推荐微信扫码登录以获得更好的体验!另:🎉建议更新到最新版,以体验新功能!🎉 版本更新记录→

2024美国总统大选赢了什么?输了什么?耶鲁政治学教授预测政

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:04Hello, welcome everybody.你好,欢迎大家。
0:05And good morning if you're joining us from the US.早上好,如果你要从美国加入我们。
0:09Good evening边
0:09if you're joining us from China or Asia, and I guess good day if you're joining us from如果你从中国或亚洲加入我们,我想今天会很高兴
0:17Europe or elsewhere.欧洲或其他地方。
0:20Let's get started.让我们开始吧。
0:23My name is Devin Lau.我叫刘德文
0:24I am the Associate Director我是副局长
0:26for Yale Center Beijing, and I will be hosting today's talk, which I'm sure you guys are我将主持今天的演讲 我相信你们是
0:32well aware will be a few reflections on the 2024 elections in the US.2024年美国大选将引发一些反响。
展开字幕全文(412 条)
序号英文中文
1Hello, welcome everybody.你好,欢迎大家。
2And good morning if you're joining us from the US.早上好,如果你要从美国加入我们。
3Good evening边
4if you're joining us from China or Asia, and I guess good day if you're joining us from如果你从中国或亚洲加入我们,我想今天会很高兴
5Europe or elsewhere.欧洲或其他地方。
6Let's get started.让我们开始吧。
7My name is Devin Lau.我叫刘德文
8I am the Associate Director我是副局长
9for Yale Center Beijing, and I will be hosting today's talk, which I'm sure you guys are我将主持今天的演讲 我相信你们是
10well aware will be a few reflections on the 2024 elections in the US.2024年美国大选将引发一些反响。
11And I see that我看见了
12many of you have already started turning on your webcams.许多人已经开始打开你的摄像头。
13For those of you that are able为你们中能
14to turn on your webcams, that would be great if you could just so we can see some faces.打开你的网络摄像头, 那太好了,如果你可以 只是让我们可以看到一些面孔。
15Let me introduce the speaker and we'll go straight into our topic today.让我介绍一下发言者,我们今天直接谈谈我们的主题。
16So Professor老师
17Alan Gerber is Sterling Professor of Political Science, as well as Economics and StatisticsAlan Gerber是斯特林政治学教授 以及经济学和统计学教授
18and Data Science at Yale.和数据科学在耶鲁。
19And for those of you that don't know, Sterling Professor is而对于你们这些不知道的人,斯特林教授是
20the highest named professorship at Yale.是耶鲁大学最有名的教授
21So happy to have Alan join us here.很高兴艾伦加入我们
22He's also他也一样
23the Director of the Institution for Social and Policy Studies and his current research社会与政策研究所所长及其目前的研究
24focuses on the political economy of evidence production and use in public policy and organizations.重点是公共政策和组织中证据生产和使用的政治经济学。
25He's published extensively on the application of experimental methods to the study of campaign他广泛发表关于应用实验方法研究运动
26communications.通讯。
27And he's also designed and performed experimental evaluations of many他还设计并进行了实验性评估
28different political communications programs, both partisan and nonpartisan in nature.不同的政治传播方案, 无论是党派还是无党派。
29His其语
30book, of course, on field experiments that he co-authored, Dawn Green, is a widely used当然,关于现场实验的书 他共同撰写,黎明格林,是一个广泛使用
31resource for researchers seeking to apply field experimental methods to problems in the social为寻求将实地实验方法应用于社会问题的研究人员提供的资源
32sciences.科学。
33And he's published so many books and articles that I won't even go through他出版了这么多的书和文章 我甚至不会通过
34the trouble of naming all of them.很难给所有人取名
35He's also a graduate of Yale as an undergrad and received他也是耶鲁大学的毕业生 毕业后接受
36his PhD from MIT.他是麻省理工学院的博士
37And he's extremely qualified to speak about our topic today.他非常有资格 谈论我们今天的主题。
38And so I'm┮и琌
39to turn things over to him now.现在把事情交给他
40Okay, Devin, thank you very much.好的,德文,非常感谢
41And thank you, everyone.谢谢各位
42I'm going to be going through我将经历
43some slides to sort of provide you a bit of a background and some of my reflections on the一些幻灯片可以给你一些背景和一些我的思考
44election, some of the identify some issues that we might want to talk about in our question and在选举时,有些问题找出一些问题,我们不妨在提问中讨论。
45give you a sense of how social scientists analyze elections.告诉你社会科学家是如何分析选举的
46And I'm not always sure what我并不总是知道什么
47topics are of greatest interest to different audiences, but I'll try to only spend maybe 20话题对不同的观众最感兴趣 但我会尽量只花20块
48to 25 minutes on my remarks so that there's plenty of time left for me to try and answer说到25分钟 这样我有足够的时间回答
49questions that you might have.你可能会有的问题。
50So let me just get started now.让我现在就开始吧
51I'm going to talk about我要谈谈
52four things.四谛.
