到侵犯了 所以说 她被拒绝了
335for the sake of the common good and the social mission为了共同利益和社会使命
336that the University of Texas Law School has defined for itself?德克萨斯大学法学院为自己定下了定义?
337Does she have a right?她有权利吗?
338Don't we deserve to be considered according to our excellences, our achievements,难道我们不应该被考虑 根据我们的优秀,我们的成就,
339our accomplishments, our hard work?我们的成就,我们的辛勤工作?
340Isn't that the right at stake?这不就是关键吗?
341Now we've already heard an answer to that argument.现在我们已经听到了关于这个论点的答案。
342No, she doesn't have a right.不,她没有权利。
343Nobody deserves to be admitted.没有人应该被接纳。
344Notice how this gets us back to the issue of desert versus entitlement.注意这如何让我们回到 沙漠与权利的问题。
345They're arguing there is no individual right that Hopwood has.他们认为霍普伍德没有个人权利
346She doesn't deserve to be admitted according to any particular set of criteria她不值得按照任何特定标准被录取
347that she believes to be important,她认为很重要,
348including criteria that have only to do with her efforts and achievements.包括仅与她的努力和成就有关的标准。
349Why not?为什么不呢?
350I think implicit in this argument我觉得这个论点是隐含的
351is something like Rawls's rejection of moral desert as the basis of distributive justice.和罗尔斯拒绝道德沙漠作为分配正义的基础一样
352Yes, once Harvard defines its mission是的,一旦哈佛确定了它的使命
353and designs its admission policy in the light of its mission,并根据其使命制定接纳政策,
354people are entitled, who fit those criteria, they are entitled to be admitted.符合这些标准的人有权被接纳。
355But according to this argument,但根据这个论点,
356no one deserves that Harvard College define its mission没有人值得哈佛大学确定它的使命
357and design its admission criteria in the first place并首先设计其接纳标准
358in a way that prizes the qualities they happen to have in abundance.以奖励他们富足的品质
359Whether those qualities are test scores or grades or the ability to play the piano这些品质是测试分数还是成绩 还是弹钢琴的能力
360or to be a good middle linebacker或成为优秀的中后卫
361or to come from Iowa or to come from a certain minority group.或来自爱荷华州或来自某个少数群体。
362So you see how this debate about affirmative action,所以,你看这场关于平权行动的辩论,
363especially the diversity argument, takes us back to the question of rights,特别是多样性的论点,让我们回到权利问题上,
364which in turn takes us back to the question of whether moral desert is or is not这反过来又让我们回到 道德沙漠是还是不是
365the basis for distributive justice.分配正义的基础。
366Think about that over the weekend and we'll continue this discussion next time.周末再考虑,下次再继续讨论
367Suppose we're distributing flutes.假设我们在分发笛子。
368Who should get the best ones?谁应该得到最好的?
369What's Aristotle's answer? Anyone?亚里士多德的答案是什么? 有人吗?
370His answer is the best flutes should go to the best flute players他的答案是最好的笛子应该去最好的笛手
371because that's what flutes are for.因为这就是笛子的目的
372When we ended last time,我们上次结束的时候
373we were considering arguments for and against affirmative action,我们在考虑主张和反对平权行动的论点,
374counting race as a factor in admissions.计算种族作为录取因素.
375And in the course of the discussion,在讨论过程中,
376three arguments emerged, three arguments for affirmative action.出现了三个论点,三个主张采取平权行动的论点。
377One of them was the idea that race and ethnic background should count其中一个想法是种族和民族背景应该算在内
378as a way of correcting for the true meaning of test scores and grades,作为纠正测试分数和分数真实含义的方法,
379getting a more accurate measure of the academic potential those scores,更准确地衡量这些成绩的学术潜力,
380those numbers represent.这些数字代表。
381Second was what we called the compensatory argument,第二是我们所谓的补偿性论点,
382the idea of writing past wrongs, past injustice.写过去的错误,过去不公正的想法。
383And the third was the diversity argument.第三是多样性的论点。
384当Cheryl Hopwood在1990年代挑战得克萨斯大学时
385law school's affirmative action program in the federal courts,法学院在联邦法院的平权行动方案,
386the University of Texas made another version of the diversity argument,德克萨斯大学提出了另一种多样性论点,
387saying that the broader social purpose,说更广泛的社会目标,
388the social mission of the University of Texas law school德克萨斯大学法学院的社会使命
389is to produce leaders in the legal community,在法律界产生领袖,
390in the political community, among judges, lawyers, legislators,在政治界、法官、律师、立法者、
391and therefore it's important that we produce leaders因此,我们必须产生领袖
392who reflect the background and the experience反映背景和经验的人
393and the ethnic and the racial composition of the state of Texas.德克萨斯州的民族和种族组成
394It's important for serving our wider social mission.这对我们更广泛的社会使命很重要.
395That was the University of Texas law school's argument.这是德克萨斯大学法学院的论点。
396And then we considered an objection to the diversity argument,然后我们考虑反对多样性的论点,
397which after all is an argument in the name of the social mission, the common good.这毕竟是一个争论 以社会使命的名义, 共同利益。
398We saw that Rawls does not simply believe我们看到罗尔斯并不只是相信
399that arguments of the common good or the general welfare should prevail(a) 应以共同利益或一般福利的论点为准;
400if individual rights must be violated in the course of promoting the common good.如果在促进共同利益的过程中必须侵犯个人权利。
401You remember that was the question, the challenge,你记得那是问题 挑战
402to the diversity rationale that we were considering when we finished last time.我们上次完成这项工作时正在考虑的多样性理由。
403And to discuss the question, well, what right might be at stake?为了讨论这个问题, 那么,什么权利是危险的?
404Maybe the right to be considered according to factors within one's control.也许根据自己控制范围内的因素来考虑的权利.
405也许这就是Cheryl Hopwood暗中提出的论点
406She婆 can婆白佛言.
407Why should her chance at getting into law school depend on a factor she can't control?为什么她上法学院的机会 取决于她无法控制的因素?
408And then Hannah, who was advancing an argument last time,然后Hannah, 他提出一个争论,
409said Harvard has the right to define its mission any way it wants to.说哈佛有权以任何它想要的方式确定它的使命.
410It's a private institution.民办机构.
411And it's only once Harvard defines its mission哈佛大学才确定了它的使命
412that we can identify the qualities that count.我们能辨别出重要的品质
413So no rights are being violated.因此,没有侵犯任何权利。
414Now, what about that argument?那这个争论呢?
415What I would like to do is to hear objections to that reply我想做的是听到对这个答复的反对
416and then see whether others have an answer.然后看看别人是否有答案
417Yes. And tell us your name.对 并告诉我们你的名字。
418Da.达曰.
419Da. Right. You spoke up last time.对 你上次说话了
420All right. How do you answer that argument?好吧,我们走。 你怎么回答这种争论?
421Well, I think there was two things in there.我觉得里面有两件事
422One of them was that a private institution could define its mission however it wants,其中之一是私人机构可以随意确定其使命,
423but then that doesn't make however it defines it right.但这并不能说明它是否正确
424Like, I could define my personal mission as I want to collect all the money in the world,喜欢,我可以确定我的个人任务 因为我想收集所有的钱 在世界上,
425but does that make it even a good mission?但是这是否就成了一个好任务?
426So you can't say that just because a college is a private institution,所以你不能因为大学是私人机构就这么说
427it could just define it whatever it wants.它可以随便定义它
428We still have to think about whether the way it's defining it is right.我们仍然需要思考它的定义是否正确.
429And in the case of affirmative action, a lot of people have said that对于平权行动,很多人都说
430since there's a lot of other factors involved, why not race?既然还有其他许多因素, 为什么不种族?
431Like, we already know that the system is imperfect.譬如,我们已经知道这个系统是不完善的。
432All right. I want to stick with your first point, Da.好吧,我们走。 我想坚持你的第一点,爸爸。
433Here's Da's objection.此处达人反对.
434Can a college or university define its social purpose any way it wants to大学或大学能否以任何方式界定其社会目的
435and then define admissions criteria accordingly?然后据此界定录取标准?
436What about the University of Texas Law School, not today, but in the 1950s?那德克萨斯大学法学院呢,不是今天,而是1950年代?
437Then there was another Supreme Court case against the admissions policy后来又发生了一起最高法院反对录取政策的案件
438of the University of Texas Law School because it was segregated.德克萨斯大学法学院,因为它被隔离。
439It only admitted whites.它只承认白人。
440And when the case went to court back in the 50s,当50年代案件上法庭时
441the University of Texas Law School also invoked its mission.德克萨斯大学法学院也援引了其使命。
442Our mission as a law school is to educate lawyers for the Texas bar, for Texas law firms.我们作为一所法学院的使命 是教育德克萨斯律师事务所的律师
443And no Texas law firm hires African Americans.没有德克萨斯州律师事务所雇用非裔美国人
444So to fulfill our mission, we only admit whites.所以为了完成我们的任务 我们只接纳白人
445Or consider Harvard in the 1930s when it had anti-Jewish quotas.或认为哈佛在1930年代拥有反犹太人配额.
446President Lowell, president of Harvard in the 1930s, said1930年代哈佛大学校长洛威尔说
447that he had nothing personally against Jews.他个人对犹太人没有意见
448But he invoked the mission, the social purpose of Harvard, he said,但他援引了任务,哈佛的社会宗旨,他说,
449which is not only to train intellectuals.这不仅是为了培养知识分子
450Part of the mission of Harvard, he said, is to train stockbrokers for Wall Street,他说哈佛的一部分任务 就是为华尔街训练股票经纪人
451presidents and senators.总统和参议员。
452And there are very few Jews who go into those professions.很少有犹太人从事这些职业。
453Now here's the challenge.现在,这是挑战。
454Is there a principle distinction between the invocation of the social purpose援引社会目的之间是否有原则上的区别?
455of the college or university today in the diversity rationale今天的学院或大学 在多样性的理由
456and the invocation of the social purpose or mission of the university和援引大学的社会宗旨或使命
457by Texas in the 1950s or Harvard in the 1930s?得克萨斯在1950年代还是哈佛在1930年代?
458Is there a difference in principle?原则上有什么区别吗?
459What's the reply?何等为答.
460Hannah?汉娜?
461Well, I think that the principle that's different here is basically我认为不同的原则是
462the distinction between inclusion versus exclusion.将包容与排斥区分开来。
463I think that it's morally wrong of the university to say,我认为大学在道德上不该说
464we're going to exclude you on the basis of your religion or your race.我们要根据你的宗教或种族来排除你
465That's denial on the basis of arbitrary factors.这是基于任意因素的否定.
466What Harvard is trying to do today with its diversity initiatives哈佛大学今天想用它的多样性倡议做什么
467is to include groups that were excluded in the past.包括过去被排除在外的群体。
468Good.不错
469Let's see if, stay there, let's see if someone would like to reply.看看有没有人愿意回答
470Go ahead.来吧。
471Actually, this was kind of in support of Hannah rather than a reply,事实上,这有点支持汉娜 而不是一个答复,
472but I was going to say another principle difference can be based on malice但我想说另一个原则上的区别 可能基于恶意
473being the justification, I guess, for the historical segregation act.我想是历史隔离法的理由
474So it's saying that we're not going to let Blacks or Jews in也就是说我们不会让黑人或犹太人进来
475because they're worse as people or as a group.因为他们比人或群体更糟糕
476Good.不错
477So the element of malice is in presence.因此恶意的元素存在.
478And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
479Stevie.史蒂维
480Stevie says that in the historic segregationist, racist,史提夫说 在历史隔离主义者 种族主义者
481anti-Semitic quotas or prohibitions,反犹配额或禁令,
482there was built into them a certain kind of malice,他们中有一种恶意,
483a certain kind of judgment that African Americans or Jews某种判断 非裔美国人或犹太人
484were somehow less worthy than everybody else.比其他人更没有价值
485Whereas present day affirmative action programs当今的平权行动方案
486don't involve or imply any such judgment.不要涉及或暗示任何这样的判断。
487What it amounts to saying is so long as a policy这相当于说, 如此长的政策
488just uses people in a way as valuable to the social purpose利用别人来达到社会目的
489of the institution, it's okay,机构,没关系,
490provided it doesn't judge them maliciously, as Stevie might add,如果它没有恶意判断他们, 正如史蒂维可能补充,
491as intrinsically less worthy.内在的不值得。
492I'd like to raise a question.我想提个问题
493Doesn't that concede that all of us,这不承认我们所有人,
494when we compete for positions or for seats in colleges and universities,当我们竞相争夺职位 或大学的席位,
495in a way are being used, not judged,某种意义上,人们正在使用,而不是判断,
496but used in a way that has nothing to do with moral desert?但用的方式 与道德沙漠无关?
497Remember we got into this whole discussion of affirmative action记得我们开始讨论平权行动
498when we were trying to figure out当我们试图找出
499whether distributive justice should be tied to moral desert or not.分配正义是否应该与道德的荒漠联系在一起。
500And we were launched on that question by Rawls and his denial,我们被罗尔斯和他否认了
501his rejection of the idea that distributive justice,他拒绝分配公正的想法,
502whether it's positions or places in the class or income and wealth,无论是在阶级中的地位或位置,还是收入和财富,
503is a matter of moral desert.是一个道德的沙漠问题。
504Suppose that were the moral basis of Harvard's admissions policy.假设那是哈佛大学招生政策的道德基础
505What letters would they have to write他们要写什么信?
506to people they rejected or accepted for that matter?他们否认或接受此事的人,
507Wouldn't they have to write something like this?他们不用写这样的东西吗?
508Dear unsuccessful applicant,亲爱的失败的申请人,
509we regret to inform you that your application for admission has been rejected.我们遗憾地通知你 你的入院申请被拒绝了
510It's not your fault that when you came along,这不是你的错 当你来了,
511society happened not to need the qualities you had to offer.社会碰巧并不需要 你必须提供的品质。
512Those admitted instead of you were not themselves deserving of a place,那些被接纳的人,而不是你们,是不配得来的,
513nor worthy of praise for the factors that led to their admission.也不值得称赞导致他们被接纳的因素。
514We are in any case only using them and you as instruments of a wider social purpose.无论如何,我们只是把他们和你们作为更广泛的社会工具。
515Better luck next time.祝你下次好运
516What was the letter you actually got when you were admitted?你被录取时收到的信是什么?
517Perhaps it should have read something like this.也许它应该读 类似的东西。
518Dear successful applicant,亲爱的成功申请者,
519we are pleased to inform you that your application for admission has been accepted.我们高兴地通知你,你的入境申请已被接受。
520It turns out, lucky for you,原来你走运了
521that you have the traits that society needs at the moment,你拥有社会目前需要的特征,
522so we propose to exploit your assets for society's advantage.所以我们建议利用你们的资产 来谋取社会利益
523You are to be congratulated,恭喜你们
524not in the sense that you deserve credit for having the qualities that led to your admission,并不是因为你拥有导致你入院的特质而值得表扬
525but only in the sense that the winner of a lottery is to be congratulated,但只是因为彩票的得奖者要受到祝贺
526and if you choose to accept our offer,如果你愿意接受我们的提议
527you will ultimately be entitled to the benefits that attach to being used in this way.您最终将有资格享受由此而获得的福利。
528We look forward to seeing you in the fall.我们期待着在秋季见到你。
529Now, there is something a little odd, morally odd,现在,有些东西有点奇怪,道德上有点奇怪,
530if it's true that those letters do reflect the theory, the philosophy,如果这些字母确实反映了理论和哲学
531underlying the policy.政策的基础。
532So here's the question they pose,这就是他们提出的问题,
533and it's a question that takes us back to a big issue in political philosophy.这个问题让我们回到政治哲学中的一个大问题。
534Is it possible, and is it desirable,可能吗,这是可取的,
535to detach questions of distributive justice解决分配公正问题
536from questions of moral desert and questions of virtue?道德荒漠和美德问题?
537In many ways, this is an issue在许多方面,这是一个问题
538that separates modern political philosophy from ancient political thought.将现代政治哲学与古代政治思想分开。
539What's at stake in the question of whether we can put desert, moral desert aside?我们是否可以把沙漠,道德沙漠放在一边,这有什么关系呢?
540It seemed when we were reading Rawls好像我们读罗尔斯的时候
541that the incentive, the reason he had奖励,他的原因
542for detaching distributive justice from moral desert was an egalitarian one,因为从道德的沙漠中分离出分配正义是平等的,
543that if we set desert to one side,如果我们把沙漠放在一边,
544there's greater scope for the exercise of egalitarian considerations,行使平等考虑的余地更大,
545the veil of ignorance, the two principles, the difference principle,无知的面纱 两项原则 区别原则
546helping the least well off, redistribution and all that.帮助最不富裕的人,再分配等等。
547But what's interesting is if you look但有趣的是,如果你看着
548at a range of thinkers we've been considering,在一系列思想家 我们一直在考虑,
549there does seem to be a reason they want to detach justice from desert似乎有原因 他们想要从沙漠中解放正义
550that goes well beyond any concern for equality.这远远超出了对平等的任何关注。
551Libertarian rights oriented theorists以自由主义权利为导向的理论家
552of the kind we've been studying,那种我们研究,
553as well as egalitarian rights oriented theorists,以及权利平等理论家,
554including Rawls, and for that matter also including Kant,包括Rawls 以及康德
555all agree, despite their disagreements over distributive justice所有人都同意,尽管他们对分配司法有分歧
556and the welfare state and all of that,以及福利状况和这一切,
557they all agree他们都同意
558that justice is not a matter of rewarding正义不是奖励
559or honoring virtue or moral desert.或尊重美德或道德的沙漠。
560Now why do they all think that?他们为什么都这么想?
561It can't just be for egalitarian reasons,不能只是因为平等的原因
562not all of them are egalitarians.并不是所有人都是平等的。
563This gets us to the big philosophical question we have to try to sort out.这让我们想到了我们想要解决的大哲学问题。
564Somehow they think tying justice to moral merit or virtue不知何故 他们认为正义与道德或美德挂钩
565is going to lead away from freedom,将远离自由,
566from respect for persons as free beings.不尊重作为自由生命的人。
567Well in order to see what they consider to be at stake,为了了解他们认为的利害关系
568and in order to assess their shared assumption,为了评估它们的共同假设,
569we need to turn to a thinker, to a philosopher,我们需要转向思想家, 哲学家,
570who disagrees with them,他们和他们争论,
571who explicitly ties justice to honor, honoring virtue他们明确地将正义与荣誉联系起来,尊重美德
572and merit and moral desert.和功绩和道德的沙漠。
573And that thinker is Aristotle.那个思想家是亚里士多德
574Now in many ways,现在在许多方面,
575Aristotle's idea of justice is intuitively very powerful.亚里士多德的正义思想直觉上非常强大.
576In some ways it's strange.在某些方面,这是奇怪的。
577I want to bring out both its power, its plausibility,我想拿出它的力量,它的可信度,
578and its strangeness,和它的怪异,
579so that we can see what's at stake in this whole debate about justice这样我们就能看到这场关于正义的争论的利害关系
580and whether it's tied to desert and virtue.是否与沙漠和美德有关
581So what is Aristotle's answer to the question about justice?那么亚里士多德对正义问题的答案是什么?
582For Aristotle, justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve,对亚里士多德来说 正义是给人们应有的
583giving people their due.给人们他们应得的。
584It's a matter of figuring out the proper fit between persons with their virtues问题是要找出人与人之间的适当合身
585and their appropriate social roles.及其适当的社会作用。
586Well what does this picture of justice look like?这幅正义的画是什么样子的?
587And how does it differ from the conception和这个概念有什么不同
588that seems to be shared among libertarian and egalitarian似乎在自由主义者和平等者之间
589rights-oriented theorists alike?以权利为导向的理论家?
590Justice means giving each person his or her due,正义意味着给予每个人他或她的权利,
591giving people what they deserve.给人们他们应得的。
592But what is a person's due?但一个人应该做什么?
593What are the relevant grounds of merit or desert?功绩或沙漠有哪些相关理由?
594Aristotle says that depends on the sort of things being distributed.亚里士多德说这取决于 分布的种类。
595Justice involves two factors,司法涉及两个因素:
596things and the persons to whom the things are assigned.和被分配的人。
597In general we say, Aristotle writes,总的来说,我们说,亚里士多德写道,
598that persons who are equal should have equal things assigned to them.平等者应拥有平等的东西。
599But here there arises a hard question.但这里出现了一个难题。
600Equals in what respects?在什么方面是平等的?
601Aristotle says that depends on the sort of thing we're distributing.亚里士多德说这取决于我们分配的是什么
602Suppose we're distributing flutes.假设我们在分发笛子。
603What is the relevant merit or basis of desert for flutes?对于笛子来说,沙漠有什么相关优点或依据?
604Who should get the best ones?谁应该得到最好的?
605What's Aristotle's answer? Anyone?亚里士多德的答案是什么? 有人吗?
606The best flute players, right.最好的笛手,没错。
607Those who are best in the relevant sense, the best flute players.相关意义上最优秀的,最好的笛手.
608Is it just to discriminate in allocating flutes?在分配笛子方面是否只是歧视?
609Yes, all justice involves discrimination, Aristotle says.亚里士多德说,所有正义都涉及歧视。
610What matters is that the discrimination be according to the relevant excellence,重要的是歧视要符合相关的优异程度,
611according to the virtue appropriate to having flutes.根据与长笛相适应的美德
612He says it would be unjust to discriminate on some other basis他说歧视别人是不公平的
613in giving out the flutes.送出长笛。
614Say wealth, just giving the best flutes to the people who can pay the highest price.说财富,只是给那些能支付最高代价的人最好的笛子.
615Or nobility of birth, just giving flutes to aristocrats.或贵族出身,只是给贵族吹笛子.
616Or physical beauty, giving the best flutes to the most handsome.或体貌优美,给最帅的笛子.
617Or chance, having a lottery.或者机会,有彩票。
618Aristotle says birth and beauty may be greater goods than the ability to play the flute.亚里士多德说生与美可能是比吹笛能力更大的商品.
619And those who possess them may surpass the flute player more in these qualities那些拥有它们的人 可能会在这些品质上超越笛手
620than he surpasses them in his flute playing.他的笛子弹得比他们还厉害
621But the fact remains that he is the person who ought to get the best flute.但事实仍然是,他应该得到最好的笛子。
622It's a strange idea, this comparison by the way,这是一个奇怪的想法, 这个比较的方式,
623that could you say am I more handsome than she is a good lacrosse player?你能说我比她还帅吗?
624It's a strange kind of comparison.比较起来很奇怪
625But putting that aside, Aristotle says we're not looking for the best overall,亚里士多德说我们不是在寻找最好的整体
626whatever that might mean, we're looking for the best musician.不管这是什么意思 我们在找最好的音乐家
627Now why, this is important to see, why should the best flutes go to the best flute players?为什么,这很重要, 为什么要最好的笛子去最好的笛手?
628Well, why do you think? Anybody?你觉得呢? 有人吗?
629What? They'll produce the best music, well, and everybody will enjoy it more.你说什么? 他们将产生最好的音乐, 好了,每个人都会更享受它。
630That's not Aristotle's answer.这不是亚里士多德的答案。
631Aristotle is not a utilitarian.亚里士多德不是功利主义者.
632He's not just saying that way there will be better music and everyone will enjoy it,他不只是说这样会有更好的音乐 每个人都会喜欢它,
633everyone will be better off.每个人都会更好。
634His answer is the best flutes should go to the best flute players他的答案是最好的笛子应该去最好的笛手
635because that's what flutes are for, to be played well.因为这就是笛子的用途 被弹得好
636The purpose of flute playing, the purpose is to produce excellent music吹笛子的目的 是为了制作优秀的音乐
637and those who can best perfect that purpose ought properly to have the best ones.并且那些最能完成这一目的的人应该有最好的目的。
638Now it may also be true as a welcome side effect that everyone will enjoy listening to that music.现在,作为受欢迎的副作用,每个人都会乐于聆听这种音乐。
639So that answer is true enough as far as it goes,因此,这个答案已经足够真实了,
640but it's important to see that Aristotle's reason is not a utilitarian reason.但重要的是要看到亚里士多德的理由并不是功利主义的理由.
641It's a reason that looks, here's where you might think it's a little bit strange,你可能觉得这有点奇怪
642it looks to the purpose, the point, the goal of flute playing.它着眼于吹笛的目的,重点,目标.
643Another way of describing this, looking to the goal to determine the just allocation,另一种方式描述这一点, 展望目标 确定公正的分配,
644the Greek for goal or end was telos.目标或终点的希腊语是telos。
645So Aristotle says you have to consider the point, the end, the goal, the telos of the thing,亚里士多德说,你必须 考虑这一点, 结束,目标, 事情的齿轮,
646in this case of flute playing and that's how you define a just allocation, a just discrimination.在吹笛子的情况下 这就是你如何定义公正分配 公正歧视
647So this idea of reasoning from the goal, from the telos is called teleological reasoning,因此,这个想法的推理 从目标, 从telos称为 遥测推理,
648teleological moral reasoning and that's Aristotle's way, reasoning from the goal, from the end.这是亚里士多德的方法, 从目标,从最后的推理。
649Now this may seem, as I said, a strange idea that we're supposed to reason from the purpose,现在,这看起来,正如我所说, 一个奇怪的想法,我们应该从目的出发,
650but it does have a certain intuitive plausibility.但它确实具有某种直觉性
651Consider the allocation, let's say at Harvard, of the best tennis courts or squash courts.考虑一下,比如在哈佛, 分配最好的网球场或壁球场。
652How should they be allocated? Who should have priority in playing on the best courts?如何分配这些资源? 在最佳法庭上谁应该有优先权?
653Well, you might say those who can best afford them, set up a fee system, charge money for them.你可以说那些最能负担他们的人, 建立一个收费制度,为他们收费。
654Aristotle would say no. You might say, well, Harvard big shots, the most influential people at Harvard,亚里士多德会拒绝的 你可以说,哈佛大人物,哈佛最有影响力的人,
655who would they be? The senior faculty should have priority.他们会是谁? 高级教职员工应该有优先权.
656The senior faculty should have priority in playing on the best tennis courts.高级教职员工应优先在最佳网球场打球。
657No, Aristotle would reject that.不,亚里士多德会拒绝的
658Some scientists may be a greater scientist than some varsity tennis player is a tennis player,有些科学家可能比一些校队网球运动员 更伟大的科学家,
659but still the tennis player is the one who should have priority for the best, playing on the best tennis court.但网球选手仍是最优秀的选手 在最佳网球场上打球
660There is a certain intuitive plausibility to this idea.这个想法有一定的直观性。
661Now, one of the things that makes it strange is that in Aristotle's world, in the ancient world,在亚里士多德的世界里 在古代的世界里
662it wasn't only social practices that were governed, in Aristotle's view,亚里士多德认为 不仅仅是社会习俗被支配
663by teleological reasoning and teleological explanation.由心智推理和心智解释。
664All of nature was understood to be a meaningful order,所有自然被理解为一个有意义的秩序,
665and what it meant to understand nature, to grasp nature, to find our place in nature,以及它意味着什么 理解自然, 理解自然, 找到我们在自然中的地位,
666was to inquire into and read out the purposes or the telos of nature.调查并宣读大自然的目的或主题。
667And with the advent of modern science, it's been difficult to think of the world that way,随着现代科学的到来, 很难想到这个世界,
668and so it makes it harder, perhaps, to think of justice in a teleological way,因此,它使得它更难,也许, 想到正义的方式,以心灵学,
669but there is a certain naturalness to thinking about even the natural world as teleologically ordered,但有某种自然性 思考甚至自然世界 以神学命令,
670as a purpose of whole.整个目的。
671In fact, children have to be educated out of this way, of looking at the world.事实上,儿童必须接受这种教育,从看世界的角度出发。
672I realized this when my kids were very young and I was reading them a book.我意识到,当我的孩子非常年轻, 我读他们一本书。
673Winnie the Pooh.荣耀维尼.
674And Winnie the Pooh gives you a great idea of how there is a certain natural, childlike way维尼的维尼给了你一个伟大的想法 如何有一个自然的,孩子般的方式
675of looking at the world in a teleological way.以神智的方式看待世界
676You may remember a story of Winnie the Pooh walking in the forest one day.你可能记得有一天 维尼在森林里散步的故事
677He came to a place in the forest, and from the top of a tree there came a loud buzzing noise.他来到了森林的一个地方, 从树顶上,有一个响亮的噪音。
678Winnie the Pooh sat at the foot of the tree, put his head between his paws, and began to think.维尼人坐在树脚下,把头放在爪子之间,开始思考.
679Here's what he said to himself.这就是他对自己说的话。
680That buzzing noise means something.那个叫声意味着什么
681You don't get a buzzing noise like that just buzzing and buzzing without its meaning something.你不会听到那种叫声 只是叫声和叫声没有意义
682If there's a buzzing noise, somebody's making a buzzing noise.如果有嗡嗡声 有人在发出嗡嗡声
683The only reason for making a buzzing noise that I know of is because you're a bee.我知道唯一能发出噪音的原因是 因为你是蜜蜂
684Then he thought for another long time and said,然后他又想了很久 然后说
685and the only reason for being a bee that I know of is making honey.而成为蜜蜂的唯一原因 我知道是做蜂蜜。
686And then he got up and he said,然后他站起来说,
687and the only reason for making honey is so I can eat it.而制造蜂蜜的唯一理由 就是让我能吃它
688So he began to climb the tree.于是他开始爬树.
689This is an example of teleological reasoning.这是心灵推理的一个例子。
690It isn't so implausible after all.毕竟也不是那么不可思议
691Now, we grew up and we're talked out of this way of thinking about the world.现在,我们长大了,我们被劝说脱离了这种对世界的思考.
692But here's the question.但问题是...
693Even if teleological explanations don't fit with modern science,即便心理解释与现代科学不符
694even if we've outgrown them in understanding nature,即使我们在了解自然方面 超越了他们
695isn't there something still intuitively and morally plausible, even powerful,难道还有些东西 直观和道德上是可信的,甚至强大,
696about Aristotle's idea that the only way to think about justice关于亚里士多德的想法 即思考正义的唯一途径
697is to reason from the purpose, the goal, the telos of the social practice,从目的、目标、社会实践的动静
698and isn't that precisely what we were doing when we were disagreeing about affirmative action?这正是我们在平权行动问题上 所要做的事吗?
699You could almost recast that disagreement as one about what the proper,你几乎可以把分歧 重塑为关于什么是适当的,
700appropriate purpose or end of a university education consists in.大学教育的适当目的或目的包括:
701Reasoning from the purpose or from the telos or from the end,由于目的 或从调音器或从结尾,
702Aristotle says that's indispensable to thinking about justice.亚里士多德说,这是思考正义所不可或缺的.
703Is he right?他说得对吗?
704Think about that question as you turn to Aristotle's politics.想想这个问题 当你转向亚里士多德的政治。
705Take a pop quiz, watch lectures you've missed, and learn a lot more.参加一个流行测验, 看你错过的讲座, 并学习更多的。
706请访问justiceharvard.org. 谓之正法.
707Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
708Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 713 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P8 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p08 7. 7.是否雇佣顶替自己服役的人 (P8)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:06Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:31When we ended last time, we were discussing Locke's idea of government by consent.上次结束的时候,我们在讨论洛克关于同意政府的想法.
0:39And the question arose, what are the limits on government that even the agreement of the majority can't override?问题是,即使多数人同意也不能推翻政府,对政府的限制是什么?
0:49That was the question we ended with.这是我们最后的问题。
0:56That's what we saw in the case of property rights.这就是我们在财产权案中看到的。
1:02That on Locke's view, a democratically elected government has the right to tax people.洛克认为,民选政府有权向人民征税.
1:12It has to be taxation with consent, because it does involve the taking of people's property for the common good.它必须是经同意的税收,因为它确实涉及为共同利益而夺取人民的财产。
1:21But it doesn't require the consent of each individual at the time the tax is enacted or collected.但是,它并不要求每个个人在颁布或征收税款时的同意.
1:31What it does require is a prior act of consent to join the society, to take on the political obligation.它确实需要的是加入社会并承担政治义务的事先同意行为。
展开字幕全文(584 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3When we ended last time, we were discussing Locke's idea of government by consent.上次结束的时候,我们在讨论洛克关于同意政府的想法.
4And the question arose, what are the limits on government that even the agreement of the majority can't override?问题是,即使多数人同意也不能推翻政府,对政府的限制是什么?
5That was the question we ended with.这是我们最后的问题。
6That's what we saw in the case of property rights.这就是我们在财产权案中看到的。
7That on Locke's view, a democratically elected government has the right to tax people.洛克认为,民选政府有权向人民征税.
8It has to be taxation with consent, because it does involve the taking of people's property for the common good.它必须是经同意的税收,因为它确实涉及为共同利益而夺取人民的财产。
9But it doesn't require the consent of each individual at the time the tax is enacted or collected.但是,它并不要求每个个人在颁布或征收税款时的同意.
10What it does require is a prior act of consent to join the society, to take on the political obligation.它确实需要的是加入社会并承担政治义务的事先同意行为。
11But once you take on that obligation, you agree to be bound by the majority.但一旦你承担了这项义务,你同意受多数的约束。
12So much for taxation.税费就够了
13But what you may ask about the right to life, can the government conscript people and send them into battle?但你可以问什么 关于生命权, 政府征召人民 并让他们投入战斗?
14What about the idea that we own ourselves?我们自己的想法呢?
15Isn't the idea of self-possession violated if the government can, through coercive legislation and enforcement powers,如果政府能够通过强制立法和执法权, 自我占有的想法不是受到侵犯吗?
16say, you must go risk your life to fight in Iraq?你要冒着生命危险去伊拉克打仗?
17What would Locke say? Does the government have the right to do that?洛克会怎么说? 政府有权这样做吗?
18Yes.
19In fact, he says in 139, he says,事实上,他在139年说,
20What matters is that the political authority or the military authority not be arbitrary.重要的是,政治当局或军事当局不是任意的。
21That's what matters.这才是最重要的。
22And he gives a wonderful example.他给出了一个很好的例子。
23He says a sergeant, even a sergeant, let alone a general, a sergeant can command a soldier to go right up to the face of the cannon,他说一个军士,甚至一个军士, 更别说一个将军,一个军士可以命令一个士兵 直上炮台,
24where he is almost sure to die.在那里他几乎肯定会死。
25That the sergeant can do.军士可以做的。
26The general can condemn the soldier to death for deserting his post or for not obeying even a desperate order.将军可以谴责士兵因逃避职务或甚至不服从绝望的命令而被处死.
27But with all their power over life and death, what these officers can't do is take a penny of that soldier's money.但是,用他们所有的力量 生死,这些军官不能做的 是拿走一分钱的士兵的钱。
28Because that has nothing to do with the rightful authority.因为这和合法权威无关
29That would be arbitrary and it would be corrupt.这样做是任意的,是腐败的。
30So consent winds up being very powerful in Locke, not consent of the individual to the particular tax or military order,因此,同意在洛克非常强大, 而不是个人同意特定税收或军事秩序,
31but consent to join the government and to be bound by the majority in the first place.但首先同意加入政府 并受多数人的约束
32That's the consent that matters.这才是最重要的同意
33And it matters so powerfully that even the limited government created by the fact that we have an unalienable right to life, liberty and property,即使是我们拥有生命、自由和财产不容剥夺的权利 所建立的有限政府
34even that limited government is only limited in the sense that it has to govern by generally applicable laws, the rule of law, it can't be arbitrary.即使这种有限的政府也只是从它必须受普遍适用的法律,法治的支配这个意义上来说是有限的,也不能是任意的.
35That's Locke.这是洛克。
36Well, this raises a question about consent.这引起了同意的问题
37Why is consent such a powerful moral instrument in creating political authority and the obligation to obey?为什么同意是建立政治权威和服从义务的强大道德工具?
38Today we begin to investigate the question of consent by looking at a concrete case, the case of military conscription.今天,我们开始调查同意问题,研究一个具体案例,即征兵问题。
39Some people say if we have a fundamental right that arises from the idea that we own ourselves,有些人说,如果我们有一个基本权利 由我们自己的想法产生,
40it's a violation of that right for a government to conscript citizens to go fight in wars.这侵犯了政府征召公民参战的权利。
41Others disagree. Others say that's a legitimate power of government, of democratically elected governments anyhow, and that we have an obligation to obey.其他人则不同意。 其他人说,这是政府的合法权力,不管怎样,是民选政府的合法权力,我们有义务服从.
42Let's take the case of the United States fighting a war in Iraq.以美国在伊拉克作战为例.
43News accounts tell us that the military is having great difficulty meeting its recruitment targets.新闻报导告诉我们,军方很难达到招募目标。
44Consider three policies that the U.S. government might undertake to deal with the fact that it's not achieving its recruiting targets.考虑美国政府可能采取的三项政策,以应对它没有达到招募目标的事实.
45Solution number one, increase the pay and benefits to attract a sufficient number of soldiers.第一解决方案,增加工资和福利,吸引足够的士兵.
46Option number two, shift to a system of military conscription.第二选择,转向征兵制度。
47Have a lottery, and whosoever numbers are drawn, go to fight in Iraq.有彩票,无论谁抽到数字,都去伊拉克战斗。
48System number three, outsource. Hire what traditionally have been called mercenaries.系统三号,外包。 雇用传统上称为雇佣军的人。
49People around the world who are qualified, able to do the work, able to fight well, and who are willing to do it for the existing wage.全世界有资质,能干功劳,能打得好,愿意为现有工资而干的人.
50So let's take a quick poll here. How many favor increasing the pay?因此,让我们在这里做一个快速的民意调查。 多少人喜欢增加工资?
51Huge majority. How many favor going to conscription?绝对是多数 征召多少人?
52All right, maybe a dozen people in the room favor conscription. What about the outsourcing solution?好吧,也许一打人 在房间里赞成征兵。 那外包方案呢?
53Okay, so there may be about two, three dozen.好吧,大概有两,三打。
54During the Civil War, the Union used a combination of conscription and the market system to fill the ranks of the military to fight in the Civil War.国共内战期间,同盟会采用征兵制和市场制相结合的办法,填补军队的队伍,参加国共内战的战斗.
55It was a system that began with conscription, but if you were drafted and didn't want to serve, you could hire a substitute to take your place.这是一个从征兵开始的制度,但是如果你是被征召而不愿服役,你可以雇一个替补来代替你.
56And many people did. You could pay whatever the market required in order to find a substitute.很多人都这样 你可以为寻找替代品而支付任何市场所需的费用。
57People ran ads in newspapers, in the classified ads, offering five hundred dollars, sometimes a thousand dollars, for a substitute who would go fight the Civil War in their place.人们在报纸上,在分类广告中跑广告, 提供500美元,有时是1000美元, 一个替补谁去打内战 代替他们。
58In fact, it's reported that Andrew Carnegie was drafted and hired a substitute to take his place for an amount that was a little less than the amount he spent in a year on fancy cigars.事实上,有报道称安德鲁·卡内基被征召并聘请了一位替补来接替他的位置,其金额略低于他在一年中花在花样雪茄上的金额.
59Now, I want to get your views about the Civil War system. Call it the hybrid system, conscription but with a buyout provision.我想了解你对内战制度的看法 称之为混合制,征兵制 但有一个买断条款。
60How many think it was a just system? How many would defend the Civil War system?有多少人认为这是一个公正的制度? 有多少人会保卫内战系统?
61Anybody? One, anybody else? Two, three, four, five. How many think it was unjust?有人吗? 一个,还有谁? 二三四五门. 有多少人认为这是不公正的?
62Most of you don't like the Civil War system. You think it's unjust. Let's hear an objection. Why don't you like it? What's wrong with it?你们大多不喜欢内战制度 你觉得这不公平吗? 让我们听到一个反对。 何故不乐. 有什么不对吗?
63Yes?是吗?
64Well, by paying three hundred dollars to be exempt one time around, you're really putting a price on valuing human life.好吧,通过支付300美元 作为豁免一次左右, 你真的付出了价值 人的生命。
65And we established earlier that's really hard to do. So they're trying to accomplish something that really isn't feasible.我们早点建立,这真的很难做到。 所以他们想完成一些 真正不可行的事情。
66Good. So paying someone three hundred or five hundred or a thousand dollars...不错 因此,支付一个人 300或500或1000美元...
67You're basically saying that's what their life is worth to you.你根本就是说 他们的生命对你来说是值得的
68That's what their life is worth. It's putting a dollar value on life. That's good. And what's your name?这就是他们生命的价值。 令众生得一钱. 这是很好的。 你叫什么来着?
69Liz.丽兹
70Liz. Well, who has an answer for Liz? You defended the Civil War system. What do you say?丽兹 谁知道丽兹的答案? 你为内战制度辩护 你说什么?
71If you don't like the price, then you have the freedom to not be sold or hired. So it's completely up to you.如果你不喜欢价格,那么你就有不被出售或雇用的自由. 所以这完全取决于你。
72And I don't think it's necessarily putting a specific price on you. And if it's done by himself, I don't think there's anything necessarily morally wrong with that.我也不认为这会让你付出具体的代价 如果这是他自己做的,我觉得这在道德上没有必然的错.
73So the person who takes the five hundred dollars, let's say, he's putting his own price on his life or on the risk of his life.故取五百元者,如是,自以命价,或以命险.
74And he should have the freedom to choose to do that.他应该有选择这样做的自由。
75Exactly.没错
76What's your name?你叫什么来着?
77Jason.贾森
78Jason. Thank you. Now we need to hear from another critic of the Civil War system. Yes.贾森 谢谢 现在我们需要听到另一位内战制度的批评者。 对
79It's a kind of coercion, almost, to people who have lower incomes. For Carnegie, he can totally ignore the draft.这几乎是一种对低收入者的胁迫。 对卡内基来说,他完全可以忽略草案.
80Three hundred dollars is irrelevant in terms of his income. For someone of a lower income, they're essentially being coerced to be drafted.三百元与其收入无关. 对于收入较低的人来说,他们基本上是被胁迫被征召的.
81Or, I mean, it's probably they're not able to find a replacement.或者,我的意思是,这可能是 他们找不到替代。
82Tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
83Sam.萨姆
84Sam. All right. So you say, Sam, that when a poor laborer accepts three hundred dollars to fight in the Civil War, he is in effect being coerced by that money, given his economic circumstances.萨姆 好吧,我们走。 你说,山姆,当一个穷苦的工人 接受三百美元在内战中作战时, 他实际上是被那笔钱胁迫的, 考虑到他的经济状况。
85Because Carnegie can go off, pay the money, and not serve.因为卡内基可以去,支付 钱,而不是服务。
86All right. I want to hear if someone has a reply to Sam's argument that what looks like a free exchange is actually coercive.好吧,我们走。 我想听听如果有人对山姆的论调有回应,认为看起来自由交换其实是胁迫性的.
87Who has an answer to Sam? Go ahead.谁对萨姆有答案? 来吧。
88I'd actually agree with him in saying that.我同意他这么说
89You agree with Sam?你同意山姆的话吗?
90I agree with him in saying that it is coercion in the sense that it robs an individual of his ability to reason.我同意他说,这是胁迫,因为它剥夺了个人的理性能力。
91Okay. And what's your name?摆 你叫什么来着?
92Raoul.拉乌尔
93All right. So Raoul and Sam agree that what looks like a free exchange, free choice, voluntary act, is actually, it involves coercion.好吧,我们走。 所以拉乌尔和萨姆都同意,看起来像是自由交换,自由选择,自愿的行为,其实是涉及胁迫.
94It's profound coercion of the worst kind because it falls so disproportionately upon one segment of the society.这是最恶劣的深层胁迫 因为它不成比例地落在社会的一个阶层身上
95All right. So Raoul and Sam have made a powerful point. Who would like to reply? Who has an answer for Sam and Raoul? Go ahead.好吧,我们走。 因此,拉乌尔和萨姆提出了强有力的观点. 谁想回答? 谁有山姆和拉乌尔的答案? 来吧。
96I just, I don't think that these drafting systems are really terribly different from, you know, all volunteer army sort of recruiting strategies.我只是,我不认为这些起草系统 与所有志愿军的招募策略有很大不同。
97The whole idea of, you know, having benefits and pay for joining the army is, you know, sort of a coercive strategy to get people to join.拥有参军福利和报酬的整个想法 是一种强迫性策略 让人们加入
98It is true that military volunteers come from disproportionately, you know, lower economic status and also, you know,确实,军事志愿者来自 不成比例的,你知道的, 较低的经济地位, 而且,你知道,
99from certain regions of the country where you can use like the patriotism to try and coerce people to feel like it's the right thing to do to volunteer and go over to Iraq.从这个国家的某些地区,你可以像爱国主义者一样, 试图强迫人们, 觉得这是应该做的 志愿工作,然后去伊拉克。
100And tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
101Emily.艾米丽。
102All right. Emily says, and Raoul, you're going to have to reply to this, so get ready.好吧,我们走。 艾米丽说,和拉乌尔, 你必须回答这一点, 所以准备。
103Emily says, fair enough, there is a coercive element to the civil war system when the laborer takes the place of Andrew Carnegie for $500.艾米丽说,很公平,当劳工以500美元取代安德鲁·卡内基时,内战系统就有强制因素.
104Emily concedes that. But she says, if that troubles you about the civil war system, shouldn't that also trouble you about the volunteer army today?艾米莉承认这一点。 但她说,如果这困扰你 关于内战系统, 不应该这也困扰你 关于志愿军今天?
105And let me, before you answer, how did you vote on the first poll? Did you defend the volunteer army?在你回答之前,让我来,你是怎么投票的? 你保护志愿军了吗?
106I didn't vote.我没有投票
107You didn't vote? By the way, you didn't vote? Did you sell your vote to the person sitting next to you? No. All right.你没投票? 对了,你没有投票? 你把你的选票卖给坐在你旁边的人了吗? 不,没关系。
108So what would you say to that argument?那么,你会对这个争论说什么?
109I think that the circumstances are different and that there was conscription in the civil war.我认为情况不同,内战中有征兵制度。
110There is no draft today. And I think that the volunteers for the army today have a more profound sense of patriotism that is of an individual choice than those who were forced into the military in the civil war.今天没有草案。 我认为,今天为军队服务的志愿者们,比那些在内战中被迫参军的人,有更深刻的爱国感,是个人选择的.
111Somehow less coerced.不知何故,不那么被胁迫。
112Less coerced.少为逼迫.
113Even though there is still inequality in American society, even though, as Emily points out, the makeup of the American military is not reflective of the population as a whole.尽管美国社会仍然存在着不平等,尽管正如艾米莉指出的,美国军队的构成并不反映整个人口.
