推荐微信扫码登录以获得更好的体验!另:🎉建议更新到最新版,以体验新功能!🎉 版本更新记录→

【剑桥辩论】技术侵蚀了民主 2026-11-06 [B1]

【剑桥辩论】技术侵蚀了民主 2026-11-06 [B1]

【剑桥辩论】技术侵蚀了民主 2026-11-06 [B1]

发布于 2026-11-07 · 时长 1:39:31

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:13Hello, everyone, and welcome to the fifth debate of the year.大家好 欢迎参加今年的第五次辩论
0:18A few points from me first, as usual.我先说几分,如往常.
0:21Firstly, applications for Deputy Returning Officer第一,申请副返回干事
0:24close soon.很快关闭。
0:25Make sure to get on that as soon as you can.尽快解决
0:27Perks include charity points, which施舍包括慈善点,
0:29you need to run for positions on standing,你需要竞选站立位置,
0:32and priority for drink receptions和饮料招待会的优先权;
0:33with our esteemed guests, including this Hawking fellow,与我们的贵宾, 包括这个霍金家伙,
0:36Sir James Dyson.詹姆士・戴森爵士
展开字幕全文(1499 条)
序号英文中文
1Hello, everyone, and welcome to the fifth debate of the year.大家好 欢迎参加今年的第五次辩论
2A few points from me first, as usual.我先说几分,如往常.
3Firstly, applications for Deputy Returning Officer第一,申请副返回干事
4close soon.很快关闭。
5Make sure to get on that as soon as you can.尽快解决
6Perks include charity points, which施舍包括慈善点,
7you need to run for positions on standing,你需要竞选站立位置,
8and priority for drink receptions和饮料招待会的优先权;
9with our esteemed guests, including this Hawking fellow,与我们的贵宾, 包括这个霍金家伙,
10Sir James Dyson.詹姆士・戴森爵士
11Also, on your order papers, you will see our members' memos还有,在你的订货单上,你会看到我们的会员备忘录
12on the QR code.在QR代码。
13By all means, scan it if you have随便了,如果你有的话,就扫描一下
14any thoughts on the topic at hand,关于本专题的任何想法,
15any constructive criticism for the committee对委员会的任何建设性批评
16on putting on these events, or if you just或者说,如果你只是
17want to let us know how awesome we are, that would be great.告诉我们我们有多棒 那就太好了
18Moving on, the motion before the House tonight继续,今晚众议院的议案
19is this House believes technology这房子相信科技
20has eroded democracy.已经侵蚀了民主。
21Each speaker will be given eight minutes每个发言者将有8分钟的发言时间。
22to speak in opposition or proposition to the motion,表示反对或提议动议,
23during which you guys are welcome to raise your hand欢迎你们举手
24and say on that point or point of information并在此信息点上说
25if you would like to challenge what they're saying.如果你想挑战他们说的话
26They are at liberty to accept or reject your point,他们有权接受或拒绝你的观点,
27so please be respectful of that.所以请尊重这一点。
28And again, no back and forth.复次无前后.
29As usual, film and photography is not permitted tonight.和往常一样,电影和摄影是不允许 今晚。
30Leave us to do that.离开我们去做到这一点。
31We have trained professionals on standby.我们已经培训了待命的专业人员。
32OK, with all that out of the way, let's get started.好,让开,我们开始吧
33Speaking first in proposition is Dr. Fazl Barres,法兹尔·巴雷斯博士首先发言
34a senior researcher at the University of Oxford,牛津大学高级研究员,
35where he leads the Technical Safety and Governance Lab他领导技术安全与治理实验室
36and serves as technical director of the AI Governance并担任AI治理技术主任
37Initiative.倡议。
38His research examines what happens inside AI systems他的研究研究了AI系统内部发生的事情
39and how those systems can be governed,以及如何管理这些系统,
40including the risks advanced technology poses包括先进技术带来的风险
41to democratic institutions from surveillance从监视到民主机构
42to AI-enabled authoritarianism.专制主义。
43Dr. Fazl, you have the years of the House.法兹尔博士,你有家族的年号
44Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen,主席先生,女士们,先生们,
45it's a pleasure to be here.很高兴能来
46I think we all can agree that when an engineer is standing我想我们都同意 当一个工程师站在
47here before you tonight, democracy is in danger.今晚在你面前 民主处于危险之中
48And to make the case, I'll make three points.且为立案,则三分矣.
49First, technology has fundamentally首先,技术从根本上讲
50changed the balance of power between citizens and the state.改变了公民和国家之间的权力平衡。
51Governments can now monitor people政府现在可以监测人民
52on scale that once would have been unimaginable.其规模曾经是不可思议的。
53Second, technology is making accountability increasingly第二,技术使问责制日益加强。
54difficult.很难
55We are now allowing algorithms to decide我们现在允许算法决定
56what we see, what we hear, and how to live our lives.我们所看到的,我们听到的, 和如何生活我们的生活。
57And third, technology whose control and information第三,控制与信息的技术
58we use to make democratic choices are uneven我们用来做出民主选择是不平衡的
59and not distributed equally.而且分配不均
60So first of all, who can watch us?首先 谁能监视我们?
61For most of the history, governments对于大部分历史,政府
62had a very scarce resource.资源非常匮乏。
63In order for them to monitor and surveil you,为了让他们监视你
64they had to actually use a human to do so.他们不得不用人类来这样做。
65However, AI is changing technology.然而,AI正在改变技术.
66But when it comes to erosion of democratic norms,但当涉及到民主规范的削弱时,
67I think maybe we should start with a little bit of history.我想也许我们应该从一些历史开始。
68If you think about this very night,如果你想到这个晚上
69Guy Fawkes was found under the parliament议会下发现盖伊·福克斯
70with a lot of guest chambers trying to blow up the parliament.很多宾馆都想炸掉议会
71Nowadays, in order to erode democratic norms,如今,为了削弱民主规范,
72you do not need to erode the parliament你不需要侵蚀议会
73or blow up the chambers that allow freedom of speech.或者炸掉允许言论自由的会议厅。
74Similarly, if you think about East Germany,同样,如果你想到东德
75the state had around 200,000 full-time employees国家有大约20万全职员工
76in order to gather information, in order to surveil people.为了收集信息,为了监视人们。
77If you think about that, more than a quarter of million如果你考虑一下,超过25万
78of people helping monitor a country帮助监测一个国家的人
79offer 16 million alone.仅提供1600万。
80Today, all you need is a data center,今天,你只需要一个数据中心,
81and that's all you need in order to erode democratic norms.而这正是你所需要的 为了削弱民主规范。
82Much of that work can now be done现在可以做大量的工作。
83by cameras that are essentially put in place通过基本安装的摄像机
84for national security purposes and apparatus.用于国家安全目的和装备。
85However, this isn't just something不过,这不只是一件事
86that happens in authoritarian countries,发生在专制国家,
87very much so in liberal Western democracies自由的西方民主国家就是这样
88like the UK and the US.就像英国和美国
89I want to quote something quite disturbing我想引用一些令人不安的东西
90from the UK Home Secretary, Shebana Mahmood.来自英国内政大臣谢巴纳·马哈茂德.
91In an interview with Tony Blair,在接受托尼·布莱尔的采访时
92she described her vision for using artificial intelligence她描述了自己利用人工智能的愿景
93to be used in criminal justice.用于刑事司法。
94她引用了Jeremy Bentham的阴茎
95Now, if you haven't heard of Jeremy Bentham's panectogons,现在,如果你还没有听说过杰里米・本特姆的阴道,
96imagine you're in a prison where the eyes of the state想象你在监狱里 国家的眼睛
97could always be on you.可能永远在你身上。
98However, you don't know whether they're actually watching you,不过,你不知道他们是否真的在监视你
99but the fact that you believe that you could be watched但你们确信自己是被监视的,
100changes your behavior forever.永远改变你的行为
101I wish you were right.我希望你是对的
102As someone who studies this problem作为研究这个问题的人
103from a technical point of view,从技术角度来看,
104even those who are training the systems don't know how they work,即使那些正在训练系统的人 也不知道如何运作,
105let alone those who are governing it.更不要说那些管理它的人了。
106So when these cameras are searching for one person in a crowd,所以当这些摄像机在人群中寻找一个人时
107it examines all faces.它检查所有的面孔。
108In fact, on my way to Cambridge,事实上,在去剑桥的路上,
109I took a very striking photo at King's Cross.我在国王十字架上拍了一张照片
110The cameras with 360-degree view,有360度视线的摄像头
111they're taking images of every person passing through King's Cross,他们正在拍摄每个通过国王十字的人的照片,
112and that should be disturbing for us.这应该令我们感到不安。
113We used to ask whether governments could watch everyone,我们曾经问政府能否监视所有人
114but now we ask whether citizens can watch但现在我们问市民能否观看
115and determine what governments are doing.并确定政府正在做什么。
116And that brings me to my second point.这让我想到我的第二点。
117Who can explain the decisions these systems allow us to make,谁能解释这些系统允许我们作出的决定,
118very similar to the point that the gentleman just raised?和刚才那位先生提出的观点非常相似?
119In 2013, the Dutch tax authorities began using an algorithm2013年,荷兰税务当局开始使用算法
120to identify possible fraud involving children benefits.查明可能涉及儿童福利的欺诈行为。
121Sounds reasonable.听起来很合理
122We want to use technology in order to determine我们想用技术来决定
123how to improve society in different ways.如何以不同的方式改善社会。
124However, if systems are used for the purpose of catching fraud,不过,如果系统被用来抓住欺诈,
125it also allows you to not necessarily make the right decisions.这也让你不必做出正确的决定。
126Over the following years that this technology was in use在接下来的几年中,这种技术被使用
127in the Dutch government,在荷兰政府,
128hundreds of thousands of families became caught up in wrongfully几十万个家庭被错误地卷入其中
129for using funds in ways that were unlawful.以非法方式使用资金。
130Some even lost their homes.有些人甚至失去了家园。
131Now imagine if you are one of these parents.现在想象一下如果你是这些父母之一。
132You have done nothing wrong.你没有做错什么。
133Subsequently, if you asked why me,后来 如果你问我为什么
134you wouldn't get a straight answer.你不会得到一个直接的答案。
135Remember, this is not a dictatorship.记住 这不是独裁统治
136This is a Western liberal democracy that used an AI system这是一个西方自由民主 使用AI系统
137to determine who is using funds inappropriately.确定谁不适当地使用资金。
138The governments eventually resigned.政府最终辞职.
139No, thank you.不 谢谢
140The governments eventually resigned over the scandal,政府最终因丑闻辞职,
141but that took years.但花了好几年时间
142To the very fact that you have AI systems因为你有人工智能系统
143that are automating the process for efficiency正在使进程自动化以提高效率
144could cause huge amounts of harms.可能会造成巨大的伤害
145And here's a question for you.给你个问题
146What is good if your appeal如果你上诉有什么好处
147cannot even be understood by the decision maker?决策者甚至无法理解?
148Now, that was one kind of algorithm failure.这是一种算法失败。
149You could say, as engineers, as developers,你可以说,作为工程师, 作为开发者,
150we patch systems, we build them, and we iterate over them.我们修补系统,建造系统, 并覆盖系统。
151But many people working on AI safety, security,但很多在AI安全工作的人,
152interpretability will tell you that it's virtually not possible,解释性会告诉你 这几乎是不可能的,
153at least in today's world, to understand how the systems work.至少在当今世界, 了解系统是如何运作的。
154And that's something rather worrying.这很令人担忧
155In an experiment, researchers at Anthropic acknowledged using...在一次实验中,Anthropic的研究人员承认使用了...
156When you give AI systems a hint,当你给AI系统一个提示,
157and they use hints in their computations,他们在他们的计算中,将有许多迹象,
158they may not always determine or acknowledge that they have used.它们可能并不总是确定或承认它们曾经使用过。
159So the very fact that the systems can explain their behaviour,所以系统可以解释它们的行为
160it doesn't necessarily mean that either they're right不一定意味着他们都是对的
161or you can understand what's going on.或者你能理解发生了什么
162Now, on my third point, who controls what we see before we vote?现在,关于我的第三点,谁控制我们投票前所看到的?
163We often say that the internet has democratised information,我们经常说, 互联网已经实现了信息民主化,
164and that's true.这是真的。
165Now you can reach hundreds of millions of people现在你可以到达亿万人民
166in a click of a button.在单击按钮时。
167However, that doesn't mean that you will be heard.但是,这并不意味着你会被听到。
168You know, democracy is not just about being able to be seen,你知道,民主不仅仅是 被看到,
169but also being able to be heard.但也能够被听到
170To conclude, I believe there are two groups of people最后,我认为有两个群体
171that are going to be watching the results of today's debate.他们将观看今天辩论的结果。
172One are the people that came before us,一个是来到我们面前的人,
173who felt really hard for us to be able to vote他们觉得我们很难投票
174and to exercise our right to freedom of speech.行使言论自由的权利。
175Sometimes they're paid with ultimate sacrifice.有时,他们得到的报酬是终极牺牲。
176And then there's the other group, our children, grandchildren,还有另一组 我们的子孙
177the people that may come after us, if there is an after.那些追随我们的人 如果有后盾的话
178What are we going to answer to them?我们要怎么回答他们?
179Are they going to ask us why we didn't develop technologies他们要问我们为什么不开发技术
180that are much more capable and more powerful,更有能力 更强大,
181or technology that we couldn't understand and control或者我们无法理解和控制的技术
182and that had eroded the very democracy that we've had so hard to build?却侵蚀了我们所建设的民主?
183I beg to oppose the motion.我恳求反对这个动议。
184Thank you.谢谢
185Thank you very much, Basil.非常感谢,巴西尔。
186We now move across the floor to our first speaker in opposition,我们现在跨过会场,请第一位反对者发言。
187Dr Gina Neff,吉娜・内夫博士
188Professor of Responsible AI at Queen Mary University of London伦敦玛丽女王大学负责AI教授
189and runs the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy at Cambridge.并管理剑桥Minderoo技术和民主中心。
190She is Deputy CEO of UKRI Responsible AI UK她是英国RI公司的副总裁
191and shares the Wales Strategic AI Advisory Council.并共享威尔士战略AI咨询理事会。
192Her books include Venture Labour, Self-Trafficking她的书包括《风险劳工》和《自残》
193and Human-Centred Data Science.和以人为中心的数据科学。
194And she led the team behind the A to Z of AI,她带领队伍 在AI的A到Z后面,
195which won a 2021 Webby and reached over a million people in 17 languages.它赢得了2021年Webby的比赛,并以17种语言达到超过100万人.
196Dr Gina, you have the years of the house.吉娜医生,你有房子的岁月
197Thank you, Mr President.谢谢你,总统先生。
198And thank you to the proposition.谢谢你的提议。
199You've given us a very vivid tour of the things we have to fear,你给了我们一个非常生动的巡演 我们不得不害怕的东西,
200of the damage that has been done,所造成的损害,
201the feeds that have been turned into outrage,已变成愤慨的饲料,
202the deepfakes, the surveillance,深层的假象 监视
203the data taken without our consent and used against us.未经我们同意而获取的数据 以及用来对付我们的数据
204I will not stand here and wish that away我不会站在这里,希望你离开
205and say that it's not true.并说不实.