53I'm going to focus on these four things.专注此四事.
54How the economic context for the经济背景如何
552024 election, how the Biden administration, how the economy performed during the Biden2024年选举 拜登政府 拜登时期的经济表现
56administration does a good job of explaining what happened in the American election.政府在解释美国大选中发生的事情方面做得很好。
57It's also the这也是
58case that a similar pattern held throughout the Western democracies over the last year or two.西方民主国家在过去一年或两年内也存在类似情况。
59Then I'm going to talk a little bit about other factors in addition to the economy,然后我要谈谈经济以外的其他因素
60the candidate, candidate quality, and the election outcome.候选人、候选人素质和选举结果。
61So candidate quality所以候选人的质量
62just refers to things like people's assessments of the candidate's likability,仅指人们评估候选人的可憎性,
63personal characteristics, qualifications for office, and then the issues.个人特征,任职资格,然后是问题。
64So in addition to所以除了这个以外
65being a retrospective evaluation of the economy and deciding whether or not the incumbent对经济进行回顾性评估,并决定现任者是否
66administration deserved another term in office, there were issues.行政当局值得连任,但存在一些问题。
67I'm going to briefly discuss我要简短讨论一下
68some of the issues that voters were focused on in 2024.2024年选民关注的一些问题.
69And then I'm going to spend a few minutes然后我要花几分钟时间
70just reviewing a little bit of data on public opinion toward China and talk a little bit about仅仅回顾一下关于中国舆论的一点数据 并谈一下
71the implications of the 2024 election results given patterns in public opinion.2024年选举结果在舆论中的影响。
72I will warn我会警告你
73everyone in advance that I looked up some stuff about China and public opinion.大家先看一看中国和舆论
74I'm not a我不是一个
75I do the things that Devin described.我做德文描述的事
76I design experimental studies and do more statistical我设计实验研究 做更多的统计
77analysis of political science things.分析政治学的东西。
78And I'm mostly focused on American domestic stuff.我主要关注的是美国国内的东西。
79Okay, so on the subject of the economy and the presidential election, here's the,好吧,所以关于经济和总统选举,这里,
80if you had to look at just one chart to try and figure out what would happen in a presidential如果你只看一张图表 就能找出总统的下场
81election, this is probably the chart you would want to start with.可能这就是你想要的图表
82And so let me just describe让我来描述一下
83what's on this chart.这张图上有什么
84The y-axis is incumbent presidential vote share.Y轴是现任总统的选票份额.
85So in the 2024 election,因此在2024年的选举中,
86this would be the Democratic Party because the Democratic Party was in power during the这是民主党,因为民主党执政时期
87previous four years.四年前的一次调查
88American presidential elections are a fixed term of four years.美国总统选举是固定的四年任期.
89So这么说
90you've got four years of Democrats or four years of Republicans, and this is their vote share.你们有四年的民主党人 或四年的共和党人 这就是他们的选票份额
91And the x-axis is how the economy is growing.而x轴则是经济如何增长.
92So one measure of growth is annualized real per因此,一个衡量增长的尺度是年化实际每
93capita growth in the election year.选举年度人均增长.