114Let's just do an experiment here. How many here have either served in the military or have a family member who has served in the military?我们在这里做个实验 这里有多少人在军队服役或有家庭成员在军队服役?
115In this generation. Not parents. Family members. In this generation.此辈中. 不为父母. 诸眷属. 此辈中.
116And how many have neither served nor have any brothers or sisters who have served?有多少人没有服务过,也没有任何兄弟姐妹服务过?
117Does that bear out your point, Emily?Emily 这证明了你的观点吗?
118All right. Now we need, we need to hear from, most of you defended the idea of the, of the all-volunteer military, overwhelmingly.好吧,我们走。 现在我们需要,我们需要听到, 从,你们大多数人 捍卫的想法, 全志愿军,压倒一切。
119And yet, overwhelmingly, people considered the civil war system unjust.然而,绝大多数人认为内战制度是不公正的。
120Sam and Raoul articulated reasons for objecting to the civil war system.Sam和Raoul阐述了反对内战制度的理由。
121It took place against a background of inequality, and therefore the choices people made to buy their way into military service were not truly free, but at least partly coerced.这是在不平等的背景下发生的,因此人们为买进军队服役所作的选择并非真正自由,至少是部分被胁迫。
122Then, Emily extends that argument in the form of a challenge.然后,艾米莉以挑战的形式扩展了这一论点.
123All right. Everyone here who voted in favor of the all-volunteer army should be able, should have to explain, well, what's the difference in principle?好吧,我们走。 在座的每一位投票支持全志愿军的,都应该能够,应该解释,在原则上有什么区别?
124Doesn't the all-volunteer army simply universalize the feature that almost everyone found objectionable in the civil war buyout provision?全志愿军是不是简单地普及了几乎每个人都认为内战买断条款中反对的特征?
125Did I state the challenge fairly, Emily?艾米丽,我说得没错吗?
126Yes.
127Okay. So we need to hear from a defender of the all-volunteer military who can address Emily's challenge. Who can do that?摆 所以我们需要听到一个全志愿军的捍卫者 他能够应对艾米莉的挑战。 谁能如此?
128Go ahead.来吧。
129The difference between the, the civil war system and the all-volunteer army system is that in the civil war, you're being hired not by the government, but by an individual.内战制度和全志愿军制度的区别在于,在内战中,你受雇的不是政府,而是个人.
130And, and as a result, different people who get hired by different individuals get paid different amounts.而且,因此,被不同个人雇用的不同的人得到不同的报酬。
131In the case of the all-volunteer army, everyone who gets hired is hired by the government and gets paid the same amount.以全志愿军为例,凡受聘之人,皆为政府所聘,所得亦同.
132It's precisely the universalization of essentially paying your service, you're paying your way into the army that makes the all-volunteer army just...正是普遍 基本上支付你的服务, 你支付你的方式 进入军队,
133Emily?艾米丽?
134I guess I'd frame the principle difference slightly differently.我想我会把原则区别 设计得有点不同
135On the all-volunteer army, it's possible for somebody to just, you know, step aside and not really think about, you know, the war at all.在全自愿的军队中, 任何人都有可能, 你知道,站到一边, 而不是真正想, 你知道,战争。
136It's possible to say, well, I, I don't need the money, you know, I don't need to have an opinion about this.可以说,嗯,我,我不需要钱, 你知道,我不需要对此有意见。
137I don't need to, you know, feel obligated to take my part and defend my country.我不需要,你知道, 感到有义务 承担我的角色和捍卫我的国家。
138With a coercive system or, sorry, with an explicit draft, then, you know, there's the threat at least that every individual will have to make some sort of decision, you know,有强制系统,或者,对不起,有明确的草案, 那么,你知道,有一个威胁,至少 每个人都会 做出某种决定,你知道,
139regarding military conscription and, you know, perhaps in that way it's more equitable.关于征兵,你知道的,也许这样比较公平。
140You know, it's true that, you know, Andrew Carnegie might not serve in any case, but in one, you know, he can completely step aside from it.你知道,这是真的,你知道,安德鲁·卡内基 可能不会在任何情况下服务, 但在一个,你知道,他可以完全 走出它。
141In the other, there's some level of responsibility.另一方面,也有一定程度的责任.
142While you're there, Emily, so what system do you favor? Conscription?当你在那里,艾米丽, 所以你喜欢什么系统? 征兵?
143I would be hard-pressed to say, but I think so, because it makes the whole country feel a sense of responsibility for the conflict instead of, you know,我很难说, 但我想是的, 因为它使整个国家 感到对冲突的责任感 而不是,你知道,
144having a war that's maybe ideologically supported by a few, but only if there's no, you know, real responsibility.一场战争,也许在意识形态上得到少数人的支持, 但只有没有,你知道,真正的责任。
145Good. Who wants to reply? Go ahead.不错 谁想回答? 来吧。
146So I was going to say that the fundamental difference between the all-volunteer army and then the army in the Civil War is that in the all-volunteer army,所以我想说,在内战中,全志愿军和后来的军队的根本区别是,在全志愿军中,
147if you want to volunteer, that comes first, and then the pay comes after, whereas in the Civil War system,如果你想志愿工作,那首先,然后是报酬, 而内战制度,
148the people who are accepting the pay aren't necessarily doing it because they want to, they're just doing it for the money first.那些接受报酬的人 不一定是因为他们想这么做 他们只是为了钱
149What motivation beyond the pay do you think is operating in the case of the all-volunteer army?你认为对于全志愿军来说,除了工资之外还有什么动机?
150Like patriotism for the country.如爱国为国.
151Patriotism. Well, what about?爱国主义. 那么,怎么样?
152And a desire to defend the country. I mean, there is some motivation in pay,及欲护国. 我的意思是,有 某种动力的薪酬,
153but the fact that it's first and foremost an all-volunteer army will motivate them, I think, personally.但事实上它首先是一支全志愿军 将会激励他们,我认为,个人。
154Do you think it's better, and tell me your name. Jackie.你觉得这样更好吗 告诉我你的名字 城
155Jackie, do you think it's better if people serve in the military out of a sense of patriotism than just for the money?杰基,你觉得人们在军队中服役 是出于爱国感比为了钱好吗?
156Yes, definitely, because the people who, that was one of the main problems in the Civil War army,是的,肯定的,因为人民 谁,这是内战军队的主要问题之一,
157is that the people that you're getting to go in it, or to go to war, aren't necessarily people who want to fight,你所要加入的人 或参战的人 不一定是想参战的人
158and so they won't be as good soldiers as they will be had they been there because they want it to be.他们不会像他们那样优秀的士兵,因为他们希望这样。
159All right, what about Jackie's, having raised the question of patriotism?好吧 那Jackie的呢 提出了爱国主义的问题
160That patriotism is a better or a higher motivation than money for military service.这种爱国主义的动机比服兵役的钱更好或更高。
161Who would like to address that question? Go ahead.谁想谈这个问题? 来吧。
162Patriotism absolutely is not necessary in order to be a good soldier,爱国是绝对没有必要的 为了成为一个好士兵,
163because mercenaries can do just as good of a job as anyone who waves the American flag around因为雇佣兵可以做一个工作 就像任何挥动美国国旗的人一样
164and wants to defend what the government believes that we should do.并且想为政府 认为我们应该做的辩护
165Did you favor the outsourcing solution?你赞成外包办法吗?
166Yes, sir.是 长官
167And, all right, so let Jackie respond. What's your name?好吧,让杰基回答 你叫什么来着?
168Philip.飞利浦.
169What about that, Jackie? So much for patriotism.怎么样,杰基? 爱国主义就够了
170If you've got someone whose heart is in it more than another person, they're going to do a better job.如果你的心比别人更强 他们就会做得更好
171When it comes down to the wire and there's like a situation in which someone has to put their life on the line,当它下到电线, 并有类似的情况 某人不得不将其生命 上线,
172someone who's doing it because they love this country will be more willing to go into danger than someone who's just getting paid.那些因为热爱这个国家而这么做的人 会比刚刚拿到报酬的人更愿意陷入危险
173They don't care. They've got the technical skills, but they don't care what happens他们不在乎。 他们有技术,但他们不在乎会发生什么
174because they really have nothing invested in this country.因为他们真的没有投资 在这个国家。
175There's another aspect, though. Once we get onto the issue of patriotism,还有另一个方面 一旦我们谈到爱国主义的问题
176if you believe patriotism, as Jackie does, should be the foremost consideration and not money,如果你相信爱国主义,像杰基一样, 应该成为首要考虑而不是金钱,
177does that argue for or against the paid army we have now?这是否代表着现在的有薪军队?
178We call it the volunteer army, though if you think about it, that's a kind of misnomer.我们称它为志愿军,不过如果你考虑一下,那是种错误。
179A volunteer army, as we use the term, is a paid army.志愿军,在我们使用这个词的时候,是一支有报酬的军队.
180So what about the suggestion that patriotism should be the primary motivation for military service, not money?那么,关于爱国主义应该是兵役的首要动机而不是金钱的建议呢?
181Does that argue in favor of the paid military that we have, or does it argue for conscription?这是赞成我们拥有的军饷,还是主张征兵?
182And just to sharpen that point, building on Phil's case for outsourcing,为了突出这一点 根据菲尔的外包案例
183if you think that the all-volunteer army, the paid army, is best because it lets the market allocate positions如果你认为全志愿军,有薪军 是最好的,因为它让市场分配位置
184according to people's preferences and willingness to serve for a certain wage,根据人们的偏好和愿意服务以获得一定的工资,
185doesn't the logic that takes you from a system of conscription to the hybrid civil war system,逻辑上你不是从征兵制度到混合内战制度
186to the all-volunteer army, doesn't the idea of expanding freedom of choice in the market,对全志愿军来说,这不是扩大市场选择自由的想法,
187doesn't that lead you all the way, if you follow that principle consistently, to a mercenary army?这难道不带你一路, 如果你坚持这一原则, 雇佣军军队?
188And then if you say no, Jackie says no, patriotism should count for something.如果你说不,杰基说不 爱国主义应该算什么
189Doesn't that argue for going back to conscription, if by patriotism you mean a sense of civic obligation?如果爱国主义意味着公民义务感,那难道不认为要重新征兵吗?
190Let's see if we can step back from the discussion that we've had.让我们看看我们能不能从我们的讨论中退一步。
191And see what we've learned about consent as it applies to market exchange.看看我们在同意方面学到了什么,因为它适用于市场交易。
192We've really heard two arguments, two arguments against the use of markets and exchange我们确实听到两个论点,两个反对利用市场和交换的论点
193in the allocation of military service.在兵役分配方面。
194One was the argument raised by Sam and Raoul, the argument about coercion.其中一个是Sam和Raoul提出的论点,关于胁迫的论点。
195The objection that letting the market allocate military service may be unfair and may not even be free允许市场分配兵役可能不公平,甚至可能不自由
196if there's severe inequality in the society, so that people who buy their way into military service如果社会上存在严重的不平等,那么那些买进军队的人
197are doing so not because they really want to, but because they have so few economic opportunities他们这样做不是因为他们真的想要, 而是因为他们的经济机会如此之少
198that that's their best choice.这是他们最好的选择。
199And Sam and Raoul say there's an element of coercion in that.萨姆和拉乌尔说,这里面有强制的因素.
200That's one argument.这是一个争论。
201Then there is a second objection to using the market to allocate military service.然后,有人第二次反对利用市场分配兵役。
202That's the idea that military service shouldn't be treated as just another job for pay这样一来,兵役不应该被当做又一份薪水工作
203because it's bound up with patriotism and civic obligation.因为它与爱国主义和公民义务联系在一起。
204This is a different argument from the argument about unfairness and inequality and coercion.这与关于不公平、不平等和胁迫的论点不同。
205It's an argument that suggests that maybe where civic obligations are concerned,这个论点表明 也许在公民义务方面
206we shouldn't allocate duties and rights by the market.我们不应该分配 责任和权利在市场。
207Now, we've identified two broad objections.现在,我们已经确定了两个广泛的反对意见。
208What do we need to know to assess those objections?我们需要知道什么来评估这些反对意见?
209To assess the first, the argument from coercion, inequality and unfairness, Sam,为了评估第一点,即来自胁迫、不平等和不公平的论点,Sam,
210we need to ask what inequalities in the background conditions of society我们需要问一下社会背景条件的不平等
211undermine the freedom of choices people make to buy and sell their labor?破坏人们为买卖劳动力所作的选择的自由?
212Question number one.问曰.
213Question number two, to assess the civic obligation patriotism argument,问题二 评估公民义务爱国论
214we have to ask what are the obligations of citizenship?我们必须问公民的义务是什么?
215Is military service one of them or not?兵役是其中之一吗?
216What obligates us as citizens, what is the source of political obligation?作为公民,我们负有什么义务? 政治义务的来源是什么?
217Is it consent or are there some civic obligations we have,是同意还是有些公民义务?
218even without consent, for living and sharing in a certain kind of society?即使没有征得同意,在某种社会中生活和分享?
219We haven't answered either of those questions,我们两个都没回答
220but our debate today about the civil war system and the all-volunteer army但我们今天关于内战制度和全志愿军的辩论
221has at least raised them, and those are questions we're going to return to in the coming weeks.至少已经提出了它们, 这些都是我们将要 在未来几周中回到的问题。
222Do you think you should be able to bid for a baby that's up for adoption?你觉得你应该买个要领养的孩子吗?
223That's Andrew's challenge.这是安德鲁的挑战。
224Do I think I should be able to bid for a baby?我想我应该能买到孩子吗?
225I'm not sure.我不太确定 说不定
226It's a market.这是一个市场。
227Today I'd like to turn our attention and get your views今天我想转过头来听听你的看法
228about an argument over the role of markets in the realm of human reproduction and procreation.关于市场在人类生殖和生殖领域作用的争论。
229Now with infertility clinics, people advertise for egg donors,现在在不孕症诊所 人们为捐蛋者做广告
230and from time to time in the Harvard Crimson, ads appear for egg donors.并且不时在哈佛Crimson杂志上,为鸡蛋捐献者登广告.
231Have you seen them?你见过他们吗?
232There was one that ran a few years ago that wasn't looking for just any egg donor.几年前有一次跑步 不是为了寻找任何捐蛋者
233It was an ad that offered a large financial incentive for an egg donor广告给一个捐蛋者带来了巨大的经济刺激
234from a woman who was intelligent, athletic, at least 5 foot 10,从一个聪明,运动, 至少5英尺10,
235and with at least 1,400 or above on her SATs.她的SAT成绩至少是1400或1400以上
236How much do you think the person looking for this egg donor你觉得找这个捐蛋者要多少钱?
237was willing to pay for an egg from a woman of that description?愿意从那个女人那里买蛋吗?
238What would you guess? $1,000? $15,000? $10,000?你猜怎么着? 1000美元 15 000美元 10 000美元吗
239I'll show you the ad.我给你看广告
240$50,000 for an egg.鸡蛋五万块
241But only a premium egg.但只吃个热蛋
242What do you think about that?你觉得怎么样?
243Well, there are also sometimes ads in the Harvard Crimson and other college newspapers for sperm donors.嗯,有时哈佛大学 和其他大学的报纸上 也有给精子捐献者的广告
244So the market in reproductive capacities is an equal opportunity market.因此,生殖能力市场是一个平等机会市场。
245Well, not exactly equal opportunity. They're not offering $50,000 for sperm.机会并不均等 他们不给精子5万元
246But there is a company, a large commercial sperm bank,但有一个公司, 一个大型的商业精子银行,
247that markets sperm. It's called California Cryobank.销售精子。 其名称取自加利福尼亚州Cryobank.
248It's a for-profit company.以利为业.
249It imposes exacting standards on the sperm it recruits.它对其招募的精子规定了严格的标准。
250And it has offices in Cambridge between Harvard and MIT and in Palo Alto near Stanford.并在剑桥的哈佛和麻省理工学院之间以及斯坦福附近的帕洛阿尔托设有办事处.
251Cryobank's marketing materials play up the prestigious source of its sperm.Cryobank的销售材料 充斥着它的精子的著名来源
252这是Cryobank网站上的信息
253Here they talk about the compensation.他们在这里谈论补偿。
254Although compensation should not be the only reason for becoming a sperm donor,虽然补偿不应该是成为精子捐献者的唯一原因,
255we are aware of the considerable time and expense involved in being a donor.我们意识到,作为捐助国需要花费大量时间和开支。
256So do you know what they offer?你知道他们提供什么吗?
257Donors will be reimbursed $75 per specimen,每样75美元
258up to $900 a month if you donate three times a week.每月最多900美元 如果你每周捐赠三次
259And then they add, we periodically offer incentives such as movie tickets然后他们又说,我们定期提供奖励 比如电影票
260or gift certificates for the extra time and effort expended by participating donors.或关于参与捐助者所花额外时间和努力的礼品证书。
261It's not easy to be a sperm donor.当精液捐献者不易.
262They accept fewer than 5% of the donors who apply.申请的捐助者不到5%。
263Their admission criteria are more demanding than Harvard's.他们的录取标准比哈佛更严格.
264The head of the sperm bank said the ideal sperm donor is six feet tall,精子库的负责人说理想的精子捐献者高六英尺
265with a college degree, brown eyes, blonde hair and dimples.有大学学位,棕色的眼睛, 金发和酒窝。
266For the simple reason that these are the traits that the market has shown the customers want.简单的理由是,这些是市场显示客户想要的特征。
267Quoting the head of the sperm bank,引用精子库的负责人,
268if our customers wanted high school dropouts, we would give them high school dropouts.如果我们的顾客想要高中辍学, 我们会给他们高中辍学。
269So here are two instances, the market in eggs for donation and the market in sperm,这里有两个例子: 捐卵市场和精子市场
270that raise a question.这引起了一个问题。
271A question about whether eggs and sperm should or should not be bought and sold for money.关于鸡蛋和精子是否应该为了钱而买卖的问题.
272As you ponder that, I want you to consider another case involving market想想看,我要你再考虑一起涉及市场的案子
273and in fact a contract in the human reproductive capacity.事实上是人类生殖能力的契约
274And this is the case of commercial surrogate motherhood.这就是商业代孕母亲的情况。
275And it's a case that wound up in court some years ago.这案子是几年前在法庭上结的
276It's the story of Baby M.这是婴儿M的故事。
277It began with William and Elizabeth Stern, a professional couple, wanting a baby,一开始是威廉和伊丽莎白・斯特恩 职业夫妇想要个孩子
278but they couldn't have one on their own, at least not without medical risk to Mrs. Stern.但他们不能自己拥有一个 至少不给斯特恩夫人带来医疗风险
279They went to an infertility clinic where they met Marybeth Whitehead,他们去了一个不孕症诊所 在那里他们遇到了玛丽贝丝·怀特黑德,
280a 29-year-old mother of two, the wife of a sanitation worker.29岁的母亲 两个, 一个卫生工人的妻子。
281She had replied to an ad that the center had placed, seeking the service of a surrogate mother.她答复了中心张贴的广告,寻求代孕母亲的服务。
282They made a deal.他们做了个交易
283They signed a contract in which William Stern agreed to pay Marybeth Whitehead a $10,000 fee,他们签了一份合同 威廉·斯特恩同意向玛丽贝斯·怀特黑德支付一万美元的费用
284plus all expenses, in exchange for which Marybeth Whitehead agreed to be artificially inseminated再加上所有费用 作为交换 玛丽贝丝·怀特黑德同意人工注射
285with William Stern's sperm to bear the child and then to give the baby to the Sterns.带着威廉·斯特恩的精子生孩子,然后把孩子交给斯特恩夫妇.
286Well, you probably know how the story unfolded.嗯,你也许知道 故事是如何展开的。
287Marybeth gave birth and changed her mind.玛丽贝斯生下孩子,改变了主意.
288She decided she wanted to keep the baby.她决定要保留孩子
289The case wound up in court in New Jersey.案件在新泽西州的法庭上结束.
290Let's put aside any legal questions and focus on this issue as a moral question.让我们把任何法律问题放在一边,把这个问题作为道德问题来集中考虑.
291How many believe that the right thing to do in the Baby M case would have been to uphold the contract,有多少人相信在Baby M案中 正确的做法是维持合同
292to enforce the contract?执行合同?
293And how many think the right thing to do would have been not to enforce that contract?有多少人认为不该执行这份合同?
294The majority say enforce.多数人说执行。
295Let's now hear the reasons that people had, either for enforcing or refusing to enforce this contract.让我们来听听人们有 执行或拒绝执行这个合同的原因。
296First, I want to hear from someone in the majority.首先,我想听到多数人的声音。
297Why do you uphold the contract?你为什么坚持合同?
298Why do you enforce it?为什么要强制执行它?
299Who can offer a reason?谁能提供理由?
300Yes.
301Stand up.站起来
302It's a binding contract.这是一份具有约束力的合同。
303All the parties involved knew the terms of the contract before any action was taken.所有有关当事方在采取任何行动之前都知道合同的条款。
304It's a voluntary agreement.自愿协议.
305The mother knew what she was getting into.母亲知道她要卷入什么
306All four, intelligent adults, regardless of formal education, whatever.四者,聪明的成年人,不论正规教育,无论什么.
307So it makes sense that if you know what you're getting into beforehand and you make a promise,所以,这是有道理的,如果你知道 你事先得到什么,你做出一个承诺,
308you should uphold that promise in the end.你最终应该信守诺言
309Okay. A deal is a deal, in other words.摆 换句话说,交易就是交易。
310Exactly.没错
311And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
312Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
313Is Patrick's reason the reason that most of you in the majority favored upholding a contract?你们多数人赞成维持合同 是因为帕特里克的原因吗?
314Yes?是吗?
315All right.好吧,我们走。
316Let's hear now someone who would not enforce the contract.让我们听听谁不会执行合同。
317What do you say to Patrick?你怎么跟帕特里克说?
318Why not?为什么不呢?
319Yes.
320Well, I mean, I agree.我是说 我同意
321I think contracts should be upheld when all the parties know all the information.我认为,当所有各方都知道所有信息时,合同就应当得到维护。
322But in this case, I don't think there's a way a mother, before the child exists,但在这种情况下,我不认为有 方法,母亲,在孩子存在之前,
323could actually know how she's going to feel about that child.可能知道她对那孩子的感受
324So I don't think the mother actually had all the information.所以我不认为母亲真的有所有的信息。
325She didn't know the person that was going to be born and didn't know how much she would love that person.她不认识将要出生的人,也不知道她会有多爱他.
326So that's my argument.这就是我的论点。
327So you would not, and what's your name?所以你不会,你叫什么名字?
328Evan Wilson.埃文・威尔逊。
329Evan says he would not uphold the contract because when it was entered into,埃文说他不会支持合同 因为合同签订时
330the surrogate mother couldn't be expected to know in advance how she would feel.代孕母亲不可能事先知道她会怎么想
331So she didn't really have the relevant information when she made that contract.所以当她签订合同时,她并没有真正掌握相关信息.
332Who else?还有谁?
333Who else would not uphold the contract?还有谁不支持合同?
334Yes?是吗?
335I also think that a contract should generally be uphold,我也认为,合同一般应当得到维护,
336but I think that the child has an inalienable right to its actual mother.但我认为孩子对自己的母亲有不可剥夺的权利
337And I think that if that mother wants it, then that child should have the right to that mother.我想如果那个母亲想要的话 那那个孩子应该有权接近那个母亲
338You mean the biological mother, not the adoptive mother.你是说生母 不是养母
339Right.
340And why is that?为什么?
341First of all, tell me your name.首先,告诉我你的名字。
342Anna.安娜,请问安娜
343Anna. Why is that Anna?安娜,请问安娜 为什么是安娜?
344Because I think that that bond that is created by nature因为我认为这种纽带是自然形成的
345is stronger than any bond that is created by a contract.强于合同创造的任何保证。
346Good. Thank you.不错 谢谢
347Who else?还有谁?
348Yes?是吗?
349I disagree.我不同意这个观点。
350I don't think that a child has an inalienable right to her biological mother.我不认为孩子对生母有不可剥夺的权利.
351I think that adoption and surrogacy are both legitimate trade-offs.我认为收养和代孕都是合法的取舍。
352And I agree with the point made that it's a voluntary agreement,我同意这个观点 这是自愿协议
353an individual made it, it's a voluntary agreement,一个人做的,这是自愿协议,
354and you can't apply coercion to this argument.你不能用强制手段来辩护
355You can't apply the objection from coercion to this argument.你不能把强制的反对 应用到这个论点。
356Correct.没错
357What's your name?你叫什么来着?
358Kathleen.凯瑟琳
359Kathleen, what do you say to Evan that though there may not have been...凯瑟琳 你怎么跟埃文说 虽然可能没有...
360Evan claimed that the consent was tainted not by coercion,埃文声称同意没有受到胁迫
361but by lack of adequate information.但缺乏足够的信息。
362She couldn't have known the relevant information,她不可能知道相关信息,
363namely how she would feel about the child.也就是她对孩子的感受
364What do you say to that?你说呢?
365I don't think the emotional content of her feelings plays into this.我并不认为她感情中的情感内容会起到作用.
366I think in a case of law, in the justice of this scenario,我认为,在法律案件中, 在这种情况下,
367her change of feelings are not relevant.她的感情改变与她无关
368If I give up my child for adoption如果我把孩子交给别人收养
369and then I decide later on that I really want that child back, too bad.之后我决定 我真的想要那个孩子回来 太糟糕了
370It's a trade-off. It's a trade-off that the mother has made.谓取舍. 以母所为取舍.
371So a deal is a deal. You agree with Patrick?所以说交易就是交易 你同意帕特里克的话吗?
372I agree with Patrick.我同意帕特里克的意见。
373A deal is a deal.一言为定
374Yes.
375Good.不错
376Yes.
377I would say that though I'm not really sure if I agree with the idea虽然我不确定我是否同意这个想法
378that the child is right to their mother,孩子对母亲的权利,
379I think the mother definitely has a right to her child.我觉得母亲对孩子有权利
380And I also think that there are some areas where market forces我也认为有些领域 市场迫使
381shouldn't necessarily penetrate.不应该穿透。
382I think that the whole surrogate mother area我想整个代孕母亲区
383smacks a little bit of dealing in human beings seems dehumanizing.有点人性化
384And it doesn't really seem right.似乎不太对劲
385So that's my main reason.所以这就是我的主要原因。
386And what is, could you tell us your name?什么,你能告诉我们你的名字吗?
387I'm Andrew.我是安德鲁
388Andrew, what is dehumanizing about buying and selling安德鲁 买卖有什么非人性
389the right to a child for money?钱给孩子的权利?
390What is dehumanizing about it?何谓非人道.
391Well, because you're buying someone's biological right.因为你在买别人的生物权利
392I mean, you can't, in the law, as it's said, you can't sell your own child.我的意思是,你不能,在法律, 正如它所说的, 你不能卖你自己的孩子。
393Like, were you to have a child,像,如果你有一个孩子,
394I believe that the law prohibits you selling it to another person.我相信法律禁止你卖给别人
395So this is like baby selling.这就像卖婴儿。
396Right.
397To a certain extent.在某种程度上
398I mean, though there is a contract with another person,我的意思是,虽然有一个合同 与另一个人,
399you've made agreements and whatnot,你已经达成协议,什么的,
400there is an undeniable emotional bond that takes place between a mother and a child.母亲和孩子之间有着不可否认的情感纽带。
401And it's wrong to simply ignore this because you've written out something contractually.而忽略这一点是错误的, 因为你已经写出了一些合同。
402You want to reply to Andrew?你想回答安德鲁吗?
403Stay there.别动
404You point out there's an undeniable emotional bond.你指出有一种不可否认的情感联系.
405I feel like in this situation,我觉得在这种情况下,
406we're not necessarily arguing against adoption or surrogacy in itself.我们并不一定反对领养或代孕本身。
407We're just sort of pointing out the emotional differences.我们只是指出情绪上的差异。
408But wait, I mean, it's easy to break everything down to numbers and say,但等等,我的意思是,它很容易 打破一切到数字说,
409oh, we have contracts like you're buying and selling a car.哦,我们有合同 像你正在买卖一辆汽车。
410But there are underlying emotions.但有内在的情绪
411I mean, you're dealing with people.我的意思是,你处理的人。
412I mean, these are not objects to be bought and sold.我的意思是,这些不是要买卖的物品。
413All right.好吧,我们走。
414What about Andrew's claim that this is like baby selling?安德鲁声称这就像卖婴儿?
415I believe that adoption and surrogacy should be permitted.我认为,应当允许收养和代孕。
416Whether or not I actually will partake in it is not really relevant.不管我是否真的会参与其中 都无关紧要
417But I think that the government should give its citizens the rights to a law for adoption and surrogacy.但我认为政府应该给予公民以收养和代孕的法律权利.
418But adoption is not according to the law.但收养不依法进行。
419Is adoption baby selling?领养婴儿卖吗?
420Well, do you think you should be able to bid for a baby that's up for adoption?你觉得你应该买个要领养的孩子吗?
421That's Andrew's challenge.这是安德鲁的挑战。
422Do I think I should be able to bid for a baby?我想我应该能买到孩子吗?
423I'm not sure.我不太确定 说不定
424It's a market.这是一个市场。
425I mean, I feel like the extent to which it's been applied,我的意思是,我觉得它应用的程度,
426I'm not sure if the government should be able to permit it.我不确定政府是否应该允许
427And I have to think about it more.我必须多考虑一下
428All right. Fair enough.好吧,我们走。 不错
429Are you satisfied, Andrew?你满意了吗,安德鲁?
430Well, yeah.
431I mean, I just I think surrogacy should be permitted.我觉得应该允许代孕
432I think that people can do it.我认为人们可以做到这一点。
433But I don't think that it should be forced upon people that once the contract is signed,但我不认为应该强迫人们 一旦签订合同,
434it's absolutely like the end all.绝对是结局
435I think that it's unenforceable.我认为这是不可执行的。
436So people should be free, Andrew, to enter into these contracts.因此人们应该有自由,安德鲁,来签订这些合同.
437But it should not be enforceable in a court.但它不应在法庭上强制执行。
438Not in the court, no.不在宫廷中,不在.
439Who would like to join on one side or the other?谁愿意加入一方或另一方?
440Yes.
441I think I have an interesting perspective on this,我觉得我有个有趣的视角
442because my brother was actually one of the people who donated to a sperm bank,因为我哥哥其实是 捐给精子银行的人之一
443and he was paid a very large amount of money.而且他得到了很多钱。
444He was six feet tall, but not blonde.他身高六英尺,但不是金发
445He had dimples, though.不过他有酒窝
446So he actually has I'm an aunt now, and he has a daughter.所以,他实际上有我现在是一个阿姨, 他有一个女儿。
447He donated his sperm to a lesbian couple in Oklahoma,他把他的精子捐给了俄克拉荷马州的一对女同性恋夫妇
448and he has been contacted by them, and he has seen pictures of his daughter.他看见他女儿的照片了
449But he still does not feel an emotional bond to his daughter.但是他仍然感觉不到他女儿的感情纽带.
450He just has a sense of curiosity about what she looks like and what she's doing and how she is.他只是对她长什么样子 在做什么 以及她是如何的好奇心
451He doesn't feel love for his child.他对孩子不感兴趣
452So from this experience, I think the bond between a mother and a child所以从这个经验来看,我认为母亲和孩子之间的联系
453cannot be compared to the bond between the father and the child.不可与父亲和孩子之间的纽带相比较。
454That's really interesting.这真的很有趣。
455What's your name?你叫什么来着?
456Vivian.维维亚
457So we've got the case of surrogacy, commercial surrogacy.故有代孕,商业代孕之例.
458And it's been compared to baby selling,它被比作卖婴儿,
459and we've been exploring whether that analogy is apt.我们一直在探索这个类比是否合适。
460And it can also be compared, as you point out, to sperm selling.正如你所指出,它也可以与精子销售相比较。
461But you're saying that sperm selling and baby selling or even surrogacy are very different.但你的意思是 精子卖和婴儿卖 甚至代孕是截然不同的
462They're unequal services.他们是不平等的服务。
463And that's because, Vivian, you say that the tie, the bond...这是因为,薇薇安,你说的领带,纽带...
464Yes, and also the time investment that's given by a mother, nine months,是的,还有母亲给的时间投资,九个月
465cannot be compared to a man going into a sperm bank, looking at pornography,不能与进入精子库的人相比 看着色情
466depositing into a cup.存进杯子里
467I don't think those are equal.我不认为这些是平等的。
468Good.不错
469All right.好吧,我们走。
470Because that's what happens in a sperm bank.因为精子库就是这样的
471All right.好吧,我们走。
472So this is really interesting.所以这真的很有趣。
473We have...我们...
474All right.好吧,我们走。
475Notice the arguments that have come out so far.注意目前为止的争论
476The objections to surrogacy, the objections to enforcing that contract,反对代孕,反对执行该合同,
477are of at least two kinds.至少有两种。
478There was the objection about tainted consent.有人反对有污点的同意。
479This time, not because of coercion or implicit coercion,这次不是因为胁迫或暗示的胁迫,
480but because of imperfect or flawed information.但因为信息不完善或有缺陷
481So tainted or flawed consent can arise either because of coercion因此,有污点或有缺陷的同意可能因胁迫而产生。
482or because of a lack of relevant information,或由于缺乏相关信息,
483at least according to one argument that we've heard.至少根据我们听到的一个论点
484And then a second objection to enforcing the surrogacy contract然后第二次反对执行代孕合同
485was that it was somehow dehumanizing.不知何故,这是非人性的。
486Now, when this case was decided by the courts,现在,当这个案子被法庭裁决时,
487what did they say about these arguments?他们怎么说这些论点的?
488The lower court ruled that the contract was enforceable.下级法院裁定合同可以执行。
489Neither party had a superior bargaining position.任何一方都不具备高级谈判地位。
490A price for the service was struck and a bargain was reached.服务价格被打破,并达成了交易。
491Neither side didn't force the other.双方都没有强迫对方。
492Neither had disproportionate bargaining power.也没有过大的讨价还价能力。
493Then it went to the New Jersey Supreme Court.之后它去了新泽西州最高法院.
494And what did they do?他们做了什么?
495They said this contract is not enforceable.他们说这份合同不能执行.
496They did grant custody to Mr. Stern as the father他们确实把监护权交给了Stern先生作为父亲
497because they thought that would be in the best interest of the child,因为他们认为这符合儿童的最大利益,
498and they restored the rights of Marybeth Whitehead他们曾恢复麦尔彦白发的权利,
499and left it to lower courts to decide exactly what the visitation rights should be.并留给下级法院确切决定探视权是什么。
500They invoked two different kinds of reasons他们引用两种不同的理由
501along the lines that Andrew proposed.按照安德鲁的提议
502First, there was not sufficiently informed consent, the court argued.首先,法院辩称,没有足够的知情同意。
503Under the contract, the natural mother is irrevocably committed根据合同,生母是不可撤销的
504before she knows the strength of her bond with her child.在她知道她和孩子的关系有多强之前
505She never makes a truly voluntary informed decision,她从来没有做出一个真正的 自愿知情的决定,
506for any decision prior to the baby's birth出生前的任何决定
507is in the most important sense uninformed.在最重要的意义上,不知情。
508That was the court.那是法庭
509Then the court also made a version of the second argument后来法院也做了第二个论点的版本
510against commodification in this kind of case.在这种情况下,反对商品化。
511This is the sale of a child, the court said,这是买卖儿童,法院说,
512and at the very least, the sale of a mother's right to her child.至少还有卖掉母亲对孩子的权利
513Whatever idealism may motivate the participants,无论理想主义能激励参与者,
514the profit motive predominates, permeates, and ultimately governs the transaction.利润的动机占主导地位、渗透,并最终支配交易。
515And so regardless, the court said,所以不管怎样 法庭说
516regardless of any argument about consent or flawed consent or full information,不论关于同意或有缺陷的同意或充分信息的任何论点,
517there are some things in a civilized society that money can't buy.在一个文明的社会中,有些东西是钱买不到的.
518That's what the court said in voiding this contract.朝廷在废除这份合同时也是这么说的.
519Well, what about these two arguments那么,关于这两个论点
520against the extension of markets to procreation and to reproduction?反对扩大市场以生产和繁殖?
521How persuasive are they?他们有多有说服力?
522There was, it's true, a voluntary agreement,确实有自愿协议
523a contract struck between William Stern and Mary Beth Whitehead.威廉·斯特恩和玛丽·贝丝·怀特海德签了合同
524But there are at least two ways that consent can be other than truly free.但至少有两种方式,同意可以是真正自由的。
525First, if people are pressured or coerced to give their agreement.第一,如果人们受到压力或被迫表示同意。
526And second, if their consent is not truly informed.其次,如果他们的同意没有被真正告知。
527And in the case of surrogacy, the court said,在代孕案中,法庭说:
528a mother can't know.母亲不能知道
529Even one who already has kids of her own,即使是已经生过孩子的人
530what it would be like to bear a child and give it up for pay.生孩子然后为了报酬而放弃孩子的感受
531So in order to assess criticism, objection number one,所以为了评估批评,反对第一,
532we have to figure out just how free does a voluntary exchange have to be我们必须弄清楚 自愿的交换必须有多自由
533with respect to the bargaining power and equal information.关于讨价还价的能力和平等的信息。
534Question number one, how do we assess?第一问题,我们如何评估?
535The second objection.第二次反对。
536The second objection is more elusive, it's more difficult.第二项反对比较难捉摸,比较困难.
537Andrew acknowledged this, right?安德鲁承认了 对吧?
538What does it mean to say there is something dehumanizing说有非人性的东西是什么意思
539to make childbearing a market transaction?使生育成为市场交易?
540我们读过的一个哲学家 Elizabeth Anderson
541tries to bring some philosophical clarity to the unease that Andrew articulated.试图给安德鲁表达的不安带来一些哲学上的清晰.
542She said, by requiring the surrogate mother to repress她说,要求代孕母亲压抑
543whatever parental love she feels for the child,无论她父母对孩子的爱
544surrogacy contracts convert women's labor into a form of alienated labor.代孕合同将妇女的劳动转化为一种疏远的劳动形式.
545The surrogate's labor is alienated because she must divert it from the end,代孕者的劳动被疏远了 因为她必须把它从最后转移
546from the end which the social practices of pregnancy rightly promote,从怀孕的社会习俗正确提倡的结束,
547namely an emotional bond with her child.也就是和她孩子的感情纽带
548So what Anderson is suggesting is that certain goods所以安德森的意思是 某些商品
549should not be treated as open to use or to profit.不应视之为可使用或可获利。
550Certain goods are properly valued in ways other than use.某些货物的价值不以使用的方式适当估价。
551What are other ways of valuing and treating goods that should not be open to use?不应允许使用的商品的估价和处理还有其他哪些方法?
552Anderson says there are many, respect, appreciation, love, honor, awe, sanctity.安德森说有许多,尊重,欣赏,爱,荣誉,敬畏,神圣.
553There are many modes of valuation beyond use估价方式很多,不能使用
554and certain goods are not properly valued某些货物没有适当估价
555if they're treated simply as objects of use.如果它们被简单地当作使用对象。
556How do we go about evaluating that argument of Anderson?我们如何去评估安德森的论点?
557In a way it takes us back to the debate we had with utilitarianism.从某种意义上说,它使我们回到了我们关于功利主义的辩论。
558Is use the only, is utility, is use the only proper way of treating goods,这是唯一的用途,是用途,是处理商品的唯一适当方式,
559including life, military service, procreation, childbearing?包括生命、兵役、生育、生育?
560And if not, how do we figure out?如果不是,我们怎么解决?
561How can we determine what modes of valuation are fitting or appropriate to those goods?我们如何确定哪种估价方式适合或适合这些货物?
562Several years ago there was a scandal surrounding a doctor,几年前有个医生的丑闻
563an infertility specialist in Virginia named Cecil Jacobson.弗吉尼亚州的一个不孕症专家 叫塞西尔·雅各布森
564He didn't have a donor catalog because unknown to his patients,他没有捐赠目录 因为他的病人不知道
565all of the sperm he used to inseminate his patients came from one donor,他用来给病人注射精液的精子 都来自一个捐献者
566Dr. Jacobson himself.雅各布森医生本人.
567At least one woman who testified in court was unnerved至少有一名在法庭上作证的妇女没有感到忧虑
568at how much her newborn daughter looked just like him.她的新生女儿长得像他
569Now it's possible to condemn Dr. Jacobson for failing to inform the women in advance.现在可以谴责雅各森博士没有事先通知女性.
570That would be the argument about consent.这就是关于同意的论点。
571The columnist Ellen Goodman described the bizarre scenario as follows.专栏作家埃伦·古德曼(英语:Ellen Goodman)将奇异的情景描述如下.
572Dr. Jacobson, she wrote, gave his infertility business the personal touch.她写道,雅各布森博士 给他的不孕症生意 个人的触摸。
573But now the rest of us, she wrote, are in for a round of second thoughts about sperm donation.但是现在我们其他人,她写道, 对于捐赠精子的第二轮想法。
574Goodman concluded that fatherhood should be something you do, not something you donate.古德曼总结道,父亲身份应该是你做的事,而不是你捐赠的东西.
575And I think what she was doing, and what the philosopher Elizabeth Anderson is doing,我认为她在做什么 哲学家伊丽莎白·安德森在做什么
576and what Andrew was suggesting with his argument about dehumanization,安德鲁用他关于非人化的争论所暗示的
577is pondering whether there are certain goods that money shouldn't buy,正在思考是否有 某些商品,钱不应该购买,
578not just because of tainted consent, but also perhaps不仅因为同意有污点,而且也许
579because certain goods are properly valued in a way higher than mere use.某些货物的价值高于仅仅使用。
580Those at least are the questions we are going to pursue with the help of some philosophers in the weeks to come.这些至少是我们今后几周在一些哲学家的帮助下将要探讨的问题。
581It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
582Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
583Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
584Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
该视频共有字幕 587 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P9 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p09 8. 8.谎言的教训 (P9)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:06Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:10We began by trying to navigate our way through Kant's moral theory,我们开始尝试通过康德的道德理论
0:35Now, fully to make sense of Kant's moral theory in the groundwork现在,充分理解康德的道德理论 在基础
0:45requires that we be able to answer three questions.要求我们能够回答三个问题。
0:52How can duty and autonomy go together?义务和自主权如何结合起来?
0:56What's the great dignity in answering to duty?何等为大庄严应供正等正觉.
1:02It would seem that these two ideas are opposed, duty and autonomy.看来这两种想法是对立的,责任和自治。
1:08What's Kant's answer to that?康德对此有何回应?.
1:10We need someone here to speak up on Kant's behalf.我们需要有人代表康德说话
展开字幕全文(782 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3We began by trying to navigate our way through Kant's moral theory,我们开始尝试通过康德的道德理论
4Now, fully to make sense of Kant's moral theory in the groundwork现在,充分理解康德的道德理论 在基础
5requires that we be able to answer three questions.要求我们能够回答三个问题。
6How can duty and autonomy go together?义务和自主权如何结合起来?
7What's the great dignity in answering to duty?何等为大庄严应供正等正觉.
8It would seem that these two ideas are opposed, duty and autonomy.看来这两种想法是对立的,责任和自治。
9What's Kant's answer to that?康德对此有何回应?.
10We need someone here to speak up on Kant's behalf.我们需要有人代表康德说话
11Does he have an answer?他有答案吗?
12Yes, go ahead, stand up.是的,继续,站起来。
13Kant believes that you only act autonomously康德认为你只能自主行事
14when you are pursuing something only in the name of duty当你只以义务的名义追求某事
15and not because of your own circumstances,不是因为你自己的情况
16{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}就像你只做一些好和道德的事 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}你只是做一些好事
17if you're doing it because of duty如果你这样做是出于职责
18and not because of something of your own personal gain.而不是因为你私利
19Now, why is that acting out of freedom?那为什么是出于自由?
20Because you choose to accept those moral laws in yourself因为你自己选择接受这些道德法则
21and not brought on from outside upon onto you.而不是从外面引到你身上
22Okay, good, because acting out of duty is following a moral law好吧 很好 因为失职是遵守道德法
23that you impose on yourself.你将自己强加于人。
24That's what makes duty compatible with freedom.这使得责任与自由相容.
25Okay, that's good Matt, that is Kant's answer.好吧,这是好马特,这是康德的答案。
26That's great, thank you.很好,谢谢
27So, Kant's answer is, it is not in so far as I am subject to the law所以康德的回答是,它不是 在我受法律约束的范围内
28of dignity, but rather in so far as with regard to that very same law,但就同一法律而言,
29I'm the author and I'm subordinated to that law on that grounds我是作者,因此我服从法律
30that I took it, as Matt just said, I took it upon myself.正如马特刚才所说,我接受它,我自己接受它。
31I willed that law.我将遵守法律
32So, that's why for Kant, acting according to duty所以,这是为什么康德,按照职责行事
33and acting freely in the sense of autonomously are one in the same.在自主的意义上自由行动是一回事。
34But that raises the question, how many moral laws are there?但这引起了一个问题,有多少道德法律?
35Because if dignity consists in being governed by a law that I give myself,因为如果尊严是由我赋予自己的法律所决定的
36what's to guarantee that my conscience will be the same as your conscience?什么能保证我的良心和你的良心一样?
37Who has Kant's answer to that? Yes?谁有康德的答案? 是吗?
38Because a moral law is not contingent upon subjective conditions,因为道德法不取决于主观条件
39it would transcend all particular differences between people它将超越人与人之间的所有特殊差异
40and so would be a universal law and in this respect,并且将是一项普遍的法律,在这方面,
41there would only be one moral law because it would be supreme.只有一种道德法,因为它是至高无上的。
42That's exactly right. What's your name? Kelly.没错 你叫什么来着? 凯莉
43So, Kelly, Kant believes that if we choose freely out of our own consciences所以,凯莉,康德相信 如果我们从自己的良心中自由选择
44the moral law, we are guaranteed to come up with one and the same moral law.道德法则,我们保证 提出同样的道德法则。
45And that's because when I choose, it's not me, Michael Sandel, choosing.这是因为当我选择时,不是我,迈克尔·桑德尔,选择。
46It's not you, Kelly, choosing for yourself.这不是你,凯莉,选择自己。
47What is it exactly? Who's doing the choosing?这到底是什么? 谁在做选择?
48Who's the subject? Who's the agent who's doing the choosing?主题是谁? 谁是代理谁做选择?
49Reason. Well, reason. Pure reason.缘由. 嗯,原因。 \ N 纯理故.
50Pure reason. And what you mean by pure reason is what exactly?纯理故. 你所说的纯粹的理由是什么?