206It is.没错
207On the symptoms, I think we can agree.关于症状,我想我们可以同意。
208Where we part company, though, is on the diagnosis.我们分公司的地方,虽然, 是在诊断。
209Every argument that you have heard,你们所听到的每一个论点,
210you will hear tonight from the other side,今晚你会从另一边听到
211rests on an assumption假设
212that negates every single one of you in this chamber.这否定了你们在座的每一个人。
213It takes you for granted.它认为你是理所当然的。
214That hidden assumption is technological determinism.这种隐蔽的假设是技术决定论。
215It's the idea that technology sets the course of history.科技开创历史道路的理念.
216Machines arrive and we are hapless in their face.机器来了,我们面对他们很不幸
217Society adapts to them.社会适应他们.
218Tools act and people are acted upon.工具法案和人们被采取行动。
219The motion in its very wordingB. 动议的措辞
220basically takes all of us in this historic chamber for granted,基本上,我们在这个历史性的会议厅里是理所当然的,
221and I, for one, refuse to accept that.我拒绝接受这一点。
222The historian Thomas Hughes spent his career历史学家托马斯·休斯度过了他的职业生涯
223looking at how Europe and the United States展望欧洲和美国
224developed electricity and technology发展电力和技术
225in the 19th and early 20th century.19世纪和20世纪初
226And the world was made.而世间众生.
227It was made by engineers, it was made by financiers,由工程师制造,由金融家制造
228by city councils, by regulators, and yes, by voters.由市议会,监管者, 和是的,选民。
229His conclusion was technology is an expression of human creativity他的结论是技术是人类创造力的体现
230and that the stories we tell about technologies我们讲述的科技故事
231help to shape those technologies.帮助塑造这些技术。
232I'm going to come back to that idea of the stories我会回到那个故事的想法
233that we tell about the technologies today.今天我们来谈谈技术
234The world of technology, the technologies in our world技术世界,我们世界的技术
235are not magical, they are not God-given, they are human-built.他们不是神赐予的 而是人造的
236They're built by people and that means他们由人建造,这意味着
237that they can be built differently.他们可以不同的方式建造。
238We can tell different stories about the kinds of futures we want.我们可以讲述我们想要的未来的不同故事。
239The story the proposition will tell is not new.提议要讲的故事不是新的。
240It's very popular, however, in Silicon Valley.然而在硅谷非常流行.
241It's popular, it was popular in Washington, DC, too,广受欢迎 在华盛顿特区也很受欢迎
242until Tuesday night.到星期二晚上为止
243The story, that story says that technology is coming故事说科技即将到来
244whether or not we like it不管我们是否喜欢
245and whether or not we do anything about it.无论我们是否做任何事情。
246It's too fast for people to govern.人民治理太快.
247We're too dumb to govern the complexity of technology.我们太笨了,不能管理技术的复杂性。
248That's that story.就是这样
249So the sensible thing to do, logically,所以,明智的事情做,逻辑上,
250is to outsource our moral and political decisions.将我们的道德和政治决定外包出去。
251The compass that allows us to understand who we are,指南针 允许我们了解我们是谁,
252outsource that to the chatbots and the apps外包给聊天机和应用程序
253that increasingly form the infrastructure of our society.这日益构成我们社会的基础设施。
254The problem with technological determinism技术决定主义的问题
255is it's moving power away from people.这是在转移权力 远离人。
256It's a story that plays into the hands of people这是一个故事 玩到人们的手中
257who build the technology.谁是技术建设者。
258They get to be the only heroes of the story they are telling.他们只能成为故事的英雄
259I have news for you.我有一个消息给你。
260The world is not built in Palo Alto.世界不是在帕洛阿尔托建造的.
261A youth organiser in Lagos, a fact-checker in Malaysia,在拉各斯的青年组织者,马来西亚的一位事实检查者,
262a Welsh granny on a WhatsApp group,一个威尔士祖母在WhatsApp集团,
263a union rep in Leeds.利兹的工会代表
264They are using the same technologies,他们使用同样的技术,
265but the outcomes and what they do with them但结果和他们的行为,
266and the stories they tell about them are different.他们所讲述的故事是不同的。
267What's different is not the technology.不同的是技术。
268Yes?是吗?
269All of them are small.皆为小.
270I appreciate the question,我很感激这个问题,
271and certainly this speech is not slopped.这部经文,确是不朽的。
272This is the hard-earned effort of a PhD.这是博士辛苦付出的努力。
273Thank you very much.谢谢
274Excuse me.对不起。
275So, if technology determines outcomes,所以,如果技术决定了结果,
276it would determine a similarity.它将决定一种相似性。
277It would flatten the world, and that is not what we see.它会使世界变得平坦,而这并不是我们所看到的。
278What makes us different are our institutions,使我们不同之处在于我们的机构
279our communities, our laws,我们的社区,我们的法律,
280the things that make us human成为人类的东西
281are the things that are making us different.是那些让我们不同的东西。
282Now, the story my colleagues in the opposition现在,我的反对派同事的故事
283{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}会告诉今晚 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}而且会一直说
284is that we all have power and agency我们都有权力和权力
285to determine our futures.来决定我们的未来
286That's the democratic ideal,这是民主的理想
287and no tool can take that away from us.没有任何工具能夺走我们的生命
288Only we can surrender democracy.只有我们才能放弃民主
289And it's this process of negotiation.这是谈判的过程。
290Making good technology is a lot like做好技术是很像的
291what we're doing in this debate.我们在这次辩论中所做的一切。
292We get around and we argue it out.我们四处走动 争辩出来
293We negotiate with one another.我们彼此谈判。
294So, what's actually a voting democracy?那么,什么是投票民主制?
295If it's not technology, what is it?如果这不是科技,那又是什么?
296I would argue and present it's autocracy,我将争辩并提出这是专制,
297it's oligarchy, it's power concentrated寡头政治 权力集中
298in fewer and fewer hands.手越来越少
299It's wealth that is pulled over deeper pockets财富被挖得更深
300of inequality in more unequal countries.不平等的国家的不平等。
301These forces are not technological,这些力量不是技术的
302they are social.他们是社交的。
303And they are made by the choices that people are making.它们是由人们的选择作出的。
304When the world's richest man wanted to influence当世界上最富有的人想要影响
305democracy in America,美国的民主,
306it was not technology that got him there.不是技术让他来的
307It was checks for hundreds of millions of dollars.是几亿美金的支票
308It didn't work this time, by the way.顺便说一句,这次不行
309That's not the point.这不是重点。
310The point that we're saying is it's not the technology我们要说的是 这不是技术
311that made him the richest man in the world,使他成为世界上最富有的人,
312it's the concentration of power and how he used it.这是权力的集中 和他如何使用它。
313It was not inevitable that that would be the case.情况并非不可避免的。
314No, thank you.不 谢谢
315I want to leave you with the words of Maria Reza,我想把玛丽亚·雷萨的话留给你
316a Nobel Prize winner,一个诺贝尔奖得主,
317who has just written a book called The Fight Back,他刚刚写了一本名为"反击"的书,
318a citizen's guide to standing up to,公民的指南 站起来,
319and she gives you three lessons.她给你三课
320She says, first, understand the stakes,她说,首先, 理解赌注,
321second, defend yourself and your communities第二,保护自己和你的社区
322and your institutions,和你的机构,
323and third, build the world you want to see.第三,建立你想看到的世界。
324She dedicates the book to you.她把书献给你
325She says, you who stand on the rubble of the world that was她说,你站在世界的废墟上
326and can build the world that should be.并能够建立应该存在的世界。
327So do not let anyone,所以不要让任何人,
328least of all the people trying to sell you shiny new toys,尤其是那些想卖你新玩具的人
329deny you that power.否认你的力量。
330I beg to oppose.我恳求反对。
331Thank you very much, Gina.非常感谢,吉娜。
332Order, please.请安静
333We now move on to our first round of floor speeches.我们现在进行第一轮发言。
334Please try to keep your speech around three minutes long.请尽量保持您的演讲 大约三分钟长。
335Would anyone like to speak in proposition to the motion?有人想就动议发言吗?
336Yes, please, name and college.是的,请,名字和大学。
337I would like to speak for the proposition我想代表这个提议
338that technology has eroded democracy,技术侵蚀了民主,
339and I mean that technology as one of the factors我的意思是,技术作为因素之一
340that is contributing to the erosion of democracy.这助长了民主的削弱。
341To persuade your minds, I would use the evidentiary rule为了说服你,我会用证据规则
342of preponderance of probabilities.可能性的优势。
343It means that both sides have solid arguments,意思是双方都有坚实的论据
344and the arguments in favor of proposition和赞成主张的论点
345weigh the scales a bit down towards my side,将天秤从我这边压下来一点
346which makes my side stronger.这让我的一方更强大。
347Let's start with the pros on how technology has supported democracy.我们先从专业的角度来谈谈技术如何支持民主。
348In India, technology has led to greater transparency在印度,技术提高了透明度
349in having election affidavits made available to the public.向公众提供选举宣誓书。
350Any member of the public can do a meta-analysis任何市民都可以进行元分析
351of all the election affidavits of all the candidates所有候选人的所有选举宣誓书
352standing from all the political parties at one go.站在所有政党一边
353Campaign manifestos and messaging reach masses at a new scale.运动宣言和讯息以新的规模传达给大众。
354It gives people the choice between choosing candidates.它让人们在选择候选人之间做出选择.
355Political startups that used to take 10, 15 years to make an impact过去需要10、15年才能产生影响的政治初创企业
356are now able to do that in two to three years.现在可以在两三年内做到这一点。
357The recent victory of Vijay in Tamil Nadu维杰最近在泰米尔纳德邦的胜利
358and the launch of Jan Suraj Party in Bihar扬·苏拉杰党在比哈尔的成立
359are prime examples of that.这是主要的例子。
360It also makes leaders more relatable.这也使领导人更加易得。
361If you see Andy Berman, he's on social media,如果你见到安迪·伯曼 他在社交媒体上
362and at the Cambridge Union Debate a couple of weeks ago,几周前在剑桥大学辩论会上
363we saw that that was a major point in favor of technology.我们发现这是支持技术的要点。
364But let's take a step back.但是我们退一步
365What is democracy?什么是民主?
366Democracy is the delegation of sovereign, constituent power,民主是主权、组成权、
367constituent power of the people人民的组成权
368to govern themselves to a representative body.将自己治理为具有代表性的机构。
369In this process of delegation,在这一授权过程中,
370we employ a process called elections.我们用一个叫做选举的过程。
371My argument is that technology has gone so far我的论点是技术已经发展到现在
372as to make the degree of free will of the people以达到人民自由意志的程度;
373highly amenable to lobbyists,对于说客们,
374advertisements, and pressure groups.广告和压力集团
375People from America would know that campaign financing美国人会知道竞选资金
376is done through the PACs, political action committees.通过政党委员会、政治行动委员会进行。
377In California, currently Sergey Bin在加州,目前是谢尔盖·宾
378has spent 102 million US dollars against Proposition 40在提案40下花费了1.02亿美元
379to tax 5% on the billionaires in the UK.对英国亿万富翁征税5%。
380Closer to home, my UK home,离家更近 我的英国家
381Cambridge Analytica,曾参与2016年特朗普选举.
382and in the Leave EU campaign as well.也参与了欧盟的休假运动。
383Back in India, political parties profile, sort,在印度, 政党概况, 排序,
384and target ethnographic, communal, economic, and other vote banks.以及目标民族、社区、经济和其他投票银行。
385The pervasive nature of these targeted marketing这些有针对性的营销的普及性
386leads to an insanely powerful technology usage导致一个疯狂强大的技术使用
387that we have not seen hitherto before.我们以前从未见过的。
388This is not even addressing voter manipulation,这甚至没有解决选民操纵问题,
389election manipulation, disinformation, misinformation,操纵选举、造谣、造谣
390AI slop, and fraud that is now happening at scale.AI的失败, 和欺诈正在发生的规模。
391To conclude, the power of technology,最后,技术的力量,
392such powerful, scalable, and immensely powerful technology如此强大、可伸缩和强大的技术
393to influence citizenry decision-making in electoral processes影响公民在选举进程中的决策
394compromises directly the consequence,直接降低后果,
395directly the concept of democracy.民主的概念。
396What for the proposition?什么建议?
397Because we are recognizing a present-day fact.因为我们承认一个今天的事实。
398Recognizing this fact that technology has eroded democracy认识到技术侵蚀了民主这一事实,
399can help us mitigate and take steps to addressing this.能够帮助我们减轻和采取步骤解决这一问题。
400Hence, what for the proposition?因此,这个提议有什么意义?
401Thank you very much.谢谢
402Would anyone like to speak in opposition to the motion?有人反对动议吗?
403Hold on.坚持住。
404To the member over here.给这里的成员
405Name and college, please.姓名和大学,请。
406Eduardo, St. John's College.爱德华多,圣约翰学院.
407I'd like to speak for opposition tonight今晚我想代表反对派发言
408for the very first reason that technology以技术为首要原因
409has enabled the democratization of access to venues of contestation.使进入竞争场所的民主化。
410In a society where you cannot contest power,在一个你无法对抗权力的社会里
411we fall into the realm of oppression我们陷入压迫的境界
412because then you cannot speak up against those who are ruling you.因为你不能对统治你的人说话。
413In older times, when we only had access to printed press,在以前,当我们只有 接触印刷机,
414who could speak up?谁能说话?
415Who had access to putting an opinion out there?谁能在那里发表意见?
416But with social media, any person can record a video但是有了社交媒体 任何人都可以录影
417and speak the truth.并说真话。
418And power will have to bear with how many views权力必须承受 多少观点
419or repercussions the video gets.或影响 视频得到。
420Of course, there is an algorithm当然有算法
421that may not offer equal access to repercussion.可能无法提供同等的打击机会。
422However, it's still a considerable progress不过,这还是个很大的进步
423from the times when we only had printed press.从那时起,我们只有印刷机。
424And my second argument revolves around我的第二个争论围绕着
425the progress that technology allowed.技术带来的进步。
426When we think through the evolution of income per capita当我们通过人均收入的演变来思考
427and what that has allowed us to just have longer lives以及那些让我们能长寿的东西
428and enjoy more the fruition of democracy,并享受民主的成果,
429if we compare with the best如果我们与最好的
430when we didn't have enough food on the table,当我们没有足够的食物在桌上,
431how could we then be able to participate in a community,那么,我们如何能够参与一个社区,
432discuss our ideas, and decide for the common good?讨论我们的想法,并为了共同利益作出决定?
433So the welfare, the technology allowed to be increased因此,福利,技术 允许增加
434is precisely the welfare that democracy rests upon.民主所依赖的福利正是如此。
435Point of information.信息点.