94And in a typical year, that would be something around,在一个典型的年份, 这将是周围的东西,
95in America, not in China.在美国,不是在中国。
96In China, it would be faster in the last period, last few decades.在中国,在过去几十年里,速度会更快。
97It这个
98might be out here or maybe here now.可能在这里,或现在在这里。
99But in the United States, it's around here.但在美国,它就在附近.
100It's around two大约两个
101percentage points, something like that.百分点,类似的东西。
102And so if you have a typical year of economic growth when所以,如果你有一个典型的经济增长年 当
103the election is being held, then what you would find is that you would typically see that the你就会发现你通常会看到
104incumbent party would get a little bit over 50 percent, so somewhere between 50 and 55 percent,现任党会得到50%多一点 所以在50%到55%之间
105which is enough to win.足以赢得胜利。
106So as you would guess from this chart, most of the time a presidential所以你从这张图表中猜到 多数时候是总统
107incumbent party running for reelection, if the incumbent is running for reelection, they tend现任政党竞选连任,如果现任政党竞选连任,他们倾向于
108to win two times out of three.以2次赢得3次比赛。
109And that's about half the time an incumbent is running for reelection.这大约是现任者竞选连任的一半时间.
110So you're seeing elections sort of in here.所以,你看到选举 有点在这里。
111In 2020, it was a bad year of economic growth.2020年是经济增长不好的一年.
112That was the year of the global pandemic.这是全球流行的一年。
113Economic growth was very low.经济增长非常低。
114Here is what Donald Trump got这是唐纳德·特朗普得到的
115of the two-party vote in 2020.2020年两党投票结果.
116That wasn't enough to win.那还不够赢
117It was 48 percent or so of the vote.这是大约48%的选票。
118That was not enough to win.这不足以赢得胜利。
119And you can see that the relationship is very tight as these sort of你可以看到,关系非常紧密 就像这种
120things go for a single variable.单变数就变了
121And so this is a very strong regularity.所以这是一个非常强的规律。
122It's also the case也一样
123that inflation over the term in office is negatively correlated with the vote share.在任职期间的通货膨胀与投票份额呈负相关。
124The best predictor is the aggregate inflation experience.最好的预测者是通货膨胀的总体情况。
125So prices go up a lot during your term.在你任职期间价格涨了很多
126That's a very large drag on your vote share.这对你的选票来说是一大拖拉
127The United States has not experienced inflation like美国没有经历过通货膨胀
128experienced over the last four years in the last two or three, two plus decades.过去二、三、二、四年期间的经验。
129So most of the所以大多数
130people who are around and voting, they don't remember a period or the older people maybe,周围的人和投票, 他们不记得一个时期 或老年人也许,
131but the younger people don't remember a period of inflation like we experienced in the United States但年轻人不记得有一段通货膨胀时期 就像我们在美国的经历
132over the last four years.过去四年来,
133So it's a little bit of a question as to how they're going to respond所以,这是一个小问题 关于他们要如何回应
134to that.对这个。
135But based on the statistics of how people have responded in the past, you would但根据过去人们的反应统计 你会
136expect this to be a very big problem for the incumbent party.希望这对现任党来说是个大问题
137And so what was the economic那么,什么是经济
138context for the election in November of 2024?2024年11月选举的背景?
139High inflation over the previous four years,过去四年的高通货膨胀率,
140moderate economic growth in the inflation year.通货膨胀年度经济适度增长。
141And so what does that mean for how the incumbent那对现任者意味着什么?
142party, the Democrats are likely to do in November?民主党很可能在11月举行?