51Well, pure reason is, like we were saying before,嗯,纯粹的理由是, 就像我们刚才说的,
52not subject to any external conditions that may be imposed on us.不受可能强加给我们的任何外部条件的限制。
53Good. That's great. So, the reason that does the willing,不错 赞曰. 所以,原因 做自愿,
54the reason that governs my will when I will the moral law,当我要遵守道德法则时, 支配我意志的原因,
55is the same reason that operates when you choose the moral law for yourself.也是你为自己选择道德法则的原因
56And that's why it's possible to act autonomously to choose for myself,所以可以自主地选择自己
57for each of us to choose for ourselves as autonomous beings,我们每个人都选择自己作为自主的生物,
58and for all of us to wind up willing the same moral law.也让我们所有人都愿意遵守同样的道德法则
59The categorical imperative.绝对必要。
60But then there is one big and very difficult question left.但还有一个大而非常困难的问题。
61Even if you accept everything that Matt and Kelly have said so far.即使你接受马特和凯利迄今所说的话
62How is a categorical imperative possible?如何实现绝对必要?
63How is morality possible?道德怎么会这样?
64To answer that question, Kant says we need to make a distinction.为了回答这个问题,康德说我们需要有所区别.
65We need to make a distinction between two standpoints.我们需要区分两种观点。
66Two standpoints from which we can make sense of our experience.我们能够从两个角度理解我们的经验。
67Let me try to explain what he means by these two standpoints.让我解释一下他从这两个角度来说意味着什么。
68As an object of experience, I belong to the sensible world.作为一个经验的对象,我属于明智的世界。
69There, my actions are determined by the laws of nature,在那里,我的行动是由自然法则决定的,
70and by the regularities of cause and effect.和因果的规律。
71But as a subject of experience, I inhabit an intelligible world.但作为一个经验的主体,我生活在一个可以理解的世界。
72Here, being independent of the laws of nature, I am capable of autonomy,在这里,独立于自然法则, 我有能力自治,
73capable of acting according to a law I give myself.能够按照法律行事 我给了自己
74Now Kant says that only from this second standpoint can I regard myself as free,现在康德说,只有从第二个角度,我才能认为自己是自由的,
75for to be independent of determination by causes in the sensible world is to be free.在明智的世界中,不受因果决定的影响是自由的。
76If I were wholly an empirical being, as the utilitarians assume,如果我是一个完全的经验存在, 正如功利主义者假设,
77if I were a being wholly and only subject to the deliverances of my senses,如果我是一个完全 并且只服从 解脱我的感觉,
78to the pain and pleasure and hunger and thirst and appetite,痛苦、快乐、饥饿、渴渴、欲望
79if that's all there were to humanity, we wouldn't be capable of freedom, Kant reasons.如果人类只有这些 我们就不会有自由 康德的理由
80Because in that case, every exercise of will would be conditioned by the desire for some object.因为在这种情况下,意志的行使都会受到对某种物体的渴望的制约.
81In that case, all choice would be heteronomous choice,这样的话,所有的选择都是异质的选择,
82governed by the pursuit of some external end.由追求某种外部目的来管理。
83When we think of ourselves as free, Kant writes,当我们认为自己是自由的,康德写道,
84we transfer ourselves into the intelligible world as members我们转身进入一个能理解的世界 作为成员
85and recognize the autonomy of the will.并承认意志的自主性。
86That's the idea of the two standpoints.这就是两个观点的想法.
87So, how are categorical imperatives possible?那么,怎样才能有绝对的必要?
88Only because the idea of freedom makes me a member of an intelligible world.只因为自由的思想使我成为了一个通晓世界的成员.
89Now, Kant admits we aren't only rational beings,康德承认我们不仅仅是理性的人
90we don't only inhabit the intelligible world, the realm of freedom.我们不只生活在能理解的世界 自由的范畴
91If we did, then all of our actions would invariably accord with the autonomy of the will.如果我们这样做,那么我们的所有行动都必然符合意志的自主性。
92But precisely because we inhabit simultaneously the two standpoints,但正因为我们同时居住着两个观点
93the two realms, the realm of freedom and the realm of necessity,两个领域,自由领域和必要领域,
94the realm of freedom and the realm of necessity,自由领域和必要性领域,
95precisely because we inhabit both realms, there is always potentially a gap正是因为我们两边都居住着 总会有缺口
96between what we do and what we ought to do, between is and ought.我们做什么和我们应该做什么, 之间是和应该的。
97Another way of putting this point,换句话说,
98and this is the point with which Kant concludes the groundwork,这就是康德完成基础建设的目的
99morality is not empirical.道德不是经验
100Whatever you see in the world, whatever you discover through science,无论你在世界上看到什么 通过科学发现什么
101can't decide moral questions.不能决定道德问题。
102Morality stands at a certain distance from the world, from the empirical world.道德与世界,经验世界有一定距离.
103That's why no science could deliver moral truth.这就是为什么没有科学能够传达道德真理。
104Now, I want to test Kant's moral theory with the hardest possible case,现在,我想用最难办的案子来检验康德的道德理论,
105a case that he raises, the case of the murderer at the door.他提出的一个案子, 凶手在门口的案子。
106Kant says that lying is wrong, we all know that, we've discussed why.康德说撒谎是错的 我们都知道 我们讨论过为什么
107Lying is at odds with the categorical imperative.撒谎不符合绝对必要。
108A French philosopher, Benjamin Constant,一位法国哲学家 本杰明·康斯坦特
109wrote an article responding to the groundwork,写了一篇回应基础的文章,
110where he said this absolute prohibition on lying is wrong, it can't be right.他说绝对禁止撒谎是错的 这不可能对
111What if a murderer came to your door,如果一个杀人犯来到你家门口
112looking for your friend who was hiding in your house,寻找你朋友 谁躲在你家,
113and the murderer asked you point blank,凶手问你,
114is your friend in your house?你的朋友在你家里吗?
115Constant says it would be crazy to say that the moral thing to do in that case,康斯坦斯说,如果说 道德的事情在那样的情况下,
116is to tell the truth.说的是实话
117Constant says the murderer certainly doesn't deserve the truth,常说凶手不配知道真相
118and Kant wrote a reply.康德写了回信
119And Kant stuck by his principle that lying even to the murderer at the door is wrong.康德坚持他的原则 连门前的凶手都撒谎是错的
120And the reason it's wrong, he said,他说,这是错的
121is once you start taking consequences into account,一旦你开始考虑后果
122to carve out exceptions to the categorical imperative,确定绝对必要事项的例外,
123you've given up the whole moral framework.你放弃了整个道德框架
124You've become a consequentialist, or maybe a rule utilitarian.你成为了一个间接主义者 或者一个规则实用主义者
125But most of you, and most of Kant's readers,但是你们大多数人,还有康德的大部分读者,
126think there's something odd and implausible about this answer.认为这个答案有些奇怪和不可思议.
127I would like to try to defend Kant on this point,我想为康德辩护
128and then I want to see whether you think that my defense is plausible.然后我想看看你是否认为我的辩护是合理的
129And I would want to defend him within the spirit of his own account of morality.我想用他道德的精神来保护他
130Imagine that someone comes to your door,想象一下,有人来到你的门,
131you were asked the question by this murderer,你被这个杀人犯问到
132you're hiding your friend.你在隐藏你的朋友。
133Is there a way that you could avoid telling a lie without selling out your friend?有没有办法避免说谎而不出卖你的朋友?
134Does anyone have an idea of how you might be able to do that?有没有人知道你怎么做到的?
135Yes, stand up.是的,站起来。
136I was just going to say if I were to let my friend in my house to hide in the first place,我只是想说,如果我要让我的朋友 在我家躲起来,
137I'd probably make a plan with them.我可能会和他们一起计划
138So I'd be like, hey, I'll tell the murderer you're here, but escape.所以我会说,嘿,我会告诉凶手 你在这里,但逃跑。
139That's one of the options mentioned.这就是提到的选择之一。
140But I'm not sure that's a Kantian option.但我不确定那是康德的选择
141You're still lying, though.你还在撒谎
142No, because he's in the house, but he won't be.不,因为他在家里, 但他不会。
143Oh, I see.原来如此
144All right, good enough. One more try.好了,够了 再试一次
145If you just say you don't know where he is because he might not be locked in the closet,如果你只是说你不知道他在哪里 因为他可能不会被锁在衣柜里
146he might have left the closet, you have no clue where he could be.他可能离开了衣柜 你不知道他可能在哪
147So you would say I don't know,所以你会说我不知道,
148which wouldn't actually be a lie because you weren't at that very moment looking in the closet.这其实不是谎言 因为你当时不在衣柜里看
149Exactly.没错
150So it would be strictly speaking true.所以严格地说,这是真实的。
151Yes.
152And yet possibly deceiving.也可能是骗人的
153Misleading.误导
154But still true.但还是真实的。
155What's your name?你叫什么来着?
156John.约翰
157All right, John has, now John may be on to something.好吧,约翰已经,现在约翰 可能在做一些事情。
158John, you're really offering us the option of a clever evasion that is strictly speaking true.约翰,你真的在给我们提供 一种聪明的逃避的选择 严格来说是真实的
159This raises the question whether there is a moral difference这引起了道德差异的问题
160between an outright lie and a misleading truth.在谎言和误导之间。
161From Kant's point of view,康德认为
162there actually is a world of difference between a lie and a misleading truth.实际上,谎言和误导性事实之间有着不同的世界。
163Why is that?为什么?
164Even though both might have the same consequences.即使两者可能都有同样的后果。
165Remember, Kant doesn't base morality on consequences.记住,康德不把道德建立在后果上.
166He bases it on formal adherence to the moral law.他以正式遵守道德法为依据。
167Now, sometimes in ordinary life we make exceptions for the general rule against lying with a white lie.有时候,在普通人的生活里,我们为禁止用白话撒谎的一般规则规定例外。
168What is a white lie?什么是白话?
169It's a lie to make, well, to avoid hurting someone's feelings, for example.比如说,为了避免伤害别人的感情,这是个谎言。
170It's a lie that we think of as justified by the consequences.我们认为这是个谎言,我们认为这是由后果证明的。
171Now, Kant could not endorse a white lie,现在,康德不能认可一个白色的谎言,
172but perhaps he could endorse a misleading truth.但也许他可以认可一个误导性的事实。
173Suppose someone gives you a tie as a gift,如果有人给你一个领带作为礼物,
174and you open the box,你打开盒子,
175and it's just awful.这太可怕了。
176What do you say?你说什么?
177Thank you.谢谢
178You could say thank you,你可以说谢谢,
179but they're waiting to see what you think of it.但他们等着看你的看法
180Or they ask you, what do you think of it?或者他们问你 你觉得呢?
181You could tell a white lie and say, it's beautiful.你可以说一个白色的谎言 说,这是美丽的。
182But that wouldn't be permissible from Kant's point of view.但从康德的角度来看,这是不允许的.
183Could you say, not a white lie but a misleading truth,你能说,不是白话,而是误导事实吗?
184you open the box and you say,你打开盒子说,
185I've never seen a tie like that before.我从来没有见过这样的领带。
186Thank you.谢谢
187You shouldn't have.你不该这样
188That's good.这是很好的。
189Can you think of a contemporary political leader who engaged?你能想到当代政治领袖是谁订婚的吗?
190You can?你能吗?
191Who are you thinking of?你在想谁?
192Remember the whole carefully worded denials记住所有精心措辞的否认
193in the Monica Lewinsky affair of Bill Clinton?在比尔·克林顿的莫妮卡·莱温斯基事件中?
194Now, those denials actually became the subject现在,那些否认 变成了主题
195of very explicit debate and argument明确的辩论和争论
196during the impeachment hearings.在弹劾听证会期间。
197Take a look at the following excerpts from Bill Clinton.看一下比尔·克林顿的以下摘录.
198Bill Clinton, is there something, do you think,比尔·克林顿,你觉得...
199morally at stake in the distinction between a lie区分谎言在道德上有利害关系
200and a misleading, carefully couched truth?以及一个误导的、认真的真理,
201I want to say one thing to the American people.我想对美国人民说一件事。
202I want you to listen to me.我要你听我说
203I'm going to say this again.我要再说一遍。
204I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.我和那个女人没有性关系 Lewinsky女士
205I never told anybody to lie, not a single time, never.我从来没有告诉任何人说谎, 没有一次,从来没有。
206These allegations are false.这些指控是虚假的。
207Did he lie to the American people when he said,他对美国人民撒谎了吗?
208I never had sex with that woman?我从来没有和那个女人做爱?
209You know, he doesn't believe he did and because of the...你知道,他不相信 他这样做,因为...
210Let me explain, may I explain, Congressman?让我解释一下,我可以解释一下吗,议员?
211What he said was to the American people他对美国人民说的话
212that he did not have sexual relations.他没有性关系。
213And I understand you're not going to like this, Congressman,我知道你不会喜欢的 议员先生
214because you will see it as a hair-splitting, evasive answer.因为你会把它看作是一个 分毛,回避的答案。
215But in his own mind, his definition was not...但在他自己的想法中,他的定义并不是...
216Okay, I understand that argument.好吧,我理解这个论点。
217So there you have the exchange.所以,你有交换。
218Now at the time, you may have thought this was just现在,你可能以为这只是
219a legalistic hair-splitting exchange between a Republican共和党人之间 合法分享头发的交流
220who wanted to impeach Clinton他们想弹劾克林顿
221and the lawyer who was trying to defend him.还有那个想为他辩护的律师
222But now, in the light of Kant,但现在,鉴于康德,
223do you think there is something morally at stake你觉得道德上有什么危险吗?
224in the distinction between a lie and an evasion,以谎言和逃避加以区别;
225a true but misleading statement?一个真实但误导性的陈述?
226I'd like to hear from defenders of Kant,我想听听康德的辩护人
227people who think there is a distinction.认为有区别的人。
228Are you ready to defend Kant?你准备好为康德辩护了吗?
229Well, I think when you try to say that好吧,我想当你试图说
230lying and misleading truths are the same thing,谎言和误导是同样的事情,
231you're basing it on a consequentialist argument,你根据一个结果论的论点,
232which is that they achieve the same thing.就是他们能达到同样的目的
233But the fact of the matter is, you told the truth但事实是,你说的是实话
234and you intended that people would believe what you were saying,你本意使人相信你所说的话,
235which was the truth, which means it is not morally the same这是事实, 这意味着它不是道德上一样
236as telling a lie and intending that they believe it is the truth,他们妄言自己是真实的,
237even though it's not true.虽不实.
238Good. What's your name?不错 你叫什么来着?
239Diana.戴安娜 戴安娜 戴安娜
240So Diana says that Kant has a point here,戴安娜说康德有道理
241and it's a point that might even come to the aid of Bill Clinton.这一点甚至可能帮助比尔·克林顿。
242And that is, well, what about that?那又怎么样?
243Someone over here.有人在这里。
244For Kant, motivation is key.对康德来说 动机是关键
245So if you give to someone because, primarily,所以,如果你给某人 因为,主要,
246you want to feel good about yourself,你想感觉好自己,
247Kant would say that has no moral worth.康德会说那没有道德价值
248Well, with this, the motivation is the same.那么,用这个,动机是一样的。
249It's to sort of mislead someone, it's to lie,这是一种误导某人, 它的谎言,
250it's to sort of throw them off the track,就是把他们扔出轨道
251and the motivation is the same.动机是一样的
252So there should be no difference.故应无分别.
253Good. So here, isn't the motive the same, Diana?不错 这里的动机不一样吗 Diana?
254What do you say to this argument that, well, the motive is the same?你对这个论点怎么说? 动机是一样的?
255In both cases, there is the attempt, or at least the hope,在这两种情况下,都有尝试,至少是希望,
256that one's pursuer will be misled.追随者将被误导
257Well, you could look at it that way,你可以这样看
258but I think that the fact is that your immediate motive但我认为事实是 你的直接动机
259is that they should believe you.他们应该相信你
260The ultimate consequence of that is that they might be deceived其最终后果是他们可能被欺骗
261and not find out what was going on.却不知道发生了什么
262But your immediate motive is that they should believe you但你的直接动机是 他们应该相信你
263because you're telling the truth.因为你说的是实话
264May I help a little?我能帮忙吗?
265Sure.当然
266You and Kant.你还有康德
267Why don't you say, and what's your name? I'm sorry.为甚么不说,又名甚么. 对不起
268What?你说什么?
269Why don't you say to Wesley,你为什么不对卫斯理说,
270it's not exactly the case that the motive in both cases这两起案件的动机并不是这样
271is to mislead.是要误导。
272They're hoping, they're hoping that the person他们希望,他们希望的人
273will be misled by the statement,将因言辞而迷误,
274I don't know where they are,我不知道他们在哪里,
275or I never had sexual relations.或者我从来没有性关系。
276You're hoping that they will be misled,你希望他们会被误导
277but in the case where you're telling the truth,但是如果你说的是实话
278your motive is to mislead while at the same time telling the truth你的动机是误导 同时说实话
279and honoring the moral law尊重道德法则
280and staying within the bounds of the categorical imperative.并遵守绝对必要。
281I think Kant's answer would be,我认为康德的答案是,
282Diana, yes?戴安娜,是吗?
283Yes.
284You like that?你喜欢吗?
285I do.当然
286And so I think Kant's answer would be,所以我认为康德的回答是
287unlike a falsehood, unlike a lie,与谎言不同,与谎言不同,
288a misleading truth pays a certain homage to duty.误导的真相会给人以一定的敬意
289And the homage it pays to duty is what justifies that the work of,它对职责的敬意 证明了它的工作
290even the work of evasion.甚至是逃避
291Diana.戴安娜 戴安娜 戴安娜
292Yes?是吗?
293You like, okay.你喜欢,好吧。
294And so there is something,所以有一点,
295some element of respect for the dignity of the moral law尊重道德法尊严的某些要素
296in the careful evasion,在谨慎的逃避中,
297because Clinton could have told an outright lie,因为克林顿可以说谎
298but he didn't.但他没有。
299And so I think Kant's,所以我认为康德...
300Kant's insight here is,康德的见解是
301in the carefully couched but true evasion,那是在谨慎的、真实的逃避中;
302there is a kind of homage to the dignity of the moral law一种对道德法的尊严的敬意
303that is not present in the outright lie.谎言中并不存在这种谎言。
304And that, Wesley, is part of the motive.韦斯利,这是动机的一部分
305It's part of the motive.这是动机的一部分。
306Yes, I hope he will be misled.是的,我希望他会被误导。
307I hope the murderer will run down the road我希望凶手会跑到路上
308or go to the mall looking for my friend instead of the closet.或者去商场找我的朋友 而不是衣橱
309I hope that will be the effect.我希望这就是效果。
310I can't control that.我不能控制这一点。
311I can't control the consequences.我无法控制后果
312But what I can control is standing by and honoring但我能控制的是 站在面前和荣誉
313however I pursue the ends I hope will unfold但我追求我所希望的结局
314to do so in a way that is consistent with respect for the moral law.以符合尊重道德法的方式这样做。
315Wesley, I don't think is entirely persuaded,卫斯理,我不认为 完全说服,
316but at least this brings out,但至少这能带来
317this discussion brings out,这场讨论带来了,
318some of what's at stake, what's morally at stake有些是利害关系,道德关系
319in Kant's notion of the categorical imperative.康德认为绝对必要
320As long as any effort is involved,只要有任何努力
321I would say that the contract is valid我要说合同是有效的
322and it should take effect.它应该生效。
323But why? What morally can you point to?为什么? 你在道义上能指什么?
324For example, two people agree to be married例如,两个人同意结婚
325and one suddenly calls the other in two minutes一个在两分钟内突然打电话给另一个
326and says, I changed my mind.我改变主意了
327Does the contract have obligation on both sides?合同双方是否有义务?
328Well, I'm tempted to say no.我很想说不
329Fine.还好
330Last time we talked about Kant's categorical imperative上次我们讨论康德的绝对任务
331and we considered the way he applied我们考虑了他的申请方式
332the idea of the categorical imperative to the case of lying.谎言案件绝对必要的想法。
333I want to turn briefly to one other application我想简单谈谈另一个申请
334of Kant's moral theory and that's his political theory.康德的道德理论 这就是他的政治理论
335Now, Kant says that just laws arise现在,康德说,只有法律产生
336from a certain kind of social contract.从某种社会契约。
337But this contract, he tells us, is of an exceptional nature.但是,他告诉我们,这份合同具有特殊性质。
338What makes the contract exceptional是什么使得合同例外
339is that it's not an actual contract其实不是合同
340that happens when people come together当人们走到一起时
341and try to figure out what the Constitution should be.试着找出宪法应该是什么。
342Kant points out that the contract that generates justice康德指出,创造正义的合同
343is what he calls an idea of reason.这是他所谓的理性思想。
344It's not an actual contract among actual men and women不是男女实际合同
345gathered in a Constitutional convention.在宪法大会上集会
346Why not?为什么不呢?
347I think Kant's reason is that actual men and women我觉得康德的理由是 真正的男人和女人
348gathered in a real Constitutional convention举行真正的制宪会议
349would have different interests, values, aims,将具有不同的利益、价值、目标,
350and there would also be differences of bargaining power谈判能力也会有差异
351and differences of knowledge among them.和他们之间知识的差别。
352And so the laws that would result from their deliberations所以他们审议后产生的法律
353wouldn't necessarily be just,也不一定只是这样
354wouldn't necessarily conform to principles of right,不一定符合权利原则,
355but would simply reflect the differences of bargaining power,但只是反映了讨价还价能力的差异,
356the special interests,特殊利益,
357the fact that some might know more than others有些人可能比其他人知道更多
358about law or about politics.关于法律或政治
359So Kant says a contract that generates principles of right康德说合同产生权利原则
360is merely an idea of reason,只是一个理性的想法,
361but it has undoubted practical reality,但它无疑地创造了现实,
362because it can oblige every legislator因为它可以强制每个立法者
363to frame his laws in such a way以这种方式制定他的法律
364that they could have been produced by the united will of the whole nation.它们本可以由整个民族的统一意志产生。
365So Kant is a contractarian,所以康德是个契约主义者
366but he doesn't trace the origin or the rightness of law但他没有追踪法律的来源和正确性
367to any actual social contract.任何实际的社会契约。
368This gives rise to an obvious question.这引起了一个显而易见的问题。
369What is the moral force of a hypothetical contract,假设合同的道德力量是什么?
370a contract that never happened?一份从未发生的合同?
371That's the question we take up today.这就是我们今天要处理的问题。
372But in order to investigate it,但为了调查
373we need to turn to a modern philosopher, John Rawls,我们需要转向现代哲学家约翰·罗尔斯
374who worked out in his book, A Theory of Justice,他在他的书《正义理论》中写道:
375in great detail an account of a hypothetical agreement详细叙述假设协议
376as the basis for justice.作为正义的基础。
377Rawls' theory of justice, in broad outline,罗尔斯的正义理论,概括地说,
378is parallel to Kant's in two important respects.在两个重要方面与康德平行
379Like Kant, Rawls was a critic of utilitarianism.和康德一样,罗尔斯也是功利主义的批评者.
380Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice,每个人拥有基于正义的不可侵犯性,
381Rawls writes, that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override.Rawls写道, 即使整个社会的福利也不能压倒一切。
382The rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining司法保障的权利不受政治谈判的约束
383or to the calculus of social interests.或社会利益的计算。
384The second respect in which Rawls' theory follows Kant's罗尔斯理论遵循康德理论的第二个方面
385is on the idea that principles of justice, properly understood,认为正义原则,
386can be derived from a hypothetical social contract,可以从假设的社会契约中推断出来,
387not an actual one.不是真实的
388And Rawls works this out in fascinating detailRawls对此非常细致
389with the device of what he calls the veil of ignorance.带着他所说的无知的面纱。
390The way to arrive at the rights,实现权利的方式,
391the basic rights that we must respect,我们必须尊重的基本权利,
392the basic framework of rights and duties,权利和义务的基本框架,
393is to imagine that we were gathered together,想象我们聚在一起
394trying to choose the principles to govern our collective lives,试图选择指导我们集体生活的原则,
395without knowing certain important particular facts about ourselves.却不知道某些关于我们的重要事实
396That's the idea of the veil of ignorance.这就是无知面纱的想法.
397Now what would happen if we gathered together, just as we are here,现在,如果我们聚集在一起会怎么样, 就像我们在这里一样,
398and tried to come up with principles of justice to govern our collective life?并试图提出公正原则来指导我们的集体生活?
399There would be a cacophony of proposals, of suggestions,会有各种建议,建议,
400reflecting people's different interests.反映人们的不同利益。
401Some are strong, some are weak.有强有弱.
402Some are rich, some are poor.有的有钱,有的穷.
403So Rawls says, imagine instead,所以罗尔斯说,想象一下,
404that we are gathered in an original position of equality.我们被聚集在 最初平等的地位。
405And what assures the equality is the veil of ignorance.而能保证平等的是无知的面纱.
406Imagine that we are all behind a veil of ignorance,想象一下,我们都站在无知的面纱后面,
407that temporarily abstracts from, or brackets, hides from us,暂时从我们这里 或从括号里隐藏
408who in particular we are.尤其是我们是谁
409Our race, our class, our place in society, our strengths, our weaknesses,我们的种族,我们的阶级,我们在社会中的地位,我们的优势,我们的弱点,
410whether we're healthy or unhealthy.不管是健康还是不健康
411Then, and only then, Rawls says,然后,只有那时,罗尔斯说,
412the principles we would agree to would be principles of justice.我们同意的原则是正义原则。
413That's how the hypothetical contract works.假设合同就是这样运作的.
414What is the moral force of this kind of hypothetical agreement?这种假设协议的道德力量是什么?
415Is it stronger or weaker than a real agreement, an actual social contract?它是否比真正的协议,真正的社会契约更强或更弱?
416In order to answer that question,为了回答这个问题,
417we have to look hard at the moral force of actual contracts.我们必须认真看待实际合同的道德力量。
418There are really two questions here.这里真的有两个问题。
419One of them is, how do actual contracts bind me or obligate me?其中之一是,实际的合同如何约束我或责成我?
420Question number one.问曰.
421And question number two,第二题
422how do actual real-life contracts justify the terms that they produce?实际合同如何证明合同条款的合理性?
423If you think about it, and this is in line with Rawls and Kant,如果你考虑一下 这符合罗尔斯和康德
424the answer to the second question,对第二个问题的回答,
425how do actual contracts justify the terms that they produce?实际合同如何证明合同条款的合理性?
426The answer is, they don't.答案是,他们没有。
427At least not on their own.至少不是靠他们自己
428Actual contracts are not self-sufficient moral instruments.实际合同不是自给自足的道德工具。
429Of any actual contract or agreement,任何实际合同或协议,
430it can always be asked, is it fair what they agreed to?人们总是可以问,他们同意的公平吗?
431The fact of the agreement never guarantees the fairness of the agreement.协议的事实从未保证协议的公正性.
432And we know this by looking at our own constitutional convention.我们通过审视自己的宪法会议来了解这一点。
433It produced a constitution that permitted slavery to persist.它产生了允许奴隶制持续存在的宪法。
434It was agreed to, it was an actual contract,同意,这是一份实际合同,
435but that doesn't establish that the laws agreed to, all of them, were just.但这并不证明法律是公正的
436Well then, what is the moral force of actual contracts?那么,实际合同的道德力量是什么?
437To the extent that they bind us,只要它们能束缚我们
438they obligate in two ways.他们以两种方式承担义务。
439Suppose, maybe here it would help to take an example.假设,也许这里能举个例子。
440We make an agreement, a commercial agreement.我们达成协议,商业协议
441I promise to pay you a hundred dollars,我答应付你一百块
442if you will go harvest and bring to me a hundred lobsters.如果你能去收割 带一百只龙虾给我
443We make a deal.我们做个交易
444You go out and harvest them and bring them to me.你出去收割他们,带给我
445I eat the lobsters, serve them to my friends, and then I don't pay.我吃龙虾, 把它们交给我的朋友, 然后我不支付。
446And you say, but you're obligated.你说,但你有义务。
447And I say, why?我说,为什么?
448What do you say?你说什么?
449Well, we had a deal.我们说好的
450And you benefited.你从中获益了
451You ate all those lobsters.你吃了所有的龙虾。
452Well, that's a pretty strong argument.嗯,这是一个相当强烈的争论。
453It's an argument that depends, though, on the fact that I benefited from your labor.这场争论取决于 我从你的劳动中获益的事实
454So, contracts sometimes bind us insofar as they are instruments of mutual benefit.因此,合同有时对我们具有约束力,因为它们是互利的工具。
455I ate the lobsters, I owe you the hundred dollars for having gathered them.我吃了龙虾,我欠你一百块 来收集它们。
456But suppose, now take a second case.但假设,现在采取第二个案件。
457We make this deal.我们做个交易
458I'll pay you a hundred dollars for a hundred lobsters.我付你一百块 买一百只龙虾
459And two minutes later, before you've gone to any work,两分钟后 在你上班前
460I call you back and say I've changed my mind.我回你电话说我改变主意了
461Now, there's no benefit.现在,没有好处。
462There's no work on your part.没有你的工作。
463So, there's no element of reciprocal exchange.所以,不存在对等交换的元素.
464What about in that case?那样怎么样?
465Do I still owe you?我还欠你钱吗?
466Merely in virtue of the fact that we had an agreement?只是因为我们有协议?
467Who says, those of you who say yes, I still owe you?谁说,你们谁说是,我还欠你?
468Why?为什么?
469Okay, stand up.好吧,站起来。
470Why do I owe you?为什么我欠你?
471I call you back.我再打给你
472After two minutes, you haven't done any work.两分钟后,你没有做任何工作。
473I think I spent a time and effort in drafting this contract with you.我想我花了很多时间和精力来起草这份合同
474And also, I have emotional expectation that I'll go through the work.而且,我还有情感上的期望 我会通过工作。
475So, you took time to draft the contract, but we did it very quickly.所以,你花了时间起草合同, 但我们做的非常快。
476We just chatted on the phone.我们刚在电话里聊天
477That wouldn't be a formal form of contract, though.不过那不是正式的合同形式
478Well, I faxed it to you.我传真给你了
479It only took a minute.只需要一分钟
480As long as any effort is involved, I would say that the contract is valid只要有努力,我就说合同有效
481and it should take effect.它应该生效。
482But why?为什么?
483What was, what morally can you point to that obligates me?什么,什么道义上,你能指出 这义务我?
484I admit that I agreed, but you didn't go to any work.我承认我同意了 但你没去工作
485I didn't enjoy any benefit.我没有享受任何好处。
486Because one might mentally go through all the work of harvesting the lobsters.因为人们可能在精神上经历 捕龙虾的所有工作。
487You mentally went through the work of harvesting the lobsters.你经过了收割龙虾的工作
488That's nothing, is it?没什么,是吗?
489It's not much.亦无甚处.
490Is it worth $100 that you were imagining yourself going and collecting?你想象自己去收集100美元吗?
491It may not worth $100, but it may worth something to some people.它可能不值100美元,但它可能对一些人有价值。
492All right, I'll give you a buck for it, for that.好吧,我给你一块钱为它,为此。
493But what I, so you're still pointing, what's interesting,但是,我,所以你还在指点, 什么是有趣的,
494you're still pointing to the reciprocal dimension of contracts.你还在指出合同的对等性
495You did or imagined that you did or looked forward to doing something on my behalf.你曾经或者想象过 你曾经或者期待为我做点什么
496For example, two people agreed to be married and one suddenly calls the other例如,两个人同意结婚,一个突然打电话给另一个
497and in two minutes say, I changed my mind.两分钟后 我改变主意了
498Does the contract have obligation on both sides?合同双方是否有义务?
499Nobody has paid any work or nobody has benefited yet.没有人支付任何工作,也没有人受益。
500Well, I'm tempted to say no.我很想说不
501Fine.还好
502All right, what's your name?好吧,你叫什么名字来着?
503- 朱利安 - 朱利安 - Julian.
504Thank you, Julian.谢谢你,朱利安。
505All right, that was good.好吧,这是很好的。
506Now, is there anyone who has, who agrees with Julian that I still owe the money?现在,有没有人 谁有,谁同意朱利安 我仍然欠的钱?
507For any other reason now, I have, go ahead, stand up.因为任何其他原因,我现在有,去,站起来。
508I think if you back out, it sort of cheapens the institution of contracts.我认为如果你退后, 它有点降低 合同制度。
509Good, but why, why does it?很好,但为什么,为什么?
510Well, I think this is kind of Kantian, but there's, you know,嗯,我想这是一种康甸, 但有,你知道,
511there's a certain intrinsic value in being able to make contracts签合同有内在价值
512and having, you know, knowing that people will expect that you'll go through with that.而且,你知道,知道, 人们会期望 你会经历这一点。
513Good, there is some, it would cheapen the whole idea of contracts,好,有的,它会降低 整个合同的想法,
514which has to do with taking an obligation on myself.和承担自己的责任有关
515Is that, is that the idea?是这样吗?
516Yeah, I think so.是的,我想是这样。
517What's your name?你叫什么来着?
518Adam.亚当
519So Adam points instead not to any reciprocal benefit or mutual exchange,因此,亚当指 而不是任何互惠 或相互交换,
520but to the mere fact of the agreement itself.但仅仅是协议本身的事实。
521We see here there are really two different ways in which actual contracts generate obligations.这里我们看到,实际合同产生义务的方式确实有两种不同。
522One has to do with the act of consent as a voluntary act.与同意行为作为自愿行为有关。
523And it points, Adam said this was a Kantian idea, and I think he's right,亚当说这是康德的主意 我觉得他是对的
524because it points to the ideal of autonomy.因为它指出了自主的理想.
525When I make a contract, the obligation is one that is self-imposed.当我订立合同时,义务是自我规定的。
526And that carries a certain moral weight, independent of other considerations.这具有一定的道德分量,独立于其他考虑。
527And then there's a second element of the moral force of contract arguments,还有第二个因素 道德力量 合同争论,
528which has to do with the sense in which actual contracts are instruments of mutual benefit与实际合同是互利工具的意义有关
529and this points toward the ideal of reciprocity.这表明了互惠的理想。
530That obligation can arise, I can have an obligation to you,这种义务可能会产生, 我可以对你承担义务,
531insofar as you do something for me.只要你为我做点什么
532Now, we're investigating the moral force and also the moral limits of actual contracts.现在我们正在调查道德力量 以及实际合同的道德限度
533And here I would like to advance an argument about the moral limits of actual contracts.在此,我想提出有关实际合同的道德限度的论点。
534Now that we know what moral ingredients do the work when people come together and say,现在我们知道当人们聚集在一起说, 道德因素能做什么了,
535I will do this if you do that.如果你这样做,我会做到这一点。
536I would like to argue first that the fact that two people agree to some exchange首先我想说的是 两个人同意交换
537does not mean that the terms of their agreement are fair.并不意味着协议的条款是公平的。
538When my two sons were young, they collected baseball cards and traded them.我的两个儿子年轻的时候,他们收集了棒球卡,并进行交易.
539And there is a two-year age difference between them.他们之间有两岁的差异。
540And so I had to institute a rule about the trades所以我不得不制定一条关于交易的规则
541that no trade was complete until I had approved it.在我批准之前 任何交易都不可能完成
542And the reason is obvious.而其理显.
543The older one knew more about the value of these cards年长者更知道这些牌的价值
544and so would take advantage of the younger one.那样就能利用年轻人
545So that's why I had to review it to make sure that the agreements were fair.这就是为什么我不得不审查它,以确保协议是公平的。
546Now you may say, well, this is paternalism.现在你可以说 这是家长制
547Of course it was.当然了
548That's what paternalism is for, that kind of thing.家长制就是这样的
549So what does this show? What does the baseball card example show?那么,这是什么显示? 棒球卡的例子显示什么?
550The fact of an agreement is not sufficient to establish the fairness of the terms.协议的事实不足以确定条款的公正性。
551I read some years ago of a case in Chicago.几年前我在芝加哥读过一个案子
552There was an elderly widow, an 84-year-old widow named Rose,有一个年长的寡妇 一个84岁的寡妇叫罗斯
553who had a problem in her apartment with a leaky toilet.她的公寓里有厕所漏水的问题
554And she signed a contract with an unscrupulous contractor她和一个不择手段的承包商签了合同
555who offered to repair her leaky toilet in exchange for $50,000.他提出修补她漏水的厕所 换取5万美元
556But she had agreed.但她已经同意了
557She was of sound mind, maybe terribly naive and unfamiliar with the price of plumbing.她心智健全 也许很天真 对管道的价格很陌生
558She had made this agreement.她做了这个协议。
559Luckily, it was discovered she went to the bank and asked to withdraw $25,000.幸好发现她去了银行 要求提取25000美元
560And the teller said, what do you need all of that money for?出纳员说,你需要这些钱干什么?
561And she said, well, I have a leaky toilet.她说 我有一个漏水的厕所
562And the teller called authorities and they discovered this unscrupulous contractor.出纳员打电话给当局 他们发现了这个肆无忌惮的承包商
563Now, I suspect that even the most ardent contractarians in the room现在,我怀疑,即使是最热心的 合同工在房间里
564will agree that the fact of this woman's agreement这个女人同意的事实
565is not a sufficient condition of the agreement being fair.并非协议公平的一个充分条件。
566Is there anyone who will dispute that?有没有人会对此提出异议?
567No one. Am I missing anyone?没有人。 我想念谁了吗?
568Alex, where are you?亚历克斯,你在哪里?
569So, maybe there's no dispute then to my first claim所以,也许没有争议,然后我的第一个要求
570that an actual agreement is not necessary to their,实际协议对于他们,
571is not a sufficient condition of their being an obligation.并不是作为义务的充分条件。
572I want to now make a stronger, maybe more controversial claim我想现在做一个更强,也许更有争议的说法
573about the moral limits of actual contracts关于实际合同的道德限制
574that a contract or an act of consent is not only not sufficient,合同或同意行为不仅不够充分,
575but it's not even a necessary condition of their being an obligation.但这不是他们义务的必要条件
576And the idea here is that if there is reciprocity, if there is an exchange,这里的想法是,如果有互惠, 如果有一个交换,
577then a receipt of benefits, there can be an obligation even without an act of consent.因此,即使没有同意,也会产生一项义务。
578One great example of this involves the 18th century philosopher,一个伟大的例子是 18世纪的哲学家
579the Scottish moral philosopher David Hume.苏格兰道德哲学家大卫·休姆.
580When he was young, Hume wrote a book arguing against Locke's idea他年轻的时候,休姆写了一本书,反对洛克的想法
581of an original social contract.原始社会合同。
582Hume heapscorned on this contractarian idea.休姆轻视这个契约主义的想法
583He said it was a philosophical fiction,他说那是个哲学小说
584one of the most mysterious and incomprehensible operations最神秘最难理解的行动之一
585that can possibly be imagined, this idea of the social contract.社会契约的这个想法
586Many years later, when he was 62 years old,许多年后,当他62岁时,
587Hume had an experience that put to the test休姆有过一次考验
588his rejection of consent as the basis of obligation.拒绝同意作为义务的基础。
589Hume had a house in Edinburgh.休姆在爱丁堡有一栋房子.
590He rented it to his friend, James Boswell,他把它租给他的朋友詹姆斯·博斯韦尔
591who in turn sublet it to a subtenant.他把它转嫁给一个附庸。
592The subtenant decided that the house needed some repairs and a paint job.副机长决定,房屋需要一些修理和油漆工作.
593He hired a contractor to do the work.他雇了一个承包商来做这项工作。
594The painter did the work and sent the bill to Hume.画家做了这部作品,并将法案寄给了休姆.
595Hume refused to pay on the grounds that he hadn't consented.休姆拒绝付款,理由是他没有同意.
596He hadn't hired the painter.他没有雇用画家。
597The case went to court.案件上法庭.
598The contractor said it's true, Hume didn't agree,承包商说这是真的 休姆不同意
599but the house needed a painting and I gave it a very good one.但房子需要一幅画 我给了它一幅非常好的画
600Hume thought this was a bad argument.休姆认为这是一场糟糕的争论.
601The only argument this painter makes is that the work was necessary to be done,这个画家提出的唯一论点是 作品是必须完成的,
602but this is no good answer because by the same rule,但这不是一个好答案 因为同样的规则,
603this painter may go through every house in Edinburgh这个画家可以走遍爱丁堡的每个房子
604and do what he thinks proper to be done without the landlord's consent做他认为应该做的 未经房东同意
605and give the same reason, that the work was necessary并给出同样的理由,认为工作是必要的
606and that the house was the better for it.房子对它更好
607So Hume didn't like the theory that there could be obligation所以休姆不喜欢有义务的理论
608to repay a benefit without consent,未经同意而偿还养恤金;
609but the defense failed and he had to pay.但辩护失败了,他不得不付出代价。
610Let me give you one other example of the distinction让我举个例子给你们看看
611between the consent-based aspect of obligations在基于同意的义务方面
612and the benefit-based aspect and how they're sometimes run together.和基于效益的方面, 和他们如何运行 有时在一起。
613This is based on a personal experience.这是基于个人经历。
614Some years ago, I was driving across the country with some friends几年前,我和朋友一起开车到全国各地
615and we found ourselves in the middle of nowhere.我们发现自己在荒郊野外
616In Hammond, Indiana.在印第安纳州的哈蒙德
617We stopped at a rest stop and got out of the car我们停在休息站 然后下车
618and when we came back, our car wouldn't start.而当我们回来,我们的车不会开始。
619None of us knew much about cars.我们谁都不懂车
620We didn't really know what to do until we noticed that我们不知道该怎么做 直到我们注意到
621in the parking lot driving up next to us was a van我们旁边的停车场开着一辆货车
622and on the side it said, Sam's Mobile Repair Van.上面写着"山姆的移动修理车"
623And out of the van came a man, presumably Sam,车里有个男人 大概是Sam
624and he came up to us and he said, can I help you?他来找我们说,我能帮你吗?
625Here's how I work.这就是我的工作方式。
626I work by the hour for $50 an hour.我每小时工作50美元
627If I fix your car in five minutes, you owe me the $50.如果我在五分钟内修好你的车 你欠我50美元
628And if I work on your car for an hour and can't fix it,如果我在你的车上工作了一个小时 却无法修复
629you'll still owe me the $50.你还欠我50美元
630So I said, well, what is the likelihood所以我说,什么是可能性
631that you'll be able to fix the car in five minutes?你五分钟后就能修好车了吗?
632And he didn't answer,他没有回答
633but he did start looking under the,但他确实开始在下面寻找,
634poking around under the steering column.在方向栏下游荡
635A short time passed.过了很短的时间
636He emerged from under the steering column and said,他从导栏下出来,说:
637there's nothing wrong with the ignition system,点火系统没有问题
638but you still have 45 minutes left.但你还有45分钟
639Should I look under the hood?我应该看看引擎盖底下吗?
640I said, wait a minute.我说,等一下
641I haven't hired you.我没有雇你
642We haven't made any agreement.我们还没达成协议
643And then he became very angry.然后他变得非常愤怒。
644And he said, do you mean to say that if I had fixed your car他说,你的意思是说 如果我修好了你的车
645while I was working under the steering column当我在指导栏下工作时
646that you wouldn't have paid me?你不会付钱给我?
647And I said, that's a different question.我说,这是一个不同的问题。
648I didn't, I didn't go into the distinction我没有,我没有去 区分
649between consent-based and benefit-based obligations,在基于同意的义务与基于利益的义务之间,
650but I think he had the intuition that if he had fixed it但我认为他有直觉 如果他修好了它
651while he was poking around that I would have owed him the $50,当他到处打探我欠他50美元时
652I shared that intuition.我也有这种直觉
653I would have, but he inferred from that,我本来会的 但他从中推断
654this was the fallacy and the reasoning这是谬论和推理
655that I think lay behind his anger,我认为他背后的愤怒,
656he inferred from that fact that therefore,他从这一事实中推断,
657implicitly, we had an agreement.暗含着,我们达成了协议。
658But that, it seems to me, is a mistake.但在我看来,这是一个错误。
659It's a mistake that fails to recognize the distinction错误是不承认区别
660between these two different aspects of contract arguments.合同论点的这两个不同方面之间。
661Yes, I agree, I would have owed him $50是的,我同意,我会欠他50美元
662if he had repaired my car during that time.如果他在那个时候修好了我的车
663Not because we had made any agreement, we hadn't.不是因为我们达成了任何协议,我们没有。
664But simply because if he had fixed my car,只是因为他修了我的车
665he would have conferred on me a benefit他本可以给我好处的
666for which I would have owed him我本该欠他的
667in the name of reciprocity and fairness.以互惠和公平的名义。
668So, here's another example of the distinction所以,这里是另一个区别的例子
669between these two different kinds of arguments,这两类争论之间,
670these two different aspects of the morality of contract.合同道德的这两个不同方面。
671Now, I want to hear how many think I was in the right in that case.现在,我想听听有多少人认为我在那个情况下是正确的。
672That's reassuring.这是令人放心的。
673Is there anyone who thinks I was in the wrong?有人认为我错了吗?
674Anyone?有人吗?
675You do?是吗?
676Why? Go ahead.为什么? 来吧。
677Isn't the problem with this is that any benefit这不是问题在于任何好处
678is inherently subjectively defined?内在主观定义?
679I mean, what if you wanted your car broken我的意思是,如果你想要你的车坏了
680and he had fixed it? I mean...他修好了吗? 我是说...
681No, I didn't want it broken.不 我不想把它弄断
682Yeah, in this case.是啊,在这种情况下。
683But who would? Who would? Who would?但谁会呢? 谁会? 谁会?
684I don't know, someone.我不知道,有人吗?
685I mean, what if Hume, you know,我的意思是,如果休姆,你知道,
686what if the painter had painted his house blue,如果画家把房子涂成蓝色,
687but he hated the color blue?但他讨厌蓝色?
688I mean, you have to sort of define what your benefit is我的意思是,你必须排序 定义你的好处是什么
689before the person does it.在别人做之前
690Well, all right.好吧,没事的。
691So, what would you conclude from that, though,所以,你会得出什么结论,虽然,
692for the larger issue here?对于更大的问题在这里?
693Would you conclude that therefore consent因此,你是否认为同意
694is a necessary condition of there being an obligation?是否有义务的必要条件?
695Absolutely.当然
696You would. What's your name?你会的。 你叫什么来着?
697Nate.内特
698Because otherwise how can we know, Nate says,否则我们怎么知道 内特说
699whether there has been an exchange是否有交换
700of equivalent or fair benefits?同等利益还是公平利益?