436We have yet incredible progress to make,我们还要取得令人难以置信的进展,
437but let's compare when child mortality was incredibly high但让我们比较一下,当儿童死亡率非常高的时候
438or when the vast majority of the population或绝大多数人口
439{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}必须依靠天气 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}我不得不依赖天气
440in order to make sure that they would have food the next day.以确保他们第二天有食物。
441So, of course, progress has been made,当然,已经取得了进展,
442and it is precisely because of the progress that has been made正是因为已经取得的进展,
443that we can then participate with more time然后我们就能有更多的时间参与
444and with better focus on our community life.更关注我们的社区生活
445And the very last point I would like to make我想说的最后一点
446in why technology has not eroded democracy技术没有侵蚀民主的原因
447revolves around, I would say,绕着我说
448the cornerstone of what allows us to think of a better future,是让我们思考更美好未来的基石,
449which is the ability to create,这是创造的能力,
450the ability to innovate.创新的能力。
451Innovation is such a cornerstone of democracy,创新是民主的基石,
452because without that, we cannot arrive at better ideas,因为没有这些,我们就无法找到更好的想法,
453we cannot land in better solutions.我们无法找到更好的解决办法。
454So if we try to curtail technology所以,如果我们试图削减技术
455in order to stop its obstacles to democracy,为了结束民主的障碍,
456we would be then curtailing human creativity,然后我们就会减少人类的创造力
457which is the precise reason why democracy makes us reach a better place.这就是民主使我们到达一个更好的地方的确切原因。
458Thank you.谢谢
459Thank you very much.谢谢
460Would anyone like to speak in abstention to the motion?有人想对动议投弃权票吗?
461Yes, please, name and college.是的,请,名字和大学。
462Thanks for this whole technology versus democracy debate, right?谢谢你的科技与民主辩论,对吧?
463Because two days ago, I completely was with the proposition,因为两天前 我完全同意这个提议
464because if you look at the capital,因为如果你看看首都
465a quarterly expenditure by the five big brothers,五大兄弟的季度开支,
466or what we call the proligarchy,或者我们所说的无产阶级,
467which is Amazon, Meta, Google, and we know the other two,亚马逊,梅塔,谷歌,我们知道另外两个
468it has increased in the last five years近五年来增长
469from US$30 billion to US$180 billion,从300亿美元到1 800亿美元,
470and there is this infrastructure being built.并且正在建造这种基础设施。
471It is being built in countries like India, where I come from,它正在印度这样的国家建造 我来自那里
472Google宣布这里的大型数据中心 叫做Tharulwada,
473which is near Port City, near Andhra Pradesh,靠近港口市 靠近安得拉邦
474and in one day, the name of that on the maps was changed有一天,地图上的名字被更改了
475至Tharulwada数据中心和IT枢纽,
476but this is a place which was known for its cashews, marigolds, teak plantations.但这里以腰果、马力果、茶叶种植园闻名
477So in that regard, I do believe that democracy因此,在这方面,我相信民主
478has kind of been eroded by technology,受到技术的侵蚀,
479and I was watching this video of one of the members我在看一个成员的录像
480of the Dalit community over there who was really disheartened在那里的达利特社区 谁真的心灰意冷
481because their land was being taken from them without their permission,因为他们的土地是未经他们许可而被剥夺的。
482and he said, what are we going to do?他说,我们该怎么办?
483Are we going to live like beggars?我们要像乞丐一样生活吗?
484For us, land is dignity.对我们来说,土地是尊严。
485But on the other hand, right, I feel we kind of get enabled但另一方面,是的,我觉得我们 有点被启用
486if you look at innovation in general如果你从总体上看创新
487and how there are these new founders which can vibe code和如何有这些新的创始人 能够感应代码
488and make amazing businesses,并创造惊人的生意,
489and my friend Tom has an AI-enabled business,我的朋友汤姆有一个AI公司,
490a sustainable AI business,一项可持续的AI业务,
491and I'm working on something similar with Edge AI我在和Edge AI做类似的事情
492and small language modules.和小语言模块。
493So when you talk about technocracy,所以当你谈论技术民主,
494yes, technocracy may have eroded democracy,是的 技术民主可能侵蚀了民主
495but when we talk about technology as a whole,但是,当我们谈论整个技术,
496I feel like it has enabled us as well.我觉得它也让我们受益匪浅。
497But again, I feel like the power imbalance and all of that has increased.但是,我再次感到权力不平衡 和所有这一切已经增加。
498So what, Gina's work is related to that.因此,吉娜的作品与此相关.
499I was reading a paper by her about can AI survive,我读了她一篇关于AI能活下来的论文
500can democracy survive AI,民主能否在大赦国际存活下来,
501and she talks about how we need to democratise these systems她谈到我们需要如何 民主化这些系统
502instead of just blaming technology bad.而不是仅仅指责技术不好。
503That's why I feel like I'm going to abstain the motion.所以我觉得我要弃权了
504Thank you very much.谢谢
505Okay, we now start our second round of paper speakers.好了,我们现在开始第二轮的纸质演讲。
506Speaking second in proposition to the motion is Kayla Howard Tripp,动议的第二位是凯拉·霍华德·特里普
507an MPhil student in politics and international studies at Newnham College.在纽汉姆学院学习政治和国际研究的MPhil学生。
508She has won the right to speak by open audition.她通过公开试镜获得了发言权。
509Kayla, you have the ears of the house.凯拉,你有房子的耳朵。
510Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, Mr. President and fellow debaters.晚上好 女士们先生们 总统先生和各位辩论员
511Technology has eroded democracy,技术侵蚀了民主
512and let me be clear what I mean by erosion.让我说清楚 侵蚀意味着什么
513Not collapse.没有崩溃。
514Erosion is a slow process.侵蚀是一个缓慢的过程。
515The building still stands while the foundations wear away.该建筑仍然站立着,而地基却逐渐耗尽.
516Democracy does not just have to disappear for it to be eroded.民主不仅必须消失才能被侵蚀。
517It only stops doing its job.它只会停止工作
518And its job is quite simple.它的工作很简单。
519Power answers to the people,权力对人民,
520not just a cross and a ballot paper every few years,不仅仅是十字架和选票 每几年,
521but a voice, an accountable government,一个声音 一个负责的政府,
522and decisions that are answerable to us.以及对我们负责的决定。
523I want to ask a question, then.我想问个问题
524If we can still vote, but increasingly cannot control the forces如果我们仍然可以投票,但越来越不能控制部队
525shaping what we see, what we think, and what we believe,塑造我们所见,所想,所信,
526how democratic are we really?我们到底有多民主?
527I'm not going to tell you a story or try to convince you today我不会告诉你一个故事 或试图说服你今天
528that technology has brought no benefits.技术并没有带来任何好处。
529It has exposed corruption and helped movements challenge the powerful.它揭露了腐败,帮助运动挑战强者。
530But we must distinguish between having more opportunities to participate但是我们必须区分 有更多的机会参与
531and having more power.并拥有更多的力量。
532Those are simply not the same thing.这些根本不是一回事。
533You will hear from experts tonight about what this technology can do.你今晚会从专家那里听到 这个技术能做什么。
534I want to ask a different question.我想问另一个问题
535Who decides?谁决定的?
536I will make this in three points this evening.我今晚将谈三点。
537Firstly, technology has undermined the very information首先,技术破坏了信息本身
538on which democratic choice depends.民主选择取决于什么。
539Consider what this looks like in practice.想想这在实际上是什么样子。
540Ahead of the local May elections,在5月地方选举之前,
541researchers at the UK Electoral Commission联合王国选举委员会研究员
542identified 219 political deepfakes,查明了219个政治漏洞,
543views over a million times,超过一百万次观看,
544with 15 of these meeting the threshold其中15个达到门槛值
545of proposing a direct risk to electoral integrity.提议直接危及选举的廉正。
546These posts included false candidate announcements,这些职位包括虚假的候选人通知,
547stimulated campaign activities,刺激竞选活动,
548and misleading details regarding the polling day.和关于投票日的误导性细节。
549But the greater danger here is not simply that we believe a lie.但这里更大的危险不仅仅是我们相信谎言。
550It's that we stop believing the truth at all.我们完全不再相信真相
551Because when technology makes it possible to fabricate a politician's words,因为当技术使得有可能 捏造政客的话,
552it also makes it possible for politicians to dismiss their genuine words as fake.也使得政治家们有可能将他们的真言说成是假话。
553When seeing is no longer believing,当看见已不信道的时候,
554every photograph can be questioned, every recording can be disputed,每张照片都可以被质疑 每张录音都可以被质疑
555every piece of evidence can be dismissed.每一个证据都可以驳回。
556And think what that does to us as voters.想想这对我们选民有什么影响
557Everyone in this room, instead of asking which argument is right,在这个房间里的每个人, 而不是问哪个论点是正确的,
558they are left asking whether anything they hear is real at all.他们被留下 问他们听到的是不是真实的。
559Democracy depends on disagreement.民主取决于分歧。
560We should be arguing over policies,我们应该争论政策,
561challenging politicians, and questioning those in power.挑战政客,质疑掌权者。
562But we cannot do that meaningfully但我们不能这样做
563if we don't share common understanding of the facts.如果我们对事实没有共同的理解
564Because democracy cannot survive when we no longer agree on what is true.因为如果我们不再就真相达成一致,民主就无法生存。
565Secondly, technology has handed the governments the off switch.第二,技术已经把政府 关闭开关。
566Democracy needs more than a vote.民主需要的不仅仅是表决。
567It needs the freedom to protest, to organize, and to challenge those in power.它需要抗议、组织和挑战掌权者的自由。
568And these freedoms now run through networks that someone else controls.这些自由现在通过别人控制的网络运行。
569In 2025, Access Now documented at least 313 deliberate internet shutdowns在2025年,Access Now记录了至少313次蓄意关闭互联网的事件.
570across 52 countries.在52个国家。
571300 times in a single year, world populations were swiftly disconnected.在一年中,世界人口迅速中断了300次。
572Like that.像这样
573And it's not only dictatorships.这不仅是独裁统治。
574Freedom House found that internet freedom has now declined for 15 years running.自由 House发现互联网自由已经持续了15年。
575And among these countries rated as free,在被评为自由国家的国家中
576Georgia, Germany, and the United States all went backwards.格鲁吉亚、德国和美国都倒退了。
577A government no longer needs to silent every critic.一个政府再也不需要让每个批评者保持沉默。
578It simply has to silence the channel they speak through.它只是需要关闭他们说话的渠道。
579Yes, go ahead.说吧
580I'm a bit confused by your question, sorry.我有点困惑 你的问题,对不起。
581Because what you're saying is that the government was able to shut down.因为你的意思是政府可以关闭
582I believe it was at least 15 of these were in relation to elections.我认为,其中至少有15项涉及选举。
583So you're shutting down the opposition and the opportunity to speak upon them.所以,你关闭了反对派 和机会谈论他们。
584Back to my point.回到我的观点。
585A government no longer needs to silence every critic,一个政府不再需要 压制每一个批评者,
586and they just silence the channel.他们只是关闭频道。
587Notice the pattern.注意规律
588Whoever controls the conversation, whether it is state or company,不管是谁控制了谈话 无论是国家还是公司
589and that brings me to my fundamental problem.这让我想到我的根本问题
590Thirdly, technology is moving the political power out of the hands of the people第三,技术正在把政治权力从人民手中移走
591and into private hands.并交给私人。
592We have spent centuries fighting for one principle.我们花了几个世纪为一条原则而战。
593That those who hold power over our lives must answer to us.统治我们生活的人必须对我们负责。
594We built parliaments, elections, and courts to make sure of it.我们建立了议会、选举和法院以确保这一点。
595Yet today, some of the most consequential decisions in our political lives然而,今天,我们政治生活中的一些最重要的决定
596are being made by people we never elected.由我们从未选举过的人制造
597Cannot then directly challenge and often cannot even name.无法直接挑战, 也往往无法命名 。
598What information?什么情报?
599No, I've already taken one.不,我已经吃了
600Consider social media.考虑社交媒体.
60171% of UK adults aged 16 to 24 used to keep up with the news.71%的16至24岁的英国成年人习惯于跟随新闻.
602For an entire generation, these platforms have become their form of the newspaper,在整整一代人中,这些平台已经成为报纸的形式,
603the television bulletin, and even the town square.电视公告,甚至镇广场。
604But there is a fundamental difference here.但这里有一个根本的不同。
605Traditional organizations report the news.传统组织报道新闻.
606Social media platforms decide what news we get to see.社交媒体平台决定我们能看到什么新闻.
607The algorithms determine which stories reach millions of people,算法决定了哪些故事会传遍数百万人
608which voices are amplified, and which are pushed out of sight.声音被放大,声音被推出视线。
609And these decisions aren't...这些决定不是...
610Yes, go ahead.说吧
611Well, if 71% of UK adults 16 to 24 are getting all of their news on social media,如果71%的英国成年人 16到24岁的人 在社交媒体上得到了他们的所有消息
612then I think we should be asking more questions about the power我觉得我们应该多问一些关于权力的问题
613that is coming from behind them.是从他们的身后传来的。
614But yes, you could have the opportunity to not use them,但是,是的,你可以有机会 不使用它们,
615but the majority of people do,但大多数人都这样做,
616and therefore that's why we're having this conversation this evening.所以我们今晚才有谈话
617And no, I've already just come off one,不,我已经从一个开始,
618and I do need to make some progress this evening.今晚我确实需要取得一些进展。
619And those decisions are not made by elected representatives.这些决定不是由当选代表作出的。
620They are made by private companies whose interest lies in profit and revenue.它们由私营公司制造,其利益在于利润和收入。
621But this power is no longer just about deciding what information reaches us.但这种力量不再仅仅是决定我们得到的信息。
622It is increasingly about shaping the information which we receive in the first place.它日益涉及我们最初收到的信息。
623No, I'm so sorry.不,对不起。
624I do need to make some more progress.我确实需要取得更多进展。
625One in five adults have used AI chatbot or an AI search tool五分之一的成年人使用过AI聊天机或AI搜索工具
626to find out about this year's elections alone.仅了解今年的选举情况。
627Yet researchers testing these tools during the Scottish elections specifically然而研究人员在苏格兰选举期间测试这些工具
628found that a third of their answers contained factual errors.他们的答复中有三分之一有事实错误。
629So we're increasingly relying on private technology companies所以我们越来越依赖私人科技公司
630not on only what to decide, what political instrument we receive,不只是决定什么, 我们得到什么政治工具,
631but to provide the answers to the rich who understand it.但为有钱人提供答案 谁理解它。
632So ask yourself this.所以问问你自己吧
633When a politician misleads you, you can vote them out.当政客误导你时,你就可以把他们赶出去.
634When an algorithm misleads you, who do you vote out?当一个算法误导你时,你会投票给谁?
635No, sorry.不,对不起。
636Again, I just need to make some progress with this speech this evening.再说一遍,我今晚的演讲需要取得一些进展。
637We cannot vote out an algorithm.我们不能淘汰一个算法。
638We cannot hold a technology executive to account我们不能让科技主管负责
639the same way we can hold an elected representative to account.我们同样可以追究当选代表的责任。
640And this is not just a theoretical concern.这不仅仅是一个理论问题。
641The Electoral Commission found that 44% of people who were concerned选举委员会发现,44%的有关人员是
642about inadequate control of political activity on social media.社会媒体对政治活动的控制不足。
643This is nearly half of the country saying that this is not properly governed.这是近一半的国家说,这没有得到适当的管理。
644And yet the regulation is on the floor.条例却在地板上
645And why?为什么?