143So we can say that this does not look like a great这样我们就可以说,这看起来不 一个伟大的
144record.记录。
145It looks okay, but not great.看起来不错,但并不伟大。
146We can do a lot better, be much more precise in our predictions我们可以做得更好 更精确的预测
147using the data on presidential elections and conducting some statistical analysis.利用总统选举数据并进行一些统计分析。
148And this还有这个
149is the sort of thing that economists and political scientists do.经济学家和政治学家都这样做。
150They construct statistical models to他们构建统计模型
151assess how different economic and political factors affect vote shares.评估不同的经济和政治因素如何影响投票权。
152And so here's an所以这是
153example of such a model.这种模式的例子。
154I'm not going to go into the details of all of how this is done,我不打算详谈这一切是如何进行的,
155but it's basically a simple regression analysis of Democratic vote share.但它基本上是一个简单的回归分析 民主党的选票份额。
156So this is the所以这是
157Democratic share of the two-party vote on a number of political variables and then economic growth两党在一些政治变数上的民主份额,然后是经济增长
158in the election year, inflation over the course of the term, and then some measure of quarters期间的通货膨胀,然后是一定的季度
159where economic growth was exceptionally strong.经济增长特别强劲。
160And then you perform this statistical analysis然后进行统计分析
161on the previous hundred years of presidential elections, and then you get a model.在前百年的总统选举中, 然后你得到一个模型。
162And then礛
163you can use that model to predict how, under the current elections conditions, you would expect你可以使用这个模式来预测,在目前的选举条件下,你如何期待
164the Democratic party to do.民主党必须这样做。
165And so let's take a look at what this means when we apply it所以让我们看看这是什么意思 当我们应用它
166to the election in 2024.参加2024年大选.
167Okay, here we are.好了,我们到了。
168So in the current election, we would put in the numbers因此,在本届选举中,我们将把数字
169for this year's growth, and that's 1.97%.今年的增长是1.97%。
170That's per capita annualized GDP growth.这就是人均年均GDP增长.
171You would put in this year's inflation, actually the experience of the last four years average你会把今年的通货膨胀, 实际的经验 在过去4年的平均
172inflation, and that was 4.54%.通货膨胀率是4.54%。
173That is much higher than the typical experience, which I think this is这比典型的经验要高得多 我认为这是
174over the last 50 years of presidential elections that averaged 2.7%.过去50年的总统选举平均为2.7%。
175And if you put all those如果你把这些
176numbers in and just sort of add it all up, 47.4 plus 0.71 times the growth rate minus 0.61 times数字加起来,47.4加0.71倍的增长率减0.61倍
177the inflation rate plus 0.87 times the number of good quarters, you would end up with a predicted通胀率加上0.87倍好区数,你最终会得到预测
178Democratic vote share of 49.5% of the two-party vote, and the actual election outcome was 49%.民主投票占两党选票的49.5%,实际选举结果为49%.
179So this is, I mean, statistics don't usually work this well, and this model doesn't usually所以,我的意思是,统计 通常不工作这么好, 这个模型通常不
180predict this well.预言如此。
181But what we saw in 2024 was pretty much exactly what you would expect.但我们在2024年所看到的 几乎就是你们所期望的
182You just looked at the economic context.你只是看看经济背景。
183So typically this model misses by a few percentage通常这个模型少了几个百分点
184points, and it misses because there are other things that determine election outcomes,因为还有其他事情决定选举结果,
185not just the economic context, though I think the economic context is extremely powerful,不只是经济背景 尽管我认为经济背景非常强大
186extremely powerful factor.极其强大的因素。
187And sometimes the parties have differential issue appeal,有时双方会有不同问题上诉,
188like some parties, or sometimes one party is better aligned than the other party with或有时一方比另一方更适合
189public opinion.舆论.
190Sometimes you have a very bad candidate, or very, not bad necessarily,有时你有一个非常糟糕的候选人, 或者非常,不一定坏,
191but an unpopular candidate.却是一个不受欢迎的候选人。
192Sometimes one party runs a better campaign.有时一个政党开展更好的运动。
193So those are other factors所以这些都是其他因素
194that might lead to differences in how the election turns out.这可能导致选举结果的差异。
195It's also the case that这也是这样
196you know, it's just a simple model.你知道,这只是一个简单的模型。
197And so there may be reasons why in any given election因此,在任何一次选举中,都可能有理由
198the incumbent party is held more or less responsible for the economic performance,现任一方对经济业绩或多或少负有责任,
199and that's something that's not captured in the model.模型里没有这个
200That's not another variable in the model.这不是模型中的另一个变量。
201One might wonder, what if it were the case that economic conditions were a little different?人们可能会怀疑,如果经济条件稍有不同,怎么办?