701Unless we have the subjective valuation,除非我们有主观评价
702which may vary one person to the next,它可能使一个人与另一个人相异,
703of the situation.情况。
704All right, that's a fair challenge.好吧,这是一个公平的挑战。
705Let me put to you one other example让我给你举个例子
706in order to test the relation between these two aspects为了检验这两个方面之间的关系
707of the morality of contracts.合同的道德规范。
708Suppose I get married,如果我结婚了,
709and suppose I discover如果我发现
710that after 20 years of faithfulness on my part,经过我20年的忠诚
711every year on our trip across the country,每年我们出国旅行时
712my wife has been seeing another man,我妻子和另一个男人约会了
713a man with a van on the Indiana toll road.一个在印第安纳收费路上有面包车的人
714This part is completely made up, by the way.顺便说一句,这部分是完全编出来的。
715Wouldn't I have two different reasons for moral outrage?我是不是有两种不同的理由 道德愤慨?
716One reason could be we had an agreement.一个原因可能是我们达成了协议
717She broke her promise,她违背了承诺
718referring to the fact of her consent.提到她同意的事实。
719But I would also have a second ground for moral outrage,但我也会有道德愤怒的第二个理由
720having nothing to do with the contract as such,与合同本身无关,
721but I've been so faithful for my part.但我一直很忠诚
722Surely I deserve better than this.我当然应该比这更好的
723Is this what I'm due in return?这就是我应得的回报吗?
724And so on. So that would point to the element of reciprocity.及诸众生. 因此,这将指向互惠的要素。
725Each reason has an independent moral force.每一种理由都有独立的道德力量.
726That's the general point.即是总论.
727And you can see this, if you imagine a slight variation你可以看到这一点, 如果你想象一个微小的变化
728on the marriage case.关于婚姻案件。
729Suppose we hadn't been married for 20 years.假设我们结婚20年了
730Suppose we were just married,假设我们刚结婚
731and that the betrayal occurred而背叛的发生
732on the way to our honeymoon in Hammond, Indiana.在去印第安纳州哈蒙德度蜜月的路上
733After the contract has been made,合同签订后
734but before there is any history of performance on my part.但在此之前,我有任何表现的历史。
735Performance of the contract, I mean.我是说合同的履行
736I would still, oh come on, come on.我还是会,哦,来吧,来吧。
737I would still, with Julian, I'd be able to say,我仍然会,与朱利安, 我可以说,
738but you promised, you promised.但你答应过,你答应过
739That would isolate the pure element of consent, right?那样会孤立同意的纯要素,对吧?
740Where there were no benefit, never mind.没有好处的地方,没关系
741You get the idea.你得到这个想法。
742Here's the main idea.这是主要的想法。
743Actual contracts have their moral force实际合同具有道德力量
744in virtue of two distinguishable ideals.依据两个可以区分的理想。
745Autonomy and reciprocity.自治与互惠.
746But in real life, every actual contract may fall short,但在现实生活中,每个实际的合同都可能不足,
747may fail to realize the ideals that give contracts可能无法实现给予合同的理想
748their moral force in the first place.他们的道德力量 首先。
749The ideal of autonomy may not be realized,自治的理想可能无法实现,
750because there may be a difference in the bargaining power因为讨价还价的力量可能不同
751of the parties.通知各缔约方。
752The ideal of reciprocity may not be realized,互惠的理想可能无法实现,
753because there may be a difference of knowledge因为知识可能不同
754between the parties.在双方之间。
755And so they may misidentify这样他们就会误认
756what really counts as having equivalent value.真正的价值。
757Now, suppose you were to imagine现在,假设你想象
758a contract where the ideals of autonomy自治理想的契约
759and of reciprocity were not subject to contingency,以及互惠原则不受制于紧急情况,
760but were guaranteed to be realized.但保证会实现
761What kind of contract would that have to be?那会是什么合同?
762Imagine a contract among parties想象一下当事人之间的契约
763who were equal in power and knowledge,他们是平等的权力和知识的,
764rather than unequal, who were identically situated而不是不平等,他们的位置相同
765rather than differently situated.而不是不同的位置。
766That is the idea behind Rawls's claim这就是罗尔斯的主张背后的想法
767that the way to think about justice思考正义的方式
768is from the standpoint of a hypothetical contract从假设合同的角度
769behind a veil of ignorance在无知的面纱后面
770that creates a condition of equality创造平等条件
771by ruling out or enabling us to forget for the moment或让我们暂时忘记
772the differences in power and knowledge权力和知识的差异
773that could, even in principle,即使原则上,
774lead to unfair results.导致不公平的结果。
775This is why, for Kant and for Rawls,这就是为什么,对于康德和罗尔斯,
776a hypothetical contract among equals平等之间的假设合同
777is the only way to think about principles of justice.是思考正义原则的唯一途径。
778What will those principles be?这些原则是什么?
779That's the question we'll turn to next time.这就是我们下次要讨论的问题。
780Thank you.谢谢
781Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
782Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 784 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P10 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p10 9. 9.小心你的动机 (P10)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:06Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:30Now we turn to the hardest philosopher we're going to read in this course.现在我们转向在这个课程中要读的最难的哲学家.
0:38Today we turn to Immanuel Kant, who offers a different account今天我们找伊曼纽尔·康德 他提供不同的说法
0:45of why we have a categorical duty to respect the dignity of persons我们为何有绝对义务尊重人的尊严?
0:51and not to use people as means, merely.而不以人为手段,
0:58Even for good ends,即使为了好的目的
1:01Kant excelled at the University of Königsberg at the age of 16.康德16岁在科尼斯贝格大学表现优异.
1:06At the age of 31, he got his first job31岁时,他得到了第一份工作
1:10as an unsalaried lecturer paid on commission作为无薪讲师支付佣金
展开字幕全文(604 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3Now we turn to the hardest philosopher we're going to read in this course.现在我们转向在这个课程中要读的最难的哲学家.
4Today we turn to Immanuel Kant, who offers a different account今天我们找伊曼纽尔·康德 他提供不同的说法
5of why we have a categorical duty to respect the dignity of persons我们为何有绝对义务尊重人的尊严?
6and not to use people as means, merely.而不以人为手段,
7Even for good ends,即使为了好的目的
8Kant excelled at the University of Königsberg at the age of 16.康德16岁在科尼斯贝格大学表现优异.
9At the age of 31, he got his first job31岁时,他得到了第一份工作
10as an unsalaried lecturer paid on commission作为无薪讲师支付佣金
11based on the number of students who showed up at his lectures.根据参加他讲座的学生人数。
12This is a sensible system that Harvard would do well to consider.这是一个明智的系统,哈佛会好好考虑的。
13Luckily for Kant, he was a popular lecturer and also an industrious one,幸好康德是个受欢迎的讲师 也是一位杰出的讲师
14and so he eked out a meager living.于是他拿出了活下来的小人物
15It wasn't until he was 57 that he published his first major work.直到57岁他才出版了他的第一部主要作品.
16But it was worth the wait.但它值得等待。
17The book was The Critique of Pure Reason,这本书是"纯理性的批评"
18perhaps the most important work in all of modern philosophy.或许是现代哲学中最重要的作品
19And a few years later,几年之后,
20Kant wrote The Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals,康德写了《道德的元物理基础》
21which we read in this course.我们读了这个课程。
22I want to acknowledge, even before we start,我想承认 甚至在我们开始之前
23that Kant is a difficult thinker.康德是一个困难的思想家。
24But it's important to try to figure out what he's saying,但重要的是要弄清楚他说什么
25because what this book is about is,因为这本书的内容是,
26well, it's about what the supreme principle of morality is, number one.这是关于道德的最高原则,第一。
27And it's also, it gives us an account,而且,它给我们一个账户,
28one of the most powerful accounts we have, of what freedom really is.我们拥有的最强大的说法之一, 自由到底是什么。
29So, let me start today.所以,让我从今天开始。
30Kant rejects utilitarianism.康德拒绝功利主义.
31He thinks that the individual person, all human beings,他认为个人,所有的人,
32have a certain dignity that commands our respect.有某种尊严,赢得我们的尊重。
33The reason the individual is sacred, or the bearer of rights according to Kant,个人是神圣的, 或根据康德拥有权利,
34doesn't stem from the idea that we own ourselves,不是因为我们拥有自己
35but instead from the idea that we are all rational beings.而不是认为我们都是理性的人
36We're all rational beings, which simply means我们都是理性的生物, 这仅仅是意味着
37that we are beings who are capable of reason.我们是有理智的人
38We are also autonomous beings,我们也是自主的人,
39which is to say that we are beings capable of acting and choosing freely.这就是说,我们是能够自由行事和选择的人。
40Now, this capacity for reason and freedom isn't the only capacity we have.这种理性和自由的能力 并不是我们唯一的能力
41We also have the capacity for pain and pleasure, for suffering and satisfaction.我们还有能力承受痛苦和快乐,能够承受痛苦和满足。
42Kant admits the utilitarians were half right.康德承认功利主义者一半是对的.
43Of course, we seek to avoid pain and we like pleasure.当然,我们力求避免痛苦,我们喜欢快乐。
44Kant doesn't deny this.康德不否认这一点.
45What he does deny is Benson's claim that pain and pleasure are our sovereign masters.他否认的是本森声称 痛苦和快乐是我们的主权主人
46He thinks that's wrong.他认为这是错误的。
47Kant thinks that it's our rational capacity that makes us distinctive,康德认为这是我们理性的能力 使我们与众不同
48that makes us special, that sets us apart from and above mere animal existence.这让我们变得特别, 把我们与动物的存在分开。
49It makes us something more than just physical creatures with appetites.这让我们不只是有食欲的生物
50Now, we often think of freedom as simply consisting in doing what we want,现在,我们常常认为 自由只是包含在做我们想要的,
51or in the absence of obstacles to getting what we want.或无障碍获得我们想要的东西。
52That's one way of thinking about freedom.这是对自由的一种思考方式.
53But this isn't Kant's idea of freedom.但这不是康德的自由思想.
54Kant has a more stringent, demanding notion of what it means to be free.康德对自由的意义有更严格,更严格的观念.
55And though it's stringent and demanding, if you think it through,虽然它严格和苛刻, 如果你仔细考虑,
56it's actually pretty persuasive.其实很有说服力
57Kant reasons as follows.康德的理由如下.
58When we, like animals, seek after pleasure or the satisfaction of our desires当我们像动物一样 追求快乐或满足我们的欲望
59or the avoidance of pain,或避免痛苦,
60when we do that, we aren't really acting freely.当我们这样做的时候,我们并没有真正自由地行动。
61Why not?为什么不呢?
62и痷琌 thosecm impulse
63I didn't choose this particular hunger or that particular appetite.我没有选择这种特殊的饥饿 或那种特殊的食欲。
64And so when I act to satisfy it, I'm just acting according to natural necessity.所以当我行动满足它, 我只是根据自然的需要。
65And for Kant, freedom is the opposite of necessity.而对于康德来说,自由与必要性相反.
66There was an advertising slogan for the soft drink Sprite a few years ago.几年前出现了软饮料Sprite的广告口号.
67The slogan was, obey your thirst.口号是 顺从你的口渴
68There's a Kantian insight buried in that Sprite advertising slogan.有康德的洞察力埋藏在 斯普拉蒂广告口号里
69That, in a way, is Kant's point.在某种程度上,这是康德的观点。
70When you go for Sprite or Pepsi,当你去Sprite或百事可乐,
71you might think that you're choosing freely Sprite versus Pepsi,你可能会认为你是在自由选择斯普拉提和百事可乐
72but you're actually obeying something, a thirst,但你实际上在服从什么, 渴了,
73or maybe a desire manufactured or massaged by advertising.或者是广告制造或按摩的欲望
74You're obeying a prompting that you yourself haven't chosen or created.你在服从一个提示,即你自己没有选择或创造。
75And here it's worth noticing Kant's specially demanding idea of freedom.这里值得注意康德特别要求的自由思想.
76What way of acting?什么行动方式?
77How can my will be determined if not by the promptings of nature如果没有大自然的启示,我怎么会决定我的意志
78or my hunger or my appetite or my desires?还是我的饥渴或欲望?
79Kant's answer, to act freely is to act autonomously.康德的回答,自由行动就是自主行动.
80And to act autonomously is to act according to a law that I give myself,自主行动就是按照我给自己的法律行事
81not according to the physical laws of nature or to the laws of cause and effect,不符合自然实体法或因果法则,
82which include my desire to eat or to drink or to choose this food in a restaurant over that.包括我想吃 喝 或在餐厅里选择这种食物
83Now, what is the opposite?现在,什么是相反的?
84What is the opposite of autonomy?自治的反面是什么?
85For Kant, he invents a special term to describe the opposite of autonomy.对于康德来说,他发明了一个特殊的术语来描述自治的反面.
86Heteronomy is the opposite of autonomy.异体性与自主性相反.
87When I act heteronomously, I'm acting according to an inclination当我行为异常时,我表现的倾向
88or a desire that I haven't chosen for myself.或者我还没有为自己选择的欲望
89So, freedom as autonomy is the specially stringent idea that Kant insists on.因此,作为自主的自由是康德所坚持的特别严格的想法.
90Now, why is autonomy the opposite of acting heteronomously or according to the dictates of nature?现在,为什么自主性与异端行为或自然规律相反?
91Kant's point is that nature is governed by laws, laws of cause and effect, for example.康德的观点是,自然受到法律,因果法的制约,比如说.
92Suppose you drop a billiard ball.如果你掉了个台球的话
93It falls to the ground.坠于地.
94We wouldn't say the billiard ball is acting freely.我们不会说台球是自由的
95Why not?为什么不呢?
96It's acting according to the law of nature, according to the laws of cause and effect,依自然法则,因果法则,
97according to the law of gravity.根据重力法则。
98And just as he has an unusually demanding and stringent conception of freedom,就像他对自由有异乎寻常的要求和严格的概念一样,
99freedom as autonomy,作为自治的自由,
100he also has a demanding conception of morality.他也有严格的道德观念
101To act freely is not to choose the best means to a given end.自由行动不是选择达到某一目的的最佳手段。
102It's to choose the end itself for its own sake.是为自性而自选终.
103And that's something that human beings can do and that billiard balls can't.这是人类可以做的, 和台球不能。
104Insofar as we act on inclination or pursue pleasure,只要我们按倾向行事或追求快乐
105we act as means to the realization of ends given outside us.我们作为实现我们之外的目标的手段。
106We are instruments rather than authors of the purposes we pursue.我们是文书而不是我们所追求宗旨的作者。
107That's the heteronomous determination of the will.这就是意志的异质决定.
108On the other hand, insofar as we act autonomously,另一方面,就我们自主行事而言,
109according to a law we give ourselves,根据我们赋予自己的法律,
110we do something for its own sake as an end in itself.我们做一些事情是为了它本身的目的。
111When we act autonomously,当我们自主行事时,
112we cease to be instruments to purposes given outside us.我们不再是我们之外的目的的工具。
113We become, or we can come to think of ourselves as ends in ourselves.我们变成了,或者我们可以把自己当作我们自己的目的。
114This capacity to act freely, Kant tells us,康德告诉我们 这种自由行动的能力
115is what gives human life its special dignity.就是给人类生命带来特殊尊严的东西。
116Respecting human dignity means regarding persons not just as means,尊重人的尊严不仅意味着对人采取手段,而且意味着:
117but also as ends in themselves.同时也是目的本身
118And this is why it's wrong to use people这就是为什么用人是不对的
119for the sake of other people's well-being or happiness.为了别人的福祉或幸福
120This is the real reason, Kant says, that utilitarianism goes wrong.康德说,这是功利主义错误的真正原因。
121This is the reason it's important to respect the dignity of persons这就是尊重人的尊严的重要原因
122and to uphold their rights.维护他们的权利。
123So even if there are cases,所以即使有案子发生
124John Stuart Mill said, well, in the long run,约翰·斯图尔特·米尔说,从长远来看,
125if we uphold justice and respect the dignity of persons,如果我们坚持正义和尊重人的尊严,
126we will maximize human happiness.我们将最大限度地实现人类幸福。
127What would Kant's answer be to that?康德的答案是什么?
128What would his answer be?他的答案会是什么?
129Even if that were true,即使那是真的,我还是会告诉你
130even if the calculus worked out that way,即使微积分是这样计算出来的
131even if you shouldn't throw the Christians to the lions,即使你不应该把基督徒扔给狮子
132because in the long run, fear will spread,因为从长远来看,恐惧将蔓延,
133the overall utility will decline.总的效用将下降。
134The utilitarian would be upholding justice and rights功利主义者将维护正义和权利
135and respect for persons for the wrong reason,并尊重有错误的理由的人,
136for a purely contingent reason,出于纯粹的或有原因
137for an instrumental reason.有个重要的原因
138It would still be using people,还会用人
139even where the calculus works out for the best in the long run,即便计算出长期最好的效果
140it would still be using people as means,它仍然会利用人作为手段,
141rather than respecting them as ends in themselves.而不是尊重它们本身的目的。
142So, that's Kant's idea of freedom as autonomy,所以,这是康德关于自由作为自治的想法,
143and you can begin to see how it's connected to his idea of morality.你可以看到这与他的道德观念有何关联
144But we still have to answer one more question.但我们还需要回答一个问题。
145What gives an act its moral worth in the first place?什么让一个行为 它的道德价值 首先?
146If it can't be directed at utility or satisfying wants and desires,如果它不能针对效用 或满足欲望和欲望
147what gives an action its moral worth?是什么让行动具有道德价值?
148This leads us from Kant's demanding idea of freedom这让我们从康德要求的自由思想中解脱出来
149to his demanding idea of morality.他要求很高的道德观念。
150What does Kant say?康德怎么说?
151What makes an action morally worthy是什么使一个道德上值得采取的行动
152consists not in the consequences or in the results that flow from it.并不包括后果或由此产生的结果。
153What makes an action morally worthy has to do with the motive,道德上值得采取的行动与动机有关
154with the quality of the will,以遗嘱的质量,
155with the intention for which the act is done.行为意图。
156What matters is the motive,重要的是动机
157and the motive must be of a certain kind.动机必须是某种
158So, the moral worth of an action depends on the motive for which it's done,所以,一个行动的道德价值 取决于它的动机是什么
159and the important thing is that the person do the right thing for the right reason.而重要的是,人做正确的事情是有道理的。
160A good will isn't good because of what it affects or accomplishes, Kant writes.康德写道:
161It's good in itself.其义自在.
162Even if by its utmost effort the good will accomplishes nothing,即使他尽了最大努力 善良的意志一无所获
163it would still shine like a jewel for its own sake为了自己,它仍然会像珠宝一样闪耀
164as something which has its full value in itself.作为它本身具有充分价值的东西。
165And so for any action to be morally good,因此,任何行动 道德好,
166it's not enough that it should conform to the moral law,仅仅遵守道德法则是不够的
167it must also be done for the sake of the moral law.也必须为了道德法而这样做。
168The idea is that the motive confers the moral worth on an action.这个想法是,动机赋予一项行动道德价值。
169And the only kind of motive that can confer moral worth on an action只有那种动机 才能给行动带来道德价值
170is the motive of duty.是责任的动机。
171Well, what's the opposite of doing something out of a sense of duty because it's right?那么,什么是相反的 做一些事情 出于一种责任感,因为它是正确的?
172Well, for Kant, the opposite would be all of those motives having to do with our inclinations.对康德来说 与我们倾向相关的动机正好相反
173And inclinations refer to all of our desires,倾角是指我们所有的欲望,
174all of our contingently given wants, preferences, impulses and the like.所有我们偶然得到的欲望,喜好,冲动等等。
175Only actions done for the sake of the moral law, for the sake of duty,只有为了道德法律 为了责任
176only these actions have moral worth.只有这些行动才有道德价值。
177Now I want to see what you think about this idea,现在我想看看你对这个想法的看法
178but first let's consider a few examples.但首先让我们考虑几个例子。
179Kant begins with an example of a shopkeeper.康德从一个店主的例子开始.
180He has to bring out the intuition and make plausible the idea他必须拿出直觉 使这个想法合理
181that what confers moral worth on an action is that it be done because it's right.使行动具有道德价值的 是因为它是正确的。
182He says suppose there's a shopkeeper and an inexperienced customer comes in,他说如果有个店主 和一个没经验的顾客进来
183the shopkeeper knows that he could give the customer the wrong change,店主知道他可以给客户错误的零钱,
184could shortchange the customer and get away with it,可以减少客户 并逃脱它,
185that at least that customer wouldn't know.至少那个顾客不知道
186But the shopkeeper nonetheless says,不过店主还是说
187well if I shortchange this customer, word may get out,如果我少了这个顾客 消息可能会传出去
188my reputation would be damaged and I would lose business.我的名声会受损,我会失去生意。
189So I won't shortchange this customer.所以我不会减少这个客户。
190The shopkeeper does nothing wrong, he gives the correct change.店主没有做错什么, 他给正确的改变。
191But does his action have moral worth?但他的行为有道德价值吗?
192Kant says no, it doesn't have moral worth康德说不,它没有道德价值
193because the shopkeeper only did the right thing for the wrong reason,因为店主做错事
194out of self-interest.出于自身利益.
195That's a pretty straightforward case.这案子很直接
196Then he takes another case, the case of suicide.然后他又接了一起自杀案
197He says we have a duty to preserve ourselves.他说我们有责任保护自己
198Now for most people who love life,现在,对于大多数热爱生命的人来说,
199we have multiple reasons for not taking our own lives.我们有很多理由不自杀
200So the only way we can really tell,所以只有这样我们才能知道
201the only way we can isolate the operative motive只有这样,我们才能分离行动动机
202for someone who doesn't take his or her life对于一个不夺命的人
203is to think, to imagine someone who's miserable思考,想象一个痛苦的人
204and who despite having an absolutely miserable life,他们虽有悲惨的生活,
205nonetheless recognizes the duty to preserve oneself但承认保护自己的义务
206and so does not commit suicide.所以不会自杀
207The force of the example is to bring out the motive that matters.例子的力量在于提出重要的动机。
208And the motive that matters for morality is doing the right thing for the sake of duty.而对于道德至关重要的动机,是为责任而做正确的事情.
209Let me just give you a couple of other examples.让我举几个其他例子。
210The Better Business Bureau, what's their slogan?更好的商业局,他们的口号是什么?
211The slogan of the Better Business Bureau, honesty is the best policy.更好的商业局的口号,诚实是最好的政策.
212It's also the most profitable.亦名最上利乐.
213这是纽约时报的Better Business Bureau的整页广告.
214Honesty, it's as important as any other asset老实说 这跟其他资产一样重要
215because a business that deals in truth, openness and fair value cannot help but do well.因为一个以真理、开放和公平价值为交易对象的企业只能做好事。
216Come join us and profit from it.来加入我们,从中获利。
217What would Kant say about the moral worth of the honest dealings康德会怎么说 诚实交易的道德价值
218of members of the Better Business Bureau? What would he say?更佳商业局的成员? 他会说什么?
219That here's a perfect example that if this is the reason这是一个很好的例子 如果这就是原因
220that these companies deal honestly with their customers,这些公司诚实地对待客户,
221their action lacks moral worth. This is Kant's point.他们的行动缺乏道德价值。 这是康德的观点。
222A couple of years ago at the University of Maryland there was a problem with cheating.几年前在马里兰大学 出现了欺骗的问题
223And so they initiated an honor system于是他们开始了一个荣誉制度
224and they created a program with local merchants他们和本地商人一起创造了一个计划
225that if you signed the honor pledge, a pledge not to cheat,如果你签了承诺书 保证不作弊
226you would get discounts of 10 to 25 percent at local shops.当地商店会给你10%到25%的折扣
227Well, what would you think of someone motivated好吧,你会认为某人的动机
228to uphold an honor code with the hope of discounts?维护荣誉守则,希望折扣?
229It's the same as Kant's shock keeper.与康德震动持戒者同.
230The point is, what matters is the quality of the will, the character of the motive关键是遗嘱的质量 动机的性质
231and the relevant motive to morality can only be the motive of duty,而道德的相关动机只能是责任的动机,
232not the motive of inclination.不是倾向的动机
233And when I act out of duty,当我失职时,
234when I resist as my motive for acting inclinations or self-interest,当我抗拒作为我的动机 表现倾向或自我利益,
235even sympathy and altruism,甚至同情和利他主义,
236only then am I acting freely,只有这样我才能自由行动
237only then am I acting autonomously,只有这样,我才能自主行事,
238only then is my will not determined or governed by external considerations.只有这样,我的意志才不是由外部考虑决定或支配的。
239That's the link between Kant's idea of freedom and of morality.这就是康德的自由思想和道德思想之间的联系.
240Now I want to pause here to see if all of this is clear现在我想暂停一下 看看这一切是否都清楚
241or if you have some questions or puzzles.或有些问题或谜题。
242They can be questions of clarification or they can be challenges.它们可以是澄清问题,也可以是挑战。
243If you want to challenge this idea如果你想挑战这个想法
244that only the motive of duty confers moral worth on the action,只有责任动机才能使行动具有道德价值,
245what do you think? Yes.你觉得呢? 对
246Yeah, I actually have two questions of clarification.是的,我实际上有两个问题需要澄清。
247The first is, there seems to be an aspect of this that makes it sort of self-defeating第一,这似乎有一个方面 使它有点自负
248in that once you're conscious of what morality is,一旦你意识到道德是什么
249you can sort of alter your motive to achieve that end of morality.你可以改变你的动机 去达到道德的目的
250Give me an example of what you have in mind.举个例子说明你在想什么
251The shopkeeper example.店主举例.
252If he decides that he wants to give the person the money to do the right thing如果他决定给他钱做正确的事
253and he decides that's his motive to do so because he wants to be moral,他决定这是他这样做的动机 因为他想要道德,
254then isn't that sort of defeating the purity of his action那不是在挫败他的纯洁行为吗?
255if morality is determined by his motive?如果道德是由他的动机决定的呢?
256His motive is then to act morally.他的动机就是道德行事。
257So you're imagining a case, not of the purely selfish calculating shopkeeper,所以你在想象一个案子, 不是纯粹自私的计算店员,
258but of one who says, well he may consider short-changing the customer,但是,如果有人说, 他可能会考虑 短期改变客户,
259but then he says, not, well my reputation might suffer if word gets out,但是他说 如果消息传出去 我的名声可能会受损
260but instead he says, actually I would like to be the kind of honest person但他却说 其实我想成为那种诚实的人
261who gives the right change to customers simply because it's the right thing to do.他们给客户正确的改变 只是因为它是正确的事情做。
262Or simply because I want to be moral.或者只是因为我想道德
263Because I want to be moral.因为我想成为道德的。
264I want to be a good person.我想成为一个好人。
265And so I'm going to conform all of my actions to what morality requires.所以我要把我所有的行动 都符合道德要求
266It's a subtle point. It's a good question.微妙之义. 善问.
267Kant does acknowledge, you're pressing Kant on an important point here,康德确实承认了 你在把康德逼到一个重要的地方
268Kant does say there has to be some incentive to obey the moral law.康德确实说过 必须遵守道德法则
269It can't be a self-interested incentive that would defeat it by definition.这不可能是一种自利的激励,从定义上来说,是会打败它的.
270So he speaks of a different kind of incentive from an inclination.因此,他提到一种不同的激励 与倾向。
271He speaks of reverence for the moral law.说敬重道德法.
272So if that shopkeeper says, I want to develop a reverence for the moral law,所以如果那个店主说 我要对道德法则保持敬重
273and so I'm going to do the right thing, then I think he's there.所以我会做正确的事情,然后我想他在那里。
274He's there as far as Kant's concerned.在康德处.
275Because he's formed his motive, his will is conforming to the moral law因为他已经形成他的动机 他的意志符合道德
276once he sees the importance of it.一旦他看到它的重要性。
277So it would count. It would count.这样就算数了 它会算数。
278And then secondly, very quickly,然后,第二,非常迅速地,
279what stops morality from becoming completely objective in this point?是什么阻止道德 成为完全客观 在这一点上?
280What stops morality from becoming subjective?是什么阻止道德成为主观?
281If morality is completely determined by your morals,如果道德完全由你的道德决定
282then how can you apply this or how can it be enforced?那么,你如何应用这个方法,又如何加以执行?
283That's also a great question. What's your name?这也是个大问题。 你叫什么来着?
284My name is Ahmadi.我叫艾哈迈迪
285Ahmadi? All right.阿迈迪? 好吧,我们走。
286If acting morally means acting according to a moral law, out of duty,如果道德行为意味着根据道德法行事,则出于职责考虑,
287and if it's also to act freely in the sense of autonomously,如果它也是在自主的意义上自由行动的,
288it must mean that I'm acting according to a law that I give myself.这一定意味着我的行为符合我给自己的法律
289That's what it means to act autonomously.自主行动就是这个意思.
290Ahmadi is right about that.艾哈迈迪说得对
291But that does raise a really interesting question.这确实引起了一个非常有趣的问题。
292If acting autonomously means acting according to a law I give myself,如果独立行事意味着按照我赋予自己的法律行事
293that's how I escape the chain of cause and effect and the laws of nature.这就是我如何逃脱 因果关系链 和自然法则。
294What's to guarantee that the law I give myself when I'm acting out of duty何以能保证我失职时 给自己的法律
295is the same as the law that Ahmadi is giving himself?和艾哈迈迪给自己的法律一样吗?
296And that each of you gives yourselves.而你们各自奉献给自己。
297Well, here's the question.问题是...
298How many moral laws, from Kant's point of view, are there in this room?从康德看,这房间有多少道德法则?
299Are there a thousand or is there one?有一千还是有一千?
300He thinks there's one, which in a way does go back to this question.他认为,有一个, 在某种程度上,它确实回到这个问题。
301All right, what is the moral law? What does it tell us?好吧,什么是道德法则? 它告诉我们什么?
302So what guarantees...那么,什么保证...
303It sounds like to act autonomously is to act according to one's conscience,这听起来像 自主行动是 根据一个人的良心行事,
304according to a law one gives oneself.根据法律规定,
305But what guarantees that if we all exercise our reason,但是,什么保证 如果我们都行使我们的理由,
306we will come up with one and the same moral law?我们会想出同样的道德法则吗?
307That's what Ahmadi wants to know.这就是艾哈迈迪想知道的
308Here's Kant's answer.这是康德的答案。
309The reason that leads us to the law we give ourselves as autonomous beings导致我们走向法律的原因 我们把自己作为自主的生物
310is a reason, it's a kind of practical reason that we share as human beings.这是一个原因,这是一个实际的原因 我们作为人类共享。
311It's not idiosyncratic.亦非仪轨.
312The reason we need to respect the dignity of persons is that we're all rational beings.我们需要尊重人格尊严的原因是,我们都是理性的生物.
313We all have the capacity for reason.我们都有理智的能力。
314And it's the exercise of that capacity for reason,而这是行使这种能力的原因,
315which exists undifferentiated in all of us,我们无差别地存在,
316that makes us worthy of dignity, all of us,这让我们值得尊严,我们所有人,
317and since it's the same capacity for reason,由於理性的能力是一样的
318unqualified by particular autobiographies and life circumstances,特定自传和生活环境不合格,
319it's the same universal capacity for reason that delivers the moral law.同样的普适能力是理性的,能传递道德法则.
320It turns out that to act autonomously is to act according to a law事实证明,自主行动就是依法行动
321we give ourselves, exercising our reason,我们给自己,行使我们的理由,
322but it's the reason we share with everyone as rational beings.但这就是我们与每个人共享理性的原因
323It's not the particular reasons we have given our upbringings,这不是我们养育自己的原因
324our particular values, our particular interests.我们的价值观,我们的特殊利益
325It's pure practical reason in Kant's terms,这纯粹是康德的实用理由
326which legislates a priori,立法先验,
327regardless of any particular contingent or empirical ends.不论任何特定或经验目的。
328Well, what moral law would that kind of reason deliver?那么,什么道德法会 那种理由产生?
329What is its content?内容是什么?
330To answer that question, you have to read the groundwork,要回答这个问题,你得读一下基础
331and we'll continue with that question next time.下次我们再继续提问
332For Kant, morally speaking, suicide is on a par with murder.对康德来说,道德上来说,自杀等同于谋杀。
333It's on a par with murder because what we violate,这跟谋杀是等同的 因为我们违反了
334when we take a life, when we take someone's life,当我们夺去生命, 当我们夺去某人的生命,
335ours or somebody else's,我们或别人的,
336we use that person, we use a rational being,我们利用那个人 我们利用理性的存在
337we use humanity as a means,我们利用人类作为手段,
338and so we fail to respect humanity as an end.因此,我们不尊重人类作为目的。
339Today we turn back to Kant before we do...今天我们回到康德之前...
340Remember, this is the week by the end of which记住,今天是周末
341all of you will basically get Kant, figure out what he's up to.你们基本上都会得到康德, 找出他在做什么。
342You're laughing. No, it will happen.你在笑吗? 不,它会发生的。
343Kant's groundwork is about two big questions.康德的基础工作涉及两个大问题.
344First, what is the supreme principle of morality?第一,道德的最高原则是什么?
345Second, how is freedom possible?第二,如何实现自由?
346Two big questions.二大问.
347Now, one way of making your way through this dense philosophical book现在,用一种方法 让你通过这个密集的哲学书籍
348is to bear in mind a set of oppositions or contrasts or dualisms that are related.是要记住一系列相关的反对或对比或二元论.
349Today I'd like to talk about them.今天我想谈谈
350Today we're going to answer the question, what, according to Kant,今天我们要回答这个问题 康德说
351is the supreme principle of morality?道德的最高原则吗?
352And in answering that question, in working our way up to Kant's answer to that question,在回答这个问题时,在努力完成康德的回答时,
353it will help to bear in mind three contrasts or dualisms that Kant sets out.它将有助于铭记康德提出的三种对比或二元论。
354The first, you'll remember, had to do with the motive according to which we act.首先,你会记得, 和我们的行为动机有关。
355And according to Kant, only one kind of motive is consistent with morality,康德说 只有一种动机符合道德
356the motive of duty, doing the right thing for the right reason.负责的动机, 做正确的事情为正确的理由。
357What other kind of motives are there?还有什么其他动机?
358Kant sums them up in the category of inclination.康德把它们归为倾斜类
359Every time the motive for what we do is to satisfy a desire or a preference每次我们这样做的动机都是满足欲望或偏好
360that we may have to pursue some interest, we're acting out of inclination.我们可能不得不追求一些兴趣, 我们的行为出于倾向。
361Now, let me pause to see if in thinking about the question of the motive of duty,现在,让我暂停一下,看看在思考 责任的动机问题时,
362the good will, see if any of you has a question about that much of Kant's claim.看你们有没有人质疑康德的主张
363Or is everybody happy with this distinction?还是每个人都喜欢这种区别?
364What do you think? Go ahead.你觉得呢? 来吧。
365When you make that distinction between duty and inclination,当你把责任和倾向区分开来
366is there ever any moral action ever?有没有道德行为?
367I mean, you could always kind of probably find some selfish motive, can't you?我的意思是,你总是可以 找到一些自私的动机,不是吗?
368Maybe very often people do have self-interested motives when they act.也许人们在行动时确实有自利的动机.
369Kant wouldn't dispute that.康德不会反对的
370But what Kant is saying is that insofar as we act morally,但康德的意思是 只要我们的行为合乎道德
371that is, insofar as our actions have moral worth,也就是说,只要我们的行动具有道德价值,
372what confers moral worth is precisely our capacity to rise above self-interest赋予道德价值的正是我们超越自身利益的能力
373and prudence and inclination and to act out of duty.以及谨慎和倾向 和不履行职责。
374Some years ago I read about a spelling bee,几年前我读到一个拼写蜜蜂
375and there was a young man who was declared the winner of the spelling bee.有个年轻人被宣布为拼音蜜蜂的赢家
376A kid named Andrew, 13 years old.一个叫安德鲁的孩子,13岁。
377The winning word, the word that he was able to spell was echolalia.胜利的词, 他能够拼出的话是回声拉莉娅。
378Does anyone know what echolalia is?有人知道什么是回声拉莉亚吗?
379What? It's not some type of flower, no?你说什么? 这不是某种花,不是吗?
380It means the tendency to repeat as an echo, to repeat what you've heard.意思是重复作为回声的倾向,重复你听到的.
381Anyhow, he misspelled it, actually.无论如何,他拼错了,其实。
382But the judges misheard him.但法官们听错了他
383They thought he had spelled it correctly and awarded him the championship of the National Spelling Bee.他们认为他拼的正确,并授予他全国拼音蜜蜂的冠军.
384And he went to the judges afterward and said,然后他去找法官说
385actually, I misspelled it. I don't deserve the prize.其实我拼错了 我不值得奖项。
386And he was regarded as a moral hero.他被视为道德英雄
387And he was written up in the New York Times,他被写在纽约时报,
388Misspeller是拼写蜜蜂英雄.
389There's Andrew, with his proud mother.这是安德鲁,和他骄傲的母亲。
390And when he was interviewed afterwards,当他接受采访后,
391listen to this, when he was interviewed afterwards,听着,当他接受采访后,
392he said, quote, the judges said I had a lot of integrity.他说,引用, 法官说我有很多正直。
393But then he added that part of his motive was, quote,但后来他又说 他的部分动机是
394I didn't want to feel like a slime.我不想觉得像粘液。
395All right, what would Kant say?好吧,康德会怎么说?
396Go ahead.来吧。
397I guess it would depend on whether or not that was a marginal reason or the predominant reason我想这要看这是否是次要原因还是主要原因
398and why he decided to confess that he didn't actually spell the word correctly.以及他为什么决定承认 他实际上没有正确拼写这个词。
399Good. And what's your name?不错 你叫什么来着?
400Vasco.- 瓦斯科 - 瓦斯科 - Vasco.
401That's very interesting.这很有趣。
402Is there anyone else who has a view about this?还有谁对此有看法吗?
403Does this show that Kant's principle is too stringent, too demanding?这是否表明康德的原则太严格,要求太高?
404What would Kant say about this?康德会怎么说?
405Yes.
406I think that Kant actually says that it is the pure motivation that comes out of duty,我认为康德实际上说, 纯粹的动机是出于职责,
407which gives the action moral worth.这使得行动道德价值。
408So it's like, for example, in this case, he might have more than one motive.所以,比如说,在这种情况下,他可能有不止一个动机.
409He might have the motive of not feeling like a slime,他的动机可能是 感觉不像粘液
410and he might have the motive of doing the right thing in and of itself out of duty.而且他可能有动机 做正确的事情 和本身的失职。
411And so while there's more than one motivation going on there,所以,虽然有 不止一个动机在那里,
412does not mean that the action is devoid of moral worth just because he has one other motive.这并不意味着,仅仅因为他有另一个动机,这一行动就没有道德价值。
413Because the motive, which involves duty, is what gives it moral worth.因为动机,包括义务, 给了它道德价值。
414Good. And what's your name?不错 你叫什么来着?
415Judith.朱迪丝
416Well, Judith, I think that your account actually is true to Kant.嗯,朱迪思,我认为你的帐户 是真的康德。
417It's fine to have sentiments and feelings that support doing the right thing,有支持做正确事情的感情和感觉是好的
418provided they don't provide the reason for acting.只要他们不提供 行动的理由。
419So I think Judith actually has mounted a pretty good defense of Kant所以我认为朱迪思确实为康德做了很好的辩护
420on this question of the motive of duty. Thank you.关于责任动机的问题。 谢谢
421Now, let's go back to the three contrasts.现在,让我们回到三个对比点。
422It's clear at least what Kant means when he says that for an action to have moral worth,康德说要有道德价值的话 到底是什么意思
423it must be done for the sake of duty, not out of inclination.这样做必须出于职责,而不是出于倾向。
424But as we began to see last time,但我们上次看到的时候
425there's a connection between Kant's stringent notion of morality康德的严格道德观念有联系
426and his specially demanding understanding of freedom.以及他对自由特别要求的理解。
427And that leads us to the second contrast, the link between morality and freedom.这导致了第二个对比,道德和自由之间的联系。
428The second contrast describes two different ways that my will can be determined,第二个对比点描述了两种不同的方式 我的意志可以被确定,
429autonomously and heteronomously.自主和无节制。
430And according to Kant, I'm only free when my will is determined autonomously,康德说,我只有在意志自主决定时才自由
431which means what? According to a law that I give myself.这是什么意思? 根据我给自己的法律
432We must be capable, if we're capable of freedom as autonomy,我们必须有能力,如果我们能 自由作为自治,
433we must be capable of acting according not to a law that's given or imposed on us,我们一定能够不按照 法律的行为 给我们或强加于我们,
434but according to a law we give ourselves.但根据法律,我们给自己。
435But where could such a law come from, a law that we give ourselves?但这种法律能从何而来,我们给自己的法律?
436Reason.缘由.
437If reason determines my will,如果理智决定了我的意志
438then the will becomes the power to choose independent of the dictates of nature然后意志就成为了 独立于自然支配的力量
439or inclination or circumstance.或倾向或情况。
440So, connected with Kant's demanding notions of morality and freedom所以,与康德要求的道德和自由观念有关
441is a specially demanding notion of reason.这是一个特别严格的理性概念。
442Well, how can reason determine the will?那么,如何理性决定遗嘱?
443There are two ways, and this leads to the third contrast.有两种方式,这导致了第三种对比.
444Kant says there are two different commands of reason.康德说理性有两个不同的指令.
445In a command of reason, Kant calls an imperative.在理智的命令中,康德称必须.
446An imperative is simply an ought.当务之急是应当做到的。
447One kind of imperative, perhaps the most familiar kind, is a hypothetical imperative.一种必要,也许是最熟悉的,是假设的必要。
448Hypothetical imperatives use instrumental reason.假设的必须用工具性的理由。
449If you want X, then do Y.如果你想要X,那就做Y.
450Its means ends reasoning.它意味着结束推理。
451If you want a good business reputation,如果你想要一个良好的商业声誉,
452then don't shortchange your customers, word may get out.然后不要少交换你的客户, 消息可能会传出去。
453That's a hypothetical imperative.这是一个假设的必然。
454If the action would be good solely as a means to something else,如果这个行动只是用来做别的东西
455Kant writes the imperative is hypothetical.康德写道 当务之急是假设。
456If the action is represented as good in itself,如果行动本身是好的
457and therefore as necessary for a will which of itself accords with reason,因此,为了符合理智的意志,
458then the imperative is categorical.那么,当务之急是绝对的。
459That's the difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical one.这就是绝对必要和假设的区别.
460A categorical imperative commands categorically,绝对必要命令,
461which just means without reference to or dependence on any further purpose.仅仅意味着不提及或依赖任何其他目的。
462And so you see the connection among these three parallel contrasts.所以你可以看到这三种平行对比之间的关联。
463To be free in the sense of autonomous requires that I act not out of a hypothetical imperative,要获得自主意义上的自由 就需要我的行为 不出于假设的迫切性
464but out of a categorical imperative.但出于绝对必要
465And so you see by these three contrasts,你从这三种对比来看,
466Kant reasons his way, brings us up to his derivation of the categorical imperative.康德解释他的原因,让我们了解他提出的绝对要求。
467Well, this leaves us one big question.这给我们留了一个大问题
468What is the categorical imperative?有什么绝对必要?
469What is the supreme principle of morality?道德的最高原则是什么?
470What does it command of us?它命令我们做什么?
471Kant gives three versions, three formulations of the categorical imperative.康德给出了3个版本,3个表述的绝对必要.
472I want to mention two and then see what you think of them.我想提到两个,然后看看你怎么看他们。
473The first version, the first formula, he calls the formula of the universal law.第一个版本,第一个公式,他称为普世法的公式.
474Act only on that maxim, whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.只能根据这一准则行事,据此,你能够同时成为一项普遍的法律。
475And by maxim, what does Kant mean?以格言来说,康德是什么意思?
476He means a rule that explains the reason for what you're doing, a principle.他指的是解释你所作所为的原因的规则,一个原则.
477For example, promise keeping.例如,承诺遵守。
478Suppose I need money, I need $100, desperately.如果我需要钱,我需要100美元,非常需要
479And I know I can't pay it back anytime soon.我知道我不能马上还钱
480I come to you and make you a promise, a false promise, one I know I can't keep.我来到你面前,给你一个承诺,一个虚假的承诺,一个我知道我不能遵守的.
481Please give me $100 today, lend me the money, I will repay you next week.请今天给我100美元,借我钱, 我下周会还你.
482Is that consistent with the categorical imperative, that false promise?这是否符合绝对必要,即虚假的承诺?
483Kant says no.康德说不行
484In the test, the way we can determine that the false promise is at odds with the categorical imperative is在测试中,我们能够确定虚假承诺与绝对必要条件不符的方法是:
485try to universalize it.尝试普及它。
486Universalize the maxim upon which you're about to act.普及你将要行动的格言
487If everybody made false promises when they needed money, then nobody would believe those promises.如果每个人都在需要钱时作出虚假承诺,那么没有人会相信这些承诺。
488There would be no such thing as a promise.誓愿无此.
489And so there would be a contradiction.因而会出现矛盾.
490The maxim universalized would undermine itself.普遍化的原则会损害自己。
491That's the test.这就是测试。
492That's how we can know that the false promise is wrong.这样我们才能知道虚假承诺是错误的.
493Well, what about the formula of the universal law?那么,世界法的公式呢?
494You find it persuasive?你觉得有说服力吗?
495What do you think?你觉得呢?
496Go ahead.来吧。
497I have a question about the difference between categoricalism and a hypothesis that if you're going to act...我有一个问题 绝对主义和假设的区别 如果你要采取行动...
498Between categorical and hypothetical imperatives.介于绝对和假设的要务之间。
499Right.
500If you're going to act with a categorical imperative so that the maxim doesn't undermine itself,如果你要用绝对的强制力行动 以免圣旨破坏自己
501it sounds like I am going to do X because I want Y.听起来我要做X 因为我想要Y
502I am going to not lie in dire need because I want the world to function in such a way that promises are kept.我将不会因为迫切需要而躺下,因为我希望世界的运作方式能够兑现诺言。
503I don't want to liquidate the practice of promises.我不想清算承诺的实践。
504Right.
505It sounds like justifying a means by an ends.听起来像是以某种目的为手段辩护
506It seems like an instance of consequentialist reasoning.这似乎是一个间接推理的例子。
507Right.
508And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
509Tim.蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆
510Well, Tim, John Stuart Mill agreed with you.蒂姆 约翰·斯图尔特·米尔同意你的意见
511He made this criticism of Kant.他这样批评康德.
512He said, if I universalize the maxim and find that the whole practice of promise keeping would be destroyed if universalized,他说,如果我实现普世化,发现如果普世化,遵守诺言的整个做法就会被摧毁,
513I must be appealing somehow to consequences.我一定在呼吁后果
514Right.
515If that's the reason, not to tell a false promise.如果这就是原因, 不要告诉一个虚假的承诺。
516So John Stuart Mill agreed with that criticism against Kant.因此约翰·斯图亚特·米尔(John Stuart Mill)同意对康德的批评.