646Because the companies being regulated are some of the因为被监管的公司是其中的一部分
647richest and best lobbied organizations in history,历史上最富有和最好的游说组织
648and they own the very platforms on which politicians campaign.他们拥有政治人物竞选的平台
649The people who write rules need the platforms to reach the voters.写规则的人需要平台到达选民手中.
650That is a referee sponsored by the players.这是球员赞助的裁判
651Now, the opposition will tell you about the online petitions现在,反对派会告诉你 关于网上请愿
652and the ability of ordinary citizens to challenge powerful institutions.以及普通公民挑战强大机构的能力。
653They are right.他们说得对。
654These are indeed powerful benefits that come with technology.这些确实是技术带来的巨大好处。
655But giving a people a platform is not the same as giving them power over that platform.但是,给予人民一个平台,与赋予他们对该平台的权力不同。
656Being allowed to speak is not simply the same as being heard.被允许发言并不仅仅是被听到。
657We must not confuse participation with power.我们决不能把参与与权力混为一谈。
658That is the distinction at the heart of this debate.这就是本次辩论的核心。
65941% of the world's population, which is about 3.4 billion people,世界人口的41%, 大约34亿人,
660now live in countries going backwards in democracy.现在生活在民主国家中。
661The average level of democracy for an average citizen in the world世界普通公民的平均民主水平
662has fallen back to 1978 levels.已经下降到1978年的水平。
663The pools that promise to liberate us arrive in the very decades承诺解放我们的游泳池 已经到了几十年
664democracy begins to retreat.民主开始退缩。
665They will say misinformation is nothing new.他们会说错误信息不是新鲜事
666It is not.事实并非如此。
667But the pamphlet here never controlled the printing press,但这里的小册子 从来没有控制印刷机,
668the post office, and the town square all at once.邮局, 和镇广场都同时。
669They will say that this is a political problem, not a technological one.他们会说,这是一个政治问题,而不是技术问题。
670I say it is both.我说两者都是
671Technology did not invent the hunger for power,技术并没有制造出对权力的渴望,
672but it built one of the most efficient machines for concentrating it但它制造了一台最高效的机器 来集中它
673we have ever seen and handed the keys to private companies.我们曾见过这些钥匙 交给私人公司
674So I leave this house with one final question.所以,我离开这个房子 最后一个问题。
675If we, the people, want to shape our political decisions, are not elected,如果我们,人民,想 塑造我们的政治决定, 不当选,
676if the systems that influence our opinions are not accountable to us,如果影响我们意见的系统 不对我们负责,
677and if the power to decide what we see and what we are told,如果能决定我们所看到的和被告知的
678what is true, rests in private hands,真实的,由私人掌握,
679then who is exactly democracy working for?那么民主到底为谁服务?
680Democracy does not have to disappear overnight for it to be eroded.民主不必一夜之间就消失,以免它受到侵蚀。
681It can survive in name while losing the very principle that gives it meaning.它可以在名义上生存,同时失去赋予它意义的原则.
682And again, that principle is quite simple.同样,这一原则非常简单。
683Power belongs to the people.权力属于人民。
684Power belongs to us.权力属于我们。
685Technology is taking this away.科技正在夺走这个
686For these reasons, I proudly propose the motion.出于这些原因,我自豪地提出动议。
687Thank you.谢谢
688Thank you very much, Kayla.非常感谢,凯拉。
689We now move across the floor to our second speaker in opposition,我们现在跨过发言的第二位反对者,
690Dr. Maya Indira Ganesh,玛雅·英迪拉·加内什博士
691Assistant Research Professor and Associate Director助理研究教授兼副主任
692at the Lever Home Center for the Future of Intelligence在利弗未来情报中心
693at the University of Cambridge.在剑桥大学
694She studies the social, political, and cultural implications of AI她研究了大赦国际的社会、政治和文化影响。
695in public institutions and spaces,在公共机构和空间,
696and co-directed LCFI's Masters in AI, Ethics, and Society.并共同执导LCFI在AI,伦理学,与社会方面的大师.
697She is the author of Autocorrect,她是自动更正的作者,
698The Fantasies and Failures of AI, Ethics, and the Driverless Car,AI的幻想和失败 伦理 和无驾驶车,
699and co-editor of the AI Anarchy's book.并担任AI无政府书的联合编辑.
700Dr. Maya, you have the ears of the house.玛雅医生,你有房子的耳朵。
701Hi, everyone.大家好,你们好。
702Thank you so much for this invitation.非常感谢你的邀请
703I'm delighted to be here.我很高兴在这里。
704I will be arguing against the proposition that technology has eroded democracy.我将反对关于技术侵蚀民主的主张。
705I want you to consider that if we think of technology as an app or an agent我希望你能考虑一下 如果我们把科技当成一个应用或代理
706that works outside of the control of people, organizations, and movements,工作在人民、组织和运动控制之外,
707then we are at risk of assuming that democracy is an output那我们就有可能认为民主是产出
708rather than a process, a process that people have agency in.而不是一个过程, 一个人们有代理的程序。
709As Gina has mentioned, technological determinism centers technology正如吉娜提到的,技术决定主义中心技术
710as the protagonist, the evil twin,作为主角 邪恶的双胞胎
711and the solution to the complexity of social and political life.解决社会和政治生活的复杂性。
712We have so fully swallowed this idea我们完全吞下了这个想法
713that we don't actually stop to look at who benefits from centering technology我们并不停下来看看谁从中心技术中受益
714and if it is really true.如果这是真的
715For as long as I can remember, every time there's been an election in India,只要我记得 每次在印度有选举
716almost any news report anywhere in the world will carry the trope of India几乎世界上任何地方的新闻报道 都会流传着印度
717as the world's largest democracy.作为世界上最大的民主国家。
718What they're usually referring to is the scale of this process,他们通常指的是这个过程的规模,
719the systems, infrastructures, and people required for 968 million voters需要9.68亿选民的系统、基础设施和人员
720to exercise their franchise across the cultural, political, and economic geographies在文化、政治和经济地理上行使选举权
721of the world's seventh largest country.世界第七大国家。
722While it can be a highly catalytic and emblematic moment in democracy虽然它可以成为民主的高度催化和象征的时刻
723and one that is susceptible to manipulation,和容易被操纵的,
724democracy is not just about voting day and electoral outcomes.民主不仅仅是投票日和选举结果。
725It is the institutions and social contracts that make voting and elections possible.使投票和选举成为可能的机构和社会契约。
726These include freedom of the press, freedom of speech and expression,其中包括新闻自由、言论和表达自由;
727the right to assembly, transparency and public accountability, rule of law.集会权、透明度和公共问责制、法治。
728These are fundamental to democracy.这些是民主的根本。
729And when they're talking about the world's largest democracy,当他们谈论 世界上最大的民主,
730there's often a sort of lump in the throat, a wobble,喉咙里经常有肿块 摇晃
731because they're referring to the fragility of these social and political institutions因为他们指的是这些社会和政治机构的脆弱性
732under conditions of authoritarianism.在独裁统治的条件下
733Technology has not eroded these.技术并没有削弱这些技术。
734People have.人们有。
735In 2024, 64 countries went to the polls,2024年,64个国家参加了投票,
736and there was widespread concern about disinformation campaigns人们普遍关注造谣运动
737and the manipulation of voting.和操纵投票。
738However, luckily, these fears were unfounded, barring one or two cases.然而,幸运的是,这些担心是没有根据的,除了一两个案件外。
739The Heinrich-Ball Foundation in Germany reported that social institutions德国海因里希-贝尔基金会报告说,社会机构
740have positively countered algorithmic disinformation有正面的反算法假说
741and that the greater threats come from offline socially engineered negative campaigning,并且更大的威胁来自线下社会策划的负面宣传,
742exacerbating people's existing prejudices and beliefs.加深人们现有的偏见和信仰。
743Technology might have amplified the speed and scale of these messages,技术可能扩大了这些信息的速度和规模,
744but did not eventually prevail because of social mobilization.但由于社会动员,最终未能占上风。
745Technology enables social mobilization towards democratic outcomes.技术有助于社会动员,实现民主成果。
746In Brazil's recently concluded and very close and fraught presidential election,在巴西最近结束的总统选举中,
747won by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva,路易斯·伊纳西奥·卢拉·达席尔瓦
748technology companies did manipulate public opinion and social media.科技公司的确操纵了舆论和社交媒体。
749But what I want to draw your attention to is how everyday Brazilians rallied但我想提醒你注意的是 巴西人每天如何集结
750offline and online using those very platforms to mobilize使用这些平台来动员
751to get the vote out for Lula's campaign.为卢拉的竞选争取选票
752There was a lot of betting on Polymarket about the outcomes.在Polymarket上有很多关于结果的赌注。
753They gave 12 to 26 percent of the market vote went to Lula,他们给了12%到26%的市场选票给卢拉,
754but he won by 51 percent because you cannot always trust prediction algorithms.但他赢了51% 因为你不能总是相信预测算法
755Challenging colonial and authoritarian conditions requires movements艰难的殖民和专制条件需要运动
756and people coming together,和人们聚集在一起,
757and there have always been ways to do this, even with analog technologies.并且一直有办法做到这一点, 即使用模拟技术。
758For instance, radio was crucial to shaping Algerian resistance to the French例如,广播对形成阿尔及利亚抵抗法国人的力量至关重要。
759and the Russian practice of zamistat,和俄罗斯的扎米斯塔习俗,
760or handmade copying of print-inspired organizations in the USSR.或手工复制苏联受印刷启发的组织。
761I mean, what is the messaging app Signal,我的意思是,什么是 消息应用信号,
762but a way for secure private communications for journalists and human rights defenders,但这是记者和人权维护者获得保密通信的途径,
763so secure that even the Department of War needs to use it?这么安全,连战争部 都需要使用它?
764The former prime minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan, is in prison there.巴基斯坦前总理伊姆兰·汗被囚禁在那里.
765He worked with his social media team to create an AI-generated image of himself他与自己的社交媒体团队合作,创造了AI生成的自己形象.
766delivering a message to his millions of supporters.向他的数百万支持者传达一个信息。
767Carefully handled, technology can support freedom of speech and expression仔细处理,技术可以支持言论和表达自由
768under suppression of democracy.压制民主。
769It isn't always just either off or on, but I get it.它不是总是 关闭或打开, 但我明白了。
770I understand.我理解,我懂你说什么
771We have been lulled into thinking that we're all data points我们都觉得我们都是数据点
772completely subject to our phones and algorithmic targeting and n-shitified apps.完全服从于我们的手机和算法瞄准 和n隐藏的应用程序。
773They want you to believe this.他们想让你相信这一点。
774However, evidence shows that this is not necessarily true.然而,有证据表明,这不一定是真的。
775Democracy is flawed and usually frustrating,民主是有缺陷的,通常是令人沮丧的,
776but it is a collective deliberation about the future we want.但是,这是对我们希望的未来的集体审议。
777World's largest democracy also refers to the complexity of what comes the day after the election.世界上最大的民主国家也提到选举之后一天的复杂性。
778It is not just about governing a billion and a half people from the top down.它不仅仅是从上而下管理十亿半的人。
779It is, in theory, about enabling those billion and a half people to participate in that governance从理论上讲,这就是使这十亿半的人能够参与这种治理。
780of the people, by the people, and for the people.以人民的名义,以人民的名义,为人民服务。
781No, I'm not saying that.不 我不是那个意思
782I'm actually saying that there is a dance between technology and society.我其实是说科技与社会之间有一场舞蹈.
783I'm trying to say that the social and political institutions that leverage technology我想说的是 利用科技的社会和政治机构
784need to be carefully handling it.需要小心处理
785So, no, I don't think that this is just that kind of liberal notion.所以,不,我不认为这只是那种自由主义的概念。
786But thank you.谢谢你
787An excellent example comes from Taiwan and how new philosophies of technology台湾是一个很好的例子,
788emerged from the 2014 People's Sunflower Movement.2014年人民葵花运动中出现.
789The Taiwanese open source platform, Polis, totally altered public policy deliberation.台湾开放源代码平台Polis彻底改变了公共政策审议.
790By mathematically clustering public opinions while intentionally eliminating reply buttons通过数学组合公众意见,同时有意取消回复按钮
791and amplifying bridging statements across differences,并扩大了跨越分歧的沟通性发言,
792the system prevents trolling and structurally rewards consensus.该系统防止了破坏和结构奖励共识。
793Taiwan successfully used this model to co-author national legislation台湾成功利用这一模式共同起草国家立法
794on the highly divisive issue of the regulation of Uber.有关Uber监管的高度分裂性问题
795Again, this only worked because you had a movement that shaped the tool.再说一次,这只因为你有一个 塑造工具的运动。
796Our colleague in sociology, Ella MacPherson, has for years been studying我们社会学的同事艾拉·麦克弗森 多年来一直在学习
797how everyday people are enrolled in analyzing digital evidence每天人们是如何参与分析数字证据的
798to identify human rights abuses similarly.以同样方式查明侵犯人权行为。
799The 2016 Brexit vote and the election of Donald Trump won2016年布雷克西特投票和唐纳德·特朗普选举获胜.
800created this anxiety about the manipulation of voting through large-scale surveillance对通过大规模监视操纵投票的担忧
801and targeting, and generated technological solutions like fact-checking目标确定和生成技术解决办法,如事实核查
802and a wave of studies about political misinformation and disinformation.和一波关于政治错误和错误的研究。
803But it turns out, according to researchers like Alice Marwick,但根据爱丽丝·马威克这样的研究者
804while polarization and manipulation does happen,当两极分化和操纵发生的时候,
805there are only a very small subset of people who are manipulated只有很小一部分人被操纵
806rather than this kind of large-scale uniform manipulation of an entire population.而不是这种大规模 统一操纵整个人口。
807In other words, the idea of people being controlled and helpless in the face of technology换句话说,人们在技术面前被控制和无助的想法
808amplifies digital tools and platforms.放大数字工具和平台。
809I need to finish this, thank you.我需要完成这个,谢谢。
810And the solutions within those tools, rather than the sociopolitical systems以及这些工具中的解决办法,而不是社会政治制度
811that actually sustain and support democracy,真正维持和支持民主,
812like, for instance, national public service media or Wikipedia例如,国家公共服务媒体或维基百科
813or national and open databases, and not criminalizing journalism or dissent,或国家数据库和公开数据库,不将新闻或异议定为犯罪,
814or indeed not letting tech billionaires buy media companies,或者不让技术亿万富翁购买媒体公司,
815these are essential to democracy and people's agency.它们对于民主和人民机构至关重要。
816Technology is a network of networks, much like the society that enables and sustains it,技术是一个网络网络, 很像社会 使它能够和维持,
817and therefore I beg to oppose the motion.因此,我恳请大家反对这项动议。
818Thank you.谢谢
819Thank you very much, Dr. Meyer.谢谢你,梅耶博士
820I would now like to open our second round of floor speeches.我现在要开始第二轮发言。
821Would anyone like to speak in proposition to the motion?有人想就动议发言吗?