202So这么说
203example, maybe the economic conditions were more typical.例如,经济条件也许更典型。
204What if it were the case that Joe Biden,如果乔·拜登是这样的
205who was the president, was able to continue on and did not decide that he would step aside身为总统,能够继续工作,没有决定让总统离开
206due to all the concerns that people had, and I guess that he might have had also,由于人们的担心, 我想他也可能有,
207that he was able to run a vigorous re-election campaign.他能够进行激烈的连任竞选。
208Well, when an incumbent runs for那么,当一个现任者竞选
209re-election, that is associated with a boost in the president's party's vote share.连选连任,这与推动总统的选票份额有关.
210And so if we had had Joe Biden running for re-election, and again, as a typical incumbent所以如果我们让乔·拜登竞选连任 并再次作为典型的现任
211that means a vigorous person who feels capable of taking on the office for another four years.也就是说,一个充满活力的人,觉得他有能力再上任四年。
212If those things had been in place, then if we had had a normal economy, say not the big inflation如果那些东西已经到位, 那么如果我们有 一个正常的经济,
213and an incumbent president running for re-election, which is typically the case after a first term以及一名现任总统竞选连任,这通常是在第一任期之后
214in power, then the Democrats would probably have won.在执政期间,民主党可能获胜。
215So that would have been enough.那就足够了
216That's the kind of thing, because America typically re-elects its incumbents,就是这样 因为美国通常会重新选举它的现任者
217and that would have been enough.这样就够了
218So the economy caused somewhat of a drag, a 1.3% drag on the因此,经济造成了一些拖累, 拖累1.3%
219vote share, and the fact that you didn't have an incumbent running for re-election, that also投票份额, 以及你没有现任竞选连任,
220caused a drag, enough to cause the election to go to the Republicans, probably.造成一个拖累, 足以导致选举 向共和党,可能。
221One other factor about these models is you can use them to sort of benchmark candidates and关于这些模型的另一个因素是 你可以用它们来排序 基准候选人和
222campaigns.运动。
223And one thing, if you went back and looked at 2016 and 2020, the actual Democratic还有一件事,如果你回头看看2016年和2020年, 真正的民主党
224vote was greater than the predicted vote.投票比预想的多。
225And in those elections, the Republican candidate for在这些选举中,共和党候选人
226president was Donald Trump.总统是唐纳德·特朗普.
227And one possible explanation for the performance of the Democrats对民主党的表现可能有一个解释
228in 2016 and 2020, which again, exceeded what you would have expected given economic fundamentals,2016年和2020年,这再次超过了你预期的经济基础,
229is that they were facing a candidate who was not a good candidate.他们遭遇了一个不称职的候选人。
230And again, that people,再说一遍,那些人,
231all things equal, were not super excited about Donald Trump per se.对唐纳德·特朗普本身 并非太兴奋
232They voted Republican他们投票给共和党
233for all sorts of reasons, but not necessarily because of what the candidate's personal qualities但不一定因为候选人的个人素质
234were contributing.正在贡献。
235And let me just sort of discuss that now in a little bit more detail.现在让我再详细讨论一下
236Candidate quality.考生素质.
237So the first thing I discussed was the economic context.所以我讨论的第一件事是经济背景。
238And the economic context经济背景
239was, I would say, somewhat favorable to the Republicans.我想说,对共和党有点好
240So that's sort of your starting所以这是你的开始
241point.点。
242But what about the candidates?候选人呢?
243Maybe if one party had an exceptionally popular and exciting也许如果一个派对特别受欢迎和兴奋
244candidate, that might overcome that natural disadvantage.候选人,这可能会克服 自然的劣势。
245Was that the case?是这样吗?
246Was there a有没有一个
247real differential between the candidates and their popularity?候选人与受欢迎程度之间的真正差别?
248Or more generally,或者更笼统地说,
249if you were to think about the election, would you say that the Republicans won because Trump is如果你考虑一下选举 你会说共和党获胜是因为特朗普
250just a very, very popular person, and it's very hard to overcome Trump's appeal?只是一个非常非常受欢迎的人,而且很难克服特朗普的吸引力?
251The answer is答案是,我们...