517But John Stuart Mill was wrong.但约翰·斯图尔特·米尔错了
518You're in good company though.不过你是好人
519You're in good company, Tim.你关系很好,蒂姆
520Kant has often read, as Tim just read him,康德经常读, 因为蒂姆刚刚读到他,
521as appealing to consequences.对后果有吸引力。
522The world would be worse off if everybody lied because then no one could rely on anybody else's word.如果所有人都撒谎,世界会更糟糕,因为没有人可以相信别人的话。
523Therefore, you shouldn't lie.因此,你不应该撒谎。
524That's not what Kant is saying exactly.康德不是这么说的
525Although it's easy to interpret him as saying that.虽然他很容易被诠释为这么说的.
526I think what he's saying is that this is the test.我想他说的是 这是测试
527This is the test of whether the maxim corresponds with the categorical imperative.这是对准则是否与绝对必要相符的检验。
528It isn't exactly the reason.这不是原因
529It's not the reason.这不是原因。
530The reason you should universalize to test your maxim is to see whether you are privileging your particular needs and desires over everybody else's.你应该普及来测试你的格言 是为了看看你是否将自己的特殊需求和欲望 置于别人的特权之下
531It's a way of pointing to this feature, this demand of the categorical imperative.这是一种指向这个特征的方法,这个绝对必要的需求.
532That the reasons for your actions shouldn't depend for their justification on your interests, your needs, your special circumstances being more important than somebody else's.你行动的原因不应该取决于他们的理由 取决于你的利益 你的需要 你的特殊情况比别人更重要
533That, I think, is the moral intuition lying behind the universalization test.我认为,这是普遍性检验背后的道德直觉。
534So let me spell out the second, Kant's second version of the categorical imperative, perhaps in a way that's more intuitively accessible than the formula of universal law.因此,让我来阐述第二,康德的第二版本的绝对必要,或许是以一种比普遍法的公式更直观易懂的方式.
535It's the formula of humanity as an end.是以人道为终.
536Kant introduces the second version of the categorical imperative with the following line of argument.康德用以下的论据提出了绝对要求的第二稿。
537We can't base the categorical imperative on any particular interests, purposes or ends.我们不能把绝对必要建立在任何特定的利益、目的或目的上。
538Because then it would be only relative to the person whose ends they were.因为那样的话,它只会是相对于他们的目的所在的人。
539But suppose there were something whose existence has in itself an absolute value, an end in itself.但假设存在的东西本身就具有绝对价值,即目的本身.
540Then in it, and in it alone, would there be the ground of a possible categorical imperative.然后,在其中,而且仅在其中,就会有可能绝对必要的理由。
541Well, what is there that we can think of as having its end in itself?那么,有什么我们可以认为 它本身有它的目的吗?
542Kant's answer is this.康德的回答是这个.
543I say that man, and in general every rational being, exists as an end in himself.我说,这个人, 总的来说, 每一个理性的存在, 存在作为自己的目的。
544Not merely as a means for arbitrary use by this or that will.不仅仅是作为任意使用的手段 被这种或那种意愿。
545And here Kant distinguishes between persons on the one hand and things on the other.这里康德将人和事物区分开来.
546Rational beings are persons.理性众生是众生.
547They don't just have a relative value for us, but if anything has they have an absolute value, an intrinsic value.它们不仅对我们有相对价值,而且如果有任何东西具有绝对价值,就具有内在价值.
548That is, rational beings have dignity.也就是说,理性的人有尊严。
549They're worthy of reverence and respect.他们值得尊敬和尊重。
550This line of reasoning leads Kant to the second formulation of the categorical imperative, which is this.这种推理方法导致康德得出了"绝对必要"的第二种提法,这就是这个.
551Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other,行动的方式,你总是对待 人道,无论是以你个人,还是以任何其他人,
552never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.永远不是简单的手段,而是永远同时作为目的。
553So that's the formula of humanity as an end.这就是人类的结局
554The idea that human beings as rational beings are ends in themselves, not open to use, merely as a means.人类作为理性生物的观念本身就是目的,不能开放使用,只是作为一种手段而已.
555When I make a false promise to you, I'm using you as a means to my ends, to my desire for the hundred dollars.臣当假约之,以汝为本,欲以百元为本.
556And so I'm failing to respect you.所以我没有尊重你
557I'm failing to respect your dignity.我没尊重你的尊严
558I'm manipulating you.我在操纵你
559Now consider the example of the duty against suicide.现在考虑一下防止自杀的责任的例子。
560Murder and suicide are at odds with the categorical imperative. Why?谋杀和自杀与绝对必要不符。 为什么?
561If I murder someone, I'm taking their life for some purpose, either because I'm a hired killer如果我杀了人,我为了某种目的夺走他们的生命, 要么是因为我是一个雇佣杀手
562or I'm in the throes of some great anger or passion.或者我陷入了某种愤怒或激情的折磨之中
563Well, I have some interest, some purpose that's particular for the sake of which I'm using them as a means.嗯,我有一些兴趣, 一些目的,特别的 为了这个原因,我用它们作为手段。
564Murder violates the categorical imperative.谋杀违反了绝对必要。
565For Kant, morally speaking, suicide is on a par with murder.对康德来说,道德上来说,自杀等同于谋杀。
566It's on a par with murder because what we violate when we take a life, when we take someone's life, ours or somebody else's,这和谋杀是等同的,因为当我们夺去生命,当我们夺去别人的生命,我们或者其他人的生命时,我们所违反的,
567we use that person, we use a rational being, we use humanity as a means.我们利用那个人 我们利用理性的存在 我们利用人性作为一种手段
568And so we fail to respect humanity as an end.因此,我们不尊重人道作为目的。
569And that capacity for reason, that humanity that commands respect, that is the ground of dignity,而这种能力是有道理的, 人类是值得尊重的, 是尊严的基础,
570that humanity, that capacity for reason, resides undifferentiated in all of us.人类,这种理性的能力,在我们所有人中是毫无区别的。
571And so I violate that dignity in my own person if I commit suicide所以,如果我自杀,我侵犯我的尊严
572and in murder if I take somebody else's life.如果我夺走别人的性命 就会被谋杀
573From a moral point of view, they're the same.从道德上看,两者是相同的.
574And the reason they're the same has to do with the universal character and ground of the moral law.而两者相同的原因也与道德法的普遍性格和基础有关.
575The reason that we have to respect the dignity of other people has not to do with anything in particular about them.我们必须尊重他人尊严的原因与任何具体与他们无关。
576And so respect, Kantian respect, is unlike love in this way.因此,尊重,康德的尊重, 不同爱的方式。
577It's unlike sympathy.这不像同情心
578It's unlike solidarity or fellow feeling or altruism.这与团结或同伴感情或利他主义不同.
579Because love and those other particular virtues or reasons for caring about other people have to do with who they are in particular.因为爱和其他特殊美德 或关心他人的原因 都与他们的身份有关
580But respect for Kant.但尊重康德.
581Respect is respect for humanity which is universal, for a rational capacity which is universal.尊重是对人类的普遍尊重,是对普遍的合理能力的尊重。
582And that's why violating it, in my own case, is as objectionable as violating it in the case of any other.这就是为什么违反它,就我个人来说, 和违反它一样,在任何其他情况下。
583Questions or objections?问题还是反对?
584Go ahead.来吧。
585I guess I'm somewhat worried about Kant's statement that you cannot use a person as a means because every person is an end in and of themselves.我想我有点担心康德的说法,你不能把一个人当作手段,因为每个人都是他们自己的目的.
586Because it seems that every day in order to get something accomplished for that day, I must use myself as a means to some end.因为看来,为了在那一天取得成就,我每天都必须利用自己来达到某种目的。
587And I must use the people around me as a means to some end as well.我必须把周围的人当作实现某种目的的手段。
588For instance, suppose that I want to do well in a class and I have to write a paper.比如说,假设我想在课堂上做得很好 我必须写一篇论文。
589I have to use myself as a means to write the paper.我得用自己来写论文
590Suppose I want to buy something, food.如果我想买点东西,食物。
591I must go to the store and use the person working behind the counter as a means for me to purchase my food.我必须去店里 利用柜台后面的人 来买我的食物
592Right. That's true. You do. What's your name?对 没错 没错 你叫什么来着?
593Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
594Patrick, you're not doing anything wrong.帕特里克 你没做错什么
595You're not violating the categorical imperative when you use other people as means.你用别人作为手段 并不违反绝对的要求
596That's not objectionable provided when we deal with other people for the sake of advancing our projects and purposes and interests,我们为了推进我们的项目、目的和利益而与其他人打交道,这是不容反对的,
597which we all do, provided we treat them in a way that is consistent with respect for their dignity.我们都这样做,只要我们对待他们的方式符合尊重他们的尊严。
598And what it means to respect them is given by the categorical imperative.尊重它们的意义在于绝对必要。
599Are you persuaded?你被说服了吗?
600Do you think that Kant has given a compelling account, a persuasive account of the supreme principle of morality?你认为康德给出了令人信服的陈述,对道德至高无上原则的令人信服的陈述吗?
601Reread the groundwork and we'll try to answer that question next time.重读基础 我们下次会试着回答这个问题
602Thank you very much.谢谢
603Funding for this program is provided by additional funding provided by本方案的资金由下列机构提供:
604Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
该视频共有字幕 606 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P11 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p11 10. 10.好公民 (P11)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00We turn to Aristotle我们转向亚里士多德
0:12after之后
0:14examining检查
0:15theories,理论,
0:20modern theories of justice现代司法理论
0:24that tried to detach试图分离
0:28theories of justice and rights from questions of moral desert and virtue.正义和权利理论 从道德和德行问题。
0:34Aristotle亚里士多德
0:37disagrees with Kant and Rawls.与康德和罗尔斯意见不一.
0:43Aristotle argues that justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve.亚里士多德认为,正义是给予人们应得的.
展开字幕全文(1040 条)
序号英文中文
1We turn to Aristotle我们转向亚里士多德
2after之后
3examining检查
4theories,理论,
5modern theories of justice现代司法理论
6that tried to detach试图分离
7theories of justice and rights from questions of moral desert and virtue.正义和权利理论 从道德和德行问题。
8Aristotle亚里士多德
9disagrees with Kant and Rawls.与康德和罗尔斯意见不一.
10Aristotle argues that justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve.亚里士多德认为,正义是给予人们应得的.
11And the central idea和中心思想
12of Aristotle's theory of justice亚里士多德的正义理论
13is that这是
14in reasoning about justice and rights司法与权利的推理
15we have unavoidably我们有不可避免
16to reason about以解释
17the purpose or the end or the kilos目的或终点或公斤
18of social practices and institutions.社会做法和机构。
19Yes, justice requires giving equal things to equal persons but the question immediately arises是的,正义要求给予平等的人平等的东西,但立即产生问题。
20in any debate about justice在任何关于司法的辩论中
21equal in what respect?在什么方面平等?
22And Aristotle says we亚里士多德说
23need to fill in the answer to that question需要填写对该问题的答复
24by looking通过查找
25to the characteristic end到特性端
26or the essential nature or the purpose或基本性质或目的
27of the thing we're distributing and so we discussed Aristotle's example of flutes who should get the best flutes我们讨论过亚里士多德的笛子的例子 应该有最好的笛子
28and Aristotle's answer was the best flute players.亚里士多德的回答是最好的笛手
29The best flute player should get the best flute最好的笛手应该有最好的笛子
30because that's a way of honoring因为那是一种尊重的方式
31the excellence卓越
32of flute playing.吹着笛子
33It's a way of rewarding the virtue这是奖励功德的方法
34of the great flute player.伟大的笛手。
35What's interesting though有趣的东西
36and this is what we're going to explore today这就是我们今天要探索的
37is that这是
38it's not这不是
39quite so easy to dispense with teleological reasoning这么容易就不用讲心术了
40when we're thinking about当我们在想
41social institutions社会机构
42and political practices.政治实践。
43In general it's hard to do without teleology when we're thinking about一般来说,我们思考的时候,没有心灵感应很难做到
44ethics,道德操守,
45justice司法
46and moral argument.和道德争论。
47At least that's Aristotle's claim至少这是亚里士多德的说法
48Now I would like to bring out the force in Aristotle's claim by considering two examples.现在我想通过考虑两个例子,把亚里士多德主张中的力量拿出来.
49One is an example that Aristotle spends quite a bit of一个是亚里士多德花了很多钱
50time discussing the case of politics,时间讨论政治案例,
51how should political offices and honors, how should political rule be distributed.如何分配政治职务和荣誉,如何分配政治统治。
52The second example第二个例子
53is a contemporary是一个当代
54debate辩论
55about golf关于高尔夫球
56and whether是否为
57the professional golfers association职业高尔夫球员协会
58should be required to allow Casey Martin,应该要求允许凯西·马丁
59a golfer with a disability残疾高尔夫球员
60to ride in a golf cart.骑高尔夫车。
61Both cases两种情况
62bring out出来
63a further feature另一个特征
64of Aristotle's teleological way of thinking about justice亚里士多德对正义的思考方式
65and that is这就是
66that when we attend to the telos or the purpose当我们关注 调音器或目的
67sometimes有时候
68we disagree and argue about what the purpose我们不同意,争论什么目的
69of a social practice社会实践
70really consists in真正包含在
71and when we have those disagreements当我们有这些分歧
72part of what's at stake in those disagreements这些分歧的利害关系
73is not just who will get what不只是谁会得到什么
74not just a distributive question but also不仅是一个分配问题,而且
75an honorific question一个荣誉问题
76what qualities什么样的品质
77what excellences什么样的优异
78of persons个人资料
79will be honored将受尊敬,
80debates about purpose and telos关于目的和主题的辩论
81are often经常
82simultaneously debates about honor同时辩论荣誉
83now let's see how that works现在让我们看看它是如何工作的
84in the case of情况
85Aristotle's account亚里士多德的账户
86of politics政治观点
87when we discuss distributive justice these days我们讨论分配公正的时候
88we're mainly concerned with the distribution of income and wealth and opportunity我们主要关心的是收入、财富和机会的分配
89Aristotle took distributive justice亚里士多德接受了分配正义
90to be将会是
91mainly not about income and wealth主要不涉及收入和财富
92but about offices and honors但关于职务和荣誉
93who should have the right to rule who should be a citizen应有权统治谁应是公民
94how should political authority be distributed如何分配政治权威
95those were his questions那是他的问题
96how did he go about answering those questions他怎么回答这些问题的?
97well in line with his符合他的
98teleological account of justice司法学术语
99Aristotle argues that亚里士多德认为:
100to know how political authority should be distributed了解应如何分配政治权力
101we have first to inquire into the purpose the point我们首先要调查目的
102the telos齿轮
103of politics政治观点
104so what is politics政治是怎样的
105about关于
106and how does this help us decide who should rule如何帮助我们决定谁应该统治
107well for Aristotle the answer to that question is亚里士多德的答案是
108politics is about政治问题
109forming character组成字符
110forming good character形成良好的性格
111it's about cultivating the virtue of citizens而是培养公民的美德
112it's about the good life是关于美好生活的
113the end of the state the end of the political community国家终结 政治界终结
114he tells us他告诉我们
115in book three of the politics在第三册政治
116it's not这不是
117about your life关于你的生活
118it's not economic exchange only不只是经济交流
119it's not security这不是安全
120only仅限
121it's realizing它正在意识到
122the good life美好生活 美好生活
123that's what politics is for这就是政治的目的
124according to Aristotle根据亚里士多德
125now you might worry about this现在你可能会担心这个
126you might say well maybe this shows us why those你也许说得好 也许这告诉我们为什么那些
127modern theorists现代理论家
128of justice司法裁判
129and of politics政治问题
130are right没错
131because remember for Kant因为记得康德
132并用于 Rawls
133the point of politics政治的意义
134is not to shape the moral character of citizens it's not to make us good不是塑造公民的道德品质 也不是让我们好
135it's to respect our freedom to choose our goods是尊重我们选择商品的自由
136our values our ends我们的价值,我们的目标
137consistent with a similar liberty for others与其他人的类似自由相一致
138Aristotle disagrees亚里士多德不同意
139any polis which is truly so called任何真正被称作"政治"的警察
140and is not merely one in name must devote itself to the end of encouraging不仅仅是名义上的,必须致力于鼓励
141goodness不错
142otherwise political association sinks into a mere alliance否则,政治联系就变成单纯的联盟
143law becomes a mere covenant法律变成一个简单的契约
144a guarantor of men's rights against one another instead of being as it should be保障男人相互之间的权利,而不是保持应有的地位;
145a way of life一种生活方式
146such as will make the members of a polis good and just that's Aristotle's view这样就能让大都会的成员好起来 而这正是亚里士多德的观点
147a polis is not an association警察不是协会
148for residents on a common site供常住居民使用
149nor for the sake of preventing mutual injustice and easing exchange Aristotle writes也为了防止相互不公,
150the end and purpose of a polis is the good life大都会的终结和目的就是美好生活
151and the institutions of social life are means to that end社会生活体制是实现这一目标的手段
152now if that's the purpose of politics of the polis如果这就是大都会政治的目的
153then Aristotle says we can然后亚里士多德说我们可以
154derive from that来源于此
155the principles of distributive justice分配司法原则
156the principles that tell us who should have the greatest say原则告诉我们谁应该有最大的发言权
157who should have the greatest measure of political authority拥有最大政治权威的人
158and what's his answer to that question? well those who contribute the most他对此问题的答案是什么? 那些贡献最大的人,
159to an association of this character参加此性质的协会
160namely an association that aims at the good即一个以福利为目标的协会
161should have a greater share in political rule在政治统治中应有更大的份额
162and in the honors of the polis and the reason is而在荣誉 波利斯和理由是
163they他们
164are in a position to contribute有能力捐款
165most多数
166to what political community is essentially about政治团体的本质
167well so you can see这样你就能看见了
168the link that he draws他画的链接
169between the principle of distribution for citizenship and political authority公民身份分配原则与政治权威之间
170and the purpose目标
171of politics政治观点
172but why you'll quickly ask但你为什么会快速问
173why does he claim他为什么声称
174that political life participation in politics is somehow essential政治生活对政治的参与至关重要
175to living a good life过上美好的生活
176why isn't it possible为什么不可能呢?
177for people为人民服务
178to live perfectly good lives decent lives moral lives过上完美的美好生活 过上体面的生活
179without participating in politics不参与政治
180well he gives two answers to that question他回答这个问题有两个答案
181he gives a partial answer a preliminary answer他给出了部分答案 初步答案
182in book one of the politics在书中 政治之一
183where he tells us他告诉我们
184that only仅限
185by living in a polis住在大都会
186and participating in politics参政
187do we fully realize our nature我们是否充分意识到我们的本性
188as human beings作为人
189human beings are by nature人类是天生的
190meant
191to live in a polis在大都会生活
192it's only in琌
193political life政治生活
194that we can actually exercise我们实际上可以锻炼
195our distinctly human capacity我们独特的人的能力
196for language语言
197which Aristotle understands as this capacity to deliberate about亚里士多德所理解的这种审议能力
198right and wrong对与错
199the just and the unjust正义者和不义者,
200and so Aristotle writes亚里士多德写道
201in book one of the politics that the polis在书中 政治之一的波利斯
202the political community政治团体
203exists by nature and is prior to the individual not prior in time按性质存在,而且发生在个人之前,而不是时间之前;
204but prior in its但它在
205human beings are not self-sufficient人不能自给自足
206living by themselves独自生活
207outside外部
208a political community政治团体
209man who is isolated who's unable to share in the benefits of political association与世隔绝、无法分享政治结社利益的人
210or who has no need to share或不需要分享的人
211because he's already self-sufficient因为他已经自给自足了
212such a person must be either a beast or a god这种人必须是野兽还是神
213so we only fully realize our nature we only fully unfold our human capacities所以我们才充分意识到我们的本性 只充分展现我们的人的能力
214when we exercise our当我们锻炼
215faculty of language语言系
216which means when we deliberate这意味着当我们考虑
217with our fellow citizens about我们的同胞们
218good and evil, right and wrong, just善与恶,对与错,只是
219and the unjust和不义的人们,
220but why can we only但为什么我们只能
221exercise our锻炼我们
222capacity for language语言能力
223in political community you might ask在政治界,你可能会问
224Aristotle gives a second part, a fuller亚里士多德给出了第二部分,更完整
225part of his answer他回答的部分内容
226in the Nicomachean Ethics, an excerpt of which在尼科马切安伦理学中,摘录
227we have among the readings我们的阅读中,
228and there那边
229he他的电话
230explains解释
231that political deliberation政治讨论
232living the life of a citizen公民的生活
233living and being ruled in turn, sharing and rule, all of this生活和被统治, 分享和统治,这一切
234is necessary必须
235to virtue至美德
236Aristotle defines happiness亚里士多德定义幸福
237not as maximizing the balance of pleasure over pain而不是在快乐和痛苦之间实现最大的平衡
238but as an activity, an activity of the soul但作为一种活动, 灵魂的一种活动
239in accordance with virtue根据美德
240and he says that every student of politics must study the soul他说,每个政治学生 都必须学习灵魂
241because shaping the soul is one of the objects因为塑造灵魂是其中之一
242of legislation立法
243in a good city在一个好城市
244but why is it necessary to live in a good city in order to live a virtuous life但为什么必须生活在一个好城市 才能过上善良的生活
245why can't we just learn good moral principles at home为什么我们不能在家里学好道德原则
246or in a philosophy class or from a book或哲学课或书中
247live according to those principles, those rules, those precepts遵守这些原则、规则、戒律
248and leave it at that并把它留在那个
249Aristotle says亚里士多德说
250virtue isn't acquired that way美德不是那样获得的
251virtue贞操
252is only something we can acquire我们只能得到的东西
253by practicing练习
254by exercising通过行使
255the virtues优点
256it's the kind of thing we can only learn我们只能学这种东西
257by doing这样做
258it doesn't come from book learning不是从书学来的
259in this respect在这方面,
260it's like flute playing, you couldn't learn how to play就像吹笛子一样,你学不会弹
261a musical instrument well just by reading a book about it一部乐器,只要读一本书
262you have to practice and you have to listen to other accomplished flute players你必须练习,你必须听 其他完成的笛手
263there are other practices and skills of this type还有其他这类做法和技能
264cooking烹饪
265there are cookbooks有厨书
266no great chef ever learns how to cook by reading a cookbook only没有一个伟大的厨师只读烹饪本就能学会烹饪
267it's the kind of thing you only learn by doing这是那种你只学习 通过做
268joke telling开个玩笑
269is probably another example of this kind, no great comedian learns to be a comedian可能是另一个这样的例子, 没有伟大的喜剧演员学会做喜剧演员
270just by reading a book只读一本书
271on the principles of comedy喜剧原则
272it wouldn't work, now why not现在不行了,为什么不呢?
273what do joke telling and cooking开什么玩笑?
274and playing a musical instrument演奏乐器
275have in common有共同之处
276such that we can't learn them just by grasping a precept这样我们就不能仅仅通过 抓住一个规则来学习它们
277or a rule that we might learn from a book或者我们可能从书中学习的规则
278or a lecture, what they have in common或教诲,或他们共有的教诲,
279is that they are all concerned with他们都关心
280getting the hang of it, but also获得它,但也
281what is it we get the hang of我们得到的是什么
282when we learn how to cook当我们学会烹饪
283or play a musical instrument or tell jokes well或演奏乐器或说笑话
284discerning particulars识别细节
285particular features of a situation情况的特殊性
286no rule, no precept could tell the comedian or the cook没有规则,没有规则可以告诉喜剧演员和厨师
287or the great musician还是伟大的音乐家
288how to怎样
289get in the habit of, the practice of习以为常,习惯
290discerning the particular features了解具体特征
291of a situation, Aristotle says virtue is that way too亚里士多德说 美德也是这样
292now, how does this connect to politics?现在,这与政治有什么联系?
293the only way唯一的办法
294we can acquire the virtues我们可以获得美德
295that constitute the good life代表美好生活的,
296is to exercise锻炼
297the virtues to have certain habits inculcated in us给我们灌输某些习惯的美德
298and then接着
299to engage in the practice of deliberating with citizens about与公民讨论
300the nature of the good善的本质
301that's what politics is ultimately about这就是政治的最终目的
302the acquisition of civic virtue获得公民美德;
303of this capacity to deliberate是否具有这种审议能力
304among equals等数之间
305that's something we couldn't get living a life我们无法过上生活
306alone outside of politics一个人在政治之外
307and so就这样
308that's why in order to realize our nature这就是为什么为了实现我们的本性
309we have to engage in politics我们要参政
310and that's why those这也是为什么
311who are greatest in civic virtue, like Pericles公民美德最强的人 比如佩里克斯
312are the ones是他们
313who properly have the greatest measure of offices and honors拥有最大职位和荣誉的人
314so the argument about the distribution of offices and honors has this teleological character but also an honorific dimension因此,关于职位和荣誉分配的争论 具有这种心智特征 但也具有荣誉意义
315because part of the point of politics is to honor people like Pericles因为政治的要点是 尊重佩里克斯这样的人
316it isn't just that Pericles should不只是佩里克斯应该
317have已经
318the dominant say主语
319because he has the best judgment and that will lead to the best outcomes to the best consequences for the citizens因为他有最佳的判断力 并将导致最佳结果 给公民带来最佳后果
320that's true没错
321and that's important这很重要
322but a further reason但另一个原因
323people like Pericles佩里克斯这样的人
324should have the greatest measure应该有最大的尺度
325of offices and honors and political authority and sway in the polis权力和政治权威及政治影响力
326is that part of the point of politics是政治观点的一部分
327is to single out and honor单挑和荣誉
328those who possess the relevant virtue, in this case civic virtue, civic excellence, practical wisdom拥有相关美德的人,在这种情况下,公民美德,公民卓越,实用智慧
329to the fullest extent尽最大可能
330that's the honorific dimension这是荣耀的维度
331bound up with Aristotle's account of politics和亚里士多德关于政治的叙述联系在一起
332here's an example举个例子
333that shows显示
334the link链接
335in a contemporary controversy在当代的争议中
336the link链接
337which Aristotle draws our attention between亚里士多德让我们注意到
338arguments about justice关于正义的论点
339and rights on the one hand和权利
340and figuring out the telos or the purpose of a social practice on the other并找出 泰罗士或目的 在另一个社会实践
341not only that不仅如此
342the case of Casey Martin and his golf cart凯西・马丁和他的高尔夫球车的案子
343also brings out也带出来
344the link between链接
345debates about what the purpose关于目的的辩论
346of a social practice or a game社会实践或游戏
347is on the one hand一方面
348and the question of what qualities should be honored以及应当尊重哪些品质的问题
349on the other对方
350the link between teleology电信学之间的联系
351and honor-based和基于荣誉的
352principles of distributive justice分配公正原则
353who was Casey Martin? Well, Casey Martin is a very good golfer凯西・马丁是谁? 凯西・马丁是个很好的高尔夫球手
354able to compete at the highest levels of golf能在最高水平的高尔夫球比赛
355but for one thing但有一点
356he has a rare他有一个稀有的
357circulatory problem in his leg that makes it very difficult for him to walk, not only difficult他腿上的循环问题让他很难走路, 不仅很难走路
358but dangerous但危险
359and so he asked the PGA所以他问PGA
360which governs the pro tour in golf管理高尔夫球巡回赛
361to be able to use a golf cart能够使用高尔夫球车
362when he competed in当时,他参赛,
363professional tournaments职业联赛
364the PGA said no议员大会说不
365and he sued under the American for Disabilities Act他根据《美国残疾人法》起诉
366he sued in a case他起诉了一个案子
367that went已经过去了
368all the way to the United States Supreme Court一直到美国最高法院
369the question the Supreme Court had to answer最高法院必须回答的问题
370was当时是
371does
372Casey Martin have a right凯西・马丁有权利
373that the PGA provide him, allow him to use a golf cart on the tourPGA给他,让他在巡演中使用高尔夫球车
374or not或者没有
375how many here这里有多少
376think that认为
377from a moral point of view从道德角度
378Casey Martin凯西·马丁
379should
380have a right to use a golf cart有权使用高尔夫球车
381and how many think that和多少人认为
382he should not他不应该
383have a right to a golf cart in the tournaments在锦标赛中有权坐高尔夫车
384so the majority are sympathetic to Casey Martin's right所以大多数人都同情凯西・马丁的权利
385though a substantial虽然是一个实质性的
386minority少数民族
387disagree, let's first hear from those of you不同意,我们先从你们中听到
388who would rule against Casey Martin谁会统治凯西・马丁
389why would you not为什么你不
390说PGA必须
391give him a golf cart?给他一个高尔夫球车?
392Yes, since the inception of golf是的,从高尔夫球开始
393because it's been因为它已经
394part of the sport运动内容
395it's now现在
396intrinsically part of golf高尔夫的内在部分
397walking the course在路上走着
398and that's because it's intrinsic to golf I'd argue that那是因为它是高尔夫的内在 我想说
399not being able to walk the course无法行走
400it's just not being able to perform它只是不能发挥
401an aspect of the sport which is necessary to体育运动的一个必要方面
402performing at a professional level. Good, stay there for a minute, what's your name?专业水平。 好,待一会儿,你叫什么名字?
403Are you a golfer by the way Tom?你是高尔夫选手吗?
404Not so much but yeah a little bit没那么多,但有一点
405are there any golfers here, I mean real golfers?这里有高尔夫球手吗?
406Thank you professor. No, no谢谢教授 没有,没有
407I'm just taking your word for it我只是接受你的话
408who are there, is there someone here on the golf team?高尔夫球队里有人吗?
409Yes, tell us your name and是的,告诉我们你的名字和
410tell us what you think告诉我们你的想法
411uh... my name is Michael and呃... 我叫迈克尔和
412I usually take a cart so我通常坐推车这样
413probably the wrong可能错了
414person to ask要问的人
415Is that why your hand went up slowly? Yes这就是为什么你的手慢慢地上升? 对
416All right好吧,我们走
417but Tom is saying但汤姆说
418Tom said a minute ago汤姆刚才说
419that at least at the professional level至少在专业一级
420walking the course在路上走着
421is essential to the game, do you agree? I would, yes.对游戏至关重要,你同意吗? 我会,是的。
422You do? Then why do you take a cart?是吗? 那你为什么要坐推车?
423And you call yourself a golfer? No, no, no, no, no, I'm kidding, I'm kidding你说自己是高尔夫球手? 不不不,我开玩笑的
424What do you say to that? When I have walked the course it does add你说呢? 当我走过这条路的时候,它会增加
425tremendously to the game对游戏的极大影响
426makes it a lot harder, it really does更难,真的
427All right, let's hear好吧,让我们听听
428Michael and Tom迈克尔和汤姆
429stay there, let's hear from people who呆在那里,让我们听到的人谁
430say that he should have a right to a golf cart说他应该有权利使用高尔夫球车
431Why? Who's prepared to defend that position? Yes?为什么? 谁准备捍卫这个位置? 是吗?
432Well, I think the PGA should definitely be required to give him a golf cart because they我觉得PGA绝对需要给他一辆高尔夫球车,因为他们
433argue in the decision that it's not just a matter of在决定中争论说,这不仅仅是一个问题
434he's not experiencing fatigue for him, he's still walking about a mile他没有感到疲劳,他还在走一英里
435the cart can't go everywhere with him车不能和他一起到处走
436and in that mile he's still experiencing more fatigue and pain在那一英里里,他仍然 经历更多的疲劳和痛苦
437than a healthy player would, so it's not as if而不是一个健康的球员会, 所以它不是像
438you're moving the disadvantage你在改变不利地位
439What's your name? Riva你叫什么来着? 丽娃
440Riva, what do you say to Tom's point that walking the course is essential to the丽娃,你对汤姆说,走这条路对
441game? It would be游戏? 这将是
442as if碞钩琌
443a disabled player could play in the NBA一个残疾的玩家可以在 NBA 中玩
444but not have to run up and down the court但不必跑上跑下法庭
445Well, I think there are two responses to that. First, I don't think it's essential to the game嗯,我想有两个答案。 首先,我不认为这对游戏很重要
446because most golfers who play因为大多数打高尔夫的人
447particularly recreationally don't play with a cart特别在娱乐上 不要玩马车
448like Michael像迈克尔
449and on several of the tours you can play with a cart, on the senior PGA tour在几次巡回演出中,你可以用推车玩, 在高级PGA巡回演出中
450on the Nike tour在耐克巡演时
451in a lot of the college events and those events are just as competitive and just as high level在很多的大学活动 和那些赛事 同样的竞争 和同样高的水平
452{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}作为PGA的巡回演唱会 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}这其实是选择性的
453reasoning if you argue that it's如果你认为那是
454an important part of the sport, but运动的重要组成部分,但
455even if it is, he still does have to walk, he still plays golf standing up, it's not as if he's就算是,他还是要走路,他还是站着打高尔夫,这不像他
456playing golf from a wheelchair在轮椅上打高尔夫
457Who else?还有谁?
458I think the whole point of a competition我觉得比赛的要点
459is that it calls out the best, you know, from the second best or from the third best是它呼唤出最好的, 你知道,从第二好 或者从第三好
460And when we're talking about the national level, we're talking about, you know, the当我们谈论国家层面, 我们谈论,你知道,
461highest of the highest, and I think that最高的,我认为
462what they're arguing about here他们在这里争论什么
463is the purpose of competition, and I think in the sake of competition you can't change the rules竞争的目的,我想 为了竞争,你不能改变规则
464So the purpose of the competition所以比赛的目的
465includes walking包括行走
466That's an essential, you agree with Tom, and what's your name? David这是必需的,你同意汤姆,你叫什么名字? 大卫
467The Supreme Court ruled最高法院裁定
468that the PGA did have to accommodate Casey Martin联盟必须接纳凯西・马丁
469And they did it on grounds that Reva mentioned他们这样做的理由 Reva提到
470that walking isn't really part of, an essential part of the game走路其实不是游戏中最重要的一环
471They cited testimony saying that walking the court consumes他们引用证词说 走在法庭消耗
472no more calories than you get eating a Big Mac没有卡路里比你吃一个大麦
473That's what walking is in golf这就是行走在高尔夫球中
474According to the根据
475majority多数
476Scalia was in dissent斯卡利亚不同意
477Justice Scalia agreed with David斯卡利亚法官同意大卫的意见
478He said他说
479there is no没有
480purpose目的
481It's not, and it's certainly not for courts to try to figure out the essential purpose of golf不是的,当然不是法院 试图找出高尔夫的基本目的
482Golf, like any game, is strictly for amusement高尔夫就像游戏一样 完全是为了娱乐
483And if there's a group that wants to have one version of the game, they can have that version of the game如果有一个团体想要有一个版本的游戏,他们可以拥有该版本的游戏
484And the market can decide whether people are amused and like and show up for that and watch the television市场可以决定人们是否乐于享受 喜欢和出现,并观看电视
485Now, let's talk about golf现在,让我们谈谈高尔夫球
486Scalia's dissent斯卡利亚的异议
487was an anti-Aristotelian dissent是反阿里斯托德的异议
488because notice two things about the argument因为要注意两件事
489First, we're thrust into a discussion about what the essential nature or purpose or telos of golf really is. Does it include walking?首先,我们开始讨论 高尔夫球的基本性质或目的 或齿轮到底是什么。 包括走路吗?
490And还有
491here's something I think is rumbling beneath the surface of this debate我认为这是在这场辩论的表面下
492Whether walking是否走动
493hardly determines whether golf is really an athletic competition很难确定高尔夫球是不是一场运动比赛
494After all, the ball sits still毕竟,球坐不动
495you have to put it in a hole你要把它放进洞里
496Is it more like basketball, baseball, and football, golf, and athletic competition?更像是篮球、棒球、足球、高尔夫球、体育比赛吗?
497Or is it more like billiards?还是更像台球?
498The ball sits still there, too. You can be out of shape球还坐在那里 你可能体型不对
499and succeed并取得成功
500It involves skill, but not athletic skill它涉及技巧,但不是运动技巧
501Could it be that those professional golfers who excel会不会是那些专业的高尔夫球手
502at golf have a stake in golf being honored and recognized as an athletic event在高尔夫球场上,高尔夫球的利害关系 被尊为运动员
503not just a game of skill like billiards?不只是像台球一样的技巧游戏?
504And if that's what's at stake如果这是关键
505then we have a debate about the purpose然后,我们有一个辩论 关于目的
506the teleological dimension技术层面
507and also a debate about honor还有一场关于荣誉的辩论
508What virtues, really,什么优点,真的,
509does the game of golf honor做高尔夫球比赛
510and recognize?认得吗?
511Two questions to which Aristotle directs our attention亚里士多德要我们注意的两个问题
512We'll continue on this case next time下次我们继续查这个案子
513What's strange and seem paradoxical to me about Aristotle's viewpoint我对亚里士多德的观点感到奇怪和矛盾
514is that这是
515if you walk如果你走的话
516like a pirate and you talk like a pirate, you shouldn't be an investment banker像海盗一样,你说话像海盗, 你不应该是一个投资银行家
517because因为
518that's not what you're supposed to do这不是你应该做的
519if you have a peg leg and an eye patch and a如果你有一个钉腿和眼睛补丁
520disgruntled disposition不满的处置
521you should be on a pirate ship on the high seas你应该在公海上的海盗船上
522so he doesn't所以他不会
523his uh...他的额...
524Some would say有人会说
525the distinction between the two vocations is not as clear as you suggest两种职业的区别并不像你建议的那样明确
526When we ended last time we were talking about whether Casey Martin has a right to ride in a golf上次结束的时候 我们谈论凯西・马丁是否有权骑高尔夫
527card in the PGAPGA 中的卡片
528tournaments锦标赛
529and it's worth remembering how we got into this debate and what's at stake for an值得记住,我们是如何进入这场辩论 和什么是利害关系
530understanding of political philosophy对政治哲学的理解
531Remember we were looking at Aristotle's theory of justice and one way of记住我们在研究亚里士多德的正义理论 还有一种方法
532describing his approach to justice, we called it teleological我们称他为"灵媒"
533teleological because he says to allocate rights we first have to figure out机电学是因为他说要分配权利 我们首先要弄清楚
534the purpose or the end目的或结束
535of the social practice in question有关社会实践
536another way另一种方式
537of describing Aristotle's描述亚里士多德的
538account of justice司法问题
539is that justice is for him a matter of fit正义对他来说是一件很合适的事
540it's a matter of fitting persons是合适的人的问题
541with their virtues and excellences他们的美德和善绩,
542to the appropriate roles发挥适当作用
543Now I want to finish our discussion现在我想结束我们的讨论
544about Casey Martin and his claim关于凯西·马丁和他的索赔
545for a golf card高尔夫球卡
546and then go back to one然后回到一个
547more consequential application in Aristotle namely the question of slavery在亚里士多德, 即奴隶制问题 中更切实的适用
548what do you think你觉得呢?
549about关于
550Casey Martin's request凯西·马丁的请求
551should there be an accommodation or not given the nature如果有住宿或不给予性质
552of the game and of the tournament and its purposes比赛和比赛的目的
553isn't it discrimination这不是歧视吗?
554if he's not provided the golf cart as an accommodation say some如果他没有提供高尔夫球车 作为住宿,说一些
555others reply no if he got a cart it would be unfair to the other golfers其他人不回答,如果他得到一个车 它会不公平 其他高尔夫球员
556because they exert themselves become winded因为他们的功劳,
557fatigued疲劳
558walking the course在路上走着
559that's where we left it那是我们留下的地方
560what about the fairness公平怎么样?
561argument参数
562okay Jenny好吧,珍妮,你好吗?
563my question was why doesn't the PGA just make the option of a cart available to我的问题是,为什么PGA不 只是让一个车的选择
564all golfers所有高尔夫球员
565from our readings I learned that there are many golf tournaments从我们的阅读中得知,有很多高尔夫锦标赛
566other than the PGA where using a cart is not prohibited除了不禁止使用推车的PGA以外
567and for something like the seniors tournament it's even和一些类似 高年级的比赛,这是平
568allowed and encouraged so why doesn't the PGA just do that所以为什么PGA不这样做?
569let everybody use a cart or give everyone the option of using a cart and让每个人都用推车 或者让每个人都可以选择用推车
570let them pick让他们选吧
571so the traditionalist can say well I still choose to walk the course所以传统主义者可以说,我仍然选择走这条路
572but I do that knowing that I will be more但我知道 我会更
573tired at the end than the people who took the cart最终比开车的人累了
574all right so what about Jenny's solution那珍妮的解决方案呢?
575for the sake of fairness为了公平起见
576don't give Casey Martin an advantage别让凯西·马丁占优势
577if indeed there is an advantage to riding in a cart如果坐马车确实有优势的话
578let everyone who wants to让所有想
579use a cart用推车
580is everyone happy with that solution大家对这个方案满意吗?
581does it put to rest this whole dilemma这是否结束了这个困境?
582who has an answer for Jenny谁有珍妮的答案
583as was brought up last time if you do that you上次被提起的话
584you kind of ruin some of the spirit of golf as a lot of people like to see it你毁了一些高尔夫精神 作为很多人喜欢看到它。
585if you let everybody take a cart如果你让大家坐车
586even though it gives everybody the same playing field now虽然它现在给大家同样的游戏场地
587it sort of makes有点像
588golf less of高尔夫球少一点
589an athletic game like运动游戏,比如
590you pointed out last class你指出最后一课
591it's just like这就像
592if someone decides to go into another sport如果有人决定去参加另一个运动
593and they want an advantage like他们想要一个优势
594if you have swimming如果你有游泳的话
595and then you say okay he wants flippers so why don't we just allow everyone to have然后你说好吧,他想要翻车 所以我们为什么不让每个人都有
596flippers doing swimming翻车游泳
597and what would that do to the以及那会如何影响
598Olympic swimming competition if people were free to use如果人们可以自由使用奥林匹克游泳比赛
599Jenny and here we better let Jenny reply to this珍妮,我们最好让珍妮回答这个问题
600Da says爸爸说
601it would sort of spoil the spirit of the athletic competition那会破坏运动比赛的精神
602as if in Olympic swimming you let就像在奥运会游泳一样
603anyone who wanted to任何人谁想
604swim with flippers用翻转器游泳
605all right Jenny what do you say to Da?珍妮,你对达说什么?
606it would spoil the spirit of it它会破坏它的精神
607you're also ruining the spirit of golf by not letting people who are really你还在破坏高尔夫精神 不让真正的人
608passionate about the game and very good at it对游戏充满激情,而且很擅长
609compete simply because仅仅因为
610of an aspect of golf which is not高尔夫球的某个方面不是
611the main point of golf is you use this高尔夫球的要点是用这个
612club to make strokes and hit it into a hole帮会打个洞
613I'm sorry I'm not a golfer对不起,我不是高尔夫球手
614but that's basically the gist of the game from what I see it and I was但基本上这就是游戏的要点 从我所看到的,我是
615reading the PJ versus读取 PJ 相对
616Casey Martin decision that was one of the凯西・马丁的决定,这是其中之一
617sentences that they said is他们说的句子
618because walking the course is not an inherent part of golf only swinging the因为走着路不是高尔夫球的固有部分
619club is good so俱乐部不错啊
620Jenny replies to Da珍妮回答达
621well不错
622it isn't really essential anyhow to walk the course so we're back to the走路也没什么大不了的 所以我们回去了
623purpose目的
624I mean I'm sure there are like wheelchair basketball there are certain我的意思是,我相信有 像轮椅篮球 有确定
625different不同
626competitions that can be made for people who能够为那些
627may only be able to use their arms只能用他们的手臂
628yes
629Michael what do you think?迈克尔,你觉得呢?
630and you just said that there's stuff like wheelchair basketball where if你刚才说有些东西 比如轮椅篮球
631you can't play basketball there's another option I think there's other options你打篮球不行 还有别的办法
632in the PGA tour but the PGA tour is like it's the best it's the pinnacle在PGA巡回演唱会中,但PGA巡回演唱会就像它是最好的,它是顶峰
633and you have to have certain requirements你必须要有某些要求
634fulfilled to perform已履行
635all right Michael you want to say to Casey Martin you go there is such a好吧,迈克尔,你想对凯西马丁说 你去那里是这样一个
636thing as the Special Olympics特别奥运会
637for those who are disabled残疾人
638go play in the golf golfing version of the Special Olympics that's what you去打高尔夫高尔夫 版本的特别奥运 这就是你
639would say Michael会说迈克尔
640I think that walking is part of the sport of golf and Casey Martin you know you can't我认为走路是高尔夫和凯西马丁运动的一部分 你知道你不能
641if you can't walk the course I don't think you should be able to play on the PGA如果你走不动的话 我想你不该在PGA上玩
642all right good thank you very much for that exchange好极了,谢谢你的交流
643what comes out of this exchange这次交易的来历
644that goes back to Aristotle's theory of justice回到亚里士多德的正义理论
645well one thing is还有一件事
646the question is walking an essential part of golf问题是走在高尔夫球的重要部分
647the very fact that deciding whether there is a right决定是否存在一项权利的事实
648for Casey Martin that the PGA must respect seems to depend对于凯西・马丁,PGA必须尊重 似乎依赖于
649as Aristotle suggests it must正如亚里士多德建议的那样
650on debating and resolving the question辩论和解决问题
651{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}行走是绝对必要的 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}我
652to the game of golf进入高尔夫球场
653that's one moral of the story这是故事的道德
654but there's a second moral但有第二个道德
655to the story from an Aristotelian point of view从阿里斯托特利安的角度
656what's at stake here这里有什么危险
657this is the second Aristotelian这是第二个阿里斯托莲
658stake in this debate辩论的重要性
659is honor是荣誉
660Casey Martin wants凯西・马丁想要
661the accommodation so that he can compete他的住处,以便他竞争
662for the honor为了荣誉
663of winning the best tournaments赢得最佳联赛
664why is it为什么
665that the professional golfers职业高尔夫球手
666the great golfers testified in this case伟大的高尔夫球手在这案子作证
667Jack Nicklaus杰克·尼克劳斯
668Tom Kite汤姆·基特
669in the readings在读数中
670against letting them use a cart反对他们用推车
671and they I suspect would be equally vehement Jenny我怀疑他们同样会激怒珍妮
672in opposing反对
673your suggestion你的建议
674of letting everyone ride a cart让所有人骑车
675and this goes back in a way to Dodd's point这可以追溯到多德的观点
676how to put this怎么说呢?