822Yes, please, name and college.是的,请,名字和大学。
823Karen Shepard, Murray Edwards College.凯伦·谢帕德,默里·爱德华兹学院.
824I wanted to thank the propositions for their speeches so far,我想感谢这些提议 到目前为止的发言,
825but I think something we've not had yet come up in this debate但我想我们还没在这场辩论里想到什么
826is what has technology done to our ability to think over the last few generations技术对我们思考过去几代的能力
827and what it's doing to the current generation and the next generation以及它对当代和下一代所做的一切
828that are going to be upheld in democracy.将在民主中予以维护。
829As a historian, I want to take us back in time.作为一个历史学家,我想让我们回到过去。
830If we go back to the mid-18th century when you had the electoral reforms,如果我们回到18世纪中叶 你进行了选举改革
831you had parliamentary debates being quoted verbatim,你们的议会辩论被逐字引用,
832pages and pages and pages in every single main newspaper within the UK.英国每家主要报纸的页面和页面。
833Then we go to the turn of the century, in the middle of the century,然后我们进入世纪之交, 在世纪中叶,
834and you had people willing to be able to stand and listen to huge politicians和你有人们愿意 能够站 和倾听巨大的政治家
835and debates for over two hours and be able to engage in this.和辩论两个多小时,并能够参与这项工作。
836Now, in the 21st century, the average human has an attention span of eight seconds.现在,在21世纪,一般人类的注意力跨度为8秒.
837To put that into perspective, a goldfish is nine.换句话说,金鱼是九条
838I would say with them rioting and showing engagement in politics,我要跟他们说 暴动和表现 参政,
839they're still showing an engagement within democracy and showing up their own opinion.他们仍然在民主内部 表现出他们自己的看法
840But what we have now is a generation of children that are growing up,但是,我们现在有 一代儿童正在成长,
841especially with technology, and how is that affecting the fact特别是技术, 和如何影响事实
842that they are not able to speak and literate and think about themselves他们不能说话,不能识字,不能自觉;
843and engage with the democracy in the same way that it used to be?并以过去的方式与民主进行接触?
844Like our speaker said, the majority of them are now getting their news from social media,正如我们的演讲者所说,他们中的大多数人现在都从社交媒体得到消息,
845so how are we meant to teach these people how to engage within democracy我们该如何教这些人如何参与民主
846and what is this going to be for the future of us?这对我们的未来会有什么好处?
847Thank you.谢谢
848Thank you very much.谢谢
849Would anyone like to speak in opposition to the motion?有人反对动议吗?
850You're all right.你没事
851Name a college, please.请说一个大学
852After hearing Dr. Maia's opposition speech, I firmly believe with her.在听到马亚博士的反对言论后,我坚信她的观点.
853I think the motion that technology is the only threat to democracy我认为技术是民主的唯一威胁
854or it has eroded democracy is fundamentally not true.或者它侵蚀了民主 根本就不是真的
855Democracy has always been under threat, and it will always be under threat.民主一直受到威胁,它将永远受到威胁。
856It is something that we need to intrinsically fight for.这是我们需要从本质上争取的东西。
857Hearing the points from the proposition reminded Fukuyama essay, The End of History.听命题的要点提醒福山散文"历史的终结".
858Fukuyama thought that history has ended.福山认为历史已经结束.
859The liberal world order will prevail, and we all saw how that turned out.自由世界秩序将占上风,我们都看到了结果。
860History will never end.历史永远不会结束。
861We have to keep fighting for democracy, and we have to keep fighting for our rights.我们必须继续争取民主,我们必须继续争取我们的权利。
862It is indeed true that platforms are no longer simple conduits of information.平台确实不再是简单的信息渠道。
863The choices that technology and their makers make in terms of how they are designed技术及其制造者在如何设计方面的选择
864shape user behavior and the kind of risk that users get exposed to.形状用户行为和用户接触的风险。
865But there have always been tools of the season that have threatened democracy,但这个季节的工具 一直威胁着民主
866whether that's corruption, whether that's technology, whether that's bribery,是否腐败,是否技术,是否贿赂,
867whether that is excluding women from the right to cast their vote.这是否剥夺了妇女投票的权利。
868It is not just technology, exhaustively, that has eroded democracy.不仅技术彻底地侵蚀了民主。
869There will always be threats to our rights, and we have to keep fighting against them.我们的权利将始终受到威胁,我们必须继续与之作斗争。
870Thank you very much.谢谢
871Would anyone like to speak in abstention to the motion?有人想对动议投弃权票吗?
872Yes, please.是的,谢谢。
873Name and college.姓名和大学。
874I'm afraid that whilst I enjoy this motion, I have to totally reject it,恐怕当我喜欢这个动议时 我必须完全拒绝
875because it's ahistorical.因为它是历史的。
876Fundamentally speaking, if you look at history, technology comes and it goes.从根本上说,如果你看历史, 技术来来去去。
877It comes and it changes us.它会改变我们
878Look at highways, for example, and look at what Robert Moses did with highways比如看高速公路 看看罗伯特·摩西对高速公路做了什么
879and transportation technology and the massive changes that came as a result of the car in New York.以及纽约汽车带来的巨大变化
880Entire neighborhoods were destroyed.整个街区都被摧毁了
881It was terrible and it was awful.这是可怕的,这是可怕的。
882This happened in the 1920s and then the 1930s, and it changed how a lot of people lived.这发生在1920年代和1930年代,改变了很多人的生活方式.
883It changed how they traveled.这改变了他们旅行的方式。
884It changed how they existed and how they were entertained.这改变了他们的存在和娱乐方式。
885And then come the 1990s, and there's a real revolution in transportation there,然后到了1990年代,那里交通发生了真正的革命,
886where we realize that the way we've organized ourselves as a society,在那里,我们意识到 我们组织自己作为一个社会的方式,
887when it comes to cars, when it comes to the use of new tech through transportation, was wrong.在汽车方面,在通过运输使用新技术方面,是错误的。
888We should invest more in trains.我们应该投入更多的火车。
889We should invest more in underground railways.我们应该加大对地下铁路的投资.
890Well, the same thing is true with technology and democracy now today and the use of AI and social media.技术与民主也是一样,
891It's a challenge.这是一个挑战。
892It's a terrible challenge.这是一个可怕的挑战。
893It challenges us at our very core.它对我们的核心提出了挑战。
894And we're going to adapt.我们要适应。
895And we're going to move.且道将移.
896Point of information.信息点.
897You said that technology was like combos, but with ours, we're kind of moving away from that.你说技术就像梳理器 但是有了我们的 我们就要远离了
898We're realizing it's less sustainable.我们意识到它不那么可持续。
899We're still a road to al-Khaimah.我们还是一条通往al-Khaimah的道路。
900With AI, maybe it will come, maybe it will go.有了AI,也许它会来,也许它会去。
901That fellow Medwardian said earlier, it still had such a bad impact.那个梅德沃迪安先生刚才说,它仍然产生了如此糟糕的影响。
902Look, I don't disagree with you that there will be bad impacts.听着,我不反对你 会有坏影响。
903But I also think that we're not going to return to the 1848 where...但我也认为我们不会回到1848年...
904One minute remaining.还有一分钟
905I'm being told to shut up.有人叫我闭嘴
906We're never going to return to the 1848-esque world of politics where it's being done in the upper room of pubs and clubs,我们再也不会回到1848年的 政治世界了 在酒吧和俱乐部的上层房间
907and we're all sharing pamphlets with one another.我们一起分享小册子
908I'm sorry, when we're simply not going back.对不起,当我们只是 不回去。
909The reason why I'm abstaining is because there is a process here.我弃权的原因是 这里有个过程
910There's a very neutral process of going and going away.进退两难的过程非常中立.
911So no, I don't think we're going back.所以,我不认为我们回去。
912I wish we could go back.我希望我们能回去。
913I wish we could avoid the negative aspects of this.我希望我们能够避免这种情况的消极方面。
914But yes, please sign with me in abstention.但是,是的,请和我一起签署 弃权。
915Thank you very much to the member for that speech in abstention.非常感谢该成员投弃权票的发言。
916Right, order please.好的,请点菜
917Order please.请点菜
918Let's move on to our third round of paper speakers.继续第三轮纸质演说.
919Speaking third in proposition is Dr. Tomasz Holoneck,第三位是托马斯·霍洛内克博士
920an assistant research professor at Cambridge's Leverholme Centre for the Future of Intelligence,剑桥Leverholme情报中心助理研究教授
921working across AI ethics, critical design and human-AI interaction.工作跨越AI道德,批判性设计和人与AI互动.
922His forthcoming book, Why AI Needs Critical Design, explores how design can broaden participation in AI development他即将出版的书"为什么AI需要关键设计"探讨了设计如何可以扩大AI开发的参与.
923and make AI more transparent to non-experts.并使大赦国际对非专家更加透明。
924His research on AI companions, including grief bots, has been covered by the New York Times,他关于AI同伴的研究,包括悲伤的bots, 已经被纽约时报报道,
925卫报与BBC.
926Dr. Tomasz, the ears of the house are yours.Tomasz医生 房子的耳朵是你的了
927Mr. President, thank you and good evening to you all.主席先生,谢谢大家,晚安。
928Over the past couple of years, I have been studying how digital technologies shape people's well-being,在过去几年里,我一直在研究 数字技术如何塑造人们的福祉,
929including how we experience loneliness and grief.包括我们如何经历孤独和悲伤。
930And part of that work took me to people who have lived through war crimes and human rights violations,这项工作的一部分 把我带到了那些 经历过战争罪行和侵犯人权行为的人身上
931including refugees now living here in the UK.包括目前居住在英国的难民。
932One conversation has stayed with me in particular.有一次谈话特别和我在一起
933I spoke with a woman who is both a refugee herself and a mental health practitioner working with survivors of war.我和一位既身兼难民又为战争幸存者工作的精神保健工作者的妇女交谈。
934When we discussed the benefits and harms of AI, she told me that the people she works with indeed turn to chat GPT.当我们讨论AI的利弊时,她告诉我,她与的人确实转向聊天GPT.
935And that's not just because no other help is available.这不仅仅是因为没有别的帮助。
936No, it is largely because of trust.不,这主要是因为信任。
937When they need support and advice, they trust an American corporation more than the public institutions当他们需要支持和咨询时,他们更信任一家美国公司而不是公共机构
938that were built, at least in principle, to care for them.至少原则上是为了照顾他们
939Their experience has taught them that such institutions are bound to fail them.他们的经验教他们,这种机构必然会辜负他们。
940Meanwhile, the technology seems to show up whenever they need it.同时,科技似乎随时随地出现.
941Now, the opposition may think that I have just made their case.现在,反对派可能认为 我刚刚做了他们的理由。
942The institutions failed first.这些机构首先失败了。
943AI didn't break anyone's trust.AI没有破坏任何人的信任.
944Years of political failure did that.多年的政治失败就是如此。
945If anything, technology simply revealed the cracks.如果有的话,科技只是揭示了裂缝。
946Of course, the cracks are real.当然,裂缝是真实的。
947But I want to argue today that technology doesn't just reveal the cracks.但我今天想说,科技不只是揭示裂缝。
948No, it does much more than that.不,它的作用远不止于此。
949It grows in them.它生长在它们中。
950And the more the technology grows, the deeper the cracks become.科技越发展,裂缝越深。
951Think of the promises of the past 20 years.想想过去20年的诺言
952You don't feel safe on your street?你在街上感觉不安全吗?
953Here's a durable camera.这里有一个耐久的相机。
954You don't trust the news?你不相信新闻?
955Here's a feed made just for you.这是专为你做的饲料
956You've been feeling lonely?你一直觉得孤独?
957Here's a chatbot that is always there, always ready to listen.这里有一个聊天员,总是在那里,总是准备好听。
958Now, each of these promises turns a shared collective problem into a private fix.现在,每一个承诺都把一个共同的集体问题变成一个私人问题。
959And every private fix chips away at something.每一个私人修理芯片 远离的东西。
960That belief that we solve our problems by governing ourselves together.这种信念认为,我们通过共同管理自己来解决我们的问题。
961That belief is what democracy is.这种信念就是民主。
962Elections, courts, and parliaments are important, but they are its shell.选举、法院和议会是重要的,但它们是其外壳。
963Without the belief, the shell is empty.没有信仰,壳是空的.
964In a democracy, a failure, a visible crack in the shell, is supposed to set something in motion.在民主中,失败,外壳中可见的裂缝,应该会引发某种动静.
965When a public service fails us, we complain, we organize, and slowly make it better.当公共服务失败时,我们抱怨,我们组织起来,慢慢地改善。
966Now, let me make it clear before there is a point of information.现在,让我在有信息之前说明一下。
967I do not believe that it is the job of a refugee to reform the NHS.我认为改革国民保健制度不是难民的工作。
968Responsibility for our systems cannot be shared equally because failure and disempowerment are not experienced equally.对我们的系统的责任不能平等分担,因为失败和丧失权力是不平等的。
969But for many of us who are in the position to act, technology offers an exit.但是,对于许多能够采取行动的我们来说,技术提供了一个出路。
970A grievance that could have become a demand becomes a like, a share, or a subscription instead.原本可能成为需求的申诉变成了类似、份额或订阅。
971Quietly, our trust moves from institutions that we can change to corporations we cannot.悄悄地,我们的信任从我们能够改变的机构转移到我们不能改变的公司。
972That is how technology deepens the cracks of democracy through the slow erosion of our sense of responsibility for each other.这就是技术如何通过缓慢侵蚀我们对彼此的责任感来加深民主的裂痕。
973The woman I spoke to was describing her patients, but more and more research shows that it's not just them.我和那个女人在描述她的病人, 但是越来越多的研究表明,不仅仅是他们。
974People are turning to AI for the help we once sought from friends, family, community, and ultimately the state.人们纷纷向AI求助,
975Here in the UK, researchers at Oxford found that almost a third of regular users turned to AI for emotional support.在英国,牛津的研究人员发现,近三分之一的普通用户转向AI寻求情感支持.
976And 38% trusted for advice on their relationships.38%的人相信他们的关系
97738% 。
978Now, compare that figure with another one.现在,把这个数字和另一个数字比起来。
979Today, only 12% of British people say that they trust the government to place the need of the nation above the interests of their party.今天,只有12%的英国人说,他们信任政府,把民族的需要置于他们党的利益之上.
980We don't trust our government, but trust a machine to tell us how to deal with each other.我们不信任我们的政府,而是信任一台机器来告诉我们如何对付对方.