252that that's not the case.事实并非如此。
253So again, there are some people who are extremely excited about Donald再说一遍,有些人对唐纳德非常兴奋
254Trump.特朗普报.
255Absolutely.当然
256But if you think about the broad public, Donald Trump is generally not an但是,如果你想到广大公众,唐纳德·特朗普一般不是一个
257especially popular person as candidate for, and his performance as president was, while he was in特别受欢迎的人 作为候选人, 和他作为总统的表现, 当他是在
258office, was not unusually highly rated.办公室,没有异常的高度评价。
259In fact, if you take a look, this is just an example of this.事实上,如果你看看,这只是一个例子。
260Putting Donald Trump in historical context, his presidential approval ratings were将唐纳德·特朗普置于历史背景之下,他的总统批准率是
261the lowest of any post-war U.S. president.是战后美国总统中最低的
262If you think about his personal favorability如果你考虑他个人的喜好
263and Harris's personal favorability, one of the striking features of the candidates over the last和哈里斯的个人喜好, 候选人的显著特征之一 在过去
264few elections is that they tend to do poorly on favorability ratings.很少有选举是他们往往在优待评级方面表现不佳。
265So这么说
266this is the question.这就是问题所在。
267You get asked a question by a polling agency, something like,你被一个民调机构问了个问题 比如
268as I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of these people.当我读到每个名字时 请说,如果你对这些人有好坏的看法
269If you look at Trump and Harris, Trump was net negative eight.如果你看看特朗普和哈里斯,特朗普是净负八.
270So this means those people who这就是说那些
271said they had a somewhat or very unfavorable opinion exceeded the number who said that they说他们的意见有点或非常不满意 超过他们说的人数
272had a very or somewhat favorable opinion by eight percentage points.有八个百分点的好评
273Here's Harris coming哈里斯来了
274in there at negative two.在负2。
275Negative two is also a bad number.负2也是坏数字.
276What we had in 2024 was, again,在2024年,我们得到了,再次,
277I'm not giving any value judgment personally.我不会给任何价值判断 个人。
278I'm just saying how the public was evaluating我只是说大众怎么评价
279these candidates according to favorability or unfavorability.根据优待或不优待这些候选人。
280According to these statistics,根据这些统计数据,
281Trump was net unfavorable eight percentage points, but Harris was also net unfavorable特朗普是净不讨好 8个百分点,但哈里斯也是净不讨好
282by two percentage points.增加两个百分点。
283And if you were to compare this to, again, if I had more time,如果你再拿这个来比 如果我有更多的时间
284I'd go through the historical numbers.我会查一下历史数字
285If you looked historically, these are low favorability如果你从史上看,这些都不太受欢迎
286ratings.收视率。
287So if you were to put Trump and Harris into historical context, until the last few所以如果你把特朗普和哈里斯 放在历史背景,直到最后几个
288elections, you did not see people with negative numbers.你没有看到有负数的人。
289And if you look historically, since the如果你看历史,从
290over the last 50 years, the candidates with negative numbers were George Wallace, who was过去50年来,负数的候选人是乔治·华莱士。
291a failed third party candidate, Barry Goldwater, who was the Republican candidate for president一个失败的第三方候选人 Barry Goldwater 是共和党总统候选人
292in 1964 and lost in a landslide.1964年在山体滑坡中失利.
293Senator McGovern, George McGovern, again, negative麦高文参议员,乔治麦高文, 又是负面的
294or close to negative.或接近负数。
295He was about even, and that was enough for him to lose the 1972 election by他几乎扯平了 这足以让他失去1972年的选举
296a landslide.山体滑坡。
297And then John Kerry, who lost to George Bush.后来约翰·克里输给了乔治·布什.