677gently轻轻地
678professional golfers职业高尔夫球员
679are sensitive敏感
680about whether their sport is really a sport关于他们的运动是否真的是一种运动
681because if everyone rode around in a cart or could因为如果每个人都骑着马车到处走 或者可以
682then it would become就会变成
683clear清除
684or clearer depending on your point of view或者根据你的观点更清晰
685that golf is not really an athletic competition but rather a game a game of skill高尔夫球其实不是体育比赛 而是技能比赛
686but not a sport但不是运动
687and so not only the question of debating the purpose不仅仅是辩论目的的问题
688the teleological feature电话学特征
689but also from the standpoint但从观点来看
690of viewing debates about the purpose of golf what's essential to golf those debates Aristotle对高尔夫球目的的观察 对亚里士多德辩论至关重要
691suggests建议
692inevitably are also debates也必然是辩论
693about the allocation of honor关于荣誉分配
694because part of the purpose of golf因为高尔夫的部分目的
695is not just to amuse spectators不只是取笑观众
696what is wrong about that这有什么不对?
697from Aristotle's point of view从亚里士多德的观点
698it's not just to provide entertainment it's not just to make people happy不只是提供娱乐 不只是让人们快乐
699it's not a mere amusement这不是一个简单的娱乐
700it's honoring it's rewarding it's recognizing a certain kind of athletic excellence它的荣誉 它的奖励 它承认 某种运动优异
701at least起码
702those who have achieved the highest honors have a powerful stake获得最高荣誉的人有重大利益
703in maintaining that view持这种观点的国家
704now some of you took the position, the Scalia position现在你们中有些人采取了立场, 斯卡利亚的立场
705this is an incredibly difficult and silly question, Scalia said斯卡利亚说,这是一个非常困难和愚蠢的问题
706what is the essential nature of golf it's not the kind of thing that the United States高尔夫的基本性质 并不是美国
707Supreme Court is equipped to decide最高法院有能力裁定
708or should decide或应当决定
709that's Scalia这是斯卡利亚
710but he only says that但他只说
711because he takes a very strong and as it happens因为他很强壮,而且...
712Aristotelian 立场
713on what a game is游戏是什么
714it is the very nature of a game to have no object游戏的本质就是没有对象
715no point无意义
716except amusement除了娱乐
717says Scalia that is what distinguishes games he says from productive activityScalia说,这就是他所说的游戏与生产活动之间的区别
718you can just imagine what kind of sports fans Scalia must be你可以想象什么样的运动迷 Scalia必须是
719and so he says it's impossible to say that any of a game's arbitrary rules所以他说不可能说任何游戏的任意规则
720is essential关键
721and then he quotes Mark Twain's然后他引用马克・吐温的
722disparaging remark about golf贬低高尔夫的话
723he says many consider walking to be the central feature of golf hence Mark Twain's classic他说许多人认为步行是高尔夫球的中心特色 所以马克吐温的经典
724criticism of the sport对体育运动的批评
725a good walk spoiled不错的散步被宠坏了
726but Scalia但斯卡利亚
727misses错过
728an important feature of games游戏的重要特征
729and the arguments about rights and fairness that arise from games以及游戏中出现的关于权利和公平的论点
730when he casts当他抛下去的时候,
731games, sports, athletic competitions as solely for the sake of amusement比赛、运动、运动比赛 只是为了娱乐
732as solely a utilitarian作为纯粹的功利主义者
733activity活动
734but an Aristotelian view of sports says no it's not just about amusement但阿里斯托特利安对体育的看法说, 不仅仅是娱乐
735real sports, real athletic events are also about appreciation not just amusement真正的运动,真正的体育赛事 也是为了欣赏 不仅仅是娱乐
736and people who follow sports and care about sports and play sports know this跟着运动和关心运动和运动的人知道这一点
737which is another way of saying这是另一种说法
738there's a difference between a sport and a mere spectacle运动和场景是有区别的
739and the difference is而区别是
740that a sport is a practice运动是一种练习
741that calls forth呼唤
742and honors and prizes荣誉和奖赏
743certain excellences, certain virtues某些优秀,某些美德
744and the people who appreciate those virtues以及欣赏这些美德的人
745are the true fans, the informed fans真正的粉丝 知情的粉丝
746and for them watching the sport is not mere他们不只观察游戏,
747amusement but that means娱乐,但这意味着
748that it's always possible to make sense of a debate总是可以让辩论有意义
749about关于
750what feature of a sport运动的什么特点
751is essential to it. We can make sense of these arguments never mind the question这一点至关重要。 我们可以理会这些争论 不必理会这个问题
752whether the court should decide法院是否应当作出
753the PGA in its own internal deliberations can make sense议员全球行动联盟在其内部审议中可以讲得通
754of that debate which is why they cared very much所以他们很关心
755about their view关于他们的观点
756insisting on their view坚持他们的观点
757that walking and exertion and fatigue are essential not peripheral parts步行、锻炼和疲劳是最重要的 而不是外围的部分
758of sport体育
759this is all to illustrate这都是为了说明
760the teleological and the honorific和荣誉
761feature特性
762of debates about rights有关权利的辩论
763which Aristotle says亚里士多德说
764we need to take account of我们需要考虑
765in thinking about justice思考正义
766I want to begin for us to consider我想开始考虑
767whether Aristotle's theory of justice亚里士多德的正义理论
768is right or wrong是对是错
769whether it's persuasive or unpersuasive无论是有说服力还是没有说服力
770I want to get your thoughts about that我想得到你的想法 关于这个
771but I want to anticipate one但我想预料到一个
772obvious and important objection明显和重要的反对
773if justice is about fit如果正义是适当的
774fitting persons to roles适合角色的人
775matching virtues匹配优点
776to the appropriate honors and recognition荣誉和承认
777if that's what justice is如果这就是正义
778does it leave room for freedom它是否为自由留下了空间
779and this is one of the main objections这是主要反对之一
780to Aristotle's去亚里士多德家
781personal account of justice个人司法情况
782if certain roles social roles are fitting or appropriate to me如果某些角色 社交角色适合或适合我
783where does that leave my right我的权利在哪里
784to choose选择
785my social roles我的社会角色
786my life purposes我的生命目标
787for myself为了我自己
788what room does teleology leave for freedom and in fact电传学为自由留下什么房间,事实上
789you may remember你可能记得
790Aristotle rejects亚里士多德拒绝
791teleological accounts of justice司法学术语
792because he says that因为他说
793teleological电话学
794theories of justice司法理论
795threaten威胁
796the equal basic rights of citizens公民的平等权利
797so let's所以,让我们
798let's begin to examine让我们开始检查
799whether Aristotle is right and in particular亚里士多德是否正确,特别是
800whether his teleological way of thinking about justice is at odds with freedom他对正义的思考方式是否与自由相悖
801now one obvious现在一个明显的
802reason to worry不用担心
803is Aristotle's defense of slavery是亚里士多德捍卫奴隶制
804he defends他辩护
805slavery奴役
806which existed as an institution作为机构存在
807in the Athens of his day他的雅典时代
808well what is his defense of slavery他为奴隶制辩护的是什么呢?
809two things two conditions have to be met两个条件必须满足
810for slavery to be just使奴隶制公正
811first第一个
812it has to be necessary一定要这样
813and Aristotle says at least in our society slavery is necessary亚里士多德说至少在我们的社会中 奴隶制是必要的
814why is it necessary为什么一定要
815if there are to be citizens如果有公民的话
816who are freed from manual and menial and household chores摆脱体力劳动、体力劳动和家务劳动;
817to go to the assembly去参加大会
818to deliberate about politics讨论政治
819there have to be some一定有一些
820who look after those menial tasks照顾这些日常工作
821the mere necessities of life仅仅是生活必需品
822he says unless you could invent in some science fiction他说除非你能发明一些科幻小说
823a technological fix技术修正
824then there are going to be those who have to do那样的话,就会有人做
825the hard and difficult and menial labor if there are to be citizens如果有公民,则需要艰苦、困难和体力劳动;
826deliberating about the good考虑好
827and realizing their nature并实现其性质
828so slavery is necessary因此,奴役是必要的
829for the life of the polis for there to be open to citizens为大都会的生活 向公民开放
830the life of deliberation of argument of practical wisdom实际智慧论点的审议寿命
831but there's a further condition that has to be met但还有一个条件必须满足
832slavery has not only to be necessary for the community as a whole to function奴隶制不仅是整个社区运作的必要条件;
833but it also has to be the case remember the criterion of fit但也必须记住适合的标准
834it also has to be the case that there are some people for whom being a slave一定还有一些人是奴隶
835is the just or the fitting or the appropriate condition公正或合适或适当的条件
836Aristotle亚里士多德
837agrees that by his own standards both of those conditions must be met must be同意根据他自己的标准,必须满足这两个条件:
838true if slavery is to be just如果奴隶制是正义的
839and then in a deplorable passage然后在悲惨的一段
840he says well it is true他说的没错
841that there are some people who are fit by nature who are cut out to be slaves有些人天生就适合当奴隶
842these are people who differ from ordinary people这些是不同于普通人的人
843in the same way以同样的方式
844that the body differs from the soul these are people who are meant to be身体与灵魂不同 这些是本该是的人
845ruled and for them统治和为他们
846their nature is best realized if they're slaves如果他们是奴隶,他们本性最好能实现
847they can recognize reason in others他们能识别别人的理性
848but they can't partake of it they can't exercise it但他们不能参与其中 他们不能锻炼它
849and somehow we can know this不知怎的,我们可以知道
850now现在
851Aristotle must have known that there was something dodgy something strained亚里士多德一定知道 有一些东西 杜迪的东西 紧张
852about this claim关于这项索赔
853because he quickly acknowledges因为他很快承认
854that those who disagree may have a point分歧者或许有观点,
855and what those who disagree point out is that there are分歧者指出,
856a lot of people in Athens who are slaves雅典很多人都是奴隶
857not because they were born to be slaves不是因为他们生来就是奴隶
858or fit to be slaves或适合成为奴隶
859but because they were captured they were losers in a war因为他们被俘虏了 他们是在战争中的失败者
860and so Aristotle admits that as practiced in ancient Athens所以亚里士多德承认了 在古雅典的实践
861slavery didn't necessarily line up with who actually is fit or born to be a slave奴隶不一定和谁真正适合或生来就是奴隶
862because some actual slaves just were slaves by bad luck by being captured in a war因为一些真正的奴隶只是 运气不好的奴隶 在战争中被俘虏
863and on Aristotle's own account even if it's necessary to have slavery for the sake of和亚里士多德的自身利益 即使它是必要的 奴隶制的缘故
864this of citizenship国籍
865it's unjust这不公平
866if people who aren't properly slaves are cast in that role there is a misfit如果那些不正经的奴隶 被摆上这个角色... ...就会有不适
867Aristotle recognizes that slavery for those who aren't fit for the task is a kind of coercion亚里士多德承认 对那些不适合任务的人的奴役是一种强迫
868the reason slavery is wrong is not because it's coerced, coercion is an indicator that奴隶制度错误的原因不是因为它是强迫的, 强迫是一种指标,
869it's wrong错了
870because it's not natural因为这不是自然的
871if you have to coerce someone into a role如果你不得不强迫某人扮演一个角色
872that's a pretty good indication这是个好迹象
873that they don't belong there that that role isn't fitting for them他们不属于那里 那角色不适合他们
874and Aristotle recognized this亚里士多德意识到这一点
875so all of this is to say the example of slavery, Aristotle's defense of it doesn't show that亚里士多德对奴隶制的辩护并不能证明
876there's anything wrong in principle原则上说有问题
877with teleological argument or with the idea of justice as fit或以适当的司法观点
878between persons and roles个人与角色之间
879because it's perfectly possible within Aristotle's own terms因为亚里士多德自己的条款是完全可能的
880to explain解释
881what's wrong或
882with this application使用此应用程序
883this practical application that he made of his theory这个实际应用 他的理论
884I want to turn我想转身
885to the larger challenge to Aristotle in the name of freedom but before I do that以自由的名义挑战亚里士多德
886I want toи稱
887see what people think看别人怎么想
888of Aristotle's account亚里士多德的账户
889of justice as fit司法公正
890his teleological way他的传奇方式
891a reasoning about justice关于司法的推理
892and the honorific dimension和荣誉层面
893of rights权利宣言
894and of distributive justice that emerged in our discussion我们讨论中出现的分配公正
895of flutes笛子数
896and politics政 务
897and golf高尔夫球
898questions of clarification about Aristotle澄清亚里士多德的问题
899or
900objections反对
901to his overall合计
902account账户
903yes
904my objection to我反对
905Aristotle is that he wants to match亚里士多德想配合
906a person to a role and you know if you walk like a pirate and you talk like a pirate一个人对一个角色,你知道 如果你走路像海盗, 你说话像海盗
907you know you should be a pirate and that is what is right你知道你应该是一个海盗,这是对的
908and so就这样
909what's strange and奇怪的东西
910paradoxical to me about Aristotle's关于亚里士多德的矛盾
911viewpoint视图
912is that这是
913if you walk如果你走的话
914like a pirate and you talk like a pirate you shouldn't be an investment banker像海盗,你说话像海盗 你不应该是一个投资银行家
915because因为
916that's not what you inherently supposed to do if you have a peg leg and an eye patch如果你有双腿和眼罩 你本不该这么做的
917and a disgruntled disposition和不满的处置
918you know uh... you should be on a pirate ship on the high seas你应该在公海上的海盗船上
919uh... so he doesn't所以他不会
920his uh...他的额...
921some would say some would say有人会说有人会说
922the distinction between the two vocations is not as clear as you suggest两种职业的区别并不像你建议的那样明确
923alright but that's good i take the point好吧,但是这很好,我明白了
924it just seems to ignore individual rights so i might be它只是似乎忽略了个人权利 所以我可能是
925the perfect janitor in the whole world and i can do that job the most全世界最完美的清洁工 我最能胜任
926efficiently out of anybody高效地离开任何人
927that exists right now but i might not want to do that现在已经存在 但我可能不想这么做
928i might want to do我也许想做
929any other number of pursuits and it seems to say that that任何其他的追击行动 似乎都说
930isn't really a good option for me对我来说不是一个好选择
931alright and what's your name?好吧,你叫什么名字来着?
932Mary Kate玛丽・凯特
933alright let's uh... let's take a couple more好吧,我们... 我们再多吃两杯
934i think that the我觉得
935golf cart exchange高尔夫球车交换机
936sort of brought up有点长大了
937what i see as my main objection to this我认为这是我的主要反对意见
938theological神学
939uh... mode of reasoning呃... 推理模式
940michael i think that was your name right迈克尔,我想那是你的名字对的
941believes that walking is an认为行走是一种
942inherent part of golf高尔夫的固有部分
943myself自己来
944i believe that walking is not an inherent part of golf我相信走路不是高尔夫的固有组成部分
945and i feel that no matter我觉得不管怎样
946how long多长时间
947we debate我们辩论
948this particular这个特别
949point of contention争议点
950we're never going to reach an accord我们永远不会达成协议
951the theological神学
952framework框架
953of reasoning i believe doesn't really allow us推理,我相信不 真正允许我们
954to come to any sort of agreement达成任何协议
955alright and what's your name?好吧,你叫什么名字来着?
956Patrick, alright let me try to address帕特里克,好吧,让我试着谈谈
957this set of objections to Aristotle对亚里士多德的这组反对
958let me start with Patrick's让我从帕特里克的开始
959it's an important objection这是一个重要的反对
960we had a debate about whether我们辩论过是否
961walking is essential to golf and even in so seemingly trivial or at least走路对打高尔夫很重要 即使在这么小的 或者至少
962contained the cases that we couldn't agree包括我们无法同意的案件
963how can we possibly hope to agree我们怎么可能希望同意
964when the stakes are higher当赌注更高的时候,
965and when we're debating the fundamental purposes or ends of political community当我们辩论政治团体的基本宗旨或目的时
966and so if we can't agree所以,如果我们不能同意
967and what the ends or the goods以及什么是终点或货物
968of our shared public life consist in我们共同的公共生活
969how can we base justice and rights我们如何以正义和权利为基础
970on some notion在某些概念上
971of what the end or the purpose or the good目的或好处
972consists in包含在
973that's an important objection这是一个重要的反对
974so much so这么多
975that much modern political theory现代政治理论
976takes that worry about disagreement over the good as its starting point将担心对善的分歧作为起点
977and
978concludes结论
979that那个
980justice and rights司法与权利
981and constitutions should not be based on any particular conception of the good or the宪法不应基于任何特定的利益概念或
982purposes目的
983of political lifeB. 政治生活中的歧视
984but should instead provide a framework of rights that leaves people free to choose相反,应当提供一个权利框架,使人们可以自由选择
985their conceptions of the good他们对善的概念
986their own conceptions of the purposes of life他们自己的人生目的概念
987now Mary Kate现在,玛丽・凯特
988said
989what if a person is very well suited to having a certain role like the role of being a janitor如果一个人非常适合扮演一个像清洁工的角色
990but what something else wants to reach higher但其他东西想达到更高的
991wants to choose another way of life想选择另一种生活方式
992so that goes back to this question about freedom所以这又回到关于自由的问题
993if we take our bearing as persons如果我们把身体作为人
994from roles that are said to fit our nature从据说符合我们本性的角色
995shouldn't it at least be up to us to decide what those roles are至少应该由我们来决定这些角色是什么
996in fact shouldn't it be up to us to define其实不应该由我们来定义
997what roles are suitable to us什么样的角色适合我们
998and that's going to take us back那会带我们回去
999to the confrontation between Aristotle on the one hand and Kant and Rawls on the other亚里士多德与康德和罗尔斯的对抗
1000Kant and Rawls康德和罗尔斯
1001and Patrick has a point帕特里克说得有道理
1002they say precisely because people disagree他们说,正因为人们不同意
1003in pluralist societies在多元化社会中
1004about the nature of the good life关于美好生活的性质
1005we shouldn't try to base justice on any particular answer to that question我们不应该试图把正义建立在这个问题的任何特定答案之上
1006so they reject teleology所以他们拒绝电传
1007they reject the idea of tying justice to some conception of the good他们拒绝将正义与正义联系起来的想法,
1008what's at stake in the debate about teleology关于电传学的争论有什么关系?
1009say
1010Rawlsian and Kantian liberals罗尔西安和康德自由主义者
1011says this说这个
1012if you tie justice to a particular conception of the good如果你把正义 与一个特别的好概念联系起来
1013if you see justice as a matter of fit between a person and his or her roles如果你认为正义是个人与其角色之间的问题
1014you don't leave room for freedom你不留自由空间
1015and to be free和获得自由
1016is to be这将是
1017independent of独立
1018any particular roles任何特定角色
1019or traditions或传统
1020or conventions或公约
1021that may be handed down by my parents可能由我父母下达
1022or my society或者我的社会
1023so in order to decide因此,为了决定
1024as between these two broad traditions在这两种广泛传统之间
1025whether Aristotle is right亚里士多德是否正确
1026or whether Kant and Rawls are right或者康德和罗尔斯是否正确
1027we need to investigate我们需要调查
1028whether the right is prior to the good, question one问题一:权利是否在善良之前,
1029and we need to investigate我们需要调查
1030what it means这是什么意思
1031to be a free person成为自由人
1032a free moral agent自由的道德代理人
1033does freedom require自由需要吗?
1034that I stand toward my roles, my ends and my purposes as an agent of choice我站在我的角色, 我的目的和目的 作为选择的代理人
1035or as someone trying to discover或试图发现
1036what my nature really is我的本性是怎样的
1037two big questions两个大问题
1038and we'll take them up next time我们下次再拿
1039funding for this program is provided by方案经费由下列机构提供:
1040additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1040 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P12 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p12 11. 11.共同责任的辩论 (P12)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00Today we turn to Kant's reply to Aristotle.今天我们来看康德对亚里士多德的答复.
0:17Kant thinks康德觉得
0:20that Aristotle亚里士多德
0:22just made a mistake只是犯了个错误
0:25it's one thing这是一件事
0:27Kant says康德说
0:28to support a fair framework of rights支持公平的权利框架
0:32within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life在其中,人们可以追求自己的美好生活概念
0:38it's something else是别的东西
0:40it's something that runs the risk of coercion这是有强迫风险的东西
展开字幕全文(1090 条)
序号英文中文
1Today we turn to Kant's reply to Aristotle.今天我们来看康德对亚里士多德的答复.
2Kant thinks康德觉得
3that Aristotle亚里士多德
4just made a mistake只是犯了个错误
5it's one thing这是一件事
6Kant says康德说
7to support a fair framework of rights支持公平的权利框架
8within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life在其中,人们可以追求自己的美好生活概念
9it's something else是别的东西
10it's something that runs the risk of coercion这是有强迫风险的东西
11to base law or principles of justice以司法为根据的法律或原则
12on any particular conception任何特定概念
13of the good life.幸福的一生,
14You remember Aristotle says in order to investigate the ideal constitution we have first to figure你记得亚里士多德说过 为了调查理想的宪法 我们首先要确定
15out the best way to live走出最好的生活方式
16Kant would reject that idea康德会拒绝这个想法
17he says that constitutions and laws and rights should not他说,宪法、法律和权利不应该
18embody or affirm or promote any particular体现、确认或促进任何特定
19way of life生活方式
20that's at odds with freedom这与自由相悖
21for Aristotle亚里士多德
22the whole point of law整个法律要点
23the purpose of the polis大都会的目的
24is to shape character是要塑造字符
25to cultivate the virtue of citizens培养公民的美德;
26to inculcate civic excellence* 向公民灌输优秀知识;
27to make possible a good way of life创造美好生活方式
28that's what he tells us in the politics这是他在政治方面告诉我们的
29for Kant on the other hand对康德来说
30the purpose of law法律的目的
31the point of a constitution is not to inculcate or to promote宪法的意义不是灌输或提倡
32virtue贞操
33it's to set up a fair framework of rights建立公平的权利框架
34within which其中
35citizens may be free to pursue their own conceptions of the good for themselves公民可以自由地追求自己的福利概念
36so we see the difference所以我们看到了区别
37in their theories of justice司法理论
38we see the difference in their account of我们从他们的说法中看到不同之处
39law法律
40or the role of a constitution宪法的作用
41the point of politics政治的意义
42and underlying these differences造成这些差异的原因
43are two different accounts of what it means to be a free person是两个不同的说法 一个自由的人意味着什么
44for Aristotle亚里士多德
45we're free我们自由了
46insofar as we have the capacity to realize our potential只要我们有能力实现我们的潜力
47and that leads us并引导我们
48to the question of fit问题的审议
49fit between persons and the roles that are appropriate to them适合个人和适合他们的角色
50figuring out what I'm cut out for想知道我该做什么
51that's what it means这就是它的意思
52to lead a free life, to live up to my potential过着自由的生活 尽我所能
53Kant rejects that idea康德拒绝这个想法
54and instead substitutes his代之而来
55famously demanding notion著名的高要求概念
56of freedom as the capacity自由作为能力
57to act autonomously自主行动
58freedom自由权
59is acting according to a law I give myself是依照法律行事 我给自己
60freedom as autonomy自由作为自治
61part of the appeal上诉部分
62part of the moral force道德力量的一部分
63of the view of Kant and of Rawls康德和罗尔斯的观点
64consists in包含在
65the conception of the person人的概念
66as a free and independent self自由独立的自我
67the individual of choosing his or her own ends选择自己目的的个人
68the image of the self as free and independent自由与独立的自我形象
69offers, if you think about it, a powerful liberating vision because what it says is提供,如果你考虑它, 一个强大的解放的愿景,因为它所说的是
70that as free moral persons作为自由的道德人士
71we are not bound我们不受约束
72by any ties任何联系
73of history历史
74or of tradition或传统
75or of inherited status或继承地位
76that we haven't chosen for ourselves我们没有为自己选择
77and so we're unbound by any moral ties prior to our choosing them所以我们在选择他们之前 没有道德联系
78and that means这意味着
79that means that we are这意味着我们
80free and independent sovereign selves, we're the authors of the only obligations that constrain自由和独立的主权自我,我们是限制
81us我们
82the communitarian critics社区批评者
83of Kantian and Rawlsian liberalism康斯坦丁和罗尔斯自由主义
84acknowledge that there is something承认有东西
85powerful and inspiring强大和鼓舞人心
86in that account of freedom以自由为理由
87free independent choosing self自由独立选择自己
88but they argue但他们争论
89it misses something它错过了什么
90it misses the whole dimension of moral life and even它错过了道德生活的整个方面,甚至
91it can't make sense of our moral experience because it can't account无法解释我们的道德经历 因为它无法解释
92for certain moral and political obligations某些道德和政治义务
93that we commonly recognize and even prize我们通常承认,甚至奖励
94and these include obligations of membership, loyalty, solidarity包括成员资格、忠诚、团结的义务
95and other moral ties that may claim us for reasons以及可能因故要求我们
96that we can't trace to an act of consent我们无法追查到同意的行为
97Alastair McIntyre阿拉斯泰尔·麦金泰尔
98gives an account提供账户
99what he calls a narrative conception他所谓的叙事概念
100of the self, it's a different account自我,这是另一个说法
101of the self自我保护
102human beings are essentially storytelling creatures人类基本上是讲故事的生物
103McIntyre argues麦金泰尔认为
104that means这意味着
105I can only answer the question我只能回答这个问题
106what am I to do我该怎么办?
107if I can answer the prior question如果我能回答前一个问题
108of what story or stories do I find myself apart我发现自己与世隔绝
109that's what he means by the narrative conception这就是他所说的叙事概念
110of the self自我保护
111what does this have to do这有什么关系
112with the idea of community与社区思想
113and belonging和所属
114McIntyre says this麦金泰说
115once you accept this narrative aspect of moral reflection一旦你接受了道德反思的这个叙事方面
116you will notice你会注意到
117that we can never seek for the good我们永远无法为善
118or exercise the virtues only as individuals或只作为个人行使美德
119we all approach our circumstance as bearers of particular social identities我们都把我们的处境视为具有特殊社会特征的人
120I am someone's son or daughter我是别人的儿女
121a citizen of this or that city这座或那个城市的公民
122I belong to this plan, that tribe, this nation我属于这个计划 那个部落 这个民族
123hence McIntyre argues因此麦金泰尔认为
124what is good for me对我有好处的
125it has to be the good for someone who inhabits these roles一定对这个角色的人有好处
126I inherit from the past of my family, my city, my tribe, my nation我继承了家族、城市、部落、国家
127a variety of debts, inheritances, expectations and obligations各种债务、遗产、期望和义务
128these constitute the given它们构成给定的
129of my life, my moral starting point我生命的起点
130this is in part what gives my life这是一部分给我的生命
131its moral其道德规范
132particularity特性
133that's the narrative conception of the self这就是自我的叙事概念
134and
135it's a conception that sees the self as claimed or encumbered这是一个概念,认为自己是 声称或作保
136at least to some extent至少在某种程度上
137by the history, the tradition根据历史,传统
138the communities社区
139of which it's a part这是其中的一部分
140we can't make sense of our lives我们的生活没有意义
141not only as a psychological matter but also as a moral matter in thinking what不仅是心理问题,也是道德问题
142we ought to do我们应该做
143without attending to these features不注意这些特性
144about us关于我们
145McIntyre recognizes麦金塔认出来了
146that this narrative account, this picture of the encumbered self这段叙述,这幅图画的自我
147puts his account把他的账户
148at odds with
149contemporary liberalism and individualism当代自由主义和个人主义
150from the standpoint of individualism从个人主义的角度
151I am
152what I myself choose to be我选择的
153I may biologically be my father's son but I can't be held responsible for what我可能生来就是我父亲的儿子 但我不能对什么负责
154he did没错
155unless I choose to assume such responsibility除非我愿意承担这种责任
156I can't be held responsible for what my country does我不能为国家所做的事负责
157or has done或已完成
158unless I choose to assume such responsibility除非我愿意承担这种责任
159but McIntyre says this reflects a certain kind of moral但麦金泰尔说这反映了某种道德
160shallowness浅度
161even blindness连瞎都看不见
162it's a blindness at odds with the full measure of responsibility which这是盲目 与全方位的责任
163sometimes he says involves有时候他说,涉及
164collective responsibility集体责任
165or responsibilities that may flow from historic memories历史记忆中可能产生的责任
166and he gives some examples他举了一些例子
167such individualism is expressed by those contemporary Americans这些当代美国人表达了这种个人主义
168who deny any responsibility for the effects of slavery upon black否认对奴隶制对黑人的影响负有责任的人
169Americans saying美国人说
170I never owned any slaves我没有奴隶
171or the young German或年轻的德国人
172who believes他们确信,
173that having been born after 1945出生于1945年之后
174means that what Nazis did to Jews has no moral relevance to his relationship意味着纳粹对犹太人的所作所为 与他的关系没有道德关系
175to his Jewish contemporaries他的犹太时代
176McIntyre says all of these attitudes麦金泰说所有这些态度
177of historical amnesia历史失忆症
178amount to a kind of moral abdication相当于一种道德放弃
179once you see当你看到
180that who we are我们是谁
181and what it means以及这意味着什么
182to sort out our obligations解决我们的义务
183can't be separated不能分开
184shouldn't be separated不应该分开的
185from the life histories从生命史上
186that define us这决定了我们
187the contrast he says他说的对比
188when the narrative account is clear当叙述清楚时
189for the story of my life为了我一生的故事
190is always embedded in the story of those communities from which I derived my identity永远被植根于那些社区的故事 我从中产生我的特性
191I am born with the past and to try to cut myself off from that past我生来就与过去同在 试图与过去隔绝
192is to deform是变形
193my present我的礼物
194relationships关系
195so there you have in McIntyre在麦金泰尔
196a strong statement of the idea对想法的有力声明
197{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}那个自我
198can't be detached shouldn't be detached不能脱离,不应该脱离
199from its particular从它的特定方面
200ties of membership成员关系
201history历史
202story故事
203narrative说明
204now I want to get your reactions现在我想得到你的反应
205to the communitarian critique对社区批评
206of the individualist个人
207or the voluntrist或自愿者
208the unencumbered self未支配余额
209but let's make it concrete so that you can react to more than just the theory of it但是,让我们让它变得具体 这样你就可以反应 不只是它的理论
210by looking at通过观看
211the two different accounts of moral and political obligation that arise关于道德和政治义务的两种不同说法
212depending on which of these conceptions of the person根据这些人的这些概念,
213one accepts一个接受
214on the liberal conception自由概念
215moral and political obligations arise道德和政治义务的产生
216in one of two ways以两种方式之一
217there are natural duties有自然义务
218that we owe human beings as such我们欠人类的
219duties of respect for persons qua persons尊重人的义务
220these obligations这些义务
221are universal普及
222then接下来
223as Rawls points out正如罗尔斯指出的
224there are also voluntary obligations还有自愿义务
225obligations that we owe to particular others我们对特定其他人的义务
226insofar as we have agreed我们同意
227whether through a promise是否通过承诺
228or a deal或交易
229or a contract或合同
230now the issue between现在的问题是
231the liberal and communitarian accounts of the self自由主义和共产主义的自我
232is there another category是否有另一个类别
233of obligation义务
234or not?还是没有?
235the communitarian says there is共产主义者说有
236there is a third category that might be called obligations of solidarity or loyalty or membership第三类可以称为团结、忠诚或成员资格的义务。
237the communitarian argues that共产主义者认为:
238construing all obligations解释所有义务
239as either natural duties作为自然义务之一
240or voluntary obligations或自愿义务
241fails to capture obligations of membership or solidarity未能履行成员资格或团结的义务
242loyalties whose moral force consists partly in the fact忠诚者,其道德力量部分在于事实
243that living by them住在他们身边的人
244is inseparable from understanding ourselves as the particular persons we are与了解我们自己作为特殊的人是不可分割的
245what would be some examples什么样的例子
246and then I want to see how you would然后我想看看你会怎样
247react to them对之作出反应
248examples实例
249of obligations of membership成员的义务
250that are particular特别的,
251but don't necessarily flow from consent but rather from但不一定来自同意 而是来自
252membership成员
253narrative说明
254community社区
255and situation局势
256the most common examples are ones最常见的例子是:
257to do with the family与家庭有关
258the relation between parents and children for example例如,父母与子女之间的关系;
259suppose there were two children假设有两个孩子
260drowning淹死
261you could save only one of them你只能救一个
262one was your child the other was a stranger's child一个是你的孩子 另一个是陌生人的孩子
263would you have an obligation你是否有义务
264to flip a coin翻转硬币
265or would there be something会不会有什么
266morally obtuse if you didn't rush to save your child如果你不急着救孩子的话 道德上会很无聊的
267now you may say well parents have agreed现在你可以说父母同意了
268to have their children生儿育女
269so take the other case换个案子吧
270the case of children's obligation for their parents now we don't choose our parents至于孩子对父母的义务 我们现在不选择父母
271we don't even choose to have parents我们甚至没有选择有父母
272there is that asymmetry有一个不对称
273and yet但是,现在
274consider two考虑两个
275aging parents老年父母
276one of them yours其中一个是你的
277the other a stranger's另一个陌生人的
278doesn't it make moral sense to think that you have a greater obligation to look after认为自己有更大的义务照顾自己 这在道德上不合理
279your age of parent父母的年龄
280than to flip a coin而不是翻转硬币
281or to help the strangers或帮助陌生人
282is this traceable to consent这是否可追溯到同意
283not likely可能不会
284or take a couple of political examples或者拿几个政治例子
285during world war two二战期间
286French resistance法国抵抗运动
287pilots flew bombing raids over occupied France飞行员飞来轰炸法国
288one day总有一天
289one of the pilots其中一个飞行员
290received his target收到了目标
291and noticed并且注意到
292that the village he was being asked to bomb被要求轰炸的村庄
293was his home village是他的家乡
294he refused他拒绝了
295not disputing that it was as necessary as the target he bombed yesterday没有反驳他昨天轰炸的目标一样必要
296he refused on the ground that he couldn't bring himself it would be a special moral他以无法自圆其说为由拒绝 这将是一种特殊的道德
297for him to bomb his people让他去轰炸他的族人
298even in a cause即使在事业中
299that he supported他支持我们
300the cause of liberating France解放法国的事业
301do we admire that我们佩服
302if we do如果是这样
303the communitarian argues社会争论
304it's because we do recognize obligations因为我们承认义务
305of solidarity团结
306take another example以另一个例子
307ten years ago there was a famine in Ethiopia十年前埃塞俄比亚发生饥荒
308hundreds of thousands of people were starving几十万人在挨饿
309the israeli government organized an airlift伊斯雷利政府安排了一次空运
310to rescue Ethiopian Jews拯救埃塞俄比亚犹太人
311they didn't have the capacity to rescue everyone in Ethiopia他们没有能力去救埃塞俄比亚的每一个人
312they rescued他们救了我们
313several hundred几百个
314Ethiopian Jews now现在埃塞俄比亚犹太人
315what's your moral assessment is that a kind of你的道德评价是:
316very troubling非常麻烦
317partiality偏颇性
318a kind of prejudice一种偏见
319or
320as the israeli government作为爱尔兰政府
321thought认为
322is there a special obligation of solidarity是否有特别的团结义务
323that this airlift properly适当空运
324responded to答复
325well that takes us to the broader question of patriotism那又怎样,我们才有爱国心
326what morally speaking什么道德论
327is to be said for patriotism可以说是爱国主义
328there are two towns named Franklin one is Franklin Texas and the other is just across the Rio Grande River Franklin Mexico富兰克林一个叫富兰克林 德克萨斯,另一个叫富兰克林 墨西哥河对面
329what is the moral significance of national boundaries国界的道德意义是什么?
330why is it为什么
331or is it the case还是这样
332that we as Americans have a greater responsibility我们美国人有更大的责任
333for the health and the education and the welfare and public provision健康和教育以及福利和公共供给
334for people who live in Franklin Texas富兰克林·德克萨斯人
335then equally needy people那时,有同样需要的人,
336just across the river就在河对岸
337living in Franklin Mexico住在富兰克林墨西哥
338according to the communitarian account membership does matter根据社区账户成员情况
339and the reason patriotism和爱国主义的理由
340is at least potentially a virtue is that it is an expression of至少是种潜在的美德 就是它表现了
341the obligations义务
342of citizenship国籍
343how many数量
344are sympathetic to the idea同情这个想法
345that there is this third category of obligation第三类义务
346the obligations of solidarity or membership团结或成员资格的义务
347how many are sympathetic to that idea有多少人同情这个想法
348and how many are critical of that idea有多少人批评这个想法
349how many think all obligations有多少人认为所有的义务
350can be accounted for可核算
351in the first two ways前两条路
352let's hear from the critics of the communitarian idea first先听批评社区思想的人说
353my biggest concern with我最关心的是
354the idea of having obligations义务的概念
355because you're a member of因为你是
356something or because of solidarity is that某事或因为团结
357it seems that看来
358if you accept those obligations as being sort of morally binding如果你接受这些义务 是一种道德约束
359then there's a greater occurrence of overlapping obligations那么重叠义务的发生增多
360a greater occurrence of发生次数增加
361good versus good好对好
362and I don't know if this sort of framework allows us我不知道这种框架是否允许我们
363to choose between them在它们之间选择
364good and what's your name? Patrick.好,你叫什么名字来着? 派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
365So you worry所以你担心
366that if we recognize obligations of membership or solidarity如果我们承认成员资格或团结的义务
367since we inhabit different communities their claims might conflict因为我们住在不同的社区 他们的主张可能会有冲突
368and what would we do我们该怎么办?
369if we have competing obligations?如果我们有相互竞争的义务呢?
370Well, one solution is that we could view ourselves as一个解决办法是 我们可以把自己看成
371ultimately members of the human community最后是人类社会的成员
372and that还有,
373then within that we have all these smaller spheres of that, you know, I am然后在其中,我们拥有所有这些较小的领域, 你知道,我
374American or I am a student at Harvard美国人或我是哈佛大学的学生
375and so就这样
376the most important最重要的一个
377community to be社区
378obligated to义务
379is这是
380the community of社区
381human beings and then from there you can人类,然后从那里你可以
382sort of evaluate类型评价
383which other ones are most important to you其他的对你最重要
384so the most univer- and what's your name? Nicola所以,最无能的... 你叫什么名字? 尼科拉(签名)
385so Nicola you say the most所以,尼可拉 你说最多
386universal community we inhabit, the community of humankind我们居住的世界性社区,人类社区
387always takes precedence总是优先
388Patrick, are you satisfied?帕特里克,你满意吗?
389Why not?为什么不呢?
390It seems rather arbitrary that we should choose我们选择
391the universal obligation普遍义务
392over the more specific obligation较具体的义务
393I might also say that I should be我也可以说,我应该
394obligated first首先承付
395to the most specific of my obligations, for instance以我最具体的义务为例
396take my family as a small unit把我的家人当成一个小单位
397of solidarity团结
398perhaps I should be first obligated也许 我该承担第一责任
399to that unit给那个单位的
400and then perhaps to the unit of my town然后再去我镇上的单位
401and then my country and then the human race我的国家和人类
402good, thank you很好,谢谢
403let's- I want to hear from我们... 我想听听
404another critic of the communitarian view社区观点的另一个批评者
405we have the objection我们反对
406well what if goods collide如果货物碰撞呢?
407who objects to the whole idea of it?谁反对这个想法?
408who sees他们看见了,
409patriotism is just a kind of prejudice that ideally we should overcome?爱国主义只是我们最好克服的一种偏见?
410yes, patriotism reflects是的,爱国主义反映
411a community membership社区成员
412like a given就像一个给定
413I think the problem is that我觉得问题是
414whereas some不过有些
415memberships are成员为:
416natural narratives自然叙述
417the narrative of说明
418citizenship is a constructed one公民权是人造的
419and I think a false one我觉得一个假的
420because因为
421as the river is just a historical accident因为河只是历史的意外
422it makes no sense that because the lottery of birth threw me into the因为出生的彩票把我扔进
423United States as opposed to美国与
424Mexico墨西哥
425that that's the membership that I should be a part of那就是我应该加入的成员
426good, and what's your name? Elizabeth好,你叫什么名字来着? 伊丽莎白
427Elizabeth, who has a reply?伊丽莎白,谁有答复?
428I think我觉得
429in general一般情况
430we have to ask where do our moral obligations arise from anyway我们必须问我们的道德义务从何而来
431I think basically there'd be two我想基本上有两个
432places from which they could arise, one would be kin他们的亲戚,
433another one would be reciprocity另一个是互惠
434the closer you are associated to other people there's a natural reciprocity你和别人的关系越密切 自然是互惠的
435there in terms of说明
436having拥有
437interactions with those people与这些人的互动
438you老师
439interact with the neighbors on your street, with the other people in your country与你街上的邻居 与你国内的其他人互动
440through economic arrangements, but I don't know, and you don't know those people in经济安排,但我不知道, 你不认识那些人在
441Franklin富兰克林
442Texas any more than you know the people in Franklin, Mexico, do you?比你们更了解墨西哥富兰克林的人,对吧?
443presumably you're naturally more connected with the people in your own假设你天生和别人的关系
444country国家
445in terms of interaction and trade than you are with people in other countries在互动和贸易方面 比你和其它国家的人
446good, who else?好,还有谁?
447yeah, I think that是的,我觉得
448a lot of许多
449the basis for patriotism can be compared to like school spirit or爱国主义的基础可以和学校精神相提并论
450even house spirit that we see here甚至我们在这里看到的房子精神
451where freshmen are sorted into houses and then within a day they have在那里,新生被整理成房屋,然后在一天之内,
452developed some sort of开发了某种
453attachment or pride associated with that house, and so和那栋房子有关联的感情或骄傲,所以
454I think that we can probably draw a distinction between a moral obligation我认为我们可以区分道德义务
455for communitarian beliefs社区信仰
456and sort of just a sentimental emotional attachment有点感情上的感情
457good, wait, stay there, what's your name?好,等等,待在那里, 你叫什么名字?
458Rena丽娜
459what about怎么样
460go back to my example about the obligation of the child to the parent, would you say回到我关于孩子对父母的义务的例子,你会说
461the same thing there, it's just a同样的,它只是一个
462may or may not be a sentimental tie but it has no moral weight?可能还是不是感情上的领带 但它没有道德的份量?
463well, I mean我是说
464I'm not entirely certain that accident我不完全确定那场事故
465in the initial stages第一阶段
466{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}什么? {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}什么?
467and so就这样
468just because we're randomly sorted into a house or just because we don't choose只是因为我们被随机排序到一个房子 或者只是因为我们不选择
469who our parents are or what country we're born into doesn't necessarily mean that we won't我们的父母是谁 或者我们出生的国家 并不一定意味着我们不会
470develop an obligation based on发展一项基于
471some type of某类
472benefit, I guess, which is sort of... so your obligation to your aged parent我猜,这算是... 所以你对年老父母的义务
473that's greater than to your aged parents比你的年老父母还要多
474around the world世界各地
475is only because只是因为
476and in so far as并一直到
477you're repaying a benefit你报了恩
478that your parent你的家长
479gave you when you were growing up?你长大的时候给你的?
480yeah, I mean I would say that if you look at cases of adoption where you have a biological是的,我的意思是,我会说,如果你看 收养的情况,你有一个生物
481parent somewhere else that you don't interact with and then you have a parent who adopted you父母在别的地方,你不互动 然后你有一个父母 谁收养你
482most people would say that大多数人会说
483if you had to pick between them in the case of如果你不得不挑 在他们之间,如果
484aging parents that年迈的父母
485your obligation would lie more with the person你的责任更在于这个人
486who raised you and who had exchanges with you meaningfully他曾养育你们,曾与你们交流,
487may I ask you one more question about the parent?我能再问你一个关于父母的问题吗?
488do you think that a person with a bad parent你觉得一个父母不好的人
489owes them less?欠他们多少?
490I don't know because I've never had a bad parent我不知道 因为我从来没有一个坏父母
491I think that's a good place to end我想这是结束的好地方
492we'll continue with this next time, thank you下次再继续吧 谢谢
493if I were working on an egg problem set for example如果我在研究一个鸡蛋问题 比如说
494and I saw that my roommate was cheating我看见室友在作弊
495that might be a bad thing for him to do but I wouldn't turn him in那对他可能不好 但我不会告发他
496you would not turn him in? I wouldn't turn him in and I think that你不会把他交出来吧? 我不会告发他 我觉得
497I would argue that's the right thing to do because of my obligation to him我认为这是正确的事情 因为我对他的义务
498you don't have a duty to tell the truth你没有义务说实话
499to report someone who cheated?报告一个作弊的人?
500today I'd like to take今天我想带
501I'd like to consider the strongest objections to the idea我想考虑一下最强烈的反对意见
502that there are obligations of solidarity or membership有团结或成员资格的义务
503and I want to see if those objections can be met我想看看这些反对是否能得到满足
504successfully成功吗?
505one objection emerged in the discussion last time Patrick said well上次Patrick说得好的时候 有人反对
506if obligations flow from community membership and identity we inhabit如果社区成员的义务 和身份,我们居住
507multiple communities doesn't that mean that our obligations多社区不代表我们的义务
508will sometimes有时候
509conflict冲突
510so that's one possible objection所以,这是一个可能的反对
511and then Rena said然后蕾娜说
512these examples meant to这些例子意在
513bring out the moral force唤起道德力量
514of solidarity and membership团结和成员资格
515examples about实例
516parents and children家长和子女
517about the french resistance fighter asked to bomb his own village and drawing back关于法国抵抗战士 要求轰炸自己的村庄和撤退
518about the airlift关于空运
519by Israel of Ethiopian Jews these examples they may be intuitively evocative Rena said埃塞俄比亚犹太人的以色列说,
520but really they're pointing to但实际上他们指
521matters of emotion matters of sentiment情感问题 情感问题
522not true moral obligations非真正的道德义务
523and then接着
524there were a number of objections有一些反对
525not necessarily to patriotism as such不一定要爱国
526but to patriotism understood as但爱国主义被理解为
527an obligation of solidarity and membership团结和成员资格的义务
528beyond consent未经同意
529this objection本反对
530allowed that there can be obligations to the communities we inhabit including允许对我们居住的社区承担义务,包括:
531obligations of patriotism爱国主义的义务
532but this objection argued that但这一反对意见认为,
533all of the obligations of patriotism or of community or membership are actually爱国主义、社区或成员的所有义务实际上都是
534based on基于
535liberal ideas and perfectly compatible with them自由主义思想与自由主义思想完全兼容
536consent either implicit or explicit默示或明示同意
537or reciprocity或对等
538例如,在网站上的Julia Rothow
539said that liberalism can endorse patriotism说自由主义可以认可爱国主义
540as a voluntary自愿参加
541moral obligation道德义务
542patriotism and familial love爱国主义和家庭爱情
543both fall under this category两者都属于这一类
544because after all Julia points out因为毕竟茱莉亚指出
545the Kantian framework关甸框架
546allows people free reign to choose to express virtues such as these允许自由统治者选择表达这些美德
547if they want to如果他们想
548so you don't need the idea所以你不需要这个想法
549of a non-voluntary particular moral obligation非自愿的特定道德义务
550to capture the moral force抓住道德力量
551of community社区
552values数值
553where's Julia?茱莉亚呢?