981Now, this might sound like a private issue, but it's not.现在,这听起来可能像 一个私人问题,但它不是。
982Dealing with each other is exactly what democracy asks of us.相互打交道正是民主对我们的要求。
983It means listening to people we find difficult, and disagreeing without walking away.这意味着倾听我们发现困难的人, 和不同意而不走开。
984Instead of repairing the cracks, the cracked shell of democracy, we choose a cocoon of technology.而不是修复裂缝,民主的裂缝, 我们选择一个技术的茧。
985One that seems more comfortable every day, because the cocoon knows exactly how to make us feel better.每天看起来更舒服的, 因为茧确切知道如何让我们感觉更好。
986One second, it flatters us, and I mean quite literally.一秒钟,它恭维我们, 我的意思是相当字面上。
987Anthropic's own research found that in conversations about relationships,Anthropic自己的研究发现,在有关关系的对话中,
988its AI was sycophantic a quarter of the time,它的人工智能在四分之一的时间里是虚幻的,
989taking the user's sight against someone it had never heard from.将用户的视线 与它从未听说过的人对峙
990Isolated and flattered?孤立和恭维?
991That is not a recipe for engaged citizens.这不是让公民参与的秘方。
992Yes, please.是的,谢谢。
993And I would never argue that it doesn't.我绝不会说它没有。
994There were some good examples that Maya provided us with有一些好的例子 玛雅为我们提供了
995that indeed point that technology can help certain processes in certain groups.这确实表明,技术可以帮助某些群体的某些进程。
996But my general point is that it grows in the cracks但总而言之,它生长在裂缝里
997and it basically prevents some of us from acting when we should.它基本上阻止了我们中的一些人采取行动。
998Anyway, I could keep talking about human rights violations, loneliness and grief无论如何,我可以继续谈论 侵犯人权,孤独和悲伤
999because these are my research topics,因为这些是我的研究课题,
1000but I want to close with something slightly lighter, food.但我想用些轻一点的食物来结束
1001In 2019, the Barbican hosted an exhibition on AI2019年,巴比坎人主持了AI上的展览
1002with a display showing possible futures of food in the age of climate crisis.展示气候危机时代粮食可能的未来。
1003The visitor's favourite was the so-called personal food computer,访客最喜欢的是所谓的个人食品电脑,
1004an AI-driven food-growing chamber for your own kitchen table.一个人工智能驱动的食品生产室 供你们自己的厨房餐桌使用
1005Now let that sink in, my personal device, my food, my table,现在让它沉进去,我的个人设备,我的食物,我的桌子,
1006as a response to a collective crisis.作为对集体危机的反应。
1007Now that is the ultimate cocoon, a technology that perpetuates the illusion现在,这是最终的茧, 这种技术使幻觉永久化
1008that you can become independent of everyone else.你可以独立于其他人。
1009A cocoon keeps us comfortable, a bunker keeps others out.茧能让我们舒适 地堡能让别人远离
1010For a cocoon to become a bunker, all it takes is believing that the world outside has failed us.为了让茧成为地堡 它只需要相信外面的世界 辜负了我们
1011Now the personal food computer is only a prototype, thankfully,现在个人的食品电脑 只是一个原型, 感谢,
1012but its logic is already manifesting in your home and in your pocket.但它的逻辑已经在你的家和你的口袋里显现出来。
1013It's your smart doorbell, your hyper-personalised feed and your sycophantic chatbot.这是你的智能门铃 你的超个性化的饲料 还有你的爱奇艺聊天员
1014Now that is my case.现在,这是我的情况。
1015Technology has eroded democracy because it grows in the cracks of our institutions技术侵蚀了民主 因为它生长在我们体制的裂缝里
1016and our communities and keeps making them deeper.和我们的社区,并不断使他们更深入。
1017I'm concluding.我结束了。
1018It has taken our trust and handed it to companies no voter can reach.它夺走了我们的信任,把它交给了选民无法接触到的公司。
1019It has taken our grievances, the raw material of democratic reform,我们的不满 民主改革的原料
1020and turned them into fuel for private consumption of online content.然后把它们变成私人消费网上内容的燃料。
1021And it is replacing the daily difficult practice of living with other people它取代了每天与其他人生活在一起的艰难做法
1022with a feed and a chatbot that agree with us.还有一个和我们一致的聊天机
1023Our democracy erodes through a thousand private fixes,我们的民主通过一千个私人的修补被侵蚀,
1024and we don't feel the need to mend the cracks in the shell of democracy而我们并不觉得需要 弥补民主的裂缝
1025when we can choose the cocoon of technology instead.当我们可以选择技术的茧。
1026But as the cocoon turns into a bunker, we must realise但当茧变成掩体时 我们必须意识到
1027we won't sustain, let alone reform, democracy from inside a bunker.我们不会维持民主 更不要说改革民主了
1028And that is why I back to propose.这就是为什么我回来求婚。
1029Thank you.谢谢
1030Thank you very much, Dr Tomas.非常感谢,托马斯博士。
1031We now move across the floor to our third speaker in opposition, Joel Smith,我们现在跨过会场,请第三位反对者乔尔·史密斯发言。
1032a first-year HSPS student at Jesus College.耶稣学院一年级HSPS学生.
1033He is on the events subcommittee of the Cambridge Union,他是剑桥联盟的活动小组委员会的成员
1034and he has won the right to speak by open audition.他通过公开试镜获得了发言权
1035Joel, you have the ears of the House.乔尔,你有 众议院的耳朵。
1036Evening all.晚间所有。
1037It's great to be speaking here today.今天在这里发言真好
1038I thank the Union for inviting me in.我感谢联盟邀请我。
1039It's been wonderful hearing from the proposition tonight很高兴听到今晚的提议
1040because they have been so unbearably close to being right about basically everything.因为他们一直如此难以忍受的接近 对基本上的一切是正确的。
1041There's a couple of points I'd like to address while I'm here,我想在这里谈几点
1042particularly from the second proposition speaker.特别是第二位提议发言人。
1043You mentioned internet shutdowns.你提到互联网关闭。
1044Funnily enough, that was literally going to be my first point.有意思的是,这其实就是我的第一点。
1045I was even going to do the click thing.我甚至打算做点心
1046It was going to be really cool before you did the bit.在你这么做之前会很酷的
1047To that I respond quite simply.我的反应很简单。
1048If someone takes away my gun, does that make the gun weak?如果有人拿走了我的枪,那枪会变弱吗?
1049I think not.我想没有。
1050Secondly, there was a point the first proposition speaker brushed over really quickly第二,第一位提议演讲者说得有一点很迅速
1051because he was running out of time that I'd like to get into more.因为他没有时间了,我想多加投入
1052You quite wisely addressed the idea that technology has allowed us to be heard better,你非常明智地谈到这个想法,即 技术让我们能更好地听到,
1053and you shut it down on the basis that algorithms are controllable你关闭它基于 算法是可控制的
1054and manipulable by the people who run them.由管理他们的民众操纵。
1055Undeniably, tech oligarchs do have a big influence over their algorithms.不可否认的是,技术寡头对其算法确实有很大的影响.
1056The amount of far-right propaganda I've seen on Twitter tells me that's enough.我在推特上看到的极右宣传量告诉我够了.
1057However, I think what we can all notice...然而,我想我们都知道...
1058Yes?是吗?
1059The X algorithm is open source.X算法是开源的.
1060Is it?是吗?
1061Yes.对
1062I can't allow it.我不能允许
1063I was using Twitter as a vague example.我用Twitter作为模糊的例子。
1064I'm sure some of them are private at the end.我敢肯定,有些是 私人在最后。
1065And if you're saying you don't understand how it works, then why didn't you use...如果你说你不明白它是如何运作的 那你为什么不用...
1066I didn't use an AI chatbot for what it's worth.我并没有用AI聊天机来做它的价值。
1067This was all like bad memory or AI-free speech.这就像糟糕的记忆 或自由AI的演讲。
1068Don't you worry.别担心
1069But what I would counterpoint that with is,但我想反驳的是,
1070how many people here saw footage from Palestine in the last three years on their feeds,这里有多少人在过去三年里 从巴勒斯坦看到录像
1071on a non-open source feed?在非开源的种子上?
1072I think we can say we all did, right?我想我们可以说 我们都做了,对不对?
1073And how many of us think the people who own those feeds wanted us to see that footage?有多少人认为拥有这些饲料的人 想要我们看到那段录像?
1074I think not.我想没有。
1075With each new technological development, the ability to censor gets worse.随着每个新的技术发展,审查能力会越来越差。
1076It's like increasingly lubricating the information.这就像越来越润滑的信息。
1077Back in the Middle Ages, only scribes controlled what could be read,早在中世纪,只有文士控制着可以读到的东西,
1078and as such, it was incredibly easy to fire your scribe.因此,解雇你的文士是非常容易的。
1079Then the Gutenberg Press came along.后来古腾堡出版社也随之而来.
1080With it came the novel and printed text and the earliest forms of democracy.有了这部小说和印刷文本以及最早的民主形式。
1081Then came radio and telecommunications.然后是无线电和电信
1082More ways to speak, more ways to be heard, but still privately owned.更多的说话方式,更多的表达方式,但仍是私有的.
1083Finally, we get the internet and our own ability to capture footage and video.最后,我们得到了互联网 和我们自己的能力 捕捉镜头和视频。
1084Whilst it can be attempted to be censored,虽然可以尝试被审查,
1085it is censored at the output level rather than the input level.它在产出层面而不是投入层面受到审查。
1086A traditional media oligarch is given options as to what to publish传统媒体寡头可以选择出版什么
1087and then chooses to publish it.然后选择出版。
1088A tech oligarch has it published first and then has to retroactively take it down.一个技术寡头先发布,然后必须追溯下来。
1089That is vastly harder.这困难很大。
1090And as such, we get far, far more information off the internet than we would have elsewhere.因此,我们从互联网上获得的信息远比其他地方要多。
1091Now, the proposition has rightly recognised that that also includes a greater ability to lie.现在,该提议正确地认识到,这也包括更大的说谎能力。
1092This is true.这是真的。
1093However, I would vastly rather that deception be a democracy than a monopoly.然而,我宁愿欺骗是一种民主,而不是垄断。
1094By that what I mean is, conventional media does, I feel like it has been ignored,我的意思是,传统媒体做的, 我觉得它被忽略了,
1095still lies sometimes, and when it does, it can be detrimental.有时仍会撒谎,一旦撒谎,就可能有害无益。
1096Look at the Hillsborough disaster.看看希尔斯伯勒的灾难
1097The Sun, the most-read newspaper in the country, blamed the victims for the disaster.[永久失效連結] 国内阅读量最高的报纸"太阳报"责备灾民.
1098And that was the national narrative for decades because they had no way to counter it.这是几十年来的民族叙事 因为他们无法反驳
1099Sorry, I'm being too loud.对不起,我太大声了
1100Had that happened today, we would unfortunately have quite grim,如果今天发生这种事,我们很不幸会很惨
1101but very important footage accessible like that.但非常重要的镜头可以这样查看
1102Got to do the click thing in the end.最后得做点心的事
1103And that is essentially what we're seeing in Palestine.这就是我们在巴勒斯坦看到的。
1104It is a vastly, vastly worse, vastly, vastly more tragic example,这是一个巨大、巨大、更糟糕、更悲惨的例子,
1105but it is a case where people are able to overpower media gatekeepers但它是一个案例,人们能够 压倒媒体守门员
1106using their ability to take footage themselves and put it into the world.利用他们的能力 自己拍摄录像 并将其投入世界
1107I think that is democracy in the most literal meaning of the term,我认为,这是民主 在这个词的最字面意义,
1108demos plus kratos, ancient Greek, people and power.演示品加kratos,古希腊语,人和权力.
1109We talk a lot about democratic norms.我们经常谈论民主准则。
1110The problem with democratic norms is they often aren't very democratic.民主规范的问题在于它们往往不十分民主.
1111If you model democratic norms on somewhere like the United States, for instance,如果你在像美国这样的地方树立民主规范
1112that's like saying that I'm the union president.就像说我是工会主席
1113I'm standing near the guy.我站在那个家伙旁边
1114We look a bit similar.我们看起来有点相似。
1115We're not the same bloke.我们不是同一个家伙。
1116The fact of the matter is I don't think we should be modeling our understanding of democracy事实是 我觉得我们不应该模仿 对民主的理解
1117on the country in the world with arguably the largest state-owned slave population.在世界上拥有最多国有奴隶的人口的国家
1118I think we can do a bit better than that.我认为我们可以做得更好一点。
1119And I think measuring the power of the people to hear, to speak, and to be heard我想测量人民的声音 说话和被倾听的力量
1120is infinitely better to comparing it to a nation founded by slave owners把它比作一个奴隶主建立的国家 绝对更好
1121and which still owns slaves itself.仍然拥有奴隶
1122One common criticism of technology is that it has increased polarisation.对技术的一个常见批评是它增加了两极化.
1123To that I ask, what does the word polarisation actually mean?我问,两极化这个词到底是什么意思?
1124It means increasing in distance, but from what?意思是增加距离,但从什么?
1125Some ideal centre point?一个理想的中心点?
1126Some consensus we're all meant to have?我们都会有共识吗?
1127To that I say, I think it's good that we lose some amount of consensus我说,我觉得我们失去一些共识是件好事
1128because it allows us to challenge it.因为它允许我们挑战它。
1129Yes?是吗?
1130Polarisation is surely moving away from us at that point.那时极化肯定正在远离我们。
1131Yes, but presumably those points of views were originally close together.是的,但大概这些观点原本是接近的。
1132That's my idea.这是我的主意。
1133You'd think when people complain about polarisation,你会觉得当人们抱怨极化时
1134the point they're getting at is that fundamentally we used to have more in common.他们得到的要点是,从根本上说,我们过去有更多的共同点。
1135We used to be able to get along better because we agreed on more fundamentals.我们过去能够相处得更好,因为我们商定了更多的基本要素。
1136I would argue that being able to challenge those fundamentals我主张,能够挑战这些基本因素
1137opens us up for a lot of positive development.为我们带来了许多积极发展。
1138I just did one, man.我只是做了一个,男人。
1139Yes, there are some fundamentals that we all want.是的,我们所有人都想要一些基本要素。
1140We all want to agree that bigotry is bad,我们都想同意 偏执是坏的,
1141but the good thing about those ones is they're really easy to defend.但他们的优点是 他们真的很容易防守。
1142If someone challenges them, if we are willing to take it seriously,如果有人挑战他们 如果我们愿意认真对待
1143we can beat them quite easily.我们很容易打败他们
1144But there are other fundamentals which until recently但还有其他基本因素,直到最近
1145were pretty universally agreed on that are really bad.相当普遍同意 这真的很糟糕。
1146For instance, every American war until Iran last year, this year rather,比如说,直到去年,直到伊朗的每一场美国战争, 今年,
1147was popular at its inception, and that is because the media wanted it to be一开始很受欢迎 这是因为媒体希望
1148and so people did not receive the full breadth of information所以人们没有得到 充分的信息,
1149and perspectives on the issue.以及对这一问题的看法。
1150Now that we are able to hear from Iranians and from victims of other wars directly,现在我们可以直接听到伊朗人和其他战争受害者的声音,
1151we've had our first American war that is unpopular at inception.我们第一次的美国战争 一开始就不受欢迎
1152That is pretty massive.这是相当巨大的。
1153It has not yet been enough to stop the war.尚不足以阻止战争。
1154With the recent midterm results, maybe we can hope有了最近的中期结果,也许我们可以希望
1155that I don't have much faith in the Democrats.我对民主党没什么信心
1156I must be honest.我必须说实话。
1157So to those who challenge technology,所以对那些挑战技术的人来说
1158I will ask them to look not at the future, not at the present,我将要求他们不要看未来,不要看现在,
1159but at what has happened, as the motion suggests.但正如动议所暗示的,
1160We have seen ourselves enabled to speak and to be heard on a level unlike before.我们已经看到自己能够发言和听到的声音,其程度与以往不同。
1161And I ask you, do you want to reject that just because some people can use it to lie?我问你,你想拒绝吗? 就因为有些人可以用它来撒谎?