298So these are negative candidate这些是负面候选人
299assessments.评估。
300Maybe Trump, in terms of favorability, a little more negative than Harris,也许特朗普,在偏好方面 比哈里斯更消极一点
301which might have been enough to offset somewhat the economic advantage that Donald Trump would可能足以抵消唐纳德·特朗普的经济利益
302have experienced.有过经历。
303But it wasn't enough.但还不够
304But it was definitely, I think, a little bit of a headwind但它肯定是,我想, 一点点头风
305for Donald Trump that his personal favorability ratings were not actually very high.对唐纳德·特朗普来说 他个人的好评率实际上并不高
306And he was他当时
307fortunate that he faced a candidate who had low favorability ratings by the time the election幸运的是,他面对的候选人 在选举时,有低的好评
308rolled around as well.也转过身来
309Okay.摆
310And then I just want to briefly touch on a few of the issues.然后,我只想简要谈谈其中几个问题。
311We can我们可以
312talk more about this in questions if there are questions about this.如果有疑问的话,多谈这个问题。
313But this is just an example.但这只是一个例子。
314There's a number of different ways that people look at this.人们有多种不同的方式看待这个.
315But one way is by looking at what但一种方式是看什么
316are the voting issues that people are going to find extremely important as they think about the人们在思考投票问题时 会发现投票问题极其重要
317presidential vote.总统投票。
318And here you have, I decided to break this down by party or look at a breakdown在这里,你,我决定 打破这个党 或看看崩溃
319by party.以党为单位。
320The overall, if you looked at what issues people thought were very important,总的来说,如果你看看什么问题 人们认为非常重要,
321the issues were the economy, immigration, democracy in the United States, and abortion.问题是美国的经济、移民、民主和堕胎。
322If you were to look across the entire voting population here, if you look at the parties,如果你看看这里所有的投票人口, 如果你看看政党,
323there's some difference across parties that I thought was interesting.派对上有些不同 我觉得很有趣
324The Republican voters共和党选民
325were focused on the economy, which they generally thought was poor, and immigration,他们通常认为经济贫穷,移民问题,
326which they generally thought was not being handled well by the federal government.他们一般认为联邦政府处理得不好
327And then the Democratic voters were concerned about democracy in the United States.之后民主党选民对美国的民主感到关切.
328And this was这是
329concern about Donald Trump and the idea that he might be a threat to democracy based on his关于唐纳德·特朗普的担忧 以及基于他的
330statements.发言。
331And then the Supreme Court and abortion.然后最高法院和堕胎。
332So reproductive rights became a very因此,生殖权成为一个非常
333big issue in the United States, even bigger than it had been before due to a Supreme Court decision.美国的大问题, 比以前更大的问题 由于最高法院的裁决。
334This is the big federal court that is the final word on the interpretation of the Constitution.这是关于宪法解释的联邦大法院的最后一句话.
335They determined that there was not a constitutional protection for the rights to have an abortion.他们确定,对堕胎的权利没有宪法保护。
336And so that became a state policy matter.因此,这成为国家政策问题。
337And that opened up all sorts of possibilities for这打开了各种可能性
338restrictions of access to abortion and other reproductive health services.限制获得堕胎和其他生殖保健服务。
339And that was这是
340very important issue for many Americans.对许多美国人来说非常重要的问题
341And it was especially important, as we can see here,正如我们所见,这是非常重要的,
342to the Democrat and Democratic, meaning independent voters.代表独立选民。
343And there's a lot to talk还有很多话要说
344about in terms of issues and issue positions of the parties.双方的问题和立场。
345I'm going to leave that to questions我要把这事留待问完
346if we have some questions.如果我们有一些问题。
347And then finally, I wanted just to touch on the issue of China,最后,我想谈谈中国的问题,
348public opinion and the election.舆论与选举.
349And so here, I just wanted to start with favorability ratings.所以在这里,我只想从好评开始。
350This isn't about candidates.这跟候选人无关
351This is favorability ratings of countries.这是对各国有利的评级。
352And so this is asking not,所以这是不问,
353do you have a favorable opinion of Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, but what's your opinion of a你对唐纳德·特朗普或卡马拉·哈里斯有好评吗?
354country?国家?
355And we can go into this again and also in a little more detail.我们可以再谈一次, 还要更详细一点。
356I don't think the typical我不认为典型的
357American has a deep knowledge of a lot of these countries, some of these countries, I don't think.美国人对这些国家中很多,其中一些国家有很深的了解,我认为没有.