554so did I summarize我也总结过
555that that fairly这公平
556there is actually, Julia actually is in line with事实上,茱莉亚是符合的
557what Rawls says about this very罗尔斯说的
558topic专题
559you weren't aware of that你根本没意识到
560you came up with it on your own你一个人想出来的
561that's pretty good不错
562Rawls says when he's discussing political obligation罗尔斯说,当他讨论政治义务时
563he says it's one thing if someone他说如果有人
564runs for office运行到办公室
565or enlist in the military they're making a voluntary choice或参军 他们自愿选择
566but Rawls says there is I believe no political obligation strictly speaking但罗尔斯说,严格地说,我认为没有政治义务
567for citizens为公民服务
568generally一般情况
569because it's not clear what is the requisite binding action因为它不清楚什么是 必要的约束行动
570and who has performed it和谁做了它,
571so Rawls acknowledges所以罗尔斯承认
572that for ordinary citizens适用于普通公民
573there is no political obligation没有政治义务
574except除外
575insofar as关于
576some particular citizen某些特定公民
577willingly through an act of consent自愿通过同意行为
578undertakes承诺
579or chooses such an obligation that's in line或选择符合规定的义务
580with Julia's point带着茱莉亚的观点
581it's related to another objection和另一个反对有关
582that people have raised被人们抚养成人
583which is这是
584it's perfectly possible to recognize particular obligations to one's family or to one's country完全有可能承认对家庭或国家的特殊义务
585provided提供
586honoring those obligations doesn't require you to violate any of the natural duties履行这些义务并不需要你违反任何自然义务
587of universal respect for persons, queer persons. So that's consistent with the idea that we can choose普遍尊重个人、同性恋者。 因此,这是符合的想法 我们可以选择
588if we want to如果我们想
589to express a loyalty to our country or to our people or to our family对祖国、人民、家庭表示忠诚
590provided we don't do any injustice只要我们不做任何不公正的事
591within the framework acknowledging the priority that is在承认优先事项的框架内
592of the universal联合国
593duties职责
594the one objection that I didn't mention is the view of those who say唯一我没有提到的反对意见 是那些说
595that obligations of membership really are a kind of collective selfishness成员的义务确实是一种集体自私
596why should we honor them?我们为什么要尊重他们?
597Isn't it just a kind of prejudice?这不是一种偏见吗?
598So what I'd like to do所以,我想怎么办
599perhaps if those of you也许,如果那些你们
600who have agreed双方同意
601who wrote and who have agreed to press these objections谁写了,谁同意按这些反对
602perhaps if you could gather down也许如果你可以聚集下来
603all together we'll form a team我们一起组成一个团队
604as we did once before and we'll就像我们以前一样,我们会
605see if you can respond to those who want to defend看看你能不能回应那些想辩护的人
606patriotism conceived爱国主义
607as a communal作为社区
608obligation.义务。
609Now, there were a number of people现在,有很多人
610who argued in谁是争论
611defense辩护
612of patriotism爱国主义
613as the communitarian作为共产主义者
614view conceives it so let me go down now and join the critics景色是想象的,所以让我现在下去 加入批评者
615the critics of communitarianism if there's共产主义的批评者 如果有的话
616a microphone that we could use somewhere.麦克风,我们可以用它
617Who as the critics of patriotism, communal patriotism,作为爱国主义,社区爱国主义的批评者,
618gather their forces here?把他们的军队召集到这里?
619Patrick if you want to you can join as well or Rena帕特里克,如果你愿意,你也可以加入 或者雷娜
620others who have spoken or addressed this question are free to join in已发言或已发言的其他人可自由加入
621but I would like to hear now from但我现在想听听
622those of you who defend你们中辩护者,
623patriotism爱国主义
624and defend it并捍卫它
625as作为
626a moral obligation道德义务
627that can't be这不可能
628translated back into翻译为
629purely consent based纯粹基于同意
630terms条件
631can't be translated into liberal不能翻译为自由主义
632terms. Where's A.J. Kumar?条件。 库马在哪?
633A.J. (英语).
634everybody seems to know you.大家都好像认识你
635Let's hear from A.J.来听听A. J.
636You said in the same way I feel I owe more to my family than to the general community, I owe more to my你说过,同样地,我觉得我欠我的家人 而不是一般社区, 我欠我的
637country than to humanity in general国家相对于全人类
638because my country holds a great stake in my identity.因为我国对我的身份有重大关系
639It is not prejudice for me to love my country我热爱祖国是没有偏见的
640unless it is prejudice for me to love my parents more than somebody else's.除非我更爱父母而不是别人的偏见
641So A.J. what would you say to this group?A. J. 你会对这群人说什么?
642Stand up.站起来
643I think that there's some我觉得有些
644fundamental基础
645obligation that comes from a communitarian responsibility to社区的责任
646people and groups that form your identity. I mean组成你身份的人和团体 我是说
647even, like I'll give the example that you know甚至,我也会举出你知道的例子
648there are a lot of things about our government right now that I'm not我们的政府有很多事情,现在我不是
649in favor of but part of my identity is that支持但部分我的身份是,
650America values a free society where we can美国珍视自由社会,我们可以
651object to certain things and I think that's an expression of patriotism as well.我认为这是爱国主义的体现
652I go back to the parent example or even at Harvard I think我回到父母的榜样,甚至哈佛,我想
653I owe more to my roommates because they make up my identity than I do it to the我欠我的室友更多的 因为他们是我的身份 而不是我做它
654Harvard community as a whole and I think that applies to整个哈佛社区 我认为这适用于
655our country because there are certain things that growing up here, yes we can't我们的国家 因为有些东西是在这里长大的,是的,我们不能
656choose it, we can't choose our parents,选择它,我们不能选择 我们的父母,
657things like that, but类似的事情,但
658it makes up part of our identity.它构成我们身份的一部分。
659Okay, who would like to take that on?好吧,谁愿意承担呢?
660Yeah, about the obligation to others是啊,关于对他人的义务
661simply by virtue of只是因为
662being in their,在他们,
663being influenced by them.受到他们的影响。
664I'm a German citizen and if I had been born 80 years earlier than我是德国公民 如果我出生早于80岁
665I would have been a citizen of Nazi Germany and我本来是纳粹德国的公民
666for some reason I just don't think that I would因为某种原因 我只是不认为我会
667have to feel obligated不得不感到义务
668towards Germany德国
669because I had benefited from actions of Nazis.因为我从纳粹的行动中获益
670I mean I guess my response to that would be you have我的意思是,我想我的反应是,你会
671hundreds of thousands of protesters in the United States right now现在美国有数十万抗议者
672who hold up signs that say peace is patriotic他们举出一些迹象 说和平是爱国的
673and I'm sure there are people in this room who don't agree with that. I personally do我敢肯定,在这个房间里 有人不同意这一点。 我个人有
674and I would say that they're strongly objecting to basically我想说他们强烈反对
675everything the Bush administration is doing right now布什政府现在所做的一切
676but they still consider themselves loving their country because they're但他们仍然认为自己爱自己的国家,因为他们
677furthering the cause推进事业
678of what they see is best for the country and I tend to agree with that as a他们所看到的对国家来说是最好的 我倾向于同意
679patriotic movement.爱国运动.
680Well, but不过
681how's that then, how do you still favor your country, how's that still patriotic?那又怎样,你还怎么支持你的国家呢? 那又怎样?
682I mean isn't that more sentimental attachment?我的意思是,这不是更感伤的恋情?
683Where's the obligation there?义务在哪里?
684Not to bring this back to Don Locke, but不是把这个带回给唐洛克,但
685I'd like to bring this back to Don Locke.我想把这个还给唐洛克
686In his conception of在他的构想
687when people join society当人们加入社会
688there's still some outlet, like if you're not satisfied with your仍然有一些出口, 就像如果你不满意你的
689society社会
690you do have a means of exit even though we had a lot of concerns about你确实有出路 尽管我们有很多担心
691how怎么样
692you're born in and it's not very feasible, he still provides that option.你出生了,这不太可行 他仍然提供这个选择。
693If we want to say that如果我们想说
694your obligation to society is a moral one你对社会的义务是道德的
695that means that prior to这意味着在
696knowing exactly what that society is going to be like or what your position is going to be in确切知道社会会是什么样子 或者你的地位会是什么
697that society社会
698that means that you have a binding obligation to这意味着你有义务
699a completely unknown body that could be一个完全未知的尸体,可能是
700completely foreign to all of your personal beliefs or what you完全与你的个人信仰无关
701would hold to be.将会是。
702Do you think that that kind of communal obligation or patriotism means你认为这种共同义务或爱国主义意味着
703writing the community写作社区
704a blank moral check?空白的道德检查?
705Basically, yeah, I think that we can,基本上,是的,我认为我们可以,
706I think it's reasonable to say that我觉得这样说很合理
707as you grow and as you develop within that community that you acquire some type of当你在社区里成长时 当你在社区里成长时 你就会获得某种
708obligation based on reciprocity基于互惠的义务
709but to say that you have a moral obligation I think requires但是说,你有一个道德义务 我认为需要
710a stronger justification.一个更有力的理由。
711Anyone else like to address that?还有谁喜欢说这个?
712I guess we could say that you could argue that you're morally obliged to我想我们可以说,你可以争论 你道德上有义务
713society by the fact that there is this reciprocity. I think it's the idea that由于存在这种对等性,社会才有了这种对等性。 我想这是想法
714you know we participate in society, we pay our taxes, we vote,你知道我们参与社会, 我们交税,我们投票,
715this is why这就是为什么
716we could say that we owe something to society but beyond that I don't think我们可以说,我们欠 社会的东西,但超越 我认为
717there's anything inherent有内在的东西
718in the fact that we are members of the society itself that we owe it anything. I事实上,我们是社会本身的成员,我们欠它什么。 一、导 言
719think insofar想想,从这个角度
720as the society gives us something, gives us protection, safety, security,社会给我们一些东西 给我们保护 安全
721then we owe the society something but那我们就欠了社会一笔钱
722nothing beyond what we give the society.除了我们给社会的东西之外,别无他法。
723Who wants to take that on?谁想穿这个?
724Rahul?拉胡尔?
725I don't think we我不认为我们
726I don't think we give the community a blank moral check我不认为我们给社区一个空洞的道德检查
727in that sense. I think we only give it从这个意义上说 我想我们只给它
728a blank moral check when we一个空白的道德检查 当我们
729advocate our sense of civic responsibility and when we say that倡导我们的公民责任感 当我们说
730the debate doesn't matter because patriotism is a vice.辩论不重要 因为爱国是恶习
731I think that patriotism is important because it gives us a sense of community,我认为爱国主义之所以重要 是因为它给了我们一种集体感
732a sense of common civic virtue that we can engage一种共同的公民美德感,我们可以参与
733in the issues. Even if you don't agree在问题。 就算你不同意也一样
734with the way the government is acting,政府的行为方式
735you can still love your country and hate the way it's acting. And I think because你仍然可以爱你的国家, 恨它的行为方式。 我认为,因为
736out of that love of country离开那对祖国的爱
737you can debate with other people and have respect for their views你可以和别人辩论 尊重他们的意见
738but still engage in the debate. If you但仍参与辩论。 如果你们
739just say that, you know, patriotism is a vice,只要说,你知道, 爱国主义是一种恶习,
740you drop out of that debate and you cede the ground to people who are more你放弃了辩论,你把土地让给了更多人
741fundamentalist, who have a stronger view and who may coerce the community.原教旨主义者,他们观点较强,可能胁迫社区。
742Instead we should engage the other members of the community on that相反,我们应该让社区其他成员参与其中。
743same不变
744moral ground.道德基础。
745Well now this, what we hear from Ajay and Rahul is a very pluralistic现在,我们从阿杰和拉胡尔那里听到的是一个非常多元的
746argumentative辩词
747critically minded patriotism.充满爱国心
748Whereas不过
749what we hear from我们听到的
750Ajay and the critics of patriotism here is the worry阿杰和爱国主义的批评者在这里是担心的
751that to take这要拿
752patriotic obligation in a communal way,以集体的方式履行爱国义务,
753seriously,说真的
754involves a kind of loyalty涉及某种忠诚
755that doesn't let us just pick and choose among the beliefs or actions or我们不只选择信仰或行动
756or practices或惯例
757of our country. What more,我们的国家。 还有呢
758what's left of loyalty剩下的忠诚
759if all we're talking about如果我们谈论的一切
760Ajay and Rahul, if all we're talking about阿杰和拉胡尔,如果我们在谈论
761is loyalty to principles of justice that may happen to be对正义原则的忠诚 可能恰好是
762embodied in our community or not as the case may be and if not then we can或不是,如果不是,我们可以
763can reject its可以拒绝它
764course.当然
765I don't know, I've sort of given我不知道,我有点给
766a reply, I got carried away, I'm sorry, who would like回答一下,我被冲动了,对不起,谁愿意
767go ahead, Julia.继续,茱莉亚。
768Yeah, I think that是啊,我觉得
769patriotism, you need to define what that is. It sounds like, you know, you would爱国主义,你需要定义是什么。 这听起来像,你知道,你会
770normally think that we are given a more weak definition here, patriotism amongst us,通常认为我们被赋予 更弱的定义, 我们爱国,
771but it almost sounds like your definition is merely但几乎听起来你的定义只是
772to have some sort of civic involvement in debating within your society and I think让公民参与你们社会的辩论 我认为
773that that那个
774kind of undermines maybe the moral, some of the moral worth of patriotism as a virtue一种破坏 道德,一些道德价值 爱国作为一种美德
775as well. I think if you can consent to a stronger form of patriotism if you want,临Τ 我认为如果你可以同意 更强烈的爱国主义形式 如果你想,
776that's这是
777a stronger, I guess, moral obligation than even what you're suggesting.道德义务比你想的要强
778What we really need我们真正需要的
779to sharpen the issue突出问题
780is an example是一个实例
781from the defenders of communitarianism社区主义的捍卫者
782of a case where loyalty在忠诚的情况下
783can actually compete with能够与
784and possibly outweigh而且可能超过
785universal principles of justice.普遍正义原则。
786Isn't that what, that's the test they really need这不是他们真正需要的测试吗?
787to meet, isn't it?见面,不是吗?
788So that's the test you need to meet这就是你需要面对的考验
789or any among you who would like to defend或你们中愿意辩护的人,
790obligations of membership or solidarity independent of成员义务或团结独立于
791ones that happen to发生的事情
792embody显示
793just principles.只是原则。
794Who has an example谁有榜样
795of a kind of loyalty一种忠诚
796that can and should compete with能够并且应该与
797universal moral claims, respect for persons?普遍道德要求,尊重人?
798Yeah, if I were working on an ec-problem set, for example,是啊,如果我在做一个EC -问题集,例如,
799and I saw that my roommate was cheating,我看到我的室友在作弊,
800that might be a bad thing for him to do, but I wouldn't turn him in.这对他来说可能不好 但我不会告发他
801You would not turn him in? I wouldn't turn him in, and I think that你不告发他? 我不会告发他,我想
802I would argue that's the right thing to do because of my obligation to him, you know.我认为这是正确的事情 因为我对他的义务,你知道。
803It may be wrong, but that's what I would do, and you know, I think that's what most这也许是错误的, 但我会这样做, 你知道,我认为这是大多数
804people would do as well.人们也会这么做
805Now there's a fair test.现在有一个公平的测试。
806He's not slipping out by saying he's invoking in the name of community some他不会因为说他以社区的名义 引用一些东西而溜出去
807universal普遍
808principles of justice. What's your name? Stay there.司法原则。 你叫什么来着? 别动
809So,这么说
810what do people think about Dan's case?人们怎么看待丹的案子?
811That's a harder case for the ethic of loyalty, isn't it?这对忠诚的道德来说更难,不是吗?
812But a truer test?但更真实的测试?
813How many agree with Dan?有多少人同意丹的意见?
814So, loyalty,所以,忠诚,
815Dan, loyalty has its part of sense.丹,忠义有其义.
816How many disagree with Dan?有多少人和丹意见不一?
817Well, I agree with Dan, but I agree that it's a choice that we make, but it's not好吧,我同意Dan, 但我同意这是我们的选择,但它不是
818necessarily right or wrong. I mean, I'm agreeing that I'm going to make the必然是非. 我的意思是,我同意 我会做
819wrong choice because错误的选择,因为
820I'm going to choose my roommate, but I also recognize that choice isn't morally我会选择我的室友, 但我也认识到,选择不是道德的
821right.
822So you're still translating even Dan's loyalty. You're saying, well, that's a所以你还在翻译丹的忠诚 你是说,嗯,这是一个
823matter of choice, but选择的问题,但
824what's the right thing to do?何等为正.
825Most people put up their hand saying,大多数人举起手来说:
826Dan would be right to stand by his roommate丹应该能支持他的室友
827and not turn him in.而不是告发他
828Go ahead.来吧。
829Also, I think as a roommate you have还有,我想你作为一个室友
830insider information and内幕信息和
831that might not be something you want to use. That might be something unfair这也许不是你想用的东西。 这也许不公平
832to hold against.坚持反对。
833You know, you're spending that much time with a roommate. Obviously, you're going to learn你知道,你花这么多时间 与室友。 很明显,你会学会的
834things about him, and关于他的事,和
835I don't think it's fair to reveal that to a greater community.我认为向一个更大的社区透露这一点不公平。
836But it's loyalty, Wojtek. You agree with Dan that loyalty is the ethic at stake here.但是这是忠诚,沃伊泰克。 你同意丹的观点 忠诚是这里的伦理
837Absolutely.当然
838You don't have a duty to tell the truth,你没有义务说实话
839to report someone who cheated?报告一个作弊的人?
840Not if you're,如果你是的话
841if you've been advantaged into getting that kind of information.如果你有优势 得到这种信息。
842Before our在我们之前
843critics of patriotism leave,批评爱国主义的假期,
844I want to give you another version,我想给你另一个版本,
845a more public example一个更公开的例子
846of what we'll, I guess we should call it Dan's Dilemma.我想我们应该称之为丹的难题
847Dan's Dilemma of Loyalty, and I want to get the reaction of people to this.丹的忠诚之谜 我想得到人们的反应
848This came up a few years ago in Massachusetts.这几年前在马萨诸塞州出现。
849Does anyone know who this man is?有人知道这个人是谁吗?
850Billy Bulger 没错
851Who is Billy Bulger?谁是比利・布格?
852He was president of the Massachusetts State Senate for many years,他担任马萨诸塞州参议院议长多年,
853one of the most powerful politicians in Massachusetts,马萨诸塞州最强大的政治家之一
854and then he became president of the University of Massachusetts.之后他成为马萨诸塞大学校长.
855Billy Bulger 你听说过他的故事吗?
856that bears on Dan's Dilemma?和丹的难题有关?
857Billy Bulger有个弟弟
858named Whitey Bulger,名为怀特·布格,
859and this is Whitey Bulger.这是怀特·布格
860His brother Whitey他的弟弟怀特尼,他现在已经...
861was on the FBI's most wanted list,在FBI最通缉名单上
862alleged to be被指称为
863a notorious gang leader in Boston,波士顿一个臭名昭著的帮派头目
864responsible for many murders对很多谋杀案负责
865and now a fugitive from justice.并且现在是逃犯
866But when但何时
867when the U.S. attorney当美国律师
868they called他们叫
869Billy Bulger,比利・布格
870then the president of the University of Massachusetts当时是马萨诸塞大学校长
871before the grand jury在大陪审团之前
872wanted information on the whereabouts of his brother,想知道他弟弟的下落
873this fugitive,这个逃犯,
874and he refused他拒绝
875to give it.给它。
876U.S. attorney said,美国律师说,
877just to be clear,说清楚一点
878Mr. Bulger, you feel more loyalty to your brotherBulger先生,你对你哥哥更忠诚一点
879than to the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts?而不是马萨诸塞州人民?
880Billy Bulger说过 我从没这么想过
881but I do have a loyalty to my brother. I care about him.但我对我哥哥有忠诚 我关心他
882I hope that I'm never helpful to anyone against him.我希望我永远不会帮助任何人反对他。
883I don't have an obligation我没有义务
884to help anyone帮助任何人
885catch my brother.抓住我弟弟 抓住我弟弟 抓住我弟弟
886Dan, you would agree?丹,你同意吗?
887How many would agree with the position有多少人同意这一立场
888of Billy Bulger?比利・布格?
889Let me give one other example and then we'll let the critics reply, the critics of loyalty让我再举个例子 然后让批评者回答 忠诚的批评者
890as we'll describe it.正如我们将描述它。
891Here's an even more fateful example有个更难逃厄运的例子
892from a figure in American history,美国历史上的一个人物
893Robert E. Lee.罗伯特·E·李.
894Now, Robert E. Lee on the eve of the Civil War was an officer of the Union Army.现在,国共内战前夕的罗伯特·E·李(英语:Robert E. Lee)是同盟军军官.
895He opposed secession,他反对分离,
896in fact regarded it as treason.事实上,这是叛国罪。
897When war loomed,当战争来临时,
898Lincoln offered Lee to be the commanding general of the Union Army林肯让李成为联军的统帅
899and Lee refused李拒绝
900and he described in a letter to his sons他在给儿子们的信中,
901why he refused.他为什么拒绝?
902With all my devotion to the Union, he wrote, I have not been able to make up my mind他写道,我全心全意地为联盟奉献,我无法下定决心
903to raise my hand against my relatives, my children, my home.举手对抗我的亲戚,我的孩子,我的家。
904By which he meant Virginia.他指的是弗吉尼亚
905The Union is dissolved. I shall return to my native state联盟解散. 我会回到祖国
906and share the miseries of my people, save in her defense.并分享我族人的忧患,但为她辩护。
907I will draw my sword我会拔剑
908no more.没有了。
909Here's a real test, Dan,这是一个真正的测试,丹,
910for your principle of loyalty.你的忠诚原则
911Because here因为这里
912is the cause of the war against,是战争的起因,
913not only to save the Union but against slavery不仅拯救联盟,而且反对奴隶制
914and Lee is going to fight for Virginia李会为弗吉尼亚而战
915even though he doesn't share虽然他不分享
916the desire of the southern states to secede.南方各州都希望分离
917Now the communitarian would say there is something admirable in that.现在,共产主义者会说 有一些令人钦佩的东西。
918Whether or not the decision was ultimately right, there's something admirable.无论最终决定是否正确,都有令人钦佩的东西.
919And the communitarian would say we can't even make sense.共产主义者会说我们根本讲不通
920We can't make sense我们没有道理
921of Lee's dilemma as a moral dilemma unless we acknowledge除非我们承认李的两难境地
922that the claim of loyalty忠诚的主张
923arising from his sense of narrative of who he is由他对自己身份的描述感产生
924is immoral, not just sentimental, emotional tug.是不道德的, 不只是多愁善感的拖拉。
925Alright, who would like to respond?好吧,谁想回答?
926To Dan's loyalty,对丹的忠诚
927to Billy Bulger's loyalty,为了比利·布格的忠诚
928or to Robert E. Lee's loyalty to Virginia?还是为了罗伯特·E·李对弗吉尼亚的忠诚?
929What do you say, Julia?你觉得呢,朱莉娅?
930Okay, well I think that these are some classic examples of, you know,好吧,我认为这是一些经典的例子,你知道,
931multiple spheres of influence and that you have conflicting communities that并且你们有相互冲突的社区
932your family and your country.你的家人和你的祖国
933I think that's one reason why the idea of choice in your obligation is so important because我认为这就是为什么你义务中的选择思想如此重要的原因之一,因为
934how else can you resolve this? You have,不然你怎么能解决这个问题? 你有过
935if you're morally obligated and there's no way out of this如果你有道德义务 并且没有出路
936need for loyalty to both communities,需要忠于两族,
937you're trapped. There's nothing you can do. You have to make a choice.你被困在这里了。 无所施设. 你必须做出选择。
938And还有
939I think that being able to choose based on other characteristics and merely, you know,我认为,能够根据其他特征来选择,而仅仅是,你知道,
940the arbitrary fact that you're a member of this community is important.武断的事实,你是一个社区的成员是重要的。
941Otherwise it's left to, I guess, randomness.否则,我猜是随机的。
942Well, Julia, the issue isn't whether these,茱莉亚 问题不是这些...
943whether Dan makes a choice丹是否做出选择
944or Billy Bulger or Robert E. Lee. Of course they make a choice. The question is on what或比利·布格或罗伯特·E·李. 当然,他们做出了选择。 问题在于什么
945grounds, on what principle should they choose?他们应该选择什么原则?
946The communitarian doesn't deny that there's a choice to be made. The question is共产主义者并不否认可以做出选择. 问题是
947which choice, on what grounds, and should loyalty as such什么样的选择,基于什么理由,应该如此忠诚
948weigh?重吗?
949Andre, now you want to...安德烈,现在你想...
950Alright, go ahead. What do you say? Well, one of the things we've noticed in the three好吧,继续。 你说什么? 我们注意到的三件事之一
951examples is that the people have all chosen举例来说,人民都选择了
952the most immediate community of which they're a part, the more local one.最直接的社区 他们的一部分, 越本地。
953And I think there's something to be said for that. It's not just random.我觉得有话要说 非唯随机.
954I mean, there doesn't seem to be a conflict我的意思是,似乎没有冲突
955because they know which one is more important.因为他们知道哪个更重要
956And it's their family over他们的家人结束了
957the联合国
958Ecten课,
959their state, over their country,他们的国家,
960and their family over the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.和他们的家人 过马萨诸塞州联邦。
961So, I think所以,我觉得
962that's the answer to which is more important.这才是更重要的答案
963You think that the local, the more particular is always你以为本地人越是特别
964the weightier morally, Andre?更重的道德,安德烈?
965Well, I mean, there seems to be a trend in the three cases. I would agree with that, I think.嗯,我的意思是,似乎有一个趋势 在三个案件。 我想,我同意这一点。
966And I think most of us would agree that your family我想我们大多数人会同意你的家人
967takes precedence over优先于
968the United States, perhaps.也许是美国
969Which is why you go with Dan.这就是为什么你和丹去。
970Dan, loyalty丹,忠诚
971to the roommate over Ecten and the truth.告诉室友埃肯和真相
972Yeah, exactly.没错
973I would, because, I mean...我会,因为,我的意思是...
974I mean truth-telling, not the truth of Ecten.我是说说真话,不是艾肯的真话
975Yes.
976Alright, so we understand.好吧,所以我们理解。
977But on the same example in terms of family, you had cases in the Civil War where brother was但是在家庭方面 你也有在南北战争中 弟弟是
978pitted against brother on both sides of the war, where they chose country在战争的两边与兄弟为敌 他们选择了国家
979instead of family.而不是家人的爱
980So, I think the exact same war shows that所以,我认为同样的战争表明,
981different people have different means of making these choices and that there is no不同的人有不同的选择方式,没有
982one set of values or one set of morality一套价值观或一套道德
983that communitarians can stick to. And personally, I think that's the biggest problem with共产主义者可以坚持。 我个人认为这是最大的问题
984communitarians社区居民
985that we don't have我们没有
986one set of standard moral obligations.一套标准道德义务。
987And tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
988Samantha. So, Samantha,萨曼莎 所以,萨曼莎,
989you agree with Patrick, Patrick's point the other day,你同意帕特里克 那天帕特里克说的
990that there may be,也许有,
991if we allow obligations to be defined by community identification or membership,如果我们允许根据社区身份或成员身份确定义务,
992they may conflict, they may overlap,它们可能互相冲突,可能相互重叠,
993they may compete,他们或许会互相竞争,
994and there is no clear principle.并且没有明确的原则。
995Andre says there's a clear principle,安德烈说有一个明确的原则,
996the most particular.最特别的
997The other day, Nicola, who is sitting over here, where's Nicola, said,那天,坐在这的尼古拉说
998the most universal.最普遍的。
999You're saying, Samantha,你是说,萨曼莎,
1000the scale of the community as such can't be the decisive moral factor.社区的规模不能成为决定性的道德因素。
1001So there has to be some other所以一定还有别的
1002moral道义
1003judgment.判决。
1004All right, let's first, let's let our critics of communal patriotism,好吧,让我们先让我们的批评 社区爱国主义,
1005let's express our appreciation and thank them for their having stood up让我们表示赞赏和感谢他们站起来
1006and responded to these arguments,并对这些论点作出答复,
1007to find the issue.找到问题。
1008Let's turn我们转身
1009to the implications for justice对司法的影响
1010of the positions that we've heard discussed here.我们听到讨论过的立场
1011One of the worries一个担心
1012underlying基础
1013these multiple objections这些多重反对
1014to the idea of loyalty or membership as having independent moral weight忠诚或成员资格是具有独立道德影响力的概念
1015is that it seems to argue是它似乎争论
1016that there is no way of finding principles of justice找不到正义原则
1017that are detached from脱离
1018conceptions of the good life美好生活的概念
1019as they may be lived他们可以活着
1020in any particular community.在任何特定社区。
1021Suppose the communitarian argument is right. Suppose the priority of the right over the假设公社的论点是正确的。 假设权利优先于
1022good can't be sustained.好事无法维持
1023Suppose instead假设
1024that justice and rights unavoidably正义和权利不可避免
1025are bound up with
1026conceptions of the good.善的概念。
1027Does that mean这是否意味着
1028that justice正义
1029is simply很简单
1030a creature一个生物
1031of convention,公约,
1032of the values that happen to prevail in any given community在任何特定社区偶然流行的价值观
1033at any given time?在任何特定时间?
1034One of the writings we have我们的著作之一
1035among the communitarian critics在社区批评者中
1036is by Michael Walser.是迈克尔·瓦尔瑟写的
1037He draws the implications of justice this way.他这样画正义的意义。
1038Justice is relative to social司法相对于社会
1039meanings. A given society is just意义 一个社会是公正的
1040if its substantive life is lived in a certain way如果其实质性生活以某种方式存在
1041in a way that is faithful to the shared understandings以忠于共同谅解的方式
1042of the members.成员名单。
1043So, Walser's account seems to bear out因此,沃尔瑟的账户似乎证明
1044the worry担心
1045that if we can't find independent principles of justice, independent that is from conceptions如果我们找不到独立的正义原则 独立的原则就是从概念上
1046of the good that prevail in any given community,在任何特定社区中普遍存在的利益,
1047that we're simply left with justice being a matter of fidelity or faithfulness我们只是把正义留给忠诚或忠诚
1048to the shared understandings or values or conventions that prevail in any given society在任何特定社会中普遍存在的共同理解或价值观或公约
1049at any given time.在任何特定时间。
1050But is that an adequate way但是,这是一个适当的方式
1051of thinking思维
1052about justice?关于正义?
1053Let's take a look at a short clip我们看看短片
1054from the documentary Eyes on the Prize.从纪录片"眼看奖"。
1055Goes back in the nineteen fifties in the south.回到南方十九个五十年代
1056Here are some这里有些
1057situated地点
1058American southerners美国南方人
1059who believe in the tradition in the shared understandings他们信仰共同的谅解,
1060of segregation.隔离。
1061Find out the arguments they make about loyalty and tradition找出他们关于忠诚和传统的论点
1062and see if they don't make看他们有没有做
1063you uneasy烦死了
1064about tying arguments about justice关于将正义的论据捆绑起来
1065to the shared understandings or traditions理解或传统
1066that prevail in any given society at the moment. Let's run the clip.在任何特定社会,在目前盛行。 让我们运行剪辑。
1067This land is composed of这片土地由
1068two different cultures.两个不同的文化。
1069A white culture and a colored culture and I've lived close to them all my life.一种白色的文化和一种彩色的文化 我一生都生活在他们身边
1070But I'm told now that we mistreated them and that we must change但我现在被告知我们虐待他们 我们必须改变
1071and these changes are coming faster than I expected.这些变化比我预期的要快
1072And I'm required to而我必须
1073make decisions作出决定
1074on a basis of
1075a new way of thinking and it's difficult.新的思维方式 和它的难度。
1076It's difficult for me, it's difficult for我很难,我很难
1077all servants.所有仆人 都一样
1078Well there you have it.好吧,你在这里。
1079Narrative selves, situated selves, invoking tradition.叙述自己,定位自己, 援引传统。
1080Doesn't that show us这不表明我们
1081that justice can't be tied to the shared understandings of goods that prevail in正义不能与共同理解
1082any given community at any given time?任何特定时间的族群?
1083Or is there a way of rescuing that claim或者有办法挽救这个要求
1084from this example?从这个例子?
1085Think about that question and we'll return to it next time.想想这个问题,我们下次再来吧
1086Don't miss the chance to interact online with other viewers of Justice. Join the不要错过与司法界其他观众在线互动的机会. 加入到
1087conversation. Take a pop quiz. Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.谈话。 做个流行测验 看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
1088访问法官Harvard.org. 谓之正法.
1089Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
1090additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1090 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P13 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p13 12. 12.同性婚姻的争论 (P13)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00We ended last time我们上次结束了
0:11talking about the narrative conception of the self.谈论自我的叙事概念。
0:14We were testing我们在测试
0:16the narrative conception of the self and the idea of obligations of solidarity or自我的叙述概念和团结义务的概念;
0:21membership成员
0:25that did not flow没有流动
0:27from consent拒绝同意
0:29that claimed us for reasons要求我们的原因
0:31unrelated to a contract or an agreement与合同或协议无关
0:35or a choice we may have made.或者我们做了一个选择
展开字幕全文(1082 条)
序号英文中文
1We ended last time我们上次结束了
2talking about the narrative conception of the self.谈论自我的叙事概念。
3We were testing我们在测试
4the narrative conception of the self and the idea of obligations of solidarity or自我的叙述概念和团结义务的概念;
5membership成员
6that did not flow没有流动
7from consent拒绝同意
8that claimed us for reasons要求我们的原因
9unrelated to a contract or an agreement与合同或协议无关
10or a choice we may have made.或者我们做了一个选择
11And we were debating among ourselves我们彼此辩论
12whether there are any obligations of this kind是否有任何此类义务;
13or whether all apparent obligations of solidarity and membership can be或所有明显的团结义务和成员资格义务是否都是
14translated翻译
15into输入
16consent同意书
17or reciprocity or a universal duty that we owe persons, great persons.或对等,或我们应尽的普遍义务。
18And then there were those who defended the idea of loyalty and of patriotism.后来有人为忠诚和爱国主义的思想辩护.
19So the idea of loyalty所以,忠诚的想法
20and of solidarity and of membership团结和成员资格
21gathered a certain kind of收集了某种类型的
22intuitive moral force in our discussion我们讨论中的直觉道德力量
23and then as we concluded然后当我们得出结论
24we considered what seems to be a pretty powerful counter example我们考虑过什么 似乎是一个相当强大的反例
25to that idea.对这个想法。
26Namely也就是说
27the film of those southern segregationists这些南方隔离主义者的电影
28in the nineteen fifties十九个五十年代
29and they talked all about他们谈论了很多
30their traditions,他们的传统,
31their history, the way in which their identities were bound up with their他们的历史,他们的身份与他们的
32life history, do you remember that?人生史,你还记得吗?
33What flowed from that history, from that narrative sense of identity for those从那段历史中产生的东西, 从描述性的认同感中产生
34southern segregationists?南方隔离主义者?
35They said we have to defend our way of life.他们说我们必须捍卫我们的生活方式。
36Is this a fatal or a decisive objection to the idea这是致命还是决定性的反对
37of the narrative conception of the self? That's the question we were left with.自我的叙事概念? 这就是我们的问题。
38What I would like to do today今天我想做什么就做什么吗?
39is to advance an argument是要推进一个论证
40and see what you make of it.且见其造化.
41And let me tell you让我告诉你
42what that argument is.这争论是什么。
43I would like to defend我想辩护
44the narrative conception叙事概念
45of the person该人
46as against the voluntary conception.与自愿概念相对应。
47I would likeи稱
48to defend辩护
49the idea that there are obligations of solidarity or membership.认为有团结或成员资格的义务。
50Then礛
51I want to suggest我想建议
52that there being such obligations有这种义务
53lends force to the idea让这个想法生效
54when we turn to justice当我们走向正义
55that arguments about justice关于正义的争论
56can't be detached, cannot be detached after all不能脱离, 毕竟不能脱离
57from questions of the good.从好的问题。
58But I wanted to distinguish two different ways但我想区分两种不同的方式
59in which justice might be tied to the good正义可能与正义联系在一起
60and argue for one of them.并为其中一人辩护。
61Now the voluntary conception of the person of Kant and Rawls we saw was powerful and liberating.现在我们看到的康德和罗尔斯人的自愿概念是强大和解放的。
62A further appeal is its universal aspiration.另一个呼吁是它的普遍愿望。
63The idea of treating persons as persons将人视为人的想法
64without prejudice,不带偏见,
65without discrimination.不歧视。
66And I think that's what我想这就是
67led some among us带领我们中的一些人
68to argue辩论
69that okay maybe there are obligations of membership but they are always subordinate, they must always be subordinate也许有成员义务 但他们总是从属 他们必须永远从属
70to the duties that we have to human beings as such, the universal duties.我们对人类的责任,即普遍的义务。
71But is that right?是吗?
72If our encompassing loyalties should always take precedence如果我们的忠诚永远优先
73over more particular ones更特别的
74then the distinction between然后,区分
75friends and strangers朋友和陌生人们
76should ideally be overcome.最好能够克服
77Our special concern for the welfare of friends would be a kind of prejudice,我们特别关注朋友的福利 是一种偏见,
78a measure of our distance from universal衡量我们与世界的距离
79human concern.人类的关心。
80But if you look closely但是如果你仔细看
81at that idea这个想法
82what kind of a moral什么样的道德
83universe, what kind of moral imagination宇宙,什么样的道德想象
84would that lead you to?这能让你找到吗?
85The Enlightenment philosopher Montesquieu启蒙主义哲学家蒙特斯基乌
86gives perhaps the most powerful and I think ultimately the most honest account说不定最有力量的人 最终也是最诚实的人
87of where this这里
88relentless无情
89universalizing普及
90tendency趋势
91leads the moral imagination.领导着道德的想象力。
92Here's how Montesquieu put it. He said a truly virtuous man这是蒙特斯基厄说的 他说,一个真正的正直的人
93{\fnSIMHEI\fs22\1cHFFFFFF\3cHFF8000}帮助最遥远的陌生人 {\fnSIMHEI\fs22\1cHFFFFFF\3cHFF8000}以及他自己的朋友
94And then he adds然后他又说
95listen to this.听着
96If men were perfectly virtuous如果男人是纯洁的
97they wouldn't have friends.他们不会有朋友。
98But it's difficult to imagine a world但很难想象世界
99in which persons were so virtuous that they had no friends, only a universal在其中,人是如此的善良, 他们没有朋友,
100disposition to friendliness.准备为方便。
101The problem isn't问题不是
102simply简单
103that such a world would be difficult to bring about,这样一个世界将难以实现,
104that it's unrealistic.这是不现实的。
105The deeper problem更深层的问题
106is that这是
107such a world would be difficult to recognize这样的世界是很难承认的
108as a human world.作为一个人类的世界。
109The love of humanity is a noble sentiment人类的爱是一种高尚的情感
110but most of the time但大多数时候
111we live our lives by smaller solidarities.我们靠较小的团结生活
112This may reflect certain limits to the bounds of moral sympathy这可能反映了道德同情限度的某些限制
113but more important但更重要的是,我们...
114it reflects the fact它反映了事实
115that we learn to love humanity我们学会爱人
116not in general非一般情况
117but through its particular expressions.但通过它的具体表达
118So这么说
119these are some considerations.这些都是一些考虑。
120They're not knockdown arguments.他们不是打倒辩论。
121But moral philosophy但道德哲学
122can't offer knockdown arguments but considerations无法提供倒计时的论据 但考虑
123of the kinds类型
124that we've been我们一直
125discussing and arguing about讨论和争论
126all along. Well suppose一直这样 假设
127that's right.没错
128One way of assessing whether this picture of the person and of obligation is right评估个人和义务的这一状况是否正确的一种方式
129is to see是要看见
130what are its consequences for justice.它对正义的后果是什么?
131And here's where it confronts这就是它面对的地方
132a serious problem and here we go back to our southern segregationists.我们回到南方的隔离主义者身边
133They felt the weight of history.他们感受到了历史的重量。
134Do we admire their character?我们佩服他们的性格吗?
135These segregationists who wanted to preserve their way of life?这些隔离主义者想保持他们的生活方式?
136Are we committed to saying我们承诺要说
137if we accept the idea of solidarity membership, are we committed to saying如果我们接受团结会会籍的想法,我们是否承诺说
138that justice is tied to the good in the sense that justice means正义与正义联系在一起
139whatever a particular community or tradition says it means无论特定社区或传统怎么说
140including those southern segregationists.包括那些南方隔离主义者。
141Here it's important to distinguish two different ways要分辨两种不同的方式
142in which justice can be tied to the good.正义可以和好人联系在一起
143One is a relativist way.一是相对论法.
144That's the way that says就是这样
145to think about rights, to think about justice,思考权利,思考正义,
146look to the values that happen to prevail in any given community at any given time.关注任何特定社区在任何特定时间偶然流行的价值观。
147Don't judge them别评判他们
148by some outside standard根据某些外部标准
149but instead conceive justice as a matter of being faithful to the shared understandings却把正义视为忠实于共识
150of a particular tradition.某种传统
151But there's a problem with this way of tying justice to the good.但这种将正义与善联系起来的方式有问题.
152The problem问题
153is that it makes justice wholly conventional,是它使正义完全常规,
154a product of circumstance环境产物
155and this deprives justice of its这剥夺了正义
156critical character.关键人物。
157But there is a second way但还有另一种办法
158in which justice司法权
159can be tied with or bound up with the good.可以和好人捆绑或捆绑在一起
160On this second non-relativist way of linking justice with conceptions of the good,在将正义与善良概念联系起来的第二种非相对主义方式上,
161principles of justice司法原则
162depend for their justification取决于理由
163not on the values that happen to prevail at any given moment不是任何特定时刻出现的价值观
164in a certain place在某个地方
165but instead on the moral worth or the intrinsic good of the ends rights serve.但相反的是,权利最终的道德价值或内在好处是起作用的。
166On this non-relativist view, the case for recognizing a right depends on showing根据这种非相对主义观点,承认某项权利的理由取决于是否表明
167that it honors or advances some important human good.它尊重或促进一些重要的人类利益。
168The second way第二条路
169of tying justice to the good is not, strictly speaking, communitarian严格地说,将正义与正义联系在一起并不是社区性的。
170if by communitarian you mean如果你是说社区主义者
171just giving over to a particular community只是给一个特定的社区
172the definition of justice.正义的定义。
173Now what I would like to suggest that of these two different ways of linking justice to the现在我想建议的是,在这两种将司法与
174good不错
175the first is insufficient第一点不够
176because the first leaves justice the creature of convention.因为第一点是正义是公约的产物
177It doesn't give us enough不够
178moral resources to respond to those southern segregationists who invoke their way of life,以道德资源来对付那些援引其生活方式的南方隔离主义者,
179their traditions,他们的传统,
180their way of doing things.他们做事的方式
181But if justice is bound up with the good in a non-relativist way, there's a big challenge,但是如果正义以非相对主义的方式与善相联,那么就有一个巨大的挑战,
182a big question to answer.一个大问题要回答。
183How can we reason about the good?我们怎么解释好?
184What about the fact that people hold different那么,人们持有不同的事实
185conceptions of the good?对好的想法?
186Different ideas不同的想法
187about the purposes of key social institutions.关键社会机构的目的。
188Different ideas不同的想法
189about what social goods and human goods are worthy of honor and recognition.关于哪些社会公益物和人类公益物值得荣誉和表彰。
190We live in a pluralist society. People disagree about the good.我们生活在一个多元化社会。 众生对善不一.
191That's one of the incentive to try to find principles of justice这是找到正义原则的动机之一
192and rights that don't depend和不依赖的权利
193on any particular ends or purposes目标或目的
194or goods.或货物。
195So is there a way to reason about the good?那么,有办法解释好事吗?
196Before addressing that question,在讨论这个问题之前,
197I want to address a slightly easier question.我想谈一个稍微简单的问题。
198Is it necessary, is it unavoidable有必要吗,是不可避免的
199when arguing about justice当争论正义时
200to argue about the good? And my answer to that question争辩好? 我对这个问题的回答
201is yes.没错
202It's unavoidable.这是不可避免的。
203It's necessary.这是必要的。
204So for the remainder of today, I want to take up,所以今天剩下的时间 我想谈谈
205I want to try to我想尝试
206advance that claim预付款项
207that reasoning about the good, about purposes and ends, is an unavoidable feature of arguing关于善、宗旨和目的的推理,是争论的必然特点。
208about justice. It's necessary.关于正义。 这是必要的。
209Let me see if I can establish that.我看看能不能证明这一点。
210And for that,为此,
211I'd likeи稱
212for us to begin a discussion让我们开始讨论
213of same-sex marriage.在同性婚姻中,
214Now, same-sex marriage现在,同性婚姻
215draws on,借过
216implicates涉案人
217deeply contested深有争议
218and controversial ideas和有争议的想法
219morally and religiously.在道德和宗教上。
220And so there's a powerful incentive因此,有一个强大的激励
221to embrace a conception of justice or of rights接受正义或权利的概念
222that doesn't require the society as a whole to pass judgment不需要全社会做出判断
223one way or another以某种方式
224on those关于这些
225hotly contested moral and religious questions激烈争论的道德和宗教问题
226about the moral permissibility of homosexuality,关于同性恋的道德允许性,
227about the proper ends of marriage关于婚姻的适当结束
228as a social institution.作为一个社会机构。
229So clearly, if there's an incentive to resolve this question, to define people's rights很明显,如果有办法解决这个问题, 确定人们的权利
230in a way that doesn't require the society as a whole以不需要整个社会的方式
231to sort out those moral and religious disputes,解决那些道德和宗教纠纷,
232that would be very attractive.这将是非常吸引人。
233So what I would like to do now所以我现在想做什么
234is to see, using the same-sex marriage case,以同性婚姻为例
235whether it's possible可能吗?