1162Do you deny your own dignity in that way?你这样否定自己的尊严吗?
1163We have the power to speak more now,我们现在有话要说
1164and technology does not deny us our civic duty, it gives us a new one.技术并不否定我们的公民义务, 它给了我们一个新的责任。
1165Thank you.谢谢
1166Thank you very much, Joel.谢谢你,乔尔。
1167Okay, I'm going to open up one more round of floor speeches.好吧,我要再打开一圈楼层演讲。
1168Would anyone like to speak in proposition briefly?有人想简略地谈谈提议吗?
1169Yeah, all right.是的,没事。
1170Name and college, please.姓名和大学,请。
1171Existential risk, no for technology.存在风险,不用于技术。
1172Certain technologies, some people have more choices to make.某些技术,有些人有更多的选择。
1173The question is, across history, has technology,问题是,在整个历史中,有技术,
1174why is it being told that, indeed, the very first politics invasion为什么有人会说 第一次政治入侵
1175brought to the world in the first place?先带给世界?
1176We don't have the very first king to rise from the throne,我们没有第一个从王位上站起来的国王
1177but our technologies are the most confident ones.但我们的技术是最自信的
1178Take nuclear weapons.拿核武器来
1179At the end of the world, one man, Donald Trump,世界末日,一个人,唐纳德·特朗普,
1180the U.S. is a firm and unique man.美国是一个坚定而独特的人。
1181Likewise, mass surveillance.同样,大规模监视。
1182I agree.и種
1183Thank you very much, Luke.非常感谢,卢克。
1184Would anyone like to speak in opposition to the motion?有人反对动议吗?
1185Yes, please.是的,谢谢。
1186Name and college.姓名和大学。
1187Thank you very much.谢谢
1188Right, would anyone like to speak in abstention对,有人想弃权发言吗?
1189to close off the floor speeches?关闭发言?
1190I want to say right in the corner over there,我想说就在那边的角落里
1191name and college, please.姓名和大学,请。
1192I'm Cindy from Sydney Sussex College.我是悉尼·萨塞克斯学院的辛迪
1193I would like to speak for abstention today我今天要作弃权发言。
1194because I think both the proposition and the opposition因为我认为提议和反对派
1195have made some correct arguments,已经做了一些正确的论点,
1196but also tiny bits of mistakes.但也有一些小错误
1197So first of all, I would like to ask everyone to consider所以首先 我想请大家考虑一下
1198who are the people that we are talking about我们谈论的那些人
1199in this debate about democracy.在这场关于民主的辩论中。
1200So the proposition would talk about some people who have been,因此,这个提议会谈论一些 曾经,
1201for example, harmed by certain algorithms例如,受到某些算法的损害
1202and certain technology decisions,和某些技术决定,
1203while also proposing that everybody have equally同时也建议每个人都有平等的权利
1204the possibility of being harmed by such technological problems,可能因这种技术问题而受到伤害,
1205while the opposition would say,而反对派会说,
1206okay, some people have got the possibility to speak up好吧,有些人有 说话的可能性
1207and that all of us are now empowered with such a possibility.并且我们现在都获得了这种可能性。
1208Now, I think both of these arguments are quite superficial现在,我认为这两个论点都相当肤浅
1209when considering the human beings as a whole.在考虑整个人类时
1210And so my argument is that if we think from the proposition side,所以我的论点是 如果我们从提议的角度思考
1211of course, we get direct consequences of technology,当然,我们得到的直接后果 技术,
1212including surveillance, misinformation,包括监视、错误信息、
1213those arguments that you can say.那些你可以说的论点。
1214On the other side, we can say that people build the technology, yes.另一方面,我们可以说,人们建设技术,是的。
1215People are also behind the technology, yes.科技的幕后黑手,是的。
1216There are systematic and institutional reasons有系统和体制原因
1217behind democratic backsliding, yes.在民主的背后,是的。
1218But then my argument would be twofold.但是,那么我的论点将是双重的。
1219And so I think technology has not eroded democracy,所以我认为技术并没有侵蚀民主
1220because where it erodes things,因为它侵蚀事物,
1221I think it has eroded humanity and creativity and trust as a whole,我认为它侵蚀了整个人类 以及创造力和信任
1222like the foundations of human society.就像人类社会的基础
1223Whereas when the technology, I think technology has not,而当技术,我认为技术没有,
1224well, simply empowered democracy.好吧,只是赋予民主权力。
1225So in the aspects that it has empowered us,因此,在它赋予我们权力的方面,
1226it has empowered more areas other than democracy,它赋予了民主以外的更多的权力,
1227like economic developments, the ways we receive information,就像经济发展, 我们获得信息的方式,
1228the ways we can inquire more ways of learning, et cetera.我们可以问更多的学习方式,等等。
1229And so it's also in multiple aspects of life.因此它也存在于生命的多个方面.
1230But my point, coming back to how we humans can approach AI,但我的观点,回到我们人类如何接近AI,
1231I think we should know that there are both people who can benefit from AI我认为我们应该知道,有两个人 谁可以从AI受益
1232and people who are being harmed by AI.以及受到大赦国际伤害的人。
1233So there are people who can be passive,所以有人可以被动,
1234whereas there are also people who can actively harness that.但也有人可以积极利用它。
1235And I think this dichotomy,我认为这种二分法,
1236this seemingly contradictory thing is the approach that we have to take这似乎自相矛盾的是 我们必须采取的方法
1237and that's something that we have to accept.这是我们必须接受的
1238And so going back to, I think, the first speaker of the proposition所以回到,我想,第一位演讲者
1239who talked about talking about a kind of technological determinism,他们谈论一种技术决定论,
1240I partly disagree with it because I think even if humans invented the technology,我部分不同意 因为即使人类发明了这种技术
1241we are not in full control of it.我们没有完全控制它。
1242This is why I choose to abstain.这就是为什么我选择弃权。
1243Thank you.谢谢
1244And thank you very much.非常感谢
1245We now move on to our last round of paper speakers.我们现在开始最后一轮的纸质演讲。
1246Speaking fourth in proposition is James He,提议第四位是詹姆斯·贺
1247co-founder and CEO of Artificial Societies,人工社会共同创始人兼首席执行官,
1248a London company building foundational models of human societies.a 伦敦公司建立人类社会的基础模式。
1249At Cambridge, he used data science and agent-based simulation to study human behaviour,在剑桥,他利用数据科学和基于代理的模拟研究人类行为,
1250including social media's effect on public opinion,包括社会媒体对公众舆论的影响,
1251and in 2023, led the first peer-reviewed paper on large agent swarms,2023年,领导了第一篇关于大型毒剂群的同行评审论文,
1252simulating a society of 33,000 agents.模拟33000名特工组成的社会.
1253His current work explores what protects societies against information attacks.他目前的工作探讨什么是保护社会免受信息攻击.
1254James, you have the ears of the house.詹姆斯,你有房子的耳朵。
1255Thank you, Mr.谢谢,先生。
1256He, for inviting me to this chamber.他邀请我来到这个会议厅
1257I was very surprised when I was invited to speak in proposition of technology has eroded democracy我被邀请来演讲时很惊讶 技术提案侵蚀了民主
1258because I am a Chinese man who is founding a Silicon Valley tech startup因为我是中国人 正在创办硅谷科技公司
1259that's using technology to simulate human societies.用技术模拟人类社会
1260So perhaps my mere presence is an argument in proposition to the fact that technology has,所以,也许我的存在仅仅是一个论点 提出这样一个事实: 技术,
1261or perhaps is eroding, human democracy.也许正在侵蚀人类的民主
1262And perhaps I know it too well from spending time at Y Combinator at Silicon Valley或许我对在硅谷的Y联合体呆过太了解了
1263talking to my fellow founders who's raised tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars跟我的创始人们谈话 他们已经筹集了几千,甚至几百万美元
1264trying to figure out how do we build a better world with technology.我们如何用技术建立一个更美好的世界。
1265They would argue that, look, democracy is about having humans with independent thoughts他们会认为,看,民主是 关于人类与独立思想
1266coming together to have discourse like this and about the distribution of power.走到一起来进行这样的讨论 关于权力的分配。
1267And technology can enable all of those.而技术可以使所有这些。
1268They will argue that.他们会辩驳的
1269And so we've heard from proposition tonight as well.我们今晚也听到了提案
1270Sorry, opposition tonight as well.对不起,今晚也反对
1271But I will argue that technology in trying to enable each individual to have independent thoughts,但我会说,技术 试图使每个人 有独立的想法,
1272in trying to connect people together, and in trying to distribute power试图将人联系起来 试图分配权力
1273has in fact done the opposite.事实并非如此。
1274And remember, the motion is that it has eroded.记住,运动是 它已经侵蚀。
1275Not that it will forever be.不是说它会永远是。
1276It's just that it has, remember, grammar.只是它有,记住,语法。
1277So we will hear arguments, or we have heard arguments,所以我们要听取争论,或听到争论,
1278that technology has enabled people to have more independent thoughts,技术使人们有了更独立的想法,
1279to have more access to information.以获得更多的信息。
1280But what's actually happening as people are given all the information in the world,但当人们得到世界上所有的信息时 究竟发生了什么
1281as people have social media to see everything?因为人们有社交媒体来观察一切?
1282What's happened is that we have become not enabled, but influenced.发生的事情是,我们没有被启用,而是受到了影响。
1283Technology has empowered some individuals to influence us.技术使一些人有能力影响我们。
1284That influence, that empowerment is taking away our ability to think of ourselves.这种影响,赋予权力正在夺走我们思考自己的能力。
1285Our generation is becoming more and more reliant on other people's thoughts instead of our own.我们这一代人越来越依赖别人的思想,而不是我们自己的思想。
1286When technology argues that we can enable people to connect with each other,当科技认为我们能使人们互相连接时,
1287with social media, with everything else, with all of these ability to communicate with each other与社交媒体,其他一切, 和所有这些能力 互相沟通
1288and form discourse, what's actually happening is that people are losing our own identity并形成对话, 实际发生的事情是, 人们正在失去我们自己的身份
1289and we are becoming isolated.我们变得孤立
1290Let me give you a real example of what some of my fellow founders in Silicon Valley want to build as a world.让我举一个真正的例子,说明我在硅谷的一些创始人想要建立一个世界。
1291They want you to wake up in your hyper-futuristic pod house,他们希望你醒过来 在你超富丽堂皇的房子,
1292and they want your personalized meal to appear in front of you.他们希望你个性化的晚餐出现在你面前
1293They want personalized content.他们想要个性化的内容。
1294They want a personal friend that is ready to listen, ready to talk, sometimes ready to fuck.他们想要一个私人朋友 准备好倾听 准备好说话 有时准备做爱
1295And all of that creating a perfectly isolated individual.这一切造就了一个完全孤立的个人。
1296Democracy is about the discourse between people.民主是人与人之间的讨论。
1297Can we still have that when every individual is no longer able to have that discourse with each other当每个人不再能够彼此对话时,我们还能有吗?
1298because we are so safe and so comfortable in our own individual selves?因为我们自己如此安全舒适?
1299When it comes to all of these two forces in terms of looking at,说到这两股力量的目光
1300hey, technology can enable more individual capability, but actually that's just influencing us.嘿,技术可以让更多的个人能力, 但实际上这只是影响我们。
1301Technology can connect people, but actually that is just isolating us.技术可以把人连接起来, 但实际上,那只是隔离我们。
1302What is happening here?这是怎么回事?
1303What's happening is that suddenly our own ability to take power has been taken away from us.突然间我们夺权的能力被夺走了
1304It's been sucked into a vacuum, and all of that power becomes concentrated.它被吸进了真空, 并且所有的能量都集中起来。
1305看看Anthropic和他们的2兆IPO.
1306Look at them capturing all of United States white-collar work.看看他们把全美国白领作品都拍下来了
1307Look at Elon being able to turn everything from atom to intelligence, from orbit to dust.看看伊隆能够把一切从原子变成智能,从轨道变成尘埃.
1308All of that power concentrated in one man.所有的权力都集中在一个人身上
1309That is what technology has been doing to our society.这就是技术对我们社会所做的。
1310Now, of course, opposition, very confusing, has not enabled, whatever.现在,当然,反对,非常令人困惑, 还没有实现,什么的。
1311Technology doesn't have the will to do all of this.科技没有做这一切的意志.
1312It's the humans that are doing all of this to each other.是诸众生以一切众生故.
1313But no, technology does have a will.但是,不,技术确实有意愿。
1314I'm building a tech company.我在建立一家技术公司
1315My will is to enable democracies to defend themselves against autocracies,我的意愿是使民主得以抵御专制统治
1316enable us to understand society better.使我们能够更好地理解社会。
1317And yet every day I fight the forces of capitalism, of other technologies然而,我每天都在与资本主义和其他技术的力量作斗争
1318that is eroding every individual's ability to have independent thoughts,正在削弱每个人独立思考的能力,
1319to have free discourse, and to have a distribution of power.拥有自由的言论, 和权力的分配。
1320So yes, absolutely, technology has the potential to save democracy.所以,是的,绝对的,技术有拯救民主的潜力。
1321That's what I'm trying to work towards for my entire life.我一辈子都在为这个努力
1322But it has eroded our democracy.但它侵蚀了我们的民主。
1323Thank you.谢谢
1324Thank you very much, James.非常感谢,詹姆斯
1325Right, finishing us off tonight, fourth in opposition is Dr. Johnny Penn,对,今晚结束比赛,第四名是强尼·宾博士
1326co-director and associate teaching professor of AI ethics and societyAI伦理和社会共同主任和副教授
1327at the University of Cambridge and a senior research fellow剑桥大学一名高级研究员
1328at the Leverholm Center for the Future of Intelligence.在利弗霍尔姆情报中心
1329An historian of technology and number one New York Times bestselling author,技术史学家 纽约时报畅销书第一
1330he is also a faculty affiliate at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center他也是哈佛伯克曼克莱因中心的教职员
1331and a former MIT media lab assembly fellow and Google technology policy fellow.以及麻省理工学院前媒体组装研究员和谷歌技术政策研究员。
1332Johnny, you have the ears of the house.强尼,你有房子的耳朵。
1333Thank you.谢谢
1334I want to start by thanking Mark Zuckerberg for opening my digital containment cell首先我要感谢马克・扎克伯格 打开我的数字封存室
1335long enough for me to be here with you tonight.足够我今晚和你在一起
1336The taste of democratic debate in person like this is as sweet像这样的民主辩论的口味也不错
1337as a kind of collector's edition of prime energy drink.作为一种收藏家版的质能饮料.