358So you have to take these answers for what they are.所以,你必须接受 这些答案是什么。
359But this is just an example of a relatively但这只是一个例子 一个相对
360recent take on this.最近这个。
361It hasn't changed all that much in the last year.去年没有改变这么多
362But if you take a look,但是如果你看看的话,
363countries that are viewed as very or mostly favorable, you can see those are the sort of你可以看到,那些被认为非常或大多数是有利的国家,
364Anglosphere kind of countries, Canada and Britain, and then Europe and Japan.盎格鲁人种国家,加拿大和英国,然后是欧洲和日本.
365And then if you sort of然后如果你有点
366go down the list, you see this cluster at the bottom here.从列表中下移,你可以看到下面的这个集群。
367And what have you got?你有什么发现?
368You've got你已经有了
369North Korea, Russia, Iran, China.朝鲜,俄罗斯,伊朗,中国.
370So it's pretty low down in terms of favorability ratings.因此,在收视率上相当低.
371And还有
372you're really just asking literally a random person in the American population, what do you你真的只是 问一个随机的人在美国人口, 你是什么
373think about these countries?考虑一下这些国家?
374And they're kind of giving you whatever they have to say on this,他们给你什么 他们不得不说,
375but this is what they have to say.但这是他们必须说的
376And then a couple other slides and then we'll open it up然后用其他几张幻灯片打开
377to questions.对问题。
378This is not a perennial thing.这不是一个常年的事情。
379This isn't like every time we've done this survey in这不像我们每次调查
380the past or at Pew or Gallup or whoever has done this survey, it's always the case that China is过去或者在皮尤 或者盖洛普 或者做过这次调查的人 总是中国
381viewed very unfavorably.感觉很不合适
382In fact, it really is a relatively recent phenomenon.事实上,它确实是一个相对较新的现象。
383You can see there你看见了
384it's over the last seven or eight years that this has sort of occurred.在过去的七八年里 事情发生了
385And I'd be interested in我有兴趣
386hearing people's views about why that might be.听到人们的观点 为什么会这样。
387Again, I'm not an expert on public opinion再说一次,我不是舆论专家
388toward other countries, but I have a little bit of background knowledge of that, but I'd be very我对其他国家有一点背景了解 但我会非常
389interested in hearing other people's views.有兴趣听到别人的看法。
390And then finally, here's the breakdown by party.最后,这里是按派对细分的。
391So这么说
392a majority of conservative Republicans hold very unfavorable views of China.大多数保守的共和党人对中国持有非常不友好的观点.
393If you broke down that如果你打破这个
394unfavorable chart by party overall, and this would be both favorable, both very and somewhat总体来说,这不可取的图表,无论是非常还是有些
395unfavorable.不乐.
396It would be Republicans 90 to 9, very or somewhat unfavorable to very or somewhat应该是共和党90比9 非常或有些不满意
397Democrats are still pretty heavily unfavorable, but it's a 77 to 21.民主党人仍然相当不讨好,但以77比21不讨好.
398So it's noticeably less所以,它明显减少
399unfavorable, but still rather unfavorable.不好,但还是很不好
400And if you sort of look at just very unfavorable,如果你看着很不合适
401there is a clear difference across the parties.各方之间显然存在分歧。
402Conservative Republicans are really extremely保守派的共和党人真的很厉害
403negative in terms of, this is again, this isn't politicians, this is the general public.负面的方面,这又是, 这不是政客, 这是普通大众。
404Conservative Republicans are extremely negative, 68% with a very unfavorable opinion of China.保守派的共和党人极其消极,68%的人对中国有非常不友好的看法.
405There's a question that asks, is China an enemy, a competitor or an ally or friend or something有人问中国是敌人,是竞争对手还是盟友还是朋友
406like that?像这样?
407And when given that choice, I believe that's what this question is about.如果有这个选择,我相信这就是问题所在。
40869% of the占69%
409conservative Republicans are, if you can see for yourself, quite negative.保守的共和党人,如果你能亲眼看到的话,是相当消极的.
410And then some index of然后,一些指数
411concern about China as a competitor is indicated by the third column.第三栏列出了对中国作为竞争对手的关切。
412So let me stop there.因此,让我停下来。
该视频共有字幕 412 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格