236to detach切换
237one's views一个观点
238about the moral permissibility of homosexuality and about关于同性恋的道德允许性和
239the purpose, the end of marriage, to detach目的,婚姻的终结, 拆散
240those questions这些问题
241from the question从问题
242of whether the state should recognize国家是否应当承认
243marriage or not.结婚与否。
244So, let's begin.所以,让我们开始。
245I would like to begin我想开始
246by hearing the arguments of those听取他们的论点
247who believe that there should be no same-sex marriage他们认为不应该有同性婚姻
248but that the state should only recognize marriage between a man and a woman.但国家只应承认男女之间的婚姻。
249Do I have volunteers? I had two. There were我有志愿者吗? 我有两个 曾经
250two people I asked,我问两个人,
251people who had voiced their views already on the Justice blog,在司法博客上表达自己观点的人,
252Mark Lough马克·劳
253and Ryan McCaffrey. Where are you?还有瑞安・麦卡弗里 你们在哪?
254Okay. Mark?摆 马克?
255And where's Ryan?莱恩呢?
256Let's go first to Mark.让我们先去马克。
257I have sort of a teleological understanding我有点心智上的理解
258of页:1
259the purpose of sex and the purpose of marriage.性的目的和婚姻的目的。
260I think that for people like myself,我想对于像我这样的人来说
261who are a Christian and also a Catholic,他们是基督徒,也是天主教徒,
262the purpose of sex性别目的
263is, one, for its procreative其一,因为它的生殖性
264uses, and two,使用,和 2,
265for(单位:千美元)
266a unifying purpose between统一目标
267a man and a woman一个男人和一个女人
268within the institution of marriage. You have a certain conception of the purpose, or the telos,婚姻制度。 你对这个目的有某种认识 或者是提摩斯
269of human sexuality,人类性行为,
270which is bound up with procreation,与生育相连,
271as well as union. And the essence of marriage, the purpose还有工会 婚姻的本质,目的
272of marriage as a social institution,作为社会机构的婚姻,
273is to give expression表达式
274to that telos,给那个提洛斯,
275and to honor that purpose, namely the procreative purpose并尊重这一目的,即生殖目的;
276of marriage. Is that a fair summary of your view?结婚 你的观点是这样总结的吗?
277Where's Ryan?赖安呢?
278Do you agree more or less with Mark's你或多或少同意马克的
279reasons?原因吗?
280Yes, I agree.是的,我同意这一点。
281I think that我觉得
282the ideal of marriage involves procreation.婚姻的理想涉及生育。
283And it's fine that homosexuals would go off同性恋也没关系
284and
285cohabitate with each other, but the government doesn't have a responsibility to同居,但政府没有责任
286encourage that.鼓励这样做。
287Alright, so the government should not encourage好吧,所以政府不应该鼓励
288homosexual behavior by conferring the recognition of marriage.同性恋行为 通过承认婚姻。
289Yeah, it would be wrong to outlaw it,是啊,这是错的 违法,
290but encouraging it is not necessary.但鼓励是没有必要的。
291Who has a reply?谁有答复?
292Yes.
293Hannah?汉娜?
294I'd just like to ask a question to Mark.我只想问马克一个问题。
295Let's say you got married to a woman,假设你嫁给了一个女人
296you did not have sex with her before marriage, and then when you became married,结婚前你没有和她发生性关系 然后结婚后
297it became evident that you were an infertile couple. Do you think that it很明显你们是一对不育的夫妇 你觉得
298should be illegal for you to engage in sex if children will not如果孩子不做爱,你应该违法
299result from that act?行为的结果?
300Yeah, I think that it is moral, and that's why I gave the two-fold purpose.是啊,我认为这是道德的, 这就是为什么我给出了双重目的。
301So like, a woman, say, I think older couples can get married, someone, a woman所以,一个女人,说,我认为 老年夫妇可以结婚,某人,一个女人
302who's beyond,谁超越,
303who's already had menopause,谁已经更年期了,
304and who can't have a child, because I think that和谁不能有一个孩子, 因为我认为
305sex has these,性有这些,
306it has purposes beyond procreation. I hate to be uncouth, but have you ever engaged它的目的不仅仅是生育 我讨厌不严谨 但你有没有订婚过
307in masturbation?手淫吗?
308You don't have to answer that.你不必回答这个问题。
309Just a minute.请等一下
310I'd like to respond to that.我想对此作出回应。
311We've done pretty well我们做得很好
312over a whole semester, and we're doing pretty well now,整个学期 我们表现得很好
313dealing with questions that most people think can't even be discussed in a处理大多数人认为无法在
314university setting.大学环境。
315Hannah, you have a powerful point. Make that point as a general汉娜,你很有说服力 做一个将军
316argument, rather than参数,而不是
317as an interrogative. But make the point.作为审讯。 但说正法.
318What's the principle that you're appealing? What's the argument you have in mind?你上诉的原则是什么? 你想说什么?
319Put it in the third person, rather than放在第三个人,而不是
320in the second person. Make the argument. Go ahead.在第二个人。 作是辩才. 来吧。
321Biblically, masturbation or onanism圣经,自慰或自恋
322is not permissible because it's spilling your seed on the earth when因为它将你的种子洒在地上
323it's not going to result in the birth of a child.它不会导致孩子的诞生。
324But what I'm saying is,但我要说的是,
325you're saying that sex, there's something wrong with sex if it doesn't你说的性,有 错与性,如果它不
326produce children or reinforce the marriage bond.生育子女或加强婚姻关系。
327But then how can you say that there's something wrong, that masturbation但是,你怎么能说 有事,自慰
328is permissible if masturbation obviously is not going to create a child?如果手淫显然不会造成孩子,那么是否允许?
329Yeah, I think marriage是啊,我觉得婚姻
330is society's way to create this separate institution where they say,社会是建立这个独立机构的方法,他们说,
331this is what we hold as a virtue. Yes, every day we fall short.这是我们所持有的美德。 是的,我们每天都缺钱。
332And people fall short in so many different other ways. But I think that人们在很多不同的方面都不足。 但我认为
333if you personally fall short in some moral sphere, as we all do, that doesn't如果你个人在一些道德领域 不足,像我们一样,这不是
334take the right of向右移动
335you to argue.你来争辩吧
336I want you to stay there. I want to bring in我要你留在这 我想带进来
337some other voices and we'll continue. Stay there if you would. Go ahead.其他的声音,我们会继续。 如果你愿意的话,留在那。 来吧。
338I think that the response to the masturbation... My name's Steve.我想对自慰的反应... 我叫史提夫,你好吗?
339The response to the masturbation issue is, it's not something that's permissible. I对自慰问题的反应是,这不是允许的东西. 一、导 言
340don't think anyone will argue that homosexual sex is impermissible.别以为有人会认为同性恋是不允许的
341It's just that society has no place in letting you marry yourself if只是社会没有地方让你自己结婚
342masturbation is something that you do.手淫是你们做的事
343Alright, Hannah.好吧,汉娜。
344Alright, Steve has drawn...好吧,史蒂夫已经画...
345Alright, that's a good argument.好吧,这是一个很好的争论。
346Steve has drawn our attention to the fact that there are two issues here.史蒂夫提请我们注意,这里有两个问题。
347One of them is the moral permissibility of various practices.其中之一是各种做法的道德允许性。
348The other is the fit between certain practices,另一种是某些做法之间的吻合,
349whatever their moral permissibility,无论道德上允许什么
350with the honor or recognition荣誉或承认
351that the state should accord in allowing marriage. So Steve has a pretty good国家应同意允许结婚。 所以,史蒂夫有一个相当好
352counter-argument.反辩.
353What do you say to Steve?你对史蒂夫怎么说?
354Well, I think that我觉得
355it's clear that human sexuality is something that is, you know, inherent in, I believe,显然,人类的性爱是,你知道, 内在的,我相信,
356most people. And it's not something you can avoid. And masturbation, I mean,大多数人。 而且这不是你能避免的 还有自慰,我的意思是,
357yeah, you can't marry yourself, but I don't think that是啊,你不能嫁给自己, 但我不认为
358takes away from the fact that, you know, homosexuals are people too.远离事实,你知道,同性恋也是人。
359And I just, I can't understand why我只是,我不明白为什么
360they wouldn't be able to marry each other. If you want to marry yourself,他们不可能结婚 如果你想嫁给自己
361I mean, I don't know if you can legally do that.我的意思是,我不知道 你是否能合法这样做。
362That's fine, but I don't think... Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.没关系 但我不觉得... 慢着,慢着
363Now here we're deciding, here we're deliberating as if legislators what the law现在我们来决定,我们来考虑 立法者什么法律
364should be.应该
365So you said, Steve, that's fine. Does that mean as a legislator you would vote你说,史蒂夫,没关系。 这是否意味着作为一个立法者 你会投票
366for a law of marriage that would be so broad婚姻法如此宽泛
367that it would let它会让
368people marry themselves?人们结婚吗?
369Well, I mean,我是说...
370that's really beyond the pale of, like,这真的超出了苍白的,喜欢,
371anything that would really happen, but任何真的会发生的事,但
372I don't think that... But in principle. Yeah, in principle. Yeah, sure, I mean, if Steve wants to marry我不认为... 但原则上 是啊,原则上。 是啊,当然,我的意思是,如果史蒂夫想结婚
373himself, I'm not going to stop him.我不会阻止他
374And you would confer state recognition on that你会得到国家承认
375solo marriage.单独结婚
376And while we're at it, what about consensual polygamous marriages?而当我们到了它, 那自愿的多配偶婚姻呢?
377I actually think that if the male and the female, or if the wives and the事实上,我认为,如果男女, 或者妻子和女人
378man and the husband or the husbands and the wife are consenting, it should be男人和丈夫或丈夫和妻子都同意,应该
379permissible.允许
380Who else? I know there are a lot of people who...还有谁? 我知道有许多人...
381Yes, okay, down here. Stand up and tell us your name. Victoria.是的,好吧,在这里。 站起来告诉我们你的名字。 维多利亚
382So we're talking about the theological reasoning here for marriage, but I我们谈的是婚姻的神学推理
383think the problem is that we're talking about it within问题是我们是在谈论它
384the Catholic viewpoint,天主教的观点,
385whereas the theological而神学
386and the point to marriage for another religion or someone who's an atheist和婚姻的意义 对于另一个宗教 或者一个无神论者
387could be completely different.可能会完全不同
388And the government doesn't have a right to impose政府没有权力强制
389the theological reasoning for Catholicism on天主教的神学推理
390everyone in the state,州内所有人
391which is what my problem is with not allowing same-sex marriage, because这就是我的问题 不允许同性婚姻,因为
392I mean, your beliefs are your beliefs, and that's fine,我的意思是,你的信仰是你的信仰, 这很好,
393but civil union is not marriage within the Catholic church.但民事结合不是天主教会内部的婚姻。
394And the state has a right to recognize a civil union between国家有权承认
395whoever it wants,无论它想要谁
396but does not have a right to impose the beliefs of a certain minority or但无权强迫某一少数人或
397majority or whoever it is多数或无论是谁
398based on a religion基于宗教
399within our state. Alright, Victoria, good. A question.在我们国家 好吧,维多利亚,很好。 问曰.
400Do you think the state should recognize same-sex marriage or just你觉得国家应该承认同性婚姻还是
401same-sex civil unions as something short of marriage?同性民事结合是婚姻的缺点?
402Well,那个
403I think that the state doesn't have a right to recognize it as marriage within我认为国家没有权利承认它是婚姻
404a church, because that is not their place,一个教堂,因为那里不是他们的地方,
405but whereas civil union, I see civil union as essentially the same thing,但尽管民事结合, 我认为民事结合 基本上是一样的,
406except not under a religion, and the state has a right to recognize国家有权承认
407a civil union. Alright, so Victoria's argument is that the state should not try to民事结合。 好吧,所以维多利亚的论点是 州不应该试图
408decide the question of what the telos of marriage is. That's only something that决定什么是婚约的问题。 那只是一些东西
409religious communities宗教社团
410can decide.可以决定。
411Who else?还有谁?
412My point is, I don't see why we feel like the state should recognize marriages at all.我想说的是,我不明白为什么我们觉得国家应该承认婚姻
413So I'm like one of these seven people who voted,所以我就像这七个人之一 谁投票,
414the state should not recognize any marriages, because国家不应承认任何婚姻,因为:
415I believe it is a union between我相信这是一个结合
416a male and a female, or男女,或
417two males or two females,两名男性或两名女性,
418but there is no reason to ask the state to give permission to me to但没有理由要求国家允许我
419unite myself, and some might say that团结我,有些人可能会说
420if the state recognizes these marriages,如果国家承认这些婚姻,
421it will help children, it will它会帮助儿童,它会
422have a binding effect, but in reality I don't think it但实际上我不觉得
423actually has a binding effect. Tell us your name.实际具有约束作用。 告诉我们你的名字。
424Victorian Cezanne's comments维多利亚·塞桑的评论
425differ from earlier parts of the conversation. They say与对话的早期部分不同。 他们说
426the state shouldn't be in the business国家不该插手
427of honoring or recognizing or affirming承认或确认
428any particular telos or purpose of marriage or of human sexuality,婚姻或人类性行为的任何特定传言或目的,
429and Cezanne is among those who says therefore maybe the state should get out of the businessCezanne是其中之一 说,也许国家应该 退出生意
430of recognizing marriage at all. Here's the question.完全承认婚姻。 问曰.
431Unless you adopt Cezanne's position, no state recognition of any kind of marriage,除非你采取Cezanne的立场, 没有州承认任何类型的婚姻,
432is it possible有没有可能
433to choose between,选择其中,
434to decide the question of same-sex marriage决定同性婚姻的问题
435without taking a stand on the moral and religious controversy over在道德和宗教的争论上,
436the proper telos of marriage?婚姻的传承?
437Thank you very much to all of you who have participated. We'll pick this up next time.非常感谢所有与会人员。 我们下次再拿
438You did a great job.你表现得很好
439When we当我们
440first came together some thirteen weeks ago,13个星期前第一次见面
441I tried to warn you我试着警告你
442that once the familiar turns strange,一旦熟悉的人变得奇怪,
443once we begin to reflect on our circumstance,一旦我们开始思考我们的情况
444it's never quite the same again.再也不会变了
445I hope you have by now experienced at least a little of this unease我希望你已经体验到 至少一点点这种不安
446because this is the tension因为这就是紧张
447that animates critical reflection动画 关键反射
448and political improvement政治改善
449and maybe even the moral life as well.甚至还有道德生活
450We have two remaining questions to answer.我们还有两个问题要回答。
451First, is it necessary,首先,是否有必要
452is it unavoidable这是不可避免的
453to take up questions of the good life and thinking about justice?接受美好生活的问题 思考正义?
454Yes.
455And is it possible有可能吗?
456to reason about justice?解释正义?
457Yes, I think so.是的,我想是这样。
458Let me try to让我试试
459develop开发
460those answers to those two questions.回答这两个问题
461Now, as a way of现在,作为一个方式
462addressing those questions, we began last time我们上次开始讨论这些问题
463to discuss the question of same-sex marriage.讨论同性婚姻的问题。
464And we heard from those我们听到那些
465who argued against same-sex marriage他们反对同性婚姻
466on the grounds that the purpose or telos以目的或电话为理由
467of marriage婚姻关系
468is这是
469at least in part至少有一部分
470procreation,生育,
471the bearing and raising of children.生育和抚养子女。
472And then there were those还有那些
473who defended辩护人
474same-sex marriage同性婚姻
475and they contested他们争先恐后,
476that account of the说明
477purpose or telos of marriage婚姻目的或婚约
478arguing争吵
479we don't require我们不需要
480as a condition of heterosexual marriage作为异性婚姻的条件
481that couples那对夫妇
482be able能够
483or willing to procreate.或愿意生育。
484We allow infertile couples我们允许不孕的夫妇
485to marry, this is结婚,这是
486Hannah's point in the exchange with Mark.汉娜在与马克的交流中的观点.
487But then there was another position但后来又有个位置
488expressed at the end of our discussion by Victoria维多利亚在讨论结束时
489who argued谁争论
490we shouldn't try to decide this question.我们不应该试图决定这个问题。
491We shouldn't at least at the level of the state至少我们不应该在州一级
492at the level of law在法律一级
493try to come to any agreement尝试达成任何协议
494on those questions about the good关于那些关于好人的问题
495because we live in a pluralist society where people have different moral and religious convictions.因为我们生活在一个多元社会,人们有不同的道德和宗教信仰。
496And so we should try所以我们应该试试
497to make law制定法律
498and the framework of rights和权利框架
499neutral with respect to these competing moral and religious views.对这些相互竞争的道德和宗教观点持中立态度。
500Now it's interesting that others现在有趣的是其他人
501some others还有一些
502who favor the idea of neutrality他们主张中和,
503argued not in favor不赞成
504of restricting marriage限制婚姻
505to a man and a woman对一男一女
506nor in favor也不赞成
507of permitting same-sex marriage. They argued允许同性婚姻。 他们争吵
508in the name of neutrality以中立的名义
509for a third possibility第三种可能性
510which is that government就是那个政府
511should get out of the business of recognizing any kind of marriage.应该放弃承认任何一种婚姻的工作。
512That was the third possibility.这是第三种可能性。
513Now, Andrea Mayrose安德里亚·梅罗斯
514had an interesting contribution to this debate. She had a rejoinder对这次辩论作出了令人感兴趣的贡献。 她有一个复辩状
515to people who argue以争论的人们发誓,
516for neutrality. Where is Andrea?为了中立。 安德里亚在哪?
517Andrea, would you be willing安德里亚,你愿意吗?
518share with us和我们分享
519the view, if we can get you a microphone,风景,如果我们能 给你一个麦克风,
520share with us your view. Why do you think与我们分享你的观点。 你为什么认为
521that it's a mistake那是个错误
522for the state to try to be neutral国家试图保持中立
523on moral and even religious questions like same-sex marriage?关于道德甚至宗教问题 比如同性婚姻?
524I don't know that it is possible because people's lives我不知道这是可能的 因为人们的生活
525are已经
526completely embedded in how they view the world and完全植根于他们如何看待世界
527maybe I just agree with Aristotle that the role of the government is helping people也许我同意亚里士多德的观点 政府的作用是帮助人民
528live in a sort of生活在某种意义上
529having a collective understanding of what集体理解什么
530is wrong and what is right. Is it possible, and one could ask the same question of abortion错和错 有可能吗? 可以问同样的堕胎问题
531that we've been asking我们一直在问
532of same-sex marriage,同性婚姻,
533do you think it's possible你觉得这有可能吗?
534to decide whether abortion should be是否应当堕胎
535permitted or prohibited允许或禁止
536without taking a stand or making a judgment不采取立场或作出判断
537about the moral permissibility of abortion?关于堕胎的道德允许性?
538No, I don't think it is and I think that's why it's such a controversy because people are不,我不认为它是, 我认为这就是为什么 这是一个如此争议 因为人们是
539so deeply committed to their fundamental beliefs about whether a fetus is a life or if it isn't.如此坚定的信念 他们关于胎儿是生命,还是生命不是。
540If I believe that a fetus is a living being如果我相信一个胎儿是生命
541and has rights和享有权利
542and has fundamentally the rights to live, then it's very hard for me to say,并且基本上有生存的权利, 那么它是非常困难的我说,
543but I can put that aside and let you do what you want because that's like me saying,但我可以把那个放在一边 让你做你想做的事 因为就像我说的
544well despite my beliefs I'm going to let you commit what to me is murder.好吧,尽管我的信仰... ...我要让你做... ...什么对我来说是谋杀。
545The analogy in the same-sex marriage case is,同性婚姻案中的类比是,
546you said你说
547you're a defender of same-sex marriage,你是同性婚姻的维护者
548but you only came to that view但你只是来到了那个观点
549once you were persuaded你曾经被说服过
550on the underlying moral question.道德问题。
551Right, well I think particularly in the U.S. so many people's beliefs are driven by their religious beliefs对,我想在美国尤其如此 所以很多人的信仰 是由他们的宗教信仰驱动的
552and like Mark the other day, I'm Christian, I'm Catholic,像马克前几天一样 我是基督徒 我是天主教徒
553and I had to decide for myself like on a lot of thought, a lot of prayer, a lot of conversations with other people我不得不决定自己喜欢 很多思考, 很多祷告, 很多对话 其他人
554that I disagreed with the Catholic standpoint that homosexuality itself is in a sin.我不同意天主教的观点 同性恋本身是有罪的。
555{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}当我来到那种地方
556conclusion in my personal relationship with God,我和上帝的私人关系
557like, I mean that sounds喜欢,我的意思是,这听起来
558hokey right, that's like, oh religious, but a lot of people are religious and that's where they draw their beliefs and their views from.对,这就像,哦,宗教, 但很多人是宗教, 在那里他们吸引他们的信仰和观点。
559That's when I could say, yeah, I'm down with the state saying这时候我可以说,是的, 我下与州说
560go same-sex marriage because I'm okay with that and I think that's morally okay.做同性婚姻,因为我同意 我认为这在道德上是好的。
561Good, thank you.很好 谢谢
562Now who would like to reply, if you can perhaps现在,谁愿意回答,如果你可以
563hang on there for a moment, who would like to reply等一会,谁想回答
564to Andrea's idea安德里亚的想法
565that in order to decide the question of same-sex marriage为了决定同性婚姻问题
566it's necessary to这是必须的
567sort out the question about the解决关于
568moral status of homosexuality and同性恋的道德地位
569figuring out the purpose, the telos, the proper end找出目的, 提洛斯, 适当的结束
570of marriage. Who disagrees结婚 谁不同意
571with Andrea与安德里亚
572on that point?这点?
573Well, I think you absolutely can separate your moral opinion好吧,我觉得你绝对可以 分离你的道德观点
574and what you think the law should be.以及你认为法律应该是什么
575For example,举例来说,
576I think abortion is我认为堕胎是
577unequivocally morally wrong,道德上显然是错误的,
578but I do not believe that illegalizing abortion makes it go away.但我不认为非法堕胎会让它消失
579I don't believe illegalizing abortion stops it我不相信非法堕胎会阻止它
580and therefore I am pro-choice所以我赞成选择
581and I do believe the woman should have the choice我相信女人应该有选择
582as it gives them more safety just as让他们更加安全
583maybe也许
584morally I don't want to get married to a man道德上我不想嫁给男人
585but I'm not going to try to但我不会试图
586impede someone else's freedom妨碍别人的自由
587to do what they wish to do做他们想做的事
588in terms of the law.以诸法界.
589Whether the law makes something legal or illegal is it's implicitly法律是合法还是非法 是隐含的
590approving or disapproving something. So if you say批准或不批准的东西。 所以,如果你说
591by making abortion堕胎
592legal, we're saying it's okay. As a society, collectively we're saying法律,我们说没关系。 作为一个社会,我们集体说
593it's okay with us in our society我们社会上也没关系
594to abort a fetus.将胎儿流产。
595If we make it legal,如果我们使它合法,
596if we make it illegal, then we're saying collectively as a society如果我们把它非法, 然后我们集体地说作为一个社会
597it's not okay. And that's why society says it's not legal.这不好。 社会也因此说不合法.
598My name is Daniel.我叫丹尼尔
599Daniel, what do you say?丹尼尔,你觉得怎么样?
600Are we saying collectively that it's okay?我们一起说没关系吗?
601We're saying that collectively we don't want women我们说我们集体不要女人
602who are going to have an abortion anyway to go to clinics in the side alleys and have准备堕胎的人 要去边巷的诊所
603unsafe conditions.不安全的条件。
604All right, bring it to the same-sex marriage case.好吧,把它带到同性婚姻案件。
605Why don't you have to decide that which position you're in favor of你为何不决定你赞成什么立场
606same-sex marriage, Daniel, being legally permitted? I think it absolutely should be丹尼尔,是法律允许的同性婚姻? 我觉得绝对应该
607legally permitted法律允许的
608because it's not something telling me that I need to marry a man.因为它没有告诉我 我需要嫁给一个男人。
609I don't see if two men are consenting adults and want to get married.我看不出两个男人是否同意成年,想要结婚.
610I don't see how I could even object to that. There's no harm. There's no harm done, either way,我看不出我怎么会反对 无碍无碍. 也没什么坏处
611even if it is morally wrong according to me.即使我认为这在道德上是错误的
612Let me turn to the way让我转过身去
613the Massachusetts court, who made this landmark ruling in the same-sex在马萨诸塞州法庭上,他以同性关系做出这一具有里程碑意义的裁决
614marriage case,婚姻案件,
615grappled with努力争取
616the very issue that Andrea and Dan have been安德里亚和丹的问题
617discussing here. Thanks to both of you very much.讨论在这里。 非常感谢你们俩
618What did the court say? This was in the Goodridge case, which法庭怎么说? 这是在Goodridge的案子里
619required the state of Massachusetts需要马萨诸塞州
620to extend marriage to将婚姻延伸至
621same-sex couples.同性伴侣。
622The court法院
623started out, well, the court was conflicted,一开始,嗯,法院是冲突的,
624if you read that opinion carefully,如果你仔细读了这个意见
625the court was conflicted宫廷冲突
626as between之间
627the two positions两个职位
628we've just been我们刚刚
629defended by Andrea and by Dan.由安德里亚和丹辩护
630The court begins, and this is朝廷开始,这是
631Chief Justice Margaret Marshall's opinion,首席法官玛格丽特·马歇尔的意见,
632it begins开始
633with an attempt试图
634at liberal neutrality.在自由中立。
635Many people hold deep-seated religious moral and ethical convictions that许多人持有根深蒂固的宗教道德和伦理信念,
636marriage should be limited to the union of one man and one woman,婚姻应限于一男一女的结合;
637and that homosexual conduct is immoral.同性恋的行为是不道德的
638Many hold equally strong religious moral and ethical convictions that same-sex许多人同样坚信同性
639couples are entitled to be married, that homosexual person should be treated no夫妇有权结婚,同性恋者应得到待遇
640differently than their heterosexual neighbors.跟他们的异性恋邻居不一样
641This is the court.此是宫廷.
642Neither view answers the question两种观点都没有回答问题
643before us.在我们面前。
644What is at stake is, quote, respect for individual autonomy关键在于尊重个人自主
645and equality和平等
646under law.根据法律规定。
647At stake is事关重大
648an individual freely choosing the person with whom to share an exclusive个人自由选择与谁分享排他性
649commitment. In other words, an issue is not承诺。 换句话说,问题不是
650the moral worth of the choice,选择的道德价值,
651but the right of the individual to make it.但个人有权做它。
652So, this is the liberal neutral strand in the court opinion,所以,这是自由中立 线在法院的意见,
653Bollentra strand, the one that emphasizes autonomy, choice, consent.Bollentra线条,强调自主,选择,同意的线条.
654But the court seemed to realize但法庭似乎意识到
655that the liberal case,自由主义的情况,
656the neutral case, for recognizing same-sex marriage中立的理由,因为承认同性婚姻
657doesn't succeed, doesn't get you all the way to that position, because if it were没有成功,没有 让你一路到那个位置, 因为如果它是
658only a matter of respect for individual autonomy,仅仅是尊重个人自主的问题,
659if government were truly neutral如果政府真正中立
660on the moral worth道德价值
661of voluntary intimate relationships,自愿的亲密关系,
662then接下来
663it should adopt它应该通过
664a different policy,不同的政策,
665which is to remove要删除的
666government and the state altogether政府和整个国家
667from
668according根据
669recognition承认
670to certain associations, certain kinds of unions,对某些协会、某些类型的工会,
671rather than others.而不是别人。
672If government really must be neutral,如果政府真的要中立的话
673then接下来
674the consistent position立场一致
675is what we here have been describing as这就是我们在这里描述的
676the third position,第三个职位,
677the one defended in the article by Michael Kinsley,迈克尔·金斯利在文章中辩护的那个
678who argues谁争辩
679for the abolition of marriage at least as a state function.废除婚姻至少是一项国家职能。
680Perhaps a better term for this is the disestablishment of religion.或许一个更好的术语就是宗教的瓦解。
681This is Kinsley's proposal.这是金斯利的提议。
682He points out他说
683that the reason原因
684for the opposition反对派代表
685to same-sex marriage同性婚姻
686is that it would go beyond它会超越
687neutral toleration中性容忍
688and give same-sex marriage a government stamp of approval.并给予同性婚姻政府批准印章。
689That's at the heart of the dispute.这是争议的核心。
690In Aristotle's terms,按亚里士多德的说法
691at issue here is the proper distribution of offices and honors, a matter of social这里的问题是职务和荣誉的适当分配,这是一个社会问题。
692recognition.承认。
693Same-sex marriage同性婚姻
694can't be justified on the basis of liberal neutrality or nondiscrimination or不能以自由中立、不歧视或
695autonomy rights alone,仅自主权利,
696because the question at stake in the public debate因为这个问题在公开辩论中至关重要
697is whether same-sex unions have moral worth, whether they're worthy of honor and是同性结合是否具有道德价值, 是否值得荣誉和
698recognition,承认,
699and whether they fit the purpose of the social institution以及它们是否符合社会制度的宗旨;
700of marriage.结婚
701So,这么说
702Kinsley says,金斯利说,
703you want to be neutral?你想保持中立吗?
704Then let churches and other religious institutions offer marriage ceremonies.然后让教会和其他宗教机构举行结婚仪式。
705Let department stores and casinos get into the act if they want to.百货公司和赌场如果愿意,就让它们参与行动。
706This is Kinsley.这是金斯利。
707Let couples celebrate their union in any way they choose让夫妇以他们选择的任何方式庆祝他们的结合
708and consider themselves married认为自己结婚了
709whenever they want.随时随地
710And if three people want to get married,如果三个人想结婚
711or if one person wants to marry如果一个人想结婚
712himself or herself,他或她,
713and someone else wants to conduct a ceremony for them and declare them married,还有别人想为他们举行仪式 宣布他们结婚了
714let them. If you and your government are implicated,让他们。 如果你和你的政府被牵连
715what do you care? This is Kinsley.你关心什么? 这是金斯利。
716But, this is not但是,这不是
717the position职位
718that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts wanted.马萨诸塞州最高法院想要的
719They didn't call for the abolition他们没有要求废除
720or for the disestablishment of marriage.或者因为婚姻破裂
721The court did not question法院没有质疑
722the government's role in conferring social recognition on some intimate associations政府在给予一些亲密协会社会承认方面的作用
723rather than others.而不是别人。
724To the contrary,相反,
725the court waxes eloquent宫廷充满雄辩
726about marriage关于婚姻
727as quote, one of our community's most rewarding and cherished institutions.作为引文,我们社区最有价值和最珍视的机构之一。
728And then it goes on to expand the definition of marriage to include partners然后,它进一步扩大了婚姻的定义 包括伴侣
729of the same sex.同一性别。
730And in doing so,这样一来,
731it acknowledges它承认
732that marriage is more婚姻更是这样
733than a matter一个问题
734of tolerating choices that individuals make.个人作出的容忍选择。
735It's also a matter这也是个问题
736of social recognition社会承认
737and honor.和荣誉。
738As Justice Marshall wrote, in a real sense, there are three partners to every civil marriage,正如马歇尔法官所写, 真正意义上, 每个公证婚姻有三个伴侣,
739two willing spouses,两人是自愿的,
740and an approving state.和批准状态。
741Marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment, but also a highly public celebration婚姻既是个人的深厚承诺,也是公众的盛庆
742of the ideals of mutuality, companionship, intimacy, fidelity, and family.彼此相爱、亲密、忠诚和家庭的理想。
743This is the court.此是宫廷.
744Now this is reaching well beyond liberal neutrality.现在,这远远超出了自由中立。
745This is celebrating and affirming这是庆祝和肯定
746marriage as an honorific,作为荣誉的婚姻,
747as a form of作为一种形式的
748public recognition.公开承认。
749And therefore the court found that it couldn't avoid the debate因此法庭认为无法避免辩论
750about the telos有关电视剧
751of marriage.结婚
752Justice Marshall's opinion considers马歇尔法官的意见认为
753and rejects the notion并拒绝这个想法,
754that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation.结婚的主要目的是生育。
755She points out that there's no requirement that applicants她指出,没有要求申请人
756for marriage license who are heterosexuals attest to their ability or their intention异性恋者证明自己的能力或意图;
757to conceive children.怀着孩子
758Fertility is not a condition of marriage.生育不是婚姻的条件。
759People who cannot stir from their deathbed无法从死亡中振动的人
760may marry.可以结婚。
761So she advances all kinds of arguments所以她提出各种论点
762including the lines that we began last time包括上次开始的台词
763about what the proper and the essential nature of the telos of marriage is. And she concludes婚姻的本质和本质是什么 她总结了
764not procreation,不生育,
765but the exclusive and permanent commitment of the partners to one another但伙伴们对彼此的专有和永久承诺
766is the essential关键是
767point
768and purpose目标
769of marriage.结婚
770Now nothing I've said我什么都没说
771about关于
772this这个
773court opinion法院意见
774is an argument for or against same-sex marriage, but it is an argument against the claim这是支持或反对同性婚姻的论点,但它是反对主张的理由。
775that you can favor or oppose same-sex marriage你可以支持或反对同性婚姻
776while remaining neutral保持中立时
777on the underlying说明
778moral道义
779and religious questions.和宗教问题。
780So all of this is to suggest所以所有这一切都是暗示
781that at least in some至少在某些
782of the hotly contested热竞者
783about justice and rights that we have in our society,关于我们社会中的正义和权利,
784the attempt to be neutral,企图中立,
785the attempt to say试图说
786it's just a matter只是个问题
787of consent and choice and autonomy,同意、选择和自主,
788we take no stand, that doesn't succeed.我们不采取立场,那不会成功。
789Even the court,连法庭,
790which wants to be neutral on these moral and religious disputes, finds that it can't.想要在这些道德和宗教纠纷上保持中立, 发现它不能。
791What then about our second question?那第二个问题呢?
792If reasoning about the good如果关于好的推理
793is unavoidable这是不可避免的
794in debates about justice and rights,在关于司法和权利的辩论中,
795is it possible?有可能吗?
796If reasoning about the good如果关于好的推理
797means表示
798that you must have a single principle or rule or maxim您必须有一个单一的原则或规则或准则
799or criterion或标准
800for the good life为了美好生活
801that you simply plug in every time you have a disagreement你只要每次有分歧
802about morality, then the answer is no.关于道德,那么答案是否定的。
803But having a single但有一个单身
804principle or rule原则或规则
805is not the only way,不是唯一的办法,
806not the best way不是最好的办法
807of页:1
808reasoning推理
809either about the good life或关于美好生活
810or about justice.或关于正义。
811Think back,回想起来
812think back回想起来
813to the arguments that we've been having here我们一直在这里争论
814about justice关于司法
815and about rights权利
816and sometimes about the good life.有时候,关于美好生活。
817How have those arguments proceeded?这些论点如何进行?
818They've proceeded他们开始了
819very much in the way非常麻烦
820that Aristotle suggests亚里士多德建议
821moving back and forth前后移动
822between our judgments about particulars, particular cases, events,我们对于具体案件 事件
823stories, questions,故事,问题,
824back and forth between our judgments about particular cases在我们对特定案件的判决之间
825and more general principles that make sense of our reasons for the positions we take更一般性的原则 说明我们的立场的理由
826on the particular cases.关于特定案件。
827This这个
828dialectical way辩证方法
829of doing moral reasoning进行道德推理
830goes back to the ancients回到古人身边
831to Plato and Aristotle到柏拉图和亚里士多德
832but it doesn't stop with them但它不停止与他们
833because there is a version因为有一个版本
834of Socratic or dialectical索克拉底语或辩证语
835moral reasoning道德推理
836that is这是
837with great clarity and force以极大的清晰度和力量
838约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)
839in giving an account在提供账户时
840of his method他的方法
841of justifying说明理由
842a theory of justice.一个正义的理论。
843You remember it's not only the veil of ignorance and the principles你记得这不仅仅是无知的面纱和原则
844Rawls主张的
845It's also a method of moral reasoning,这也是一种道德推理的方法,
846reasoning about justice that he calls他所说的正义的推理
847reflective equilibrium.反应平衡
848What is the method of reflective equilibrium?什么是反映平衡的方法?
849It's moving back and forth前后移动
850between our我们之间
851considered judgments about particular cases考虑对特定案件的判决
852and the general principles和一般原则
853we would articulate我们来阐述
854to make sense of those judgments使这些判决有意义
855and not just stopping there而不只是停留在那里,
856because we might be wrong in our initial intuitions.因为我们最初的直觉可能错了
857Not stopping there不要停下来
858but then sometimes revising our particular judgments但有时会修改我们的具体判决
859in the light of the principles根据这些原则,
860once we work them out一旦我们解决了他们
861so sometimes we revise the principles所以有时候我们修改原则
862sometimes we revise our judgments and intuitions in the particular cases有时我们修正我们的判断 和直觉在特定案件中
863the general point is this总的一点是
864and here I quote Rawls我在这里引用罗尔斯的话
865a conception of justice can't be deduced正义的概念不能推论
866from self-evident premises从不言而喻的前提出发
867its justification理由说明
868is a matter of the mutual support of many considerations是一个得到许多考虑的相互支持的问题。
869of everything fitting together与一切相适应
870into one coherent变成一个整体
871and later in a theory of justice he writes moral philosophy is socratic在后来的正义理论中 他写道德哲学是专制的
872we may want to change our present considered judgments我们也许想改变我们目前深思熟虑的判决
873once their regulative一次他们的规制
874principles原则
875are brought to light.被揭发。
876Well, if Rawls accepts that idea如果罗尔斯接受这个想法
877and advances that notion of reflective equilibrium the question并推进反映平衡的概念
878we're left with is我们留下的是
879he applies that他应用
880to questions of justice司法问题
881not to questions不问问题
882of morality道德观
883and the good life和幸福的生活,
884and that's why这就是为什么
885he remains committed to the priority of the right over the good他仍然致力于将权利置于好人之上
886he thinks the method of reflective equilibrium他认为 反射平衡的方法
887can generate shared judgments能够生成共同判断
888about justice and the right关于正义和权利
889but he doesn't think但他不认为
890they can generate shared judgments它们可以产生共同的判决
891about the good life关于美好生活
892about what he calls comprehensive关于他所说的全面,
893moral道义
894and religious questions宗教问题
895the reason he thinks that他这样想的原因
896is that he says that他说
897in modern societies在现代社会中
898there is a fact of reasonable pluralism about the good事实上,在福利方面,存在着合理的多元化。
899even conscientious people who reason well即使是有良心的人 也有理由
900will find that they disagree将发现他们不同意
901about questions关于问题
902of the good life过着美好的生活
903about morality and religion关于道德和宗教
904Rawls is likely罗尔斯很可能会
905right about that
906he's not talking about the fact of disagreement他不是在说分歧的事实
907in pluralist societies在多元化社会中
908he's also suggesting他还建议
909that there may be persisting可能存在持续性
910disagreements不同意见
911about the good life关于美好生活
912and about moral and religious questions道德和宗教问题
913but if that's true但是如果这是真的
914then接下来
915is he warranted in his further claim在进一步申诉中他是否有理由
916that the same can't be said about justice正义是不能说的
917isn't it also true这不也是事实吗
918not only that we as a matter of fact disagree不仅是事实上我们不同意
919about justice in pluralist societies关于多元社会中的正义
920but that at least some of those disagreements are reasonable disagreements但至少其中一些分歧是合理分歧
921in the same way以同样的方式
922some people favor有人喜欢
923a libertarian theory of justice自由主义的正义理论
924others a more egalitarian theory of justice and they argue其他人更平等的正义理论 他们争论
925and there is pluralism in our society as between free market laissez faire libertarian在自由市场和自由自由主义者之间 社会上存在着多元化
926theories of justice司法理论
927and more egalitarian ones和更加平等的人,
928is there any difference in principle原则上有没有区别
929between the kind of moral reasoning在道德推理之间
930and the kind of disagreements that arise when we debate about justice以及我们辩论正义时产生的分歧
931and the meaning of free speech言论自由的意义
932and the nature of religious liberty宗教自由的性质
933look at the debates we have看看我们的辩论
934over结束
935disagreements to the supreme court与最高法院的分歧
936these are all disagreements about justice and rights这些都是关于正义和权利的分歧
937is there any difference between有没有区别
938the fact of reasonable pluralism合理多元化的事实
939in the case情况
940of justice and rights司法与权利
941and in the case在案件发生时
942of morality道德观
943and religion in principle宗教原则
944i don't think that there is我不认为有
945in both cases在这两种情况下
946what we do when we disagree我们意见不一时做什么
947is这是
948we engage with our interlocutor我们与对话者接触
949as we've been doing here for an entire semester就像我们在这里做了整整一个学期
950we consider the arguments我们考虑的论点
951that are provoked by particular cases被特定案件激怒的人
952we try to develop the reasons that lead us to go one way rather than another我们试图找出导致我们走向一条道路而不是另一条道路的原因
953and then we listen to the reasons of other people然后我们听别人的理由
954and sometimes we're persuaded有时候我们被说服
955to revise our view来修改我们的观点
956other times we're challenged at least to shore up and strengthen our view换句话说 我们至少要站出来加强我们的视野
957but this is how moral但这是道德
958disagreement proceeds异议收益
959with justice正义
960and so it seems to me also所以在我看来
961with questions有问题
962of the good life过着美好的生活
963now there remains a further worry现在还有人担心
964and it's a liberal worry这是自由主义的担心
965what about怎么样
966if we're going to think of our disagreements about morality and religion如果我们要考虑 关于道德和宗教的分歧
967as bound up with our disagreements about justice就像我们对于正义的分歧
968how are we ever going to find our way to a society我们怎样才能找到通往社会的道路
969that accords respect给予尊重
970to改为:
971fellow citizens with whom we disagree我们不同意的同胞们
972it depends i think这要看我想
973on which conception在哪个概念上
974of respect尊重的权利
975one accepts一个接受
976on the liberal conception自由概念
977to respect our fellow citizens moral and religious convictions尊重我们的同胞道德和宗教信仰
978is so to speak这么说吧
979to ignore them无视他们
980for political purposes用于政治目的
981to rise above or abstract from or to set aside超越或抽象脱离或搁置
982those moral and religious convictions这些道德和宗教信仰
983to leave them undisturbed让他们不受干扰
984to carry on our political debate without reference to them继续我们的政治辩论 而不提及他们
985but that isn't the only way但这不是唯一的办法
986or perhaps even the most也许最
987plausible way说得有道理
988of understanding the mutual respect理解相互尊重
989on which democratic life民主生活
990depends取决于
991there's a different conception of respect有不同的尊重观念
992according to which we respect our fellow citizens我们尊重同胞
993moral and religious convictions道德和宗教信仰
994not by ignoring but by engaging them不是无视而是让他们参与
995by attending to them照顾他们
996sometimes by challenging and contesting them有时通过质疑和质疑
997sometimes有时候
998by listening通过监听
999and learning from them和向他们学习
1000now there's no guarantee现在没有保证
1001that a politics of moral and religious一种道德和宗教政治
1002attention and engagement关注和参与
1003will lead in any given case to agreement在任何特定情况下,都会达成协议
1004there's no guarantee it will lead even to appreciation连感激都无法保证
1005for the moral and religious convictions of others it's always possible after all对于他人的道德信仰和宗教信仰,毕竟永远是可能的
1006that learning more about a religious or a moral doctrine更了解一种宗教或道德理论
1007will lead us to like it会让我们喜欢
1008less
1009but the respect of deliberation但尊重审议
1010and engagement参与
1011seems to me a more adequate more suitable ideal for a pluralist society对我来说,对于多元社会来说, 更合适的理想
1012and to the extent范围
1013that our moral and religious disagreements reflect我们的道德和宗教分歧反映了
1014some ultimate plurality of human goods人品的某些最终多元性
1015a politics of moral engagement道德参与政治
1016will better enable us更能让我们
1017so it seems to me to appreciate所以在我看来很欣赏
1018the distinctive goods特殊货物
1019our different lives express我们不同的生活表达
1020when we当我们
1021first came together some thirteen weeks ago13周前第一次见面
1022i spoke of the exhilaration of political philosophy我说的是政治哲学的赞叹
1023and also of its dangers及其危险
1024about how philosophy works关于哲学如何运作
1025and has always worked并一直工作着
1026by estranging us因为我们被包围
1027from the familiar从熟悉的
1028by unsettling通过不安
1029our settled assumptions我们的既定假设
1030i tried to warn you我试着警告你
1031that once the familiar turns strange一旦熟悉的人变得奇怪
1032once we begin to reflect on our circumstance一旦我们开始思考我们的情况
1033it's never quite the same again再也不会这样了
1034i hope you have by now experienced at least a little of this unease我希望你已经体验了 至少一点点这种不安
1035because this is the tension因为这就是紧张
1036that animates critical reflection动画 关键反射
1037and political improvement政治改善
1038and maybe even the moral life as well甚至还有道德生活
1039and so our argument comes to an end in a sense but in another sense goes on我们的争论从某种意义上说结束 但从另一种意义上说
1040why为什么
1041we asked at the outset我们一开始问
1042why do these arguments keep going为什么要继续这些争论
1043even if they raise questions即使他们提出问题,
1044that are impossible ever finally to resolve永远无法解决
1045the reason原因
1046is that we live some answer是我们活在一个答案
1047to these questions这些问题
1048all the time总是
1049in our public life在我们的公共生活中
1050and in our personal lives以及我们个人生活中
1051philosophy is inescapable哲学是不可避免的
1052even
1053if it sometimes seems如果有时看起来
1054impossible无法
1055we began with the thought of Kant我们从康德的思想开始
1056that skepticism is a resting place for human reason怀疑是人类的宿命
1057where it can reflect upon its dogmatic wanderings在那里它可以反射 它的教条流浪
1058but it is no dwelling place for permanent settlement但它不是永久住所
1059to allow ourselves simply to acquiesce in skepticism or in complacence仅仅允许自己默许怀疑主义或合谋
1060Kant wrote康德写道:
1061can never suffice永远不够
1062to overcome the restlessness of reason克服理性的不安
1063the aim of this course课程的目的
1064has been to awaken已经醒来
1065the restlessness of reason不安的理性
1066and to see where it might lead并看看它可能通往何处
1067and if we have done at least that如果我们至少已经这样做了
1068and if the restlessness假若他们不安,
1069continues to afflict you继续折磨你
1070in the days and years to come未来的日子和岁月
1071then we together然后我们在一起
1072have achieved已经实现
1073no small thing没什么小事
1074thank you谢谢
1075don't miss the chance to interact online with other viewers of Justice不要错过与司法界其他观众互动的机会
1076join the conversation加入对话
1077take a pop quiz参加一个流行测验
1078watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more看你错过的讲座 学到更多
1079visit justiceharvard.org访问司法厅.org
1080it's the right thing to do这是正确的事情
1081funding for this program is provided by方案经费由下列机构提供:
1082additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1083 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格