1338It's really reaching my soul.它真的到达我的灵魂。
1339And, you know, I never thought I'd be here arguing about而且,你知道, 我从没想过我会在这里争论
1340or rather debating technology's purported murder of democracy或者说辩论科技对民主的谋杀
1341with three speakers who work in AI.在大赦国际工作的三名发言者。
1342Is that right?是吗?
1343Yeah, they do.没错
1344Okay.摆
1345It's a confusing honor.这是令人困惑的荣誉。
1346Okay.摆
1347It's easy to joke about all this because I, too, as many of you,开个玩笑很容易 因为我跟你们一样
1348at least everyone who's still here, feel scared.至少所有还在的人 都感到害怕
1349The weight of this is quite off-putting.这的重量相当低。
1350I worry about bringing kids into this burdensome moment.我担心把孩子带进这个累赘的时刻
1351There's a lot changing at the moment.目前变化很大.
1352Seasonality, as in the move from spring to summer, appears to be eroding.季节性,如从春季到夏季的迁移,似乎正在减弱。
1353The unipolar world order, eroding.单极世界秩序正在削弱。
1354Cost of living, not eroding, as our gentleman over here pointed out.生活成本,而不是侵蚀, 正如我们的先生在这里指出。
1355But I'm sure on all of that, it's unrelated, right?但我敢肯定,这一切, 它是无关的,对不对?
1356We're here to say technology is the problem.我们在这里说,技术是问题所在。
1357And I hope you've heard in what my colleagues have had to offer我希望你们已经听到 我的同事必须提供
1358that we must reject this resolution.我们必须拒绝这项决议。
1359It's a pleasing pitch, but like in a prime energy drink,这是一个令人愉快的投球, 但像在质能量饮料,
1360it leaves a weird taste in your mouth.它在你的嘴里留下了一个奇怪的味道。
1361There's one insight to take from the history of technology,技术史上有一个洞察力
1362and I say this as a historian of technology,我以科技史学家的身份说
1363is that it doesn't operate on human culture deterministically.它不是在人类文化上 决定性的。
1364The printing press, heralded as the quintessential example印刷机是典型的例子
1365of tech determinism, did not suddenly activate literacy around the globe.技术决定论,并没有突然在全球发动扫盲。
1366It took 400 years.这花了400年。
1367And it operated in combination with other social innovations,它与其他社会革新相结合运作
1368like the introduction of elementary school, free education,比如小学的推行,免费教育,
1369that unlocked that particular technological possibility.释放出特殊的科技可能性
1370My point is that technology spreads culturally like a rumor我想说的是 科技在文化上传播 就像传言一样
1371and not deterministically like water down a hill, okay?而不是像山下水一样确定,好吗?
1372You participate in rumors.你参与谣言。
1373You may not participate in water down a hill.你可能不会参与山下的水。
1374I've been hearing a lot of rumors lately.最近我听到很多谣言
1375I heard that the people of Hungary voted Viktor Orban out after 16 years in power.听说匈牙利人民在执政16年后 投票选出了维克多·奥尔班
1376I heard that the Americans in Kansas elected their first Democratic senator我听说堪萨斯州的美国人 选出了第一位民主党参议员
1377in almost a century this week.本周将近一个世纪
1378Someone must have broken Zuck's firewall.一定是有人打破了Zuck的防火墙
1379I heard that millions of students in India repurposed a slur used against them,听说印度的数百万学生 重新用一个污泥对付他们,
1380cockroach to secure concessions from the government via weeks-long nationwide protests.蟑螂通过长达数周的全国抗议活动,
1381I heard that youth in France and Germany and Tibet, etc.我听说过法国、德国、西藏等地的青年
1382Sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself.对不起,我先走了
1383These are probably deep fakes.这些可能是很深的假货
1384What am I thinking?我在想什麽?
1385Sorry.对不起
1386I should have known when the pope called me asking for my bank password.我早该知道教皇什么时候给我打电话 问我的银行密码
1387Yes.对
1388Yeah.对
1389What about them?那他们呢?
1390That's a good point.说得有道理.
1391That's kind of where I'm going with this, so stay with me.那种我要去的地方, 所以留在我身边。
1392And I know your vote is winnable, so let's see if I can get it.我知道你的投票可以赢得 所以看看能不能拿到
1393So, yeah, my job here in the university is to teach on an AI ethics and society masters,所以,是的,我在大学的工作 是教AI道德和社会大师,
1394and on that course we talk about the word technology and the fact that it owes its popularity.在那条路线上,我们谈的是技术这个词 以及它受欢迎的事实。
1395It's probably on the ticket tonight in part because of the naming of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,可能是因为麻省理工学院的命名
1396which the historian Eric Schatzberg tells us picked the word because it sounded,历史学家Eric Schatzberg告诉我们 选这个词是因为听起来
1397and I quote, sufficiently erudite and foreign to convey intellectual authority.我引用, 足够的研究 和外国 传达知识权威。
1398Still does.仍然这样
1399The perception of intellectual authority is what brings us here tonight.知识权威的观念是今晚我们来到这里的原因。
1400It's what matters because if you staged this same debate in the post-war period,这才是最重要的 因为如果你在战后的时期 进行同样的辩论
1401many people would have told you that technology saved democracy.很多人会告诉你,技术拯救了民主。
1402It pushed off the fascists.它驱赶了法西斯
1403The atom bomb won the war, ended war, they would have told you.原子弹赢得了战争 结束了战争 他们会告诉你的
1404The trouble is, and this is why history starts to matter, is that the truth is a little bit more complicated, right?问题是,这就是为什么历史开始重要, 真相是有点复杂,对不对?
1405The Soviets entered the war, as that guy that was sitting over there probably would have told us.苏联人进入了战争 坐在那边的那个人可能已经告诉我们了
1406Japanese elites conspired.日本精英阴谋.
1407War didn't end.战争没有结束。
1408We're still doing it.我们还在做
1409It's cold now, and through financial means and proxies, et cetera.现在寒冷,通过财政手段和代理人等.
1410So what's the lesson?那有什么教训?
1411We've got to be careful with these knee-jerk explanations like atom bomb equals end of war,我们必须小心这些 膝盖神经病的解释 像原子炸弹等于战争的结束,
1412because once history passes, you see all the other contingencies in play,因为一旦历史过去 你就会看到其他的意外
1413and those contingencies are what we are defending tonight,那些突发事件是我们今晚要捍卫的
1414that you do not know where you fit in history until the time passes,直到时间流逝,你才知道自己在历史中的位置,
1415so you must not see the agency that you have, yeah?所以你不能去见你所在的机构,是吗?
1416No.没有
1417I think that something that's interesting in this debate is that we've conflated technology to digital technology我认为这场辩论很有趣的是 我们已经把技术 和数字技术混为一谈
1418and then to social media and to AI, right?然后去社交媒体和AI,对不对?
1419That's a move I want to just name because I think it matters.这是一个动作,我想只是命名 因为我认为它很重要。
1420And if this debate was AI-driven social media will impact democracy,如果这场辩论是由AI驱动的社交媒体会影响民主,
1421I would be sitting on that aisle or offering them back massages or something.我会坐在过道上 或者给他们按摩什么的
1422Though our resolution is, I think, more interesting.尽管我们的决议,我认为更有趣。
1423Technology eroded democracy, as we heard, past tense, not will erode future tense.正如我们听到的那样,技术侵蚀了民主,过去的紧张状态不会削弱未来的紧张状态。
1424This debate is about history.这次辩论是关于历史的.
1425If you vote for the proposition tonight, you are claiming that history, that that history is decisive,如果你今晚投票支持这个提议 你声称历史 历史是决定性的
1426that socio-technical phenomena are straightforward,社会技术现象是直截了当的,
1427that democracy and technology fit together like boy and girl in a singular way,民主与技术的融合 就像男孩女孩一样
1428the way they're meant to fit together.他们的本意是融合在一起
1429And that's a comforting story, but it's a story I tend to hear from guys wearing tuxedos.这是一个令人欣慰的故事, 但我经常听到一个故事 从穿礼服的家伙。
1430Around there, out there in the rest of the world, technology means a lot of other things.周围,外面的世界, 技术意味着很多其他的东西。
1431It means tin roofs, it means buses, it means Emily in Paris.意为锡屋顶,意为巴士,意为巴黎的艾米莉.
1432We cannot conflate technology with digital technology,我们不能把技术与数字技术混为一谈,
1433because if you do, you flatten the argument and there's nowhere else to go.因为如果你这样做,你平息了争论, 没有别的地方可去。
1434In our view, democracy comes in many shapes and sizes,我们认为,民主有多种形式和规模,
1435and we may not know the shape it needs to take yet,我们也许还不知道它需要什么样的形状,
1436but I think the very fact that you're here means that we can figure it out.但我认为你在这里 意味着我们可以找出答案
1437Democracy cannot have eroded because it is not the White Cliffs of Dover or the Parthenon.民主不能削弱,因为它不是多佛的白崖或帕台农神庙。
1438Our view is that democracy is alive.我们认为,民主是活的。
1439It is a practice, an ancient practice, and one that is capable of self-repair, including overnight.它是一种惯例,是一种古老的惯例,能够自我修复,包括一夜之间。
1440This is what makes it powerful and why the metaphor of erosion is unfit for the task that's been assigned to it here.这就是它的力量,为什么侵蚀的隐喻 不适合它被赋予的任务。
1441I learned all this from my grandmother, who joined Cambridge University in 1948,我从1948年加入剑桥大学的祖母那里学到了这些
1442the same year this hallowed institution allowed its first woman to graduate.同年,这个神圣的机构允许其第一位妇女毕业。
1443Queen Elizabeth, shout out democracy.伊丽莎白女王,大声疾呼民主
1444I was 11 when Rosemary, my grandmother, returned to honor the women who studied here,我11岁的时候 我祖母罗斯玛丽回来 是为了纪念在这里学习的女人
1445but did not receive degrees at that time.但当时还没有获得学位。
1446And I don't recognize the democracy that the proposition have brought us here tonight,我不承认今晚这个提议带给我们的民主
1447because it erases her struggle and the work that she did to make normal,因为它抹去了她的斗争 以及她为恢复正常而做的工作
1448to make things that we take for granted today.让我们今天认为是理所当然的事
1449And yes, the challenges will be steep.是的,挑战将是严峻的。
1450Before she came to Cambridge, if you read her about her life,在她来剑桥之前 如果你读了她的生活
1451she was 18 years old when she was sent as a nurse to work for the Red Cross in a prisoner of war camp,当她被派到一个战俘营为红十字会工作时 她才18岁
1452and she said she grew up overnight.她说她一夜之间长大了
1453And I think what hangs over this debate is we are worried and we may have to grow up overnight我觉得这场辩论的悬念在于 我们很担心 我们可能要过一夜才能长大
1454if things get bad, but we will not give up, I think, without a fight.如果事情变得糟糕, 但我们不会放弃, 我想,没有战斗。
1455And that's why you must, I believe, follow our case tonight.所以,我相信,你今晚必须关注我们的案子
1456So I'll now conclude.所以,我现在结束。
1457I think the most interesting part of this debate is the work we expect technology to do,我认为这场辩论最有趣的部分 是我们期望技术能做的
1458like the founders of MIT, to just tie it all together.就像麻省理工学院的创始人一样 把它绑在一起
1459Technology did it, like it's a poo you found on the carpet.科技成功了,就像地毯上发现的粪便
1460Technology, you know, the bad boy's history strikes again.技术,你知道,坏男孩的历史再次打击。
1461A more interesting thesis, in my opinion, is that one that connects us to our lived experience.我认为,一个更有趣的论文是,它把我们与我们的生活经验联系起来。
1462Perhaps at some level this is why I question those closest to technology,也许在某些程度上,这就是为什么我质疑那些最接近技术的人,
1463whether they have the lived experience to see the impact of their tools他们是否有活的经验 来了解他们的工具的影响
1464and to recognize the impact of their tools.并承认其工具的影响。
1465Years ago, a post went viral for describing a peculiarity of our modern age,几年前,一个文章因描述我们现代的特异性而病毒化,
1466buying things to appear upwardly mobile while navigating the realities of structural decline.买东西可以向上移动,同时顺着结构衰退的现实。
1467They called this ritual premium mediocrity.他们称这个仪式为优雅的平庸
1468Example, flying first class on Ryanair.举个例子,在瑞安艾飞上头等舱
1469Food that Instagram's better than it tastes.食物的Instagram 比它的味道更好。
1470Going to Oxford?去牛津吗?
1471Alright, sorry, that's it.好吧,对不起,就是这样。
1472I'm out of time.我没时间了
1473I'm out of time, so I will end here knowing that this is recorded我没时间了,所以我到此为止 就知道这已经录下来了
1474and since technology is a part of our history, I will speak to the future由于科技是我们历史的一部分,我将谈论未来
1475and to whoever may be watching this, come what may,凡观看《古兰经》者,都得来。
1476even though I hope I've convinced you that we are arguing about the past.虽然我希望我已经说服你 我们是在争论过去
1477The Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach,奥地利物理学家和哲学家恩斯特·马赫,
1478whose work was very influential for Einstein,他的作品对爱因斯坦很有影响
1479wrote these words and inspired me to do my PhD.写了这些话 启发我做博士
1480So there are two ways of reconciling oneself with actuality.所以,有两种方法 调和自己与实际。
1481Either one grows accustomed to the puzzles and they trouble one no more,无论谁习惯了谜题 都不再烦恼
1482or one learns to understand them by the help of history或者通过历史的帮助来了解他们
1483and to consider them calmly from that point of view.从这个角度冷静地考虑它们。
1484There is only one way to enlightenment, historical studies.启蒙,历史研究只有一个方法.
1485For these reasons, I beg you to please reject this motion.出于这些原因,我恳求你拒绝这项动议。
1486Thank you.谢谢
1487Thank you very much, Johnny.非常感谢,约翰尼。
1488Let's give one more round of applause to our eight speakers tonight.今晚再给我们八位演讲者鼓掌
1489And the floor speech prize for today was a free gin making class for two.今天的演讲奖是免费的 两人的杜松子酒课
1490I'm very proud to award it to our Lucy Cavendish member over here.我非常自豪地把它颁给我们的露西·卡文迪什成员
1491Another round of applause, please.再来一杯掌声
1492All right, that concludes today's debate, ladies and gentlemen.好了,今天的辩论到此结束 女士们,先生们
1493Coming up next, we have the etymology nerd on Tuesday in the chamber.接下来,我们周二在室里 有个病理书呆子
1494In this house, we vote with our feet, so please pick up any litter you have在这个房子里,我们用脚投票,所以请拿起你的任何垃圾
1495and walk through the door labeled I or no or abstain穿过门 贴上我标签 或没有 或弃权
1496according to which way you'd like to vote.根据你希望投票的方式
1497We'll be announcing the adults in the bar.我们将宣布成年人在酒吧。
1498Thank you very much.谢谢
1499Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.谢谢 女士们先生们
该视频共有字幕 1501 